United States News
See other United States News Articles
Title: The ANTIFA Manual: Exposed — “Do not distribute to any cis white males, non-PoC, non-LGBTQ peoples, a.k.a. fascists.”
Source:
Intellihub
URL Source: https://www.intellihub.com/the-anti ... -lgbtq-peoples-a-k-a-fascists/
Published: Jun 16, 2020
Author: Shepard Ambellas
Post Date: 2020-06-22 19:01:30 by Deckard
Keywords: None
Views: 2633
Comments: 22
The official ANTIFA playbook known as The ANTIFA Manual was sent to Intellihub via Interweb backchannel and will be posted here for your viewing pleasure.
The cover page of The ANTIFA Manual clearly states: “Do not distribute to any cis white males, non-PoC, non-LGBTQ peoples, a.k.a. fascists.”
The George Soros-sponsored playbook has quite the grand introduction that’s sure and is designed to draw in radical leftists from all walks of life.
Intellihub
“If you are reading this, it’s because someone close to our movement trusted you with it,” the manual explicitly states. “Please do not distribute to anyone who may attempt to harm or denigrate what we are doing.”
Of course, the manual’s authors didn’t count on Intellihub having inside sources embedded in the movement.
Intellihub
The handbook goes on to assert that cisgender white males have controlled the media and dispersant of information and that the power structure can be countered using social media as a weapon.
The secret manifesto aims to vilify whites “especially cis white males” who “have proven to be the greatest evil mankind has ever known” and even calls whites slave traders of the old in an attempt to indoctrinate inductees.
“Believe the way we do or you will be fired,” it reads–instructing inductees to threaten the livelihoods of anyone who speaks out against the group.
Intellihub
All and all, ANTIFA wants to remain unpredictable by keeping the enemy on their toes, never revealing their endgame. However, their endgame has now been revealed by Intellihub.
Intellihub
To no surprise, the underground manifesto even pulls the race card by asserting that a person that is less than 17% black by ethnicity has no right to say the N-word, further fueling the racial divide.
Intellihub
The far left propaganda piece maintains that neither the Pentagon nor the World Trade Center would have been attacked on 9/11 if the U.S. didn’t drop atom bombs on Japan.
Moreover, the plan’s architects appear to want nothing more than a one-world government as outlined in “Phase 4.”
“The movement will eventually spread to other nations–indeed–it has already begun,” it rstates. “Make no mistake we will prevail where others have failed.”
Needless to say, ANTIFA wants to create a culture of tolerance by eliminating all forms of hate speech and creating a racist, homophobic environment to spark chaos.
“We have the facts and history on our side,” the manifesto reads. “When all else fails, compare someone to Hitler.”
To boot, the radical far left group wants to crash the border by helping to escort people of color into America which ANTIFA feels will grow their army. 
Intellihub
ANTIFA is presumed to be funded by George Soros and philanthropist Thomas Steyer.
Shepard Ambellas is an opinion journalist, analyst, political pundit, radio talk show host, and the founder and editor-in-chief of Intellihub News & Politics (Intellihub.com). Shepard is also known for producing Shade: The Motion Picture (2013) and appearing on Travel Channel’s America Declassified (2013). Shepard is a contributor to Alex Jones’ Infowars platform and is also a regular on Coast To Coast AM with George Noory.
Read more from Shep’s World. Follow Shep on Facebook and Twitter. Subscribe to Shep’s YouTube channel. Watch the Intellihub Podcast. Listen to The Shepard Ambellas Show which airs LIVE weekdays at 2 PM Pacific–that’s 5 PM Eastern/4C on American Freedom Radio.
(7 images)Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: Deckard, All (#0) (Edited)
Title: The ANTIFA Manual: Exposed — BULLSHIT …
Antifa is not a concrete group – rather it is loosely organized radicals in an amorphous movement. The adherents to this decentralized movement have no known leaders, no headquarters, and no clear ideology other than opposition to whatever its adherents see as right-wing, or fascist, movements.
There is no organizational structure binding the Antifa movement's adherents together. It varies with some focusing on environmental causes or the rights of Indigenous groups, others for the rights of LGBT activists.
The first group to use the word "Antifa" in its branding was the Rose City Antifa (RCA) founded in 2007 in Portland, Oregon. Now, 13 years later Intellihub expects everyone to believe they suddenly laid their hands on on a “closely controlled copy” of:
The official ANTIFA playbook known as The ANTIFA Manual [and it] was sent to Intellihub via Interweb backchannel and will be posted here for your viewing pleasure. This is the Antifa: The Anti-Fascist Handbook (Paperback):
By Mark Bray and you can order a copy here for $16.99.
The National Bestseller is:
“Focused and persuasive... Bray’s book is many things: the first English- language transnational history of antifa, a how-to for would-be activists, and a record of advice from anti-Fascist organizers past and present.”—THE NEW YORKER
"Insurgent activist movements need spokesmen, intellectuals and apologists, and for the moment Mark Bray is filling in as all three... The book’s most enlightening contribution is on the history of anti-fascist efforts over the past century, but its most relevant for today is its justification for stifling speech and clobbering white supremacists."—Carlos Lozada, THE WASHINGTON POST
“[Bray’s] analysis is methodical, and clearly informed by both his historical training and 15 years of organizing, which included Occupy Wall Street…Antifa: The Anti-Fascist Handbook couldn’t have emerged at a more opportune time. Bray’s arguments are incisive and cohesive, and his consistent refusal to back down from principle makes the book a crucial intervention in our political moment.”— SAN FRANCISCO CHRONICLE
This is probably where Intellihub got the idea for their story.
#2. To: Gatlin (#1) (Edited)
Antifa is not a concrete group – rather it is loosely organized radicals in an amorphous movement.
I see you're quoting from their latest press release. Or perhaps you saw it on MSNBC.
There is no organizational structure binding the Antifa movement's adherents together. It varies with some focusing on environmental causes or the rights of Indigenous groups, others for the rights of LGBT activists.
So you say.
It seems to me that you are defending the shit bags.
Government is in the last resort the employment of armed men, of policemen, gendarmes, soldiers, prison guards, and hangmen.
The essential feature of government is the enforcement of its decrees by beating, killing, and imprisoning.
Those who are asking for more government interference are asking ultimately for more compulsion and less freedom.
#3. To: Deckard, All (#2) (Edited)
I see you're quoting from their latest press release. I see you are again posting more fake news bullshit.
It seems to me that you are defending the shit bags. What always “seems to you” is only what you are predisposed to already believe.
#4. To: Deckard, All (#3) (Edited)
What I learned from the Antifa handbook:
For starters, you won’t believe who is defined as a 'fascist'It’s called “Antifa: The Anti-Fascist Handbook,” but it feels like false advertising. You open the little book expecting a how-to guide on violence and disruption. But instead of giving advice on how to shut people up with baseball bats, the handbook is really a rather dull lecture.
Ever since the election of Donald Trump, the American Antifa movement has gone into overdrive, shutting down speeches and rallies, and spreading mayhem across the U.S.
And now here comes author Mark Bray – a lecturer at Dartmouth College and an Occupy Wall Street organizer – attempting to give philosophical justification to a movement so certain of its righteousness that it’s not going to let a little thing like free speech get in the way.
Bray spends most of his time tracing the history of the movement, but finally gets to the heart of the matter, and the argument isn’t hard to follow. In essence: tolerance and reason don’t work, and you don’t wait for a small problem to get bigger, so let’s start beating heads.
Antifa gets to decide who the fascists are, and don’t look now, but it’s you.
There are obvious objections to this. And though Bray struggles mightily to overcome them, he’s simply not up to it. Of course, no one is.
But as a result of this close-minded thinking, we’ve got a violent movement convinced it has the right to be judge, jury and executioner because it has identified a deserving enemy.
Now even if this worked in theory, we already know it doesn’t work in practice. Because the guardians of goodness who fill Antifa’s ranks don’t just shout down neo-Nazis and other racists who deserve total condemnation (but not the loss of their constitutional rights). They also disrupt and commit violence at mainstream Republicans rallies, and attack anyone they’ve deemed unacceptable.
In other words, Antifa gets to decide who the fascists are, and don’t look now, but it’s you.
Mind you, Bray does attempt to explain what fascism looks like. Its hallmarks include a preoccupation with victimhood, a cult of purity, abandonment of liberty and redemptive violence.
I know, you’re ahead of me – that sounds like the Antifa movement. But they can’t be fascist because ... Bray says they can’t. Fascists can only be the people who don’t share the left’s views on race, gender and immigration (their views at present, that is – not necessarily what they believed a generation or two ago).
Now don’t get me wrong. Ideas have consequences. Indeed, the biggest irony in this unintentionally ironic book is that while Bray wants to save the world, the revolutionary socialism he calls for would actually impoverish and enslave everyone. And I don’t consider that conjecture – it’s the verdict of history.
But the point is not whether I’m right or wrong (because I am right, after all), but whether or not I should adopt the logic and tactics of Bray. If I did, he wouldn’t be allowed to express his ideas. He couldn’t publish books, gives speeches, and perhaps not hold a job or even walk in public unmolested. And to Bray, that should be business as usual – as long as he gets to schedule the beatings.
The value of “The Anti-Fascist Handbook” is that it strips bare the radical roots of the Antifa movement. It is in strict opposition to a liberal society, and Bray isn’t afraid to say it out loud, and at length.
It’s good to see that lately some Democrats (perhaps after glancing at the polls) have denounced the Antifa movement. The only mystery is, why haven’t they all?
Steve Kurtz is a producer for the Fox News Channel, and author of "Steve’s America (the perfect gift for people named Steve)".
#5. To: Deckard, All (#4) (Edited)
Here's -
Everything You Need To Know About The Antifa Network
That's Trying To Solidify A Nazi-Punching Movement.
#6. To: Deckard, All (#2)
There is no organizational structure binding the Antifa movement's adherents together. It varies with some focusing on environmental causes or the rights of Indigenous groups, others for the rights of LGBT activists. So you say.
What do you say?
#7. To: Gatlin (#6)
There is no organizational structure binding the Antifa movement's adherents together. It varies with some focusing on environmental causes or the rights of Indigenous groups, others for the rights of LGBT activists.What do you say?
I'd say it's a pretty naive and simplistic description. antifa is only one part of a larger global leftist political movement. You did know that, right?
I find it interesting that you ignore the more violent aspects of antifa and BLM.
Government is in the last resort the employment of armed men, of policemen, gendarmes, soldiers, prison guards, and hangmen.
The essential feature of government is the enforcement of its decrees by beating, killing, and imprisoning.
Those who are asking for more government interference are asking ultimately for more compulsion and less freedom.
#8. To: Deckard, All (#7)
There is no organizational structure binding the Antifa movement's adherents together. It varies with some focusing on environmental causes or the rights of Indigenous groups, others for the rights of LGBT activists.
So you say. What do you say?
I'd say it's a pretty naive and simplistic description. All you have to say is that:
… it's a pretty naive and simplistic description. That’s ALL?
I find it interesting that you ignore the more violent aspects of antifa … At 4 hours 12 minutes and 43 seconds into the discussion, you suddenly become audacious and make a futile attempt to chastise me for not mentioning “the more violent aspects of antifa.” When The ANTIFA Manual never mentioned “the more violent aspects of antifa;” the author during his grammatical exercise of breaking down the text into its component parts with giving an explanation never mentioned “the more violent aspects of antifa and you had never mentioned “the more violent aspects of antifa” – you then suddenly for some pretentiously veiled reasoning attempt to impress by affecting this to be of such greater importance when it has never heretofore been mentioned.
REALLY?
I find it interesting that you ignore the […] BLM. The article and manual are not about the “BLM” – it is solely about “antifa.”
Antifa is only one part of a larger global leftist political movement. You did know that, right? The article, manual and remarks on this thread have ONLY been discussing antifa and not any other “larger global leftist political movements.”
You did realize this when you intentionally strayed off topic to deflect your inept ability to continue the discussion on the merits – and the lack thereof – of the article and manual.
RIGHT?
#9. To: Gatlin (#8)
The article, manual and remarks on this thread have ONLY been discussing antifa and not any other “larger global leftist political movements.”
Just tryin' to educate you Sparky, you know - get you up to speed on what's really going on in the real world while you endlessly pontificate and attempt to minimize the antifa/BLM hooliganism.
These terrorists and their allies are actively seeking to destroy America from within.
Ignore them at your own peril.
Have a nice day.
Government is in the last resort the employment of armed men, of policemen, gendarmes, soldiers, prison guards, and hangmen.
The essential feature of government is the enforcement of its decrees by beating, killing, and imprisoning.
Those who are asking for more government interference are asking ultimately for more compulsion and less freedom.
#10. To: Deckard, All (#9)
The article, manual and remarks on this thread have ONLY been discussing antifa and not any other “larger global leftist political movements.”
Just tryin' to educate you Sparky, you know … No, I don’t know that.
Please show where anything you have posted on this thread is “educational” and explain why you think it is.
… you endlessly pontificate and attempt to minimize the antifa/BLM hooliganism. Point out where you think I have “minimized antifa.”
BLM was never under discussion here.
These terrorists and their allies are actively seeking to destroy America from within. And what exactly is the purpose behind your posting all the despotically; overbearing, tyrannical anti-government and cop-hating articles you post and religiously support?
Explain that.
Ignore them at your own peril. Unneeded and unwanted advice - I shall never do that.
Have a nice day. I always do …
#11. To: Gatlin (#10)
And what exactly is the purpose behind your posting all the despotically; overbearing, tyrannical anti-government and cop-hating articles you post and religiously support?
Oh, I still throw in one or two of those just to piss you off.
However, my attitude towards cops has softened somewhat due to recent events, in fact in some cases, the cops needed to be more aggressive.
And I'm sure the rank and file cops wanted to take control of the situation but their hands were tied by corrupt mayors who allowed the rioters free reign.
I now have a little more sympathy for cops, but there are still far too many who abuse their positions.
Government is in the last resort the employment of armed men, of policemen, gendarmes, soldiers, prison guards, and hangmen.
The essential feature of government is the enforcement of its decrees by beating, killing, and imprisoning.
Those who are asking for more government interference are asking ultimately for more compulsion and less freedom.
#12. To: Deckard, All (#11)
And what exactly is the purpose behind your posting all the despotically; overbearing, tyrannical anti-government and cop-hating articles you post and religiously support?
Oh, I still throw in one or two of those just to piss you off. That’s your purpost, just to:
... throw in one or two of those just to piss you off. Narrow-minded people are shown to be very opinionated about those around them and have strong desires to try and intentionally offend them. The narrow-minded person may be quick to prejudge the reactions of others to their offensive actions. They will lead their lives according to them, do whatever they like to do, choose their own lifestyle , but will criticize others if they do agree with them
Did I miss anything in describing you and your admitted actions?
However, my attitude towards cops has softened somewhat due to recent events … Somewhat?
Too Little – Too Late, asshole hypocrite.
AMERICA IS BURNING.
And you helped light the fire with your hateful rhetoric …
#13. To: Gatlin (#12)
And you helped light the fire with your hateful rhetoric …
Yada, yada, yada.
However, my attitude towards cops has softened somewhat due to recent events …
Somewhat?
Too Little – Too Late, asshole hypocrite.
What's really insane is that you actually believe that you are relevant and that the shit you post is true.
Get a life tosser.
