Yeah, I voted for him the first Presidential election. Within 2 weeks, I knew I'd made a mistake when he gave Iran the money we were withholding to use as leverage against Iran's tyrant! (Said so on FR & it got me banned.) I voted 3rd party his next election.

He is, in fact, a Globalist traitor, & an AINO!

" He is, in fact, a Globalist traitor, & an AINO! "

AGREE COMPLETELY !!!!

Must remember his daddy was CIA & CFR !

" How would you like

To be in The alamo

wiTh This guy "

I would not !

" I will never forget seeing Poppy Bush on tv, giving a speech. 1000 points of light and the NWO! "

Neither will I !

I was at my Dad's house, watching that SOU with him. When poppy bush said that, my Dad was puzzled. He did not know what that was.

I explained it to him. My Dad, a WWII veteran, and of the same generation as poppy Bush, had a real hard time believing it. He just could not fathom someone of his generation, a fellow vet, could be that way.

I encountered the same problem with my beloved, departed uncle. Uncle was a Korean war vet, and a die hard Republican. He got mad as hell at me, because I would not vote for shrub. I explained to him why. I thought he was going to disown me. Just before he died, he called me, and asked me how I knew about shrub. He finally had come to realize I was right, and he had been wrong.

Former President George W. Bush expressed optimism that the Republican Party will "govern again." He said it depends on whether the GOP can distance itself from "white Anglo-Saxon Protestantism." Republicans, he suggested, need to embrace the traditional values the party was founded on. You posted: Hey El Jorgeo, STFU !!!! Why? Simply explain the reason you feel what he said is wrong? Can you? Probably not …

blm - marxist

benevolenT govT

3rd way now blm - marxist benevolenT govT AND – 3rd why not: Simply explain the reason you feel what he said is wrong? Can you? Your response does nothing to explain anything.

" He [Bush] is, in fact, a Globalist traitor, & an AINO! " AGREE COMPLETELY !!!! This article and tread is what Bush says about the future of the Republican Party. Former President George W. Bush expressed optimism that the Republican Party will "govern again." Do you “agree completely” with that statemen? If not – Then why not? Bush said it depends on whether the GOP can distance itself from "white Anglo-Saxon Protestantism." Do you “agree completely” with that statemen? If not – Then why not? Do you even know what "white Anglo-Saxon Protestantism" means? Probably not – So I will explain here what it actually means: White Anglo-Saxon Protestant (WASP) is an informal term, group of high- status Americans mostly of sometimes derogatory or disparaging, for a closed English Protestant ancestry. The term implies the group controls disproportionate social and financial power. The term WASP does not describe every Protestant of English background, but rather a small restricted group whose family wealth and elite connections allow them a degree of privilege held by few others. When the term appears in writing, it usually indicates the author's disapproval of the group's perceived excessive power in society. The hostile tone can be seen in an alternative dictionary: "The WASP culture has been the most aggressive, powerful, and arrogant society in the world for the last thousand years, so it is natural that it should receive a certain amount of warranted criticism." People seldom call themselves WASPs, except humorously; the acronym is typically used by non-WASPs. Scholars agree that the group's influence has waned since the end of World War II, with the growing importance of Jews, Catholics, African Americans and other former outsiders. The term is also used in Australia and Canada for similar elites. Jaime Johnson … … one of the heirs of the Johnson & Johnson pharmaceutical fortune and director of the 2003 HBO documentary Born Rich talks about the blessing and burden of white, Anglo-Saxon, protestant culture. For the past few months, he's been blogging about the lives of the top one percent, and focuses on the old-guard establishment. White Anglo-Saxon Protestants, he says, are still obsessed with exclusivity and creating distinctions to support a sense of superiority. Bush is saying – as others are also saying – get rid of the “old-guard establishment WASPs.” Do you “agree completely” with that statemen? If not – Then why not? Republicans, Bush suggested, need to embrace the traditional values the party was founded on. Do you “agree completely” with that statemen? If not – Then why not?

