[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
|
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
I AM A PROPHET and I prophesy Title: something earthshaking will occur during the eclipse. I have a premonition that something earth-shaking will come to pass during tomorrow's eclipse. I don't know if that's a good thing or a bad thing. It could be along the lines of a child will be born to a couple in Tulsa who are there to pay their taxes. (A bright Venus/Star in the East will appear over the Tulsa area around high noon very much like Venus appeared over Bethlahem when Jesus was born. Or it could be more like MAD (Mutual Assured Destruction) if demon-possessed Mr. Un decides to attack us tommorow. Any thoughts anyone? Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 13. more like MAD (Mutual Assured Destruction) if demon-possessed Mr. Un decides to attack us tommorow. Your psychic powers are a huge threat to Dear Leader, you'll be the prime target. #1
#6. To: hondo68 (#2) That is actually a back-handed compliment. I wear the badge/label with pride, glad to be a threat to Satan and his followers. But lets talk about who is a great threat to our nation, how about it. Actually, there are 2 or 3 things, but let's talk about Ron Paul who BTW hails from my neck of the woods, and we are close acqaintances. Back in 1980 We campaigned side by side for Ronald Reagan. Actually I campaigned for Reagan, and Paul campaigned mostly for himself, but he road in on the coattails of Ronald Reagan (a great president). Anyhow I often voted for Ron Paul in local politics (basically because he is for less government), but the idea of him being President scares the heck out of me. God didn't put us here to be isolationists, He put us here to rule the Earth, and that is the only reason He raised us up. If we were to ever shirk from that duty by electing an isolationist like Paul (and/or his son) we will very likely (and quickly) cease to exist and joined the big trash heap of history. You can count on it.
#7. To: interpreter, Vicomte13, redleghunter, BobCeleste (#6) Anyhow I often voted for Ron Paul in local politics (basically because he is for less government), but the idea of him being President scares the heck out of me. God didn't put us here to be isolationists, He put us here to rule the Earth, and that is the only reason He raised us up. I also liked Rand Paul and his dad, Ron. The history depicted in the Bible is that of Jews located unfortunately at the crossroads of history, between great empires that rose and fell with some mass Jewish slavery involved and various migrations to the cities of the Greek empire and the later Roman empire and ending in 70AD with the destruction of Jerusalem and the beginning of the Diaspora and the rabbinic era in other great cities of the Roman empire and the eastern empires where Jews existed in large numbers. I don't see how you derive in any serious doctrinal fashion the idea that Christians are to rule the earth. Scripture tells Christians to evangelize the world and prophecy tells us that end times will come when the Gospel is preached to everyone in every tongue and that there will be a great falling away from the true faith in false churches and that they will persecute the Remnant until the Rapture and that the Millennium of Christ will then exist for a thousand years in which a resurrected Christ will rule the earth from the New Jerusalem. At least, that is pretty standard modern Millenial apocalyptic doctrine over recent decades. You instead seem to imagine that Christians will rule this secular world. Scripture indicates this at no point, pointing only to the rule of Christ as King for a Millennium. In which case we would pass, over the course of 7 years (if we survived physically) from being citizens of a democratic republic to being the subjects of the Monarchy of Christ ruling from a seat of power in the New Jerusalem. Jesus would be our God Emperor for a thousand years.
#8. To: Tooconservative (#7) (Edited) It is no imagination. As all history books say, Christian nations have been ruling the earth ever since the sign of Christ appeared in the clouds and Jesus returned (on October 27h, 312 AD). At least they all used to say that. Nowadays the libs are in control of our schools, and history has been completely rewritten in order to be "politically correct" and not offend any pagans (or atheists). If we are to continue ruling the world, we are going to hafta quit bending over backwards to be "politically" correct, and start telling it like it is, and the way God wills it to be. And it is utterly ridiculous to think that all of the Revelation will unfold in 7 short years. It has now been unfolding for over 1700 years (since the return of Christ in 312 AD). It is called the Historicist View of the Revelation, and it used to be the predominant view before the ridiculous Futurist View was invented around the mid-19th century.