Government is in the last resort the employment of armed men, of policemen, gendarmes, soldiers, prison guards, and hangmen.
The essential feature of government is the enforcement of its decrees by beating, killing, and imprisoning.
Those who are asking for more government interference are asking ultimately for more compulsion and less freedom.
#14. To: Gatlin (#12)
Narrow-minded people are shown to be very opinionated about those around them and have strong desires to try and intentionally offend them.
Psychological projection is a defense mechanism in which the human ego defends itself against unconscious impulses or qualities (both positive and negative) by denying their existence in themselves while attributing them to others.
For example, a bully may project their own feelings of vulnerability onto the target. It incorporates blame shifting and can manifest as shame dumping.
Government is in the last resort the employment of armed men, of policemen, gendarmes, soldiers, prison guards, and hangmen.
The essential feature of government is the enforcement of its decrees by beating, killing, and imprisoning.
Those who are asking for more government interference are asking ultimately for more compulsion and less freedom.
#15. To: Deckard, All (#13)
What's really insane is that you actually believe that you are relevant and that the shit you post is true. /font> It’s all true and definitely most relevant.
You are just in denial.
Pathetic …
#16. To: Gatlin (#15)
yada, yada, yada.
More incoherent babble.
Government is in the last resort the employment of armed men, of policemen, gendarmes, soldiers, prison guards, and hangmen.
The essential feature of government is the enforcement of its decrees by beating, killing, and imprisoning.
Those who are asking for more government interference are asking ultimately for more compulsion and less freedom.
#17. To: Deckard, All (#14)
Psychological projection is a defense mechanism in which the human ego defends itself against unconscious impulses or qualities (both positive and negative) by denying their existence in themselves while attributing them to others. /font> Copied here and pasted from Wikipedia without the mandatory attrition given - you plagiarist.
You've never – NEVER – had an original thought in your life. All you can do is to copy and paste comments by others.
You will find that you can come up with original statements if you spend more time considering it, rather than immediately running to find some copy and paste comment from someone else.
Try it …
#18. To: Deckard, All (#16)
More incoherent babble. /font>
Reading comprehension should have been the ultimate goal when you were learning to read as a child. It obviously was not. It would be nice if you could find some easy-to-follow ideas to help you nurture this ability. Do so and you will find there are many different ways to help develop good reading comprehension.
#19. To: Gatlin (#17)
Copied here and pasted from Wikipedia without the mandatory attrition given - you plagiarist.
You post reams of un-sourced spam, and you criticize me for a paragraph?
Hypocrite much asshole?
You've never – NEVER – had an original thought in your life. All you can do is to copy and paste comments by others.
Wow, you really are senile.
Feeling kinda sorry for you now pal.
Maybe you should crawl away again like you've done so many times before and take a break from being an utter asshole.
Government is in the last resort the employment of armed men, of policemen, gendarmes, soldiers, prison guards, and hangmen.
The essential feature of government is the enforcement of its decrees by beating, killing, and imprisoning.
Those who are asking for more government interference are asking ultimately for more compulsion and less freedom.
#20. To: Gatlin (#18)
Reading comprehension should have been the ultimate goal when you were learning to read as a child
Shut your prissy little schoolmarm-lecturing pie-hole princess.
Nobody gives a shit about your psychobabble.
Government is in the last resort the employment of armed men, of policemen, gendarmes, soldiers, prison guards, and hangmen.
The essential feature of government is the enforcement of its decrees by beating, killing, and imprisoning.
Those who are asking for more government interference are asking ultimately for more compulsion and less freedom.
#21. To: Deckard (#20)
Oh, I upset you.
Control yourself …
#22. To: Gatlin (#21)
Government is in the last resort the employment of armed men, of policemen, gendarmes, soldiers, prison guards, and hangmen.
The essential feature of government is the enforcement of its decrees by beating, killing, and imprisoning.
Those who are asking for more government interference are asking ultimately for more compulsion and less freedom.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]