[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
Watching The Cops Title: Report: Oakland cops pointed guns at sleeping baby
According to an independent report investigating Oakland police misconduct, two cops pointed their guns at a sleeping 1-year-old while investigating a misdemeanor crime. The incident was flagged by Independent Monitor Robert Warshaw, who is responsible for auditing the OPD’s progress in complying with a Negotiated Settlement Agreement to resolve allegations of police misconduct. According to Warshaw’s most recent report, the OPD’s compliance decreased for the second quarter in a row. As well as highlighting the police department’s failure to investigate Occupy Oakland complaints, Warshaw’s report briefly mentions a troubling incident: [D]uring a search warrant, two officers pointed their firearms at a sleeping 19-month-old child who, of course, posed no immediate threat to the officers or others. The crime being investigated, according to the reports, involved a misdemeanor offense. The report also notes that in the past quarter, five incidents reportedly took place in which Oakland police pointed their guns at citizens when no crime had been committed. As the East Bay Express notes, this incident, alongside Warshaw’s broader findings, stand “in stark contrast to recent statements by Mayor Jean Quan.” Last week, the mayor told press, “The reality is that we’re making progress, this police department is changing.” Oakland police have a storied history of aggressive treatment of residents. Forty-four officers faced disciplinary action over their behavior during Occupy Oakland protests, which included seriously injuring an Iraq War veteran with a beanbag projectile shot at his head at close range. Poster Comment: Our tax dollars at work. Feh. (1 image) Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest Comments (1-10) not displayed.
I can assure you that he is no retread. No you can't.
#12. To: A K A Stone (#6) delete threads that name call visitors I said "Queer Progressive Canary", and you naturally assumed it was yutard. You called it out. ![]() "We (government) need to do a lot less, a lot sooner" ~Ron Paul #13. To: yukon (#11) No you can't. Yes I can as I personally know him.
#14. To: A K A Stone (#13) I personally know him. That makes no difference. You can't prove it so don't even get started.
#15. To: hondo68 (#12) "Queer Progressive Canary" You Calfags are, retread bushbot/hondouche.
#16. To: A K A Stone, pukon (#13) No you can't. You're wasting your time Stone... He's just like the Leftards he doesn't want to know the truth!! Leftards "greener" pastures ------ a place where their lack of intelligence isn't brought into question on every post!! #17. To: CZ82, A K A Stone (#16) he doesn't want to know the truth!! You wouldn't recognize the truth if it bit you in your cellulite-laden ass. When is Ron Paul going to introduce articles of impeachment for the traitor occupying the White House, chickenshit?
#18. To: yukon (#17) When is Ron Paul going to introduce articles of impeachment Ron Paul is retired from the HOR, moron. ![]() "We (government) need to do a lot less, a lot sooner" ~Ron Paul #19. To: yukon (#17) When is Ron Paul Pssst....Pssst... Ron Paul isn't in congress anymore. What do you think of his son Rand?
#20. To: A K A Stone, yukon (#19) What do you think of his son Rand? He's our representative, and I'm still out on that one.... (“You can't always control who walks into your life but, you can control which window you throw them out of.”) #21. To: Murron (#20) He's our representative, and I'm still out on that one.... Why would you be out on that one? He has all the right positions and deals with them with conviction. He is not a phoney like most up there today.
#22. To: yukon (#17) You wouldn't recognize the truth if it bit you in your cellulite-laden ass. You're the one who voted for Mitt not me... Leftards "greener" pastures ------ a place where their lack of intelligence isn't brought into question on every post!! #23. To: hondo68 (#18) Ron Paul is retired from the HOR, moron. He couldn't even do it prior to retiring, could he, hondouche? Why not?
#24. To: A K A Stone (#19) What do you think of his son Rand? Ask me when he accomplishes something significant.
#25. To: CZ82 (#22) You're the one who voted for Mitt not me... You're admitting you voted for Obama.
#26. To: A K A Stone (#21) Why would you be out on that one? He has all the right positions and deals with them with conviction. He is not a phoney like most up there today. Sorry I took so long to get back, my guys cooked dinner tonight and I'm staring at a quarter pounder, double decker cheese burger....lol... Anyway! Rand sought fundraising help from GOP lawmakers who voted for the massive 2008 financial bailout, flip-flopping on a campaign promise to shun those lawmakers. During the primary, Paul pledged not to accept contributions from any senator who had voted for the financial bailout. That promise was included on his campaign website, but he's taken it down since then. He was a strong opponent of the National Defense Authorization Act 2012 with its inclusion of the “indefinite detention” powers, but he did another flip/flop and voted “Yes” in favor of the same bill for 2013. I could be wrong, not sure, but libertarians, in my opinion, tend to be compromisers, and I have no faith, nor trust, in anyone who compromises their convictions. He will lose my support completely if he continues to fold like a cheap suit on issues he claims to stand by. JMHO! (“You can't always control who walks into your life but, you can control which window you throw them out of.”) #27. To: Murron (#26) He was a strong opponent of the National Defense Authorization Act 2012 with its inclusion of the “indefinite detention” powers, but he did another flip/flop and voted “Yes” in favor of the same bill for 2013. I don't believe that Rand paul voted for the NDA. If I recall correctly he voted against it. As for the other stuff about pledging not to take support from Senators that Supported TARP. I have never heard or seen anything about that. Rand Paul 2016
#28. To: Murron (#26) libertarians, in my opinion, tend to be compromisers The flip flopping is due to the fact that he's not a libertarian, but a neocon progressive, IMO. There is very little similarity to his father Ron, who is pro American. ![]() "We (government) need to do a lot less, a lot sooner" ~Ron Paul #29. To: Murron (#26) Paul campaign manager Jesse Benton confirmed that the pledge is no longer operative, and explained that it was meant for the primary, when Paul was drawing a bright line between himself and Trey Grayson. It sounds like his pledge was so that he distinguished himself as not being owned by the same people who voted for TARP. They don't own him. He still votes the same way. That doesn't bother me as it seems like a pledge for the primary. That is my opinion.
#30. To: A K A Stone (#2) It's really not required to welcome everyone, especially known assholes. Why not throw the gaywad overboard? . #31. To: hondo68 (#28) The flip flopping is due to the fact that he's not a libertarian, but a neocon progressive, IMO. Rand Paul isn't flip flopping on anything. He has all the same positions. He is better then his father. Ron paul was stupid being for legalization of Heroin and drugs like that. Rand is smarter. Ron Paul was kind of naive when he talked about Muslims and said Iran was peaceful. Rand is much smarter saying that he isn't taking anything off the table in dealing with Iran. Ron Paul looked like a total loon on Morton Downey Juniors Show. Rand doesn't come across as a fool. On abortion, murder Ron paul says it is a states matter. That is a stupid position. Ron Paul didn't favor a constitutional amendment banning abortion. Rand does. Rand Paul's positions are superior across the board, politically and morally. I like Ron Paul and would vote for him. But to be honest some of his positions are nutty.
#32. To: Biff Tannen (#30) It's really not required to welcome everyone, especially known assholes. Why not throw the gaywad overboard? Can't we all just get along? ;)
#33. To: Biff Tannen (#30) known assholes Like you, twink?
#34. To: hondo68 (#28) There is very little similarity to his father Ron, who is pro American. Then why didn't Ron introduce articles of impeachment for your boy, Obama, retread Calfag, bushbot/hondouche?
#35. To: A K A Stone, hondo68 (#31) Rand is smarter. Almost everything is smarter than bushbot/hondouche.
#36. To: yukon (#34) The real question is why doesn't Paul Ryan introduce articles of impeachment. Why hasn't that little shrimp introduced them. Hasn't he sided with Obama several times since the election?
#37. To: A K A Stone (#27) I don't believe that Rand paul voted for the NDA. If I recall correctly he voted against it. http://www.examiner.com/article/sen-rand-paul-voted-yes-for- the-650-billion-2013-ndaa Sen. Rand Paul voted yes for the $650 billion 2013 NDAA December 5, 2012 Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) angered many of his father’s supporters by voting for the 2013 NDAA. Doug Stafford, Paul’s chief of staff, stated that Sen. Paul believes that “the full panoply of due process rights should apply to all persons, not just American citizens.” Sen. Paul, however, still voted for the passage of the NDAA. ****************************** Below (votesmart.org) is one site that posted Rand voted 'NAY', this is where the confusion comes from.
HR 4310 - National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 - Voting Record U.S. Senate KY: Jr Sen. Rand Paul, Republican- Nay http://votesmart.org/bill/votes/420 50 (“You can't always control who walks into your life but, you can control which window you throw them out of.”) #38. To: yukon (#34) Then why didn't Ron introduce articles of impeachment for your boy, Obama, retread Calfag, bushbot/hondouche? You should debate honestly. Obama is not Hondos boy. Romeny wasn't either but that doesn't make him an Obama supporter. He wanted someone to the right of Romney which I want too. I went ahead and voted Romney because he was light years better. But Romney still was lacking. Hondo and others own their vote and not voting my way or your way doesn't make them Obama supporters. Well maybe a tiny bit.
#39. To: A K A Stone (#36) Why hasn't that little shrimp introduced them. Why not ask him? Unlike Ryan, Paul was a longtime Texas US Representative and presidential candidate with strong, vocal and monetary support.
#40. To: A K A Stone, hondo68 (#38) You should debate honestly. WTF do you or bushbot/hondouche know about integrity and honesty? Neither of you display either of it on internet forums.
#41. To: Murron (#37) Noted. You are correct. Apparently it passed unanimously.
#42. To: yukon (#39) Why not ask him? Unlike Ryan, Paul was a longtime Texas US Representative and presidential candidate with strong, vocal and monetary support. Why not ask Ron Paul instead of us. Paul Ryan was the VP candidate. Ron Paul never was. Paul Ryan was touted as the future leader. Why doesn't he introduce articles of impeachment? Lets be honest here while we are at it. Wasn't Paul Ryans budget a bit timid?