#9. To: interpreter (#8) (Edited) No history books say that kook false prophet.
#10. To: A K A Stone (#9) No history books say that If you are talking about the history textbooks in use today, then that is a correct statement. I'm talking about the World History textbooks that were in use when I went to school in the 60's.
#13. To: interpreter, A K A Stone (#10)
[interpreter #8] As all history books say, Christian nations have been ruling the earth ever since the sign of Christ appeared in the clouds and Jesus returned (on October 27h, 312 AD). I went to school in the 50's and 60's and never heard of of a 312 A.D. return. To what history books do you refer? Where I find mention of it on the internet, the sole author is Barry Midyet (interpreter) and no history book is ever identified. - - - - - - - - - - [interpreter, LF 2017-04-25 16:55:40 ET] "The history books tell us that the sign of Christ (a Chi-Rho, the first two letters of Christ in Greek) appeared in the sky on Oct 27th, 312 AD...." [interpreter, LF 2016-05-06 10:00:19 ET] "Every world history textbook in the world, or at least every one that I have read, says that Jesus returned in 312AD on Oct. 27th when the sign of Christ appeared in the sky and Jesus appeared to St. Constantine...." [interpreter, Christian Forums, Oct 11, 2013] "The second coming of Jesus was in 312 AD when the sign of the Son of Man appeared in the clouds, and Jesus came into power through St. Constantine who rode a white horse and conquered with a bow. That day is called the turning point in history because ever since that day, Christian nations have been the dominant force on earth." http://www.libertysflame.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=46099 Title: The 5th horseman [excerpt]
Many Christians think the 5th horseman is Jesus, but I disagree for many reasons, first of all because the history books say Jesus returned in 312 AD. But at the same time, it can also be argued that the five horsemen are five dispensations of the second coming. Also, http://the5horsemen.com/ The Fifth Horseman by Barry Midyet (interpreter)
Barry Midyet - - - - - - - - - - Christian Forums https://www.christianforums.com/threads/the-second-coming-was-in-312ad.7779535/page-2#post-64293456 Albion #26, Oct 12, 2013
interpreter said: https://www.christianforums.com/threads/the-second-coming-was-in-312ad.7779535/page-2#post-64293489 interpreter #27, Oct 12, 2013
Albion said: https://www.christianforums.com/threads/the-second-coming-was-in-312ad.7779535/page-2#post-64293520 Albion #28, Oct 12, 2013
interpreter said: - - - - - - - - - -
Replies to Comment # 13. #14. To: nolu chan, redleghunter (#13) Woh...that's some awesome cross-forum sleuthing between LF and ChristianForums.
#15. To: nolu chan (#13) (Edited) So you are trying to tell me that your history book did not say that Jesus appeared to Constantine when the sign of the Son of Man appeared in the clouds? And that it brought judgement day for the Roman Empire? And that Christian nations have been the dominant force on Earth ever since that day? At least that was in all Texas textbooks. I don't know where you went to school. probably China or somewhere.
#16. To: nolu chan (#13) (Edited) The second coming of Jesus was in 312 AD when the sign of the Son of Man appeared in the clouds, and Jesus came into power through St. Constantine who rode a white horse and conquered with a bow. That day is called the turning point in history because ever since that day, Christian nations have been the dominant force on earth." I don't know what catholic revision of history you have been reading, but Constantine was obviously a brilliant manipulator and certainly not the returned Christ. He was probably a manifestation of the anti-christ Christian nations have not been the dominant nations until recent history, the Muslims came very close to conquering Europe and Rome was defeated by the Barbarians and their own excesses. How do you explain the dark ages? a glorious church?
#33. To: nolu chan (#13) Albion said: Good dude. Wish he would come over here. :-)
End Trace Mode for Comment # 13. Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest |
|
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
|