[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

President Trump, A Formidable Candidate In 2024 Republican Primaries: Golden/TIPP Poll

The Red Wave Is Not Just Inevitable, It’s Also Conservative

How liberal policies have killed black communities: Clarence Thomas


STRANDED!!! Lake Mead's Water Dropped Too Fast!!!

A Supreme win for school choