In this age of the Internet and high-tech surveillance, is individual liberty irrelevant, obsolete or just undervalued? The answer could well be all of the above, judging from tepid public and congressional reactions to recent government intrusions into individual privacy, speech, press and association rights.
Twenty-one years before the signing of the Declaration of Independence, the Pennsylvania Assembly sent a letter to the colonial governor urging him to sign a bill he was opposing on orders from headquarters (the monarchy). Included in the letter is a passage widely attributed to Benjamin Franklin, a member of the assembly, sounding the clarion call of liberty: “Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety.” (A variation of this sentiment can be found inscribed on a plaque inside the Statue of Liberty, thereby completing the circle of Franklin’s French connection.)
< The debate over the proper balance between liberty and security has been going on long before our republic was founded, and it is reflected in the most-cited passages of the Declaration of Independence: Governments are created “to secure” the God-given rights of “life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness”; whenever “government becomes destructive of those ends,” the people have a right to form a new government “most likely to effect their safety and happiness.”
As we prepare to celebrate the 237th anniversary of our independence next week, those simple phrases offer a timely reminder that the central role of government is to provide the safety and security essential to everyone’s liberty to pursue happiness. Yet, that self-evident truth seems lost in the current debate as the fear factor takes hold. With each week, the number of terrorist attacks the government claims to have thwarted using domestic phone records and foreign email surveillance has escalated from two to four to 10 to more than 50 (at last count). Is it any wonder, given this proliferation of terrorist plots, that, according to a June Pew poll, 62 percent of Americans think it is more important to investigate such threats, even if it intrudes on their personal privacy?
Story continues here …
Congress Must Keep Libertys Flame Alive
| Source: | Roll Call |
| Published: | Jun 25, 2013 |
| Author: | By Don Wolfensber |
| Post Date: | 2021-06-09 02:41:10 by Gatlin |
| Views: | 3328 |
#1: buckeroo To: Gatlin (#0)
buckeroo posted on 2021-06-09 22:00:08 Reply Private Reply
#2: Stoner To: buckeroo (#1)
ROFLMAO !!!!!!
Stoner posted on 2021-06-09 22:15:17 Reply Private Reply
#3: Gatlin To: buckeroo, Stoner, the Homo Groupies (#1)
Gatlin posted on 2021-06-10 00:36:12 Reply Private Reply
#4: Gatlin To: Stoner, fuckeroo, The Homo Duo (#2)
Gatlin posted on 2021-06-10 00:50:34 Reply Private Reply
#5: Stoner To: Gatlin (#3)
You posted a drawing of you & Yukon, the only two queers to ever have been here.
You really love queers, because you are a queer.
That was most likely your MOS !
Do everyone here a favor, and go jump in front of a speeding train
Just go away !!!
Stoner posted on 2021-06-10 11:02:28 Reply Private Reply
#6: randge To: Stoner (#5)
randge posted on 2021-06-10 15:20:58 Reply Private Reply
#7: Gatlin To: Stoner (#5)
Gatlin posted on 2021-06-10 16:16:38 Reply Private Reply
#8: Stoner To: Gatlin (#7)
Nope.
ESAD tater.
Gee, that would require you to eat your self
Bye tater
Stoner posted on 2021-06-10 16:27:37 Reply Private Reply
#9: Gatlin To: Stoner (#8)
Gatlin posted on 2021-06-10 16:35:18 Reply Private Reply
#10: Stoner To: Gatlin (#9)
BACK AT YOU !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Stoner posted on 2021-06-10 17:03:18 Reply Private Reply
#11: Gatlin To: Stoner (#10)
Gatlin posted on 2021-06-10 17:27:22 Reply Private Reply
#12: IbJensen To: Gatlin (#0)
IbJensen posted on 2021-06-19 11:06:02 Reply Private Reply
#13: Vinny To: buckeroo (#1)
Vinny posted on 2021-11-11 07:56:17 Reply Private Reply