#43. To: A K A Stone (#42) Why not ask Ron Paul instead of us. I've never gotten an answer from Paul or his supporters. BFD! By whom? Timid? Has it passed?
#44. To: A K A Stone (#37) "As for the other stuff about pledging not to take support from Senators that Supported TARP. I have never heard or seen anything about that." http://voices.washingtonpost.com /right-now/2010/06/rand_paul_ends_ban_on_support.html The Washington Post, By David Weigel-- June 15, 2010 Rand Paul ends ban on support from pro-TARP senators During the GOP primary for U.S. Senate in Kentucky, way back in August 2009, Rand Paul pledged to take no money from senators who backed the Troubled Asset Relief Program. It was tough for his opponent, Trey Grayson, to meet him on that pledge, because Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) backed TARP and supported Grayson. But Paul's Democratic opponent, Attorney General Jack Conway, is accusing him of breaking the pledge with an upcoming June 24 D.C. fundraiser. Evidence for the breaking-the-pledge claim (via the muckraking blog Barefoot and Progressive): the error you get when searching for it. Paul campaign manager Jesse Benton confirmed that the pledge is no longer operative, and explained that it was meant for the primary, when Paul was drawing a bright line between himself and Trey Grayson. "That contest is won," said Benton. "He won the primary and he didn't take money from senators who backed the bailout. Now they're coming to support him, and he's not going to turn down support from Republicans. They're not looking for a seat at his table. They're supporting him because of his positions, and because of his steadfast commitment to principle." (“You can't always control who walks into your life but, you can control which window you throw them out of.”) #45. To: A K A Stone (#41) Noted. You are correct. Apparently it passed unanimously. Thank you... (“You can't always control who walks into your life but, you can control which window you throw them out of.”) #46. To: A K A Stone, Murron, *The Two Parties ARE the Same* (#31) (Edited) Ron Paul didn't favor a constitutional amendment banning abortion. Rand does. The constitution protects all US citizens regardless of age. All that's needed is a president and attorney general willing to prosecute and hang baby murderers. Enforce the law! Try and hang baby murderers, deport the Bush & Obama guest illegal alien dream student invaders. We haven't tried a law abiding president yet, like Ron Paul would have been. Not since before Lincoln anyway. Rand is on the take from big money D&R drug cartel political contributors, so ya he wants to keep drugs illegal to maximize profits. He's a drug pusher like most of the Republicans and Democrats. On the take from the drug cartels and banksters, is right. He's a globalist, so not giving a damn about the American people is to be expected. It's the D&R crime syndicate's way of doing business. ![]() "We (government) need to do a lot less, a lot sooner" ~Ron Paul #47. To: A K A Stone (#31) Rand Paul isn't flip flopping on anything. He has all the same positions. This after Murron just demonstrated the point? You're as bad as the hardcore leftists, when they're faced with faced; you look away, and pretend you didn't see what you just saw.
Ron paul was stupid being for legalization of Heroin and drugs like that. When was the last time a drug was prohibited in a Constitutional fashion? The word that should come to your mind is the word "prohibition." THAT is the only legal way to outlaw a drug. And since neither heroin nor any other drug has been constitutionally prohibited, the JBTs have NO AUTHORITY for their so-called "War on Drugs," which has been an abject failure. Of course, the WOD has been the justification for a variety of police-state tactics, such as no-knock raids, asset forfeiture, money-laundering laws (which can get you put in jail if you happen to have too much cash on you), and so on... Ron Paul gets it. You, OTOH, are merely another sheeple, who thinks you think. You don't. You're rather believe in the more interesting two-party fraud that our government has become, and think having the right boot on the back of your neck is somehow better than having the left boot on it... You prefer to believe in the easily-digested contest between two pro-wrestlers, than admit that it's all a fraud.
Ron Paul was kind of naive when he talked about Muslims and said Iran was peaceful. Ok, genius, when was the last time Iran invaded or occupied another country??? Answer: 2000 years ago! OTOH, how many countries has the USA invaded, occupied or overthrown?
CANADA 1775- Continental Army invaded Canada to get support of our revolution from the French settlers in Quebec. Maybe you need to rethink your positions, bubba... Because until you do, you're just another sheep, waiting to be sheared.
#48. To: hondo68, A K A Stone, Murron (#46) he wants to keep drugs illegal to increase profits. He's a drug pusher like most of the Republicans and Democrats. Honesty and integrity....hondouche? What a joke!
#49. To: Capitalist Eric (#47) Ron Paul gets it. Then why didn't he introduce articles of impeachment for every POTUS while he was a member of Congress?
#50. To: yukon, *Yukon neo-Progressive Vermin* (#48) (Edited) Shouldn't you be at the school selling drugs, marital aids, batteries, and gerbils for the D&R party? ![]() "We (government) need to do a lot less, a lot sooner" ~Ron Paul . . . Comments (51 - 91) not displayed. Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest |
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
|