is preliminary communism - atheism

move To nkorea

benevolenT govT means

whiTe slavery - cannibalism

Take

George judas bush

wiTh you

ps

ProTesTanTism ( 1sT way )

is mulTi racial

The fallouT wiTh judas

was The poliTical ( 2nd - 3rd way ) acTive parT

3rd way I will stick with MY WAY. is preliminary communism - atheism This article and tread is what Bush says about the future of the Republican Party. What does your question have to do with that? Absolutely nothing, but I will answer it anyway. Marxism–Leninism advocates atheism, rather than religious belief. move To nkorea I am perfectly happy here. Those who give the appearance of being so terribley unhappy here are the one who need to move. benevelenT govT means whiTe slavery - cannibalism A benevolent dictatorship is a government … … in which an authoritarian leader exercises absolute political power over the state but is perceived to do so with regard for benefit of the population as a whole, standing in contrast to the decidedly malevolent stereotype of a dictator who focuses on their supporters and self- interests. A benevolent dictator may allow for some civil liberties or democratic decision-making to exist, such as through public referendums or elected representatives with limited power, and often makes preparations for a transition to genuine democracy during or after their term. It might be seen as a republican form of enlightened despotism. There are nine places across the world where cannibalism is still practiced. Can you tell me which – if any – of those have a benevolent dictatorship government? Regardless – Democracy is better than benevolent dictatorship government although … … some say that a benevolent dictatorship is the best form of government. That is because a dictator who wants to serve the people well can do what he wants without restraints. It’s not that way in a democracy where public officials have to follow laws and compromise, sometimes, with others in the public sector who have different views. Definitive action is often hamstrung when opposing forces don’t want the other side to have its way. Bureaucracy often builds up because no one has the power to limit it and invoke efficiency into the process of running government. Since Katrina, we have had many examples of that. For example, Pres. George W. Bush started his presidency in a good way by cutting taxes which should have led to cutting the expenses of government by eliminating unnecessary programs. But he gave in to Congress and let many of those programs stand. As a result, we face a growing deficit. So instead of government operating at less cost and better serving the public where it needs to be served, we are paying for inflated bureaucracy and building a government debt that could cause problems in the future. Of course, a benevolent dictator could have by-passed that opposition and created a more efficient government that taxed the people less and served them better. But the problem with a benevolent dictorship is that there is no safety valve. If a benevolent dictator turns bad, he can serve his friends and turn his back on the public without a problem. So here’s the solution for the coming election days – – elect officials who together will create a government that will serve the people at large best and forego the favoritism to special groups and individuals which has turned our democracy into a largess system that doles out favors that our system of private enterprise should provide Then we will have a democratic system that can compete with a benevolent dictatorship in efficiency and contains the check valves we need for our freedom. As to your charge of white slavery – you will no doubt be surprise d to learn that … … They Were White and They Were Slaves is a thoroughly researched challenge to the conventional historiography of colonial and industrial labor, a stunning journey into a hidden epoch, the slave trade of Whites, hundreds of thousands of whom were kidnapped, chained, whipped and worked to death in the American colonies and during the Industrial Revolution. This is a chronicle that has never been fully told, part of a vital heritage that has until now comprised the dustiest shelf in the darkest corner of suppressed history. The United States was at that time – and it still is – a federal, representative, democratic republic under its Constitution. Some much for these unproven charges you have made – Moving on … Take George judas bush wiTh you I am not going anywhere and therefore can take no one with me. You were asked here to … … simply explain the reason you feel what Bush said is wrong. Why are you unable to do this? ps ProTesTanTism ( 1sT way ) is mulTi racial Yes it is. But the "white Anglo-Saxon Protestantism" Bush and many others refer to is not “mulTi racial.” You need to go here to understand exactly what "white Anglo-Saxon Protestantism" is? The fallouT wiTh judas was The poliTical ( 2nd - 3rd way ) acTive parT What has that to do with this tread that is about what … … Bush says about the future of the Republican Party?

