[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
|
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
U.S. Constitution Title: If tomorrow you could trade out Obama for Palin, would you? This hypothetical leaves for one or the other, no equivocating. Yes. The Kenyan is a Marxist and Palin, although slow on the uptake, is far less dangerous to America. Step up oh gutsy ones. Answer the question and show us your wisdom with a pithy comment. A non answer will render the poster to be an O'tard and a defender of Barry Soetoro's Big Government, Black nationalist agenda. Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 357. The Kenyan is a Marxist and Palin, although slow on the uptake, is far less dangerous to America. Being slow on the uptake makes Palin a dupe, a tool for anyone who cares to flatter and manipulate her. A non answer will render the poster to be an O'tard and a defender of Barry Soetoro's Big Government, Black nationalist agenda. Its that kind of simplistic, knee-jerk, non thought that has brought us to this point.
#275. To: lucysmom (#272) So who do you think would do a better job. Palin or Obama and why?
#282. To: A K A Stone (#275) So who do you think would do a better job. Palin or Obama and why? Obama. Palin chose money over fulfilling her promise to serve out her term as Alaska's governor. That is who she is. She will always do what is profitable for Sarah, first. She will use, she will pander, and she will sell out; and when called on it, she will whine.
#284. To: lucysmom (#282) Obama. Gotcha :P
#301. To: Jethro Tull (#284) Gotcha :P Only in your fevered imagination.
#306. To: lucysmom (#301) Only in your fevered imagination. A Tull trick question: "Would you switch Obama for Hitler"? Gotcha :P Like I said at the beginning of this thread, it's a stupid question.
#312. To: Skip Intro (#306) A Tull trick question: "Would you switch Obama for Hitler"? dis·sem·ble (d-smbl) v. dis·sem·bled, dis·sem·bling, dis·sem·bles v.tr. 1. To disguise or conceal behind a false appearance. See Synonyms at disguise. 2. To make a false show of; feign. v.intr. To disguise or conceal one's real nature, motives, or feelings behind a false appearance.
#322. To: Jethro Tull (#312) Oh bullshit, Tull. You set up an idiot "Hypothetical" then attack everyone who doesn't answer it "correctly". How about adding some other choices? Afraid you might not get the answer you want?
#341. To: Skip Intro (#322) You set up an idiot "Hypothetical" then attack everyone who doesn't answer it "correctly". How about keeping the choices within the realm of possibility? Or should we just include "hypotheticals" like 0bama vs. Elmer J. Fudd?
#345. To: Liberator (#341) (Edited) How about keeping the choices within the realm of possibility? So you think it's within the realm of possibility to trade Obama for Palin? Why not explain how that would work?
#349. To: Skip Intro (#345) So think it's within the realm of possibility to trade Obama for Palin? "Realm"? Yes. They're both alive, right? Both involved in politics, right?
#350. To: Liberator (#349) So how would you "trade" them? Where do you find that power in the Constitution?
#352. To: Skip Intro (#350) So how would you "trade" them? Where do you find that power in the Constitution? Here's the premise: 'If tomorrow you could trade out Obama for Palin, would you? This hypothetical leaves for one or the other, no equivocating.' Which part of "if" or "could" or "hypothetical" didn't you understand?
#354. To: Liberator (#352) (Edited) If we're going to play children's games, I want more choices. I wouldn't choose Palin to replace my town mayor (a job she might barely be qualified for).
#355. To: Skip Intro (#354) If we're going to play children's games, I want more choices. Dumbing down what's already a simple exercise and adding more choices would only confuse you more. I wouldn't choose Palin to replace my town mayor (a job she might barely be qualified for).
While we're playing that game, I wouldn't trust 0bama to operate an actual "hot dog" cart - even if it's in Hawaii.
#356. To: Liberator (#355) Dumbing down what's already a simple exercise and adding more choices would only confuse you more. But I'm not confused. This is a pointless exercise. If it helps you get through the day, enjoy it.
#357. To: Skip Intro (#356) It is not pointless. It could come down to Obama vs Palin. If that is what it comes down to who would you vote for?
Replies to Comment # 357. If that is what it comes down to who would you vote for? The same as I voted in 2008: Nobody.
#366. To: A K A Stone (#357) It is not pointless. It could come down to Obama vs Palin. If that is what it comes down to who would you vote for? It IS an exercise in pointless futility as it could come down to countless other scenarios. So why don't you spend the same amount of time dwelling on them too. That ought to chase away the few posters you will have left.
End Trace Mode for Comment # 357. Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest |
|
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
|