18-Year Old US Soldiers Now Entering Afghanistan 18 Years After War Began

Source: Zero Hedge
Published: Oct 9, 2019
Author: TYler Durden
Post Date: 2019-10-10 13:15:33 by Deckard
Views: 2985

This week America's longest war in Afghanistan turned eighteen, and so did its youngest solder. To mark the occasion, ABC News profiled the US occupation's newest American member: "Pvt. Hunter Nines is about to join a war nearly as old as he is," the report said.

Reflecting on his first impending deployment with the Army Pvt. Nines said, "I didn't have a lot of thoughts on Afghanistan in particular." He was but 7 months when the war began with the arrival of US troops on Oct. 7, 2001 following the 9/11 attacks. "I honestly just had the notion of I wanted to serve, and wherever that is, that's where I'll go."

Army Pvt. Hunter Nines, via ABC News.

Over the span of the now eighteen-year long war, an estimated 775,000 American troops have served at least one tour in the historically war-racked central Asian country, in a region which everyone from Alexander the Great to Genghis Khan to the British Empire had trouble subduing, as all were ultimately unsuccessful.

Very soon, the US will begin sending young service personnel who hadn't even been born at the time of the start of Bush's so-called 'war on terror'. As this stunning line from the report emphasizes:

Department of Defense statistics reflect the increasing shift in demographics of service members such as Nines who were babies or not even yet born on Sept. 11, 2001, which led to what's become America's longest war.

By the numbers, there are 15,364 active-duty enlisted Army members who are 18, and among these 1,052 of whom were born after the 9/11 attacks, reported ABC.

And the much smaller (by total numbers), more elite branch, the Marine Corps, has 28,048 active-duty personnel aged 17 to 19.

It appears that Trump as Commander-In-Chief had this tragic reality of the country's longest running quagmire in mind when he tweeted early this week, specifically in response to the unfolding crisis in Syria, that "it is time for us to get out of these ridiculous Endless Wars, many of them tribal, and bring our soldiers home.”

To be expected, the DC beltway blob had a collective conniption fit this week at the mere suggestion of a US troop exit from the Middle East.

To see inside the warped worldview of 'official Washington' it's enough to recall this 2014 Washington Post op-ed (no, not The Onion) which argued, "War may be the worst way imaginable to create peaceful societies but it is pretty much the only way."

Assuming the 'deep state' continues to have its way, we can expect many more 18-year olds to be sent to distant lands the American military machine has been active in since before they were born.

Post Comment   Private Reply

#1: Stoner    To: Deckard (#0)

I agree that the US has had too many foreign deployments, and troops scattered all over !!

I agree that it is waaaay past time to bring them home, and deploy them on the southern border.

When oh when are we going to withdraw from Korea, Afghanistan, and Europe.

Why are we still there ???

We have expended too much US blood & treasure in foreign lands !!!!

It is past time to come home !!!!

Stoner posted on 2019-10-10 13:33:48   Reply   Private Reply


#2: Tooconservative    To: Deckard (#0)

I only hope that 18 years from now, we can still support our troops when the grandchildren of the original Af-Pak invasion force start to enter combat status in Af-Pak.

Intergenerational military service in Af-Pak can become an American military family tradition, like the grandsons (and great-grandsons) of the original B-52 pilots, still flying those old planes from the late Fifties.

Tooconservative posted on 2019-10-10 13:45:49   Reply   Private Reply


#3: Liberator    To: Deckard (#0)

Criminal enterprise and arrangement.

Heartbreaking statistics.

President Trump: "It is time for us to get out of these ridiculous Endless Wars, many of them tribal, and bring our soldiers home.”

Who can rationally and logically dismiss the President's statement?

Liberator posted on 2019-10-10 15:16:53   Reply   Private Reply


#4: Liberator    To: Stoner (#1)

When oh when are we going to withdraw from Korea, Afghanistan, and Europe.

Why are we still there ???

+1000

And for that matter, why are we still a member of the UN? And why are we its sugar daddy? It's been a corrupt, useless, subversive org since Day One.

Liberator posted on 2019-10-10 15:19:23   Reply   Private Reply


#5: sneakypete    To: Deckard (#0)

To be expected, the DC beltway blob had a collective conniption fit this week at the mere suggestion of a US troop exit from the Middle East.

Which is directly related to those very people either making money from lobbying for some defense-related firm,or connected to a politician who gets campaign funds from the defense industry.

It's all about da Benjamin's.

sneakypete posted on 2019-10-10 18:44:44   Reply   Private Reply


#6: sneakypete    To: Liberator (#3)

Who can rationally and logically dismiss the President's statement?

Dims,RINO's,and Bible-thumpers who hate him because he keeps divorcing and then marrying younger woman.

Besides,his feet stink and he doan love Hay-zus!

Don't even ASK about "Bi-zus".

sneakypete posted on 2019-10-10 18:47:30   Reply   Private Reply


#7: Stoner    To: Liberator (#4)

" why are we still a member of the UN? "

Damn good question !!

We should have withdrawn from it years ago, then booted them out of the US.

Then confiscated the building and put it to some other use.

Stoner posted on 2019-10-11 09:01:38   Reply   Private Reply


#8: Liberator    To: Stoner (#7)

We should have withdrawn from it years ago, then booted them out of the US.

We can still dream.

Btw, did you hear the latest? The UN is claiming they are broke and need MORE money. Trump has told them to pound salt and seek cash from OTHER members. X-D

Liberator posted on 2019-10-11 11:56:13   Reply   Private Reply


#9: Liberator    To: sneakypete (#6)

("Who can rationally and logically dismiss the President's statement?")

Dims,RINO's,and Bible-thumpers who hate him because he keeps divorcing and then marrying younger woman.

Two out of Three ain't bad.

(*I'm* a "Bible Thumper" and I agree with Trump on pulling out 110%.)

Don't even ASK about "Bi-zus".

Who??

Liberator posted on 2019-10-11 11:58:36   Reply   Private Reply


#10: Liberator    To: sneakypete (#5)

It's all about da Benjamin's.

Yup.

The ol' Military-Industrial-DC Complex.

Liberator posted on 2019-10-11 11:59:56   Reply   Private Reply


#11: sneakypete    To: Liberator (#9)

Don't even ASK about "Bi-zus".

Who??

HAH! I wrote that yesterday and you expect me to still remember it today?

You do know I have chemo-brain,right?

I am GUESSING I was referring to the "Gay Jesus" so loved by Christian denizens of the left coast,but it's just a guess.

sneakypete posted on 2019-10-12 14:41:47   Reply   Private Reply