So...you advocate violence against someone whose speech you don't like?

I am the violence he's inciting.

I am the violence he's inciting.

Protected speech - if you can't help being triggered by a message you disagree with snowflake, then you're the one with the problem.

"I may not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it".

Seems like your view of the First Amendment is that it should only apply to those who share your viewpoint.

"F*CK TRUMP"

And F*CK Trump if you voted for him"

F*CK Trump if you voted for him" is "FREE SPEECH"?? As well as others??

THAT'S what you consider, "FREE SPEECH"??

What about, "F*CK DECKARD, HIS MOTHER, AND DAUGHTER"??

Is THAT also the type of "Free Speech" you'd "defend to the death for the right for others to say it"??

Man, this is one of yours or anyone else's worst defenses of "Freedom" ever.

the Internet Is Destroying Him

Like hell.

THAT is the interpretation and Fake News of the Leftist Antifa trolls.

The ACLU of Texas also chimed in:

“Sheriff Troy E. Nehls, Constitutional Law 101: You can’t ban speech just because it has ‘f@ck’ in it.

“Hey truck owner, feel free to contact the ACLU of Texas.”

Incendiary speech, speech that incites, AND vulgar, obscene speech IN PUBLIC is NOT "protected."

But then again, it IS the Leftist-Commie America-hating ACLU, isn't it? Yu and Gatlin finally find common ground. Oh, the irony.

What IF, a Vehicle is rolling around town with, "F*CK SGT GRAND ISLAND AND HIS MOTHER and Everyone who honors them"??

Tell me the truth -- THAT person is gonna get a beat down, aren't they, sooner or later, aren't they? (And deservedly so.)

If I saw that I wouldn't call the police. I'd take a baseball bat to his truck and let him call the police.

With ya.

Deckard: "So...you advocate violence against someone whose speech you don't like?"

You have much in common with Antifa

Misterwhite: "I am the violence he's inciting.."

Misterwhite is right again. By your rationale and logic, MW's baseball bat across the back windshield is merely also "free speech."

Incitement is a criminal offense and a verbal assault in this case. As well as defending the honor of one's wife, mother, daughter, family, friends.

Ever hear of the saying, "Them's fighting words"?? What was plastered all over that vehicle was blatant IN YOUR FACE fighting words.

The perp not only chose to publicly verbally assault the President, but those who "voted FOR him."

Deckard, to what end does this kind of incendiary Antifa baiting and BS end?

Nasty, vulgar insults designed to bait and incite can only lead to one conclusion. And THIS is just part of the Left's/Antifa's open season on Trump and those who voted for him.

With respect to this case, there are only TWO sides to take. You've chosen poorly.

Incendiary speech, speech that incites, AND vulgar, obscene speech IN PUBLIC is NOT "protected."

The Supreme Court has ruled that it is protected speech.

Ever hear of the saying, "Them's fighting words"?? What was plastered all over that vehicle was blatant IN YOUR FACE fighting words.

Sorry that words and ideas that you disagree with trigger you to violence snowflake - how is your response any different than that of Antifa?

Would you be as upset if it had said "F**k Obama"?

I've seen such sentiments here and I don't recall you ever calling for censorship.

But then again, it IS the Leftist-Commie America-hating ACLU,

The Suprerme court has ruled that political statements are protected speech.

What about, "F*CK DECKARD, HIS MOTHER, AND DAUGHTER"??

Apples and oranges - such a statement is not political.

Ever hear of the saying, "Them's fighting words"?? What was plastered all over that vehicle was blatant IN YOUR FACE fighting words.

With respect to this case, there are only TWO sides to take. You've chosen poorly.

'Fighting words' laws are made to stop fights, not authorise them. ---- The idea is that law enforcement could stop offensive displays BEFORE a crazy like whitey took a bat to the other crazy person/display.

Not that misterwhite has the real balls to take a bat to anything. -- He's an agitprop ringer, a phony.

If you can't see the obvious, I can't help you, the ACLU, or Gilligan.

This is just "Common Sense 101."

Sorry that words and ideas that you disagree with trigger you to violence snowflake - how is your response any different than that of Antifa?

You're projecting...

That said, when someone repeatedly circles the front of your house, shouting with a megaphone, "EFF DECKARD AND HIS MOM.THEY SUCK!", I'm sure you'll "Fight for his right to shout it," right?

Cut the crap.

"F*CK THE DRAFT" is far different than, "F*CK TRUMP," F*CK YOUR MOTHER," or "F*CK TRUMP VOTERS."

The only one that could even remotely be considered "fighting words" is "F**k your mother"

The others have been ruled as protected speech by the Supreme Court. Same thing with flag burning.

If you can't see the obvious, I can't help you, the ACLU, or Gilligan.

The funny thing is, Gatlin would agree with you on this.

How does it feel to be a right wing version of Antifa?

Would you be as upset if it had said "F**k Obama"?

No I would not be as upset. BUT I would recognize it as wrong to do it IN PUBLIC while also recognizing the potential baiting/incitement factor.

I've seen such sentiments here and I don't recall you ever calling for censorship.

Hey brutha -- THIS IS COMMON SENSE that transcends the subversive ACLU's BS definitions.

Now tell me -- whatcha gonna do about that car that circles your home with a megaphone, "F*CK Deckard and His Mom!!! They are douches!!"

That said, when someone repeatedly circles the front of your house, shouting with a megaphone, "EFF DECKARD AND HIS MOM.THEY SUCK!",

Once again you fail to distinguish between PROTECTED political speech and "fighting words".

You come to my house talking that trash and I'll deal with you harshly.

The Suprerme court has ruled that political statements are protected speech.

CONTEXT.

Public Vulgarities, Obscenities, Incitement, and Pornographic speech and acts are NOT "protected speech."

In fact, you can NOT even shout, "NIGGER!!" in public either, can you?? Because...IT'S CONSIDERED, "Hate Speech." NOW WHAT??

Apples and oranges - such a statement is not political.

You can't have it both ways or all ways.

THIS IS COMMON SENSE that transcends the subversive ACLU's BS definitions.

Who cares what the ACLU thinks?

I don't know how many times I have to tell you this before it sinks in to your thick skull - the Supreme Court has ruled that political statements such as "F**k Trump" are PROTECTED speech.

Now you can bitch and moan and disagree all you want, but the fact remains.

'Fighting words' laws are made to stop fights, not authorise them. ---- The idea is that law enforcement could stop offensive displays BEFORE a crazy like whitey took a bat to the other crazy person/display.

Ok...

So what's your opinion on shouting "NIGGER!!" to every black person? Or GROUPS of black people?

Apples and oranges - such a statement is not political.

You can't have it both ways or all ways.

I thought you were smarter than this.

In fact, you can NOT even shout, "NIGGER!!" in public either, can you?? Because...IT'S CONSIDERED, "Hate Speech."

Supreme Court unanimously reaffirms: There is no ‘hate speech’ exception to the First Amendment

The funny thing is, Gatlin would agree with you on this.

How does it feel to be a right wing version of Antifa?

No, the funny thing is that YOU cited the ACLU....while Gatlin worships them.

More irony -- YOU are the one engaging in Antifa tactics. They bait, and now you support baiting.

Hey -- answer the question: You're walking quietly on a street with your girlfriend, wife, or mother, and some guy come up to you and sez, "F*CK YOU and your whore." And keeps on railing against you, repeating his filth.

Whatcha gonna do?

More irony -- YOU are the one engaging in Antifa tactics.

Seems to me you're the one triggered by words and ideas you don't agree with and will resort to violence to shut someone up who is exercising his constitutionally protected right to free speech.

Saying "F**k Trump" is not the same thing as saying "Kill Trump".

Hey -- answer the question: You're walking quietly on a street with your girlfriend, wife, or mother, and some guy come up to you and sez, "F*CK YOU and your whore." And keeps on railing against you, repeating his filth.

Why don't you come over here, say it and find out.

Once again you fail to grasp even the simplest of concepts.

Supreme Court unanimously reaffirms: There is no ‘hate speech’ exception to the First Amendment

Bullsh*t.

People are getting fired for less; "Hate Speech" and "Hate Crimes" are enforced BY LAW.

Moreover, the Supreme Court is a corrupt puppet show where killing babies is legal as is men "marrying" men.

In ALL these cases -- as well as the "Free Speech" end of they insane spectrum, you are dead wrong IN PRACTICE, legally as well as wrong morally and common sense-wise, 110%.

It's sad and degrading that you're even defending the kind of "free speech" that sanctions, "F*CK YOU AND YOUR MOTHER!" in public.

Hey -- answer the question: You're walking quietly on a street with your girlfriend, wife, or mother, and some guy come up to you and sez, "F*CK YOU and your whore." And keeps on railing against you, repeating his filth.

Why don't you come over here, say it and find out.

Thanks for proving my point, Rambo.

*snicker*

People are getting fired for less; "Hate Speech" and "Hate Crimes"

Their business their rules.

It's sad and degrading that you're even defending the kind of "free speech" that sanctions, "F*CK YOU AND YOUR MOTHER!" in public.

Please don't resort to lying - as I have made it clear, those would be considered "fighting words", not political speech.

It's a shame that you don't get that.

Why don't you come over here, say it and find out.

Thanks for proving my point, Rambo.

Good grief man, you can't possibly be this dense, can you?

You really are unable to distinguish between PROTECTED political speech and "fighting words"?

Look - I like you Lib, but you really need to understand the difference between the two.

So what's your opinion on shouting "NIGGER!!" to every black person? Or GROUPS of black people?

Your career as a rap artist is off to a good start.

My next concept for the second verse of my lyrics is, "B*TCH."

Wanna co-write it?

We're done.

Fighting words' laws are made to stop fights, not authorise them. ---- The idea is that law enforcement could stop offensive displays BEFORE a crazy like whitey took a bat to the other crazy person/display.

Ok... So what's your opinion on shouting "NIGGER!!" to every black person? Or GROUPS of black people?

OK, --- we have a crazy shouting "NIGGER!!" to every black person, Or a GROUP of black people, as he goes down the street?

Hopefully someone calls 911, and the cops arrive before the crazy gets killed by the blacks. Whereupon, the crazy is put in jail for disturbing the peace.

If he's assaulted or killed, those responsible face a jury trial, and will no doubt be acquitted, or given reduced sentences/paroled because of the 'fighting words' doctrine.

Is there some problem with that?

MW's baseball bat across the back windshield is merely also "free speech."

Exactly. But Deckard believes that free speech is so sacred that it should be free from consequences. Burn a flag, no consequence. Curse and spit at a cop and he can't do a thing.

HE has rights. You don't.

OK, --- we have a crazy shouting "NIGGER!!" to every black person, Or a GROUP of black people, as he goes down the street?

Hopefully someone calls 911, and the cops arrive before the crazy gets killed by the blacks. Whereupon, the crazy is put in jail for disturbing the peace.

Ooooh...."Disturbing the peace," eh? But "Eff Trump" and "Eff those who voted for him!" ISN'T??

And....and...But...but...but...."FREE SPEECH!" OH WAIT.

Please explain what happened to IT in your anecdotal case where the so-called "crazy" who again -- according to some -- is merely exercising his constitutional "Free Speech"??

So what's your opinion on shouting "NIGGER!!" to every black person? Or GROUPS of black people?

But Deckard believes that free speech is so sacred that it should be free from consequences.

Burn a flag, no consequence. Curse and spit at a cop and he can't do a thing.

Hear ya.

For over 5,000 years, insulting and dishonoring one's mother or wife would be cause for b*tch-slapping and knuckle-sandwiching at the least, challenge to a dual/fight, OR worse. In the "old neighborhood" -- not long ago, EVERYONE would have understood the common sense unspoken rules and laws of society.

What is being defended in this case of Donald Trump as well as his voters told to "Eff" themselves, is well over the line of decency and crystal clear incitement to violence. It reeks of Antifa/Alinsky tactics. In a nutshell, we are witnessing a hostile and clear case of Social Anarchy. But only because Trump is President. The MSM has been encoraging the overt public hostility.

Now most of us realize that were this language targeting 0bama, the cacophony of howls and outrage from the Left and MSM would be deafening. The perp would likely be arrested.

This irrational support of free speech under ALL circumstances is a very new concept. However, it is VERY selective, based on political correctness and those who control the culture's power structure.

There seems to be one set of rules for Democrats, Progressives, and Homos/Queers, and one for Republicans, Conservatives, and Christians.

The inconsistencies and bias from Democrats, the Judiciary, AND even the Supreme Court in their enforcement of Constitutional Law is conspicuously one-sided. It seems Social Justice crusaders get mulligans, whereas Conservatives are disproportionately penalized.

What is being defended in this case of Donald Trump as well as his voters told to "Eff" themselves, is well over the line of decency and crystal clear incitement to violence. It reeks of Antifa/Alinsky tactics.

Oh the Irony!

How are you and paulsen any different than Antifa?

That nut is probably a Leftist-Antifa agitprop asset.

The image was from a fictional movie!

If he's assaulted or killed, those responsible face a jury trial, and will no doubt be acquitted, or given reduced sentences/paroled because of the 'fighting words' doctrine.

