United States News
See other United States News Articles
Title: 9 Most Insane Lies About Georgia’s Voter ID Law In The DOJ’s Lawsuit
Source:
the federalist
URL Source: https://thefederalist.com/2021/06/2 ... -voter-id-law-in-dojs-lawsuit/
Published: Jun 29, 2021
Author: Margot Cleveland
Post Date: 2021-06-29 20:41:34 by tankumo
Keywords: None
Views: 1243
Comments: 6
From claiming Georgia lawmakers are racist to relitigating 2020 voter fraud cases, the Biden Department of Justice's complaint against Georgia would be laughable if it weren't so frightening. On Friday, the Biden administration filed a 46-page complaint against the state of Georgia, alleging the state’s Election Integrity Act of 2021 violated Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act. For a lawsplainer of the Voting Rights Act, read here. But for a taste of the surreal state of the U.S. Department of Justice under President Joe Biden, follow along. 1. It’s Still 1965 Given that on occasion President Joe Biden believes he’s still in the Senate, it should come as no surprise that his Department of Justice believes it’s still 1965. In alleging that provisions in the Georgia voting-integrity law violate Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act, the DOJ opened its complaint by proclaiming that the Georgia legislature enacted the law “against the backdrop of Georgia’s history of discrimination against Black Georgians. ” The complaint continued with an entire section headed “The State of Georgia’s History of Discrimination,” which stressed, “the history of official racial discrimination against Black citizens in Georgia with regard to voting is longstanding, well-documented, and recognized by Federal courts.” The DOJ drafted its complaint as though that reality still exists and acting oblivious to the Supreme Court’s decision in Shelby County v. Holder, even though a few paragraphs later the Biden administration noted that Georgia had been subject to the preclearance requirement of Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act until 2013, when the Supreme Court decided Shelby County. But as the Supreme Court made clear in Shelby County, since Congress passed the Voting Rights Act in 1965 “things have changed dramatically,” and “conditions have changed significantly.” At the time the Voting Rights Act.................
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 2.
#2. To: tankumo (#0)
RATS really must think there are enough clueless rubes out there to believe this mularkey about Jim Crow laws. And these rat-minions are supposed to just play along as folks incapable of voting the way generations before us have voted. Gotta be very ignorant to be a good rat-minion...MUD
#3. To: Mudboy Slim, and Everyone (#2)
(Edited)
Unfortunately, there ARE enough clueless rubes out there – The evidence of this is that Biden/Harris got ELECTED by them. Unfortunately, there ARE just enough of the rat-minions to play along – The evidence of this is that Biden/Harris got ELECTED by them. I would never call them “Ignorant.” I would however, call them “stupid.” But I will never – NEVER – underestimate them. They definitely know and understand what they are doing. And Mud, above all – Always remember …
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Replies to Comment # 2. RATS really must think there are enough clueless rubes out there to believe this mularkey about Jim Crow laws. And these rat-minions are supposed to just play along as folks incapable of voting the way generations before us have voted. Gotta be very ignorant to be a good rat-minion...MUD The definition of “Ignorance” is “not knowing or not understanding.” While the definition of “stupidity” is “knowing or understanding, but doing the wrong thing anyway.”
End Trace Mode for Comment # 2.
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]