Title: Glenn Beck does a hit job on Debra Medina on his show this morning Source:
[None] URL Source:[None] Published:Feb 11, 2010 Author:Glenn Beck Post Date:2010-02-11 14:29:35 by Skip Intro Keywords:None Views:31887 Comments:87
She's got the neocons' dainty panties in a bunch as shown by their attempts to smear.
She's gotten a little to close in the polls, so they're scared. Tea Bagging is fine and good as long as someone can make a few bucks from it, but actually winning a race is going too far.
"You just can't debate with someone who is both stupid AND dishonest." - sneakypete on LP 02/10/2010
She's gotten a little to close in the polls, so they're scared. Tea Bagging is fine and good as long as someone can make a few bucks from it, but actually winning a race is going too far.
Her real sin is she hasn't come out as an Israel Firster.
Gorelick didn't 'head' the 911 commission. Thats the problem with the 'truthers' they play games like you do here.
FYI, she should have been under oath testifying BEFORE the 9/11 commission. Not a part of it.
LOL not according to the Bushees, who blamed the commission's inadequacies on her due to the inordinate power given to her.
And Gorelick co authored the book too. Something you bots also won't admit.
Even the MSmedia brought up that last discrepancy, yet where was the pubby cry to remedy it? The trans administration blunders were to be kept safe and hidden as Gorelick knew where they were all hidden. I bet this didn't peak your curiosity either.
He posts the same shit @ LP....I'm banned he isn't...
Goldi protects him because he only posts like this because he's "provoked". She uses the same excuse for MD.
The thing is, anybody who spends just a couple of minutes perusing his posts will see he has serious homosexual fantasies. It's all he ever posts about.
The thing is, anybody who spends just a couple of minutes perusing his posts will see he has serious homosexual fantasies. It's all he ever posts about.
There seems to be a whole inner circle of homos over there. Probably reflects the % in the GOP leadership too.
Goldi protects him because he only posts like this because he's "provoked". She uses the same excuse for MD.
When I think of all the decent folks she's banned over the years and those two remain, it just doesn't make sense...at least not to anyone with common sense.
Ah well...the only thing that pisses me off is that packass the perv "got" me...I suspect that my hyperbole struck a little too close to home for his liking...
It's kind of like Patton surviving WWII then dying from a car wreck...
Ill see what I can do about posting a more current pic, if you really want one.
Badeye posted on 2003-03-15 09:26:22 ET Reply Trace
Frankly, if you exclude the viigilante retreads that she banned, the only banning that seemed remotely justified was Badeye's and, IMHO, she didn't need to ban him, just get him under control.
Ill see what I can do about posting a more current pic, if you really want one.
Badeye posted on 2003-03-15 09:26:22 ET Reply Trace
There was another poster who employed clown posse tactics toward me. I'd email Goldi and she'd sanitize the post and chastise the poster. After maybe the third time she banned him, not at my asking. I can't recall his screen name at the moment.
Brian S was finally fed up with her uneven moderation and posted something nasty to her; I think he knew it was his last hurrah. It was something along the lines of Nebby's tag line only a little worse IMO.
Ah well...the only thing that pisses me off is that packass the perv "got" me...I suspect that my hyperbole struck a little too close to home for his liking...
If I remember correctly, you were using his tactic of demanding he prove something wasn't true. Packy, like most of the rest of them there, is blind to his own actions, and totally lacking in humor to boot.
Frankly, if you exclude the viigilante retreads that she banned, the only banning that seemed remotely justified was Badeye's and, IMHO, she didn't need to ban him, just get him under control.
That site was finished as anything more than an echo chamber when she decided to ban people expressing opinions contrary to hers on the basis that they were suppressing free speech.
I still haven't figured out how she justifies the banning of opposing opinions as preserving free speech.
One of the more bizarre claims was that if you asked someone to "prove" something she considered that censorship and that it wasn't up to someone to prove what they said as true but for the challenger to prove it false...
Ill see what I can do about posting a more current pic, if you really want one.
Badeye posted on 2003-03-15 09:26:22 ET Reply Trace
One of the more bizarre claims was that if you asked someone to "prove" something she considered that censorship and that it wasn't up to someone to prove what they said as true but for the challenger to prove it false
She's obviously been studying Birther Law at the feet of Orly Taitz.
I remember that. "Abdicate what?", I remember thinking at the time.
I believe he said he then went to the Washington Post site where his laser-like logic and persuasive arguing skills got him banned in a couple of days, whereupon he returned to LP as a conquering hero.
Yea...it was a good one but nothing will ever match Badeye's classic meltdowns. He owns the top five spots at least...his threat to go "nuclear" on me being second only to his whining plea to Neil to not ban him over having two accounts...Badeye and Monocle...that was a classic balloon "duck farting" around the room as it deflates if ever there was one...
Ill see what I can do about posting a more current pic, if you really want one.
Badeye posted on 2003-03-15 09:26:22 ET Reply Trace