Is there some problem with that?

There IS a problem with normalizing this anti-social anarchy crap and juvenile sociopathic behavior encouraged under the guise of "Free Speech."

What we're witnessing is the over-ripened rotten fruit of over a year's worth of Leftist/Anti-MAGA propaganda and indoctrination -- a psyop designed to normalize hostility and violence toward Donald Trump and those who voted for him.

Ooooh...."Disturbing the peace," eh? But "Eff Trump" and "Eff those who voted for him!" ISN'T??

And....and...But...but...but...."FREE SPEECH!" OH WAIT.

Please explain what happened to IT in your anecdotal case where the so-called "crazy" who again -- according to some -- is merely exercising his constitutional "Free Speech"??

Of course the sign saying "Fuck Trump" should be considered as disturbing the peace..

As to what happened to the crazy in my post, try reading it again.. --- He either gets jailed, --- or is assaulted, even killed.

What more could you want?

OK, --- we have a crazy shouting "NIGGER!!" to every black person, Or a GROUP of black people, as he goes down the street?

Hopefully someone calls 911, and the cops arrive before the crazy gets killed by the blacks. Whereupon, the crazy is put in jail for disturbing the peace.

If he's assaulted or killed, those responsible face a jury trial, and will no doubt be acquitted, or given reduced sentences/paroled because of the 'fighting words' doctrine.

Is there some problem with that?

Now most of us realize that were this language targeting 0bama, the cacophony of howls and outrage from the Left and MSM would be deafening. The perp would likely be arrested.

Which only proves that Left is as much in favor of political censorship as the right.

The image was from a fictional movie!

Even if it is, it STILL works as agitprop tool of the Left designed to perpetuate a stereotype and bogeyman that simply does NOT exist. "Art" has been a political tool since the 1960s.

Of ALL people, you ought to get it as well as what's going on.

As to what happened to the crazy in my post, try reading it again.. --- He either gets jailed, --- or is assaulted, even killed.

What more could you want?

Yes, yes, I read it, Paine.

But you're missing the MUCH BIGGER PICTURE:

This Crusade, these revolutions all begin with this kind of "taking-one-for-the-team."

One turns into a half-dozen. Then into two-dozen. Then hundreds. And so forth.

Consider human nature. "Us vs. Them." BOTH sides.

See the imminent future now??

If he's assaulted or killed, those responsible face a jury trial, and will no doubt be acquitted, or given reduced sentences/paroled because of the 'fighting words' doctrine. Is there some problem with that?

There IS a problem with normalizing this anti-social anarchy crap and juvenile sociopathic behavior encouraged under the guise of "Free Speech."

What we're witnessing is the over-ripened rotten fruit of over a year's worth of Leftist/Anti-MAGA propaganda and indoctrination -- a psyop designed to normalize hostility and violence toward Donald Trump and those who voted for him.

How weird, you've read my post, and apparently understood it, but still feel the need to lecture me about leftist propaganda?

I'm not your enemy. Trying to get you to realize that some here (notably misterwhite), is a propagandist, isn't getting through..

Am I wasting my time?

That nut is probably a Leftist-Antifa agitprop asset.

Nah. I bet that's Bruce Willis in the 1995 movie Die Hard with a Vengeance.

I'm not your enemy.... Am I wasting my time?

Firstly, I don't believe you or 95% of the posters here are my enemy. I think that's a weird assertion or presumption to make, but hey, it's a nameless, faceless media where intent and subtleties are often misconstrued and misunderstood. What else is new?

Beyond that, I'm not "lecturing," I'm clarifying. I apparently should refrain from giving my overview and opinion on the social dynamics and psyops by the PTB (Which does appear for be a waste of time -- a YUGE one. You're right. My bad.)

Yes, yes, I read it, Paine.

But you're missing the MUCH BIGGER PICTURE:

This Crusade, these revolutions all begin with this kind of "taking-one-for-the-team."

One turns into a half-dozen. Then into two-dozen. Then hundreds. And so forth.

Consider human nature. "Us vs. Them." BOTH sides.

See the imminent future now??

Now you've posted I'm "missing the MUCH BIGGER PICTURE", --- and implied that what? ---- I'm "taking-one-for-the-team."?

What in hell is your problem with me? -- That I can't "See the imminent future now??"

I've probably posted just as many articles as you, about how the socialists are trying to ruin our republic.

Get off your soapbox when you reply to me...

You're right. My bad.)

Thank you...