[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
|
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
911 Title: Pentagon Hunt the Boeing! And test your perceptions! As everyone knows, on 11 September, less than an hour after the attack on the World Trade Center, an airplane collided with the Pentagon. The Associated Press first reported that a booby-trapped truck had caused the explosion. The Pentagon quickly denied this. The official US government version of events still holds. Here's a little game for you: Take a look at these photographs and try to find evidence to corroborate the official version. It's up to you to Hunt the Boeing! Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 33. For your enlightenment.
#2. To: A K A Stone (#1) Heres another game..... Find pictures of the towers after math. Find the planes.
#3. To: IronSage (#2) Find pictures of the towers after math. Find the planes. What are you talking about.
#4. To: A K A Stone (#3) blown up airplanes.
#9. To: IronSage (#4) I think the point AK was making is this. Go look at the site he posted. Look at the hole. It isn't big enough to fit a boeing in there. So the wreckage must be outside. You know seats, luggage etc. But it isn't there. A boeing did not hit the pentagon. Have you done much research on this subject? Or you one who just believes what the MSM tells you to believe? Thinking for yourself is an empowering experience.
#10. To: _V_ (#9) Got the point, did you get mine? Look up, see the black helicopters.
#11. To: IronSage (#10) Got the point, did you get mine? I was shown a site last year sating all the facts and had videos on how it couldnt have been a palne that blew up the pentagon. There is actually a shot where you can see an objest that looks like a missle hurdling towards the pentagon. There is also a site where it shows a sloed down version of the towers being blown up almost as if bombs were set up on each level.
#12. To: master_of_disaster, ironsage (#11) Did you watch the clip in post 6 of this thread. The fireman cleaerly said there were bombs in the building. Here is another fireman saying the same thing. http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/IMAGES/FDNY-explosions.mov and another http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/IMAGES/heavy.duty.explosion.wmv and audio from CNN talking about bombs planted in the building. http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/IMAGES/SecondaryDevices.wma
#25. To: A K A Stone (#12) Did you watch the clip in post 6 of this thread. The fireman cleaerly said there were bombs in the building. The great evidence that Bush bombed the WTC.
#26. To: IronSage (#25) The great evidence that Bush bombed the WTC. No. Just a very small part of the puzzle. Thousands of more things like this. LIterally. It is evidence of a possiblity of bombs being planted. The official government story is that the beams failed because of heat. Even though this never happened in ANY steel framed building in the history of the world.
#28. To: A K A Stone (#26) Old news.... I guess well have to agree, we disagree.
#30. To: IronSage (#28) Old news.... Thats ok, we can disagree. Now what is the evidence that the governments story is true. Tell me what you think happened and what is the evidence to support that. I've showed you some things that support my argument. For example why no photos released except a couple of the "terrorists" at the airport. Why did the passenger list released on sept 12 in USA Today not have any of the hijackers names on it.
#31. To: A K A Stone (#30) Umm, maybe video of airplanes crashing into the building.
#33. To: IronSage (#31) I am one of those people who wont take a side on this, but is pretty suspicious that Bush's fateher failed to gett Saddam, then as soon as Bush jr. gets in there we head into war 1 year later.
Replies to Comment # 33. I am one of those people who wont take a side on this, but is pretty suspicious that Bush's fateher failed to gett Saddam, then as soon as Bush jr. gets in there we head into war 1 year later. What do you find suspicious about it? Do you think Bush 1 was thinking long term when he didn't go after saddam? Is there a Bush Clinton axis that is running the country? Was there some kind of deal for Bush to lose, then have his son become president? How does the electronic voting machines that are being put into place play into this. Was the whole bush gore election really about getting electronic voting started everywhere. That would mean Gore could be part of it too. Maybe it will be like this Bush1, clinton, W., hillary, Jeb...I can't see further than that.
#35. To: RangeRider (#33) Did you watch the video in post 32? If so what did you think about it?
End Trace Mode for Comment # 33. Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest |
|
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
|