LEFT WING LOONS
See other LEFT WING LOONS Articles
Title: From everyday language to the worlds of Shakespeare and Austin, MSM finds racism everywhere
Source:
Signs of The Times/Russia Today
URL Source: https://www.sott.net/article/437703 ... in-MSM-finds-racism-everywhere
Published: Jul 11, 2020
Author: RT
Post Date: 2020-07-11 17:43:25 by Deckard
Keywords: None
Views: 345
Comments: 1
CNN has taken cancel culture to a new level, pushing to police everyday language, some of which has nothing to do with racism, and they are not the only mainstream media outlet raising alarms with critics of political correctness.
Some of the terms called into question by one of the network's latest 'thinkpieces' are acknowledged as having origins rooted in racism like "sold down the river," but others have no connection to it.
For example, "master bedrooms/bathrooms," terms some realtors have retired in light of protests against racism across the world, are phrases that were first used in 1926, decades after slavery was abolished in the US, a fact the piece waves off.
"It's unclear whether the term is rooted in American slavery on plantations, it evokes that history," the CNN story reads.
Similarly, the Masters Tournament is pointed to as a troubling term. The name, used as the name of the annual golf tournament, originated in the '30s. It is merely the use of "masters" CNN takes issue with.
"The name appears to have been a reference to golfers with great skills, but its connotations have brought the name under scrutiny," the network reports.
"Blacklist" and "whitelist," mostly used in tech industries to describe allowed and not-allowed content, are given similar treatment. The "black list" actually originated in the 1639 drama ''The Unnatural Combat' by Philip Massinger. It is also found in the state papers of Charles II to describe a list of men who were behind the execution of his father.
Others like "peanut gallery" and "grandfather clause" have origins in describing poor or uneducated black citizens, but even if such origins are accepted as central to these terms, they have clearly taken on colloquial definitions that have erased any connection to racism from the minds of most people.
Critics were quick to point out CNN may be making a problem where there is none, capitalizing on a culture more empowered to 'cancel' and deem content or language racist or problematic thanks to the groupthink so prevalent on social media.
"I'm getting the distinct vibe that only white liberals are offended by any of these," Post Millennial columnist and YouTuber Blaire White tweeted in reaction to the story.
"Ah yes when shown the 'master bedroom' my first thought is often taken back to the slave trade," another user added.
CNN is not the only mainstream media outlet raising the alarm bells of cancel culture critics — though some liberals argue this term mischaracterizes the goals of cultural heritage being reviewed through the lenses of mordern political correctness.
A recent piece from The Washington Post highlighted the fact that while film and television have been heavily targeted by the left — see everything from the unquestionably progressive 'Hamilton' being targeted to the suggestion that any content depicting cops as protagonists should be ceased — books have gone largely unnoticed.
"Perspective: While offensive TV shows get pulled, problematic books are still inspiring debate and conversation," The Post tweeted when promoting their story.
The piece itself points to classic literature that does not meet the standards of today, including depictions of black people in plays like Shakespeare's 'Othello', as well as the "unbearable whiteness of Jane Austin novels."
NPR similarly called for people to "decolonize" their book shelves last month by resisting "the colonialist ideas of narrative, storytelling, and literature that have pervaded the American psyche for so long."
Critics pointed to decades-old literature that depicted a much different society being judged by today's politically correct measuring stick as being proof of a slippery slope that has gone from targeting Confederate statues to pieces of actual art that have been, until now, largely accepted as educational tools.
"They're not going to stop," Spectator USA Stephen Miller tweeted, almost immediately being accused by the writer of the story from The Post for not reading the piece, which never explicitly calls for mass cancellation of books.
"Buy physical copies of your favorite books. Things are getting creepier with each passing year," Washington Times writer Douglas Ernst tweeted in reaction.
Some saw the piece as a blatant call to "burn" literature that does not meet today's 'standards.'
"Banning and burning problematic books has a problematic history," conservative filmmaker Dinesh D'Souza wrote.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 1.
#1. To: Liberator, Stoner, sneakypete, A K A Stone, misterwhite, Gatlin, Fred Mertz, ALL (#0)
There are no replies to Comment # 1. End Trace Mode for Comment # 1.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest"Perspective: While offensive TV shows get pulled, problematic books are still inspiring debate and conversation," The Post tweeted when promoting their story.
The piece itself points to classic literature that does not meet the standards of today, including depictions of black people in plays like Shakespeare's 'Othello', as well as the "unbearable whiteness of Jane Austin novels."
NPR similarly called for people to "decolonize" their book shelves last month by resisting "the colonialist ideas of narrative, storytelling, and literature that have pervaded the American psyche for so long." 
Replies to Comment # 1.
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]