United States News
See other United States News Articles
Title: Kyle Rittenhouse Wasn’t the Only One Carrying a Gun in Kenosha – NUMEROUS BLM RIOTERS HAD GUNS THAT NIGHT TOO
Source:
Gateway Pundit
URL Source: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/20 ... m-rioters-guns-night-pictures/
Published: Aug 29, 2020
Author: Jim Hoft
Post Date: 2020-08-29 18:41:08 by Deckard
Keywords: None
Views: 534
Comments: 6
It looks like the atmosphere in Kenosha Wisconsin was more dangerous and volatile than has been reported to date on the night of the Kyle Rittenhouse shootings. Numerous BLM rioters also were carrying guns. 17-year-old Kyle Rittenhouse was charged with 170 years in prison for his actions in Kenosha, Wisconsin on Tuesday night. Rittenhouse killed two men and the question is whether it was in self defense. Hopefully a fair court will come to an accurate judgement on his case. One charge against Rittenhouse is related to him carrying a gun that night in the streets. We also know that one BLM rioter who was chasing young Rittenhouse later that evening and who Rittenhouse shot in the arm was carrying a gun. The man shot in the arm is reportedly a man by the name of Gaige Grosskreutz. He is connected to the far left group “People’s Revolution Movement” and he has been arrested previously and may be a felon. Grosskreutz was carrying a gun when he was shot. He pulled out a gun from his pants and then his arm is nearly blown off by Rittenhouse. One individual was wearing camo pants and had a beard – ‘Camo Man’ – was carrying a gun He also appears to have an Antifa tattoo on his forearm: Camo man was clearly carrying a gun that night in Kenosha: Advertisement - story continues below Here is a better picture of Camo man. Another BLM rioter in the streets of Kenosha was a man in a blue shirt and a Black Lives Matter mask: Advertisement - story continues below ‘BLM man’ was also carrying a gun: 
But now we have uncovered pictures of other individuals in the BLM riot crowd who were also carrying guns that night.
The situation in Kenosha was very dangerous the night of the Rittenhouse shootings. Many BLM rioters also had guns. No doubt this is the same in other Democrat cities around the US where BLM rioters are looting and destroying these cities. Why do Democrats want this?
(8 images)
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 1.
#1. To: A K A Stone, Liberator, Stoner, sneakypete, misterwhite, Hank Rearden, nolu chan (#0)
#4. To: Deckard, jeremiad (#1)
The most recent claim about the Rittenhouse gun is that it was not his, but that it belonged to a friend in Wisconsin. The gun allegedly never crossed state lines. Regardless of the source of the gun, Rittenhouse was underage in Wisconsin and his possession was unlawful. That was a misdemeanor. If someone else supplied the gun to the underage Rittenhouse, that person committed a felony. [CBS] "Dr. P. Douglas Kelley of the Milwaukee Medical Examiner’s office determined that Rosenbaum suffered one gunshot to the groin that fractured his pelvis, another to the back which perforated his right lung and liver, another to the left hand, a superficial gunshot wound to his lateral left thigh, and a graze wound to the right side his forehead." A viable claim of self-defense is a complicated matter. Rittenhouse shot the first guy (Joseph Rosenbaum) four or five times and each shot must be justified. It appears that a third party, not Rosenbaum, fired a gun and Rittenhouse turned and trained his weapon on the unarmed Rosenbaum. Then things went pear shaped. If that claim of self-defense fails, during the incident with the second two Rittenhouse would have been a fleeing felon. Also, Rittenhouse was engaged in the commission of a crime, unlawful carry, when it all went down. Whether Rittenhouse will find a fair court is not known, but it is fairly certain he will find a court within the jurisdiction which permitted the rioters to riot while the police were ordered to watch them riot. Unfortunately, the prosecution's chances of defeating the claim of self-defense are not zero, and the court may not be fair. At least it appears Rittenhouse will be well represented. Rittenhouse helped clean up the gene pool. I'm all busted up about that. However, he has not yet escaped the long arm of the law. In civil action, his family may be held liable for the actions of their minor child. It is part of Campaign 2020. They are campaigning on Orange Man Bad, racist, and causing a breakdown in law and order. They are staging the riots, assisted by useful idiots. Signs, shields, bricks and explosives are being delivered. It is organized mayhem for political purposes. It has progressed too far and has caused many to walk away from the Democrat party which is being strongly influenced by the far left radical socialist wing. They have to do something, and their candidate is showing signs of senility and hiding in his basement. The Democrat campaign, such as it is, appears ready to collapse. What to do about the debates? Now there is a dilemma. That is what the Democrat radicals got. What they wanted was to have Trump send in the troops and have a replay of Kent State. Instead, they only have a picture of Democrat cities being burned and looted, while the police are directed to stand down.
Shootout at the OK Corral! This will develop into a shooting war which it should have in the first instance of looting and arson! Black lives may matter, but one grows sick and tired of being reminded of something so damned obvious!
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Replies to Comment # 1. Rittenhouse killed two men and the question is whether it was in self defense. Hopefully a fair court will come to an accurate judgement on his case. One charge against Rittenhouse is related to him carrying a gun that night in the streets.
Why do Democrats want this?
#6. To: Deckard (#1)
End Trace Mode for Comment # 1.
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]