[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
United States News Title: Secret Service Admits To Destroying Records In Alleged Biden Breast-Grabbing Incident In 2017, the Gateway Pundit's Cassandra Fairbanks published a claim from an anonymous former Secret Service agent who said that they had to protect female agents from Joe Biden due to "Weinstein level stuff," referring to notable rapist and Democrat, Harvey Weinstein. "We had to cancel the VP Christmas get together at the Vice Presidents house because Biden would grope all of our wives and girlfriends asses," said the former agent, adding "He would mess with every single woman or teen. It was horrible." The agent also claimed Biden would walk around naked in the VP residence. "I mean, Stark naked
Weinstein level stuff." "According to the source, a Secret Service agent once got suspended for a week in 2009 for shoving Biden after he cupped his girlfriends breast while the couple was taking a photo with him. The situation got so heated, the source told Cassandra Fairbanks, that others had to step in to prevent the agent from hitting the then-Vice President." Here's why you're reading this now... While the MSM simply ignored the alleged breast-grabbing incident, Judicial Watch filed a FOIA request... ...and were told the file was destroyed. In other words, something happened, and the Secret Service just confirmed it. Via Judicial Watch: The records sought shall include, but not be limited to, witness statements, the Agents statement, victims statement, alleged perpetrators statement, incident reports, investigative reports, communications among USSS personnel regarding the incident, and disciplinary records related to the incident for the Agent in question. In a July 13, 2020 response to Judicial Watchs request, the Secret Service appeared to confirm that a file on the alleged incident existed at some point, asserting, [T]here are no responsive records or documents pertaining to your request in our files, because the above mentioned file(s) has been destroyed due to retention standards. The Secret Service added that, [n]o additional information is available. It did not deny the incident had occurred. In its lawsuit, Judicial Watch intends to test the Secret Services assertion that it destroyed all records about the incident. Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread |
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
|