intellectTual

cannibalism

you're jusT a sucked ouT

human zombie being

over indulged sTupid parasiTe liberal

financial intellectual cannibalism The definition of cannibalism is … … the practice of eating the flesh of one's own species. Now link to a definition of: financial intellectual cannibalism You cannot even use proper English and just make up shit words when you simply coin words and terms to mean only what you want them to mean. Inarticulate is the word used to describe someone who can't clearly explain things. you're jusT a sucked ouT human zombie being over indulged sTupid parasiTe liberal Name calling is a … … cognitive bias and a technique to promote propaganda. Propagandists use the name-calling technique to invoke fear in those exposed to the propaganda, resulting in the formation of a negative opinion about a person, group, or set of beliefs or ideas. The method is intended to provoke conclusions and actions about a matter apart from an impartial examinations of the facts of the matter. When this tactic is used instead of an argument, name-calling is thus a substitute for rational, fact-based arguments against an idea or belief, based upon its own merits, and becomes an abusive argumentum ad hominem. But when that’s all you have the ability to do – then that’s all you can do. I understand … You were asked to … … simply explain the reason you feel what Bush said is wrong. Why are you still unable to do this? Oh, I know … … inarticulate does have a meaning in your attempt to express yourself.

I was having a hard Time

sTudying poliTical science

unTil I came across a fooTnoTe

ThaT explained

a man wiThouT properTy righTs

has no righTs

aftTer ThaT

I was cured from communism

back in The sixtTies I was having a hard Time sTudying poliTical science unTil I came across a fooTnoTe ThaT explained a man wiThouT properTy righTs has no righTs aftTer ThaT I was cured from communism Now, THAT was articulate – A profound improvement. However – It still doesn’t tell me why you feel Bush was wrong in his statements about the Republican Party. Can you please do that …

popery / inquisiTion / deaTh camps

soulless - blind - obedienT - unigodless masses

all from The govT veal pen media - schools

plaTo described iT arTfully

iT's pluralism ( wasp ) vs diversiTy ( 666 )

Laura bush's dunce sesame sTreeT hubby

no child lefT behind

old world church / sTaTe monopoly - communism popery / inquisiTion / deaTh camps soulless - blind - obedienT - unigodless masses all from The govT veal pen media - schools plaTo described iT arTfully iT's pluralism ( wasp ) vs diversiTy ( 666 ) Laura bush's dunce sesame sTreeT hubby no child lefT behind If SumWun waz Albe To Raed whut U PosTd, ThEy Might Have Typoglycemia.

your govT intell brain infesTed elecTrodes

Has your brain - mouth polluTing The earTh

with marching marxisT orchresTated orders

a loose sovieT cannon broadcasTing 3rd way agenda - anThems

“Logic can be met with logic, while illogic cannot - it confuses those who think straight".....

"The whole vocabulary is a dictated set of slowly hypnotizing slogans."

"In the semantic fog that permeates the atmosphere, words lose their direct communicative function."

"They become merely commanding signs, triggering off reactions of fear and terror."

"They are battles cries and Pavlovian signals, and no longer represent free thinking"....

"The fact is that the demagogue is not appealing to what is rational and mature in man; he is appealing to what is most irrational and most immature."

"To attempt to answer his ravings with logic is to attempt the impossible."

From 'The Rape of the Mind' by A. M. Meerloo, M.D.

The Rape of the Mind explores the Psychology of Thought Control, Menticide, and Brainwashing.

Published in 1956 and written by Joost A. M. Meerloo, M.D., Instructor in Psychiatry, Columbia University Lecturer in Social Psychology, New School for Social Research, Former Chief, Psychological Department, Netherlands Forces.

https://archive.org/stream/TheRapeOfTheMind1961/1961%20- %20Rape%20of%20the%20Mind%20-%20Joost%20Meerloo_djvu.txt

This is a quote from the book written by A. M. Meerloo, M.D.

The Rape of the Mind

"The Rape of the Mind explores the Psychology of Thought Control, Menticide, and Brainwashing. Published in 1956 and written by Joost A. M. Meerloo, M.D., Instructor in Psychiatry, Columbia University Lecturer in Social Psychology, New School for Social Research, Former Chief, Psychological Department, Netherlands Forces."

"….people capable only of imitation, incapable of inquisitive sense of objectivity and perspective that leads to questioning and understanding and to the formation of individual ideas and ideals."

"In other words, the individual citizen becomes a parrot, repeating ready-made slogans and propaganda catchwords without understanding what they really mean, or what forces stand behind them."

Great book, highly recommend:

https://archive.org/stream/TheRapeOfTheMind1961/1961%20- %20Rape%20of%20the%20Mind%20-%20Joost%20Meerloo_djvu.txt

So, it does nothing to me. What does it do for you?

I'll decode iT for you Actually – Your “coded” made more sense …

"The Rape of the Mind explores the Psychology of Thought Control, Menticide, and Brainwashing. Published in 1956 and written by Joost A. M. Meerloo, M.D., Atually, Abraham Maurits Meerloo was a “Johnny Come Later” – with his book Rape of the Mind published in 1956. Edward Hunter was the first to sound the clarion alarm in 1950. The term and technique used in "brainwashing" was covered extensively by Hunter to describe how the Chinese government appeared to make people cooperate with them. Hunter’s research into the concept also looked at Nazi Germany along with some criminal cases in the United States, and at the actions of human traffickers. It was Hunter that actually reported on the treatment of American soldiers in Chinese prison camps during the Korean War. Brainwashing techniques have been around for ages and documented as far back as the Egyptian Book of the Dead and used by abusive spouses and parents, self-proclaimed psychics, cult leaders, secret societies, revolutionaries, and dictators to bring others under their thumbs and manipulate them seemingly willingly. These techniques don’t involve fantastic weapons or exotic powers, but they do involve an understanding of the human psyche and a desire to exploit it. By understanding these techniques better, you can learn how to protect yourself and others from them. USAF flight crew members are taught how to mentally counter these techniques during actual realistic exercises in the “RESISTANCE” portion of the extensive SURVIVAL, EVASION, RESISTANCE AND ESCAPE (SERE). I attended six-week long SERE and I am here to tell it was downright nasty rough. So – No thank you. I don’t need to hear anything about A. M. Meerloo since I will continue to use Edward Hunter as the original authority on brainwashing.

America losT iTs nerve

when 1sT way was dumped

replaced witTh 3rd way

because of spuTnik

Took you wiTh iT

Why do you always have such a pessimistic attitude in that you usually expect negative outcomes and are suspicious when things seem to be going well?

sneaky ruskies America losT iTs nerve when 1sT way was dumped replaced witTh 3rd way because of spuTnik Took you wiTh iT SpuTnik's ImpacT on AmeriKa Nevr beFore ded so sMall objcT creaTe GrT consTernaTion. "LsTen now," NBC neTwurk anoucer chiPing in kEy of A-flaT from ouTer spaCe "dEep beEp-beeP." siMple Xmitter oN the SovieT SpuTnik sTelliTe pssEd out of hriing raNge of The Unted StaKes 1sT way NeVr BoThred mE aT aLl U ? 3rd way graT FaLre U nEed 2 ReAd – BRAINWASHING, THE STORY OF MEN WHO DEFIED IT bYe EdWard HunTer

U nEed mE decode ThaT 4 you

"In other words, the individual citizen becomes a parrot, repeating ready-made slogans and propaganda catchwords without understanding what they really mean, or what forces stand behind them." Nah – This need never happen. Understand that those who attempt to brainwash others tend to prey upon the weak and vulnerable. Not everyone is a target for mind control, but certain people are more susceptible to forms of it at different times. People brainwash other people to be in control and to have power over others. Most of the time it is to make up what they lack within themselves, which is positive self-esteem. Stay Wise – Remain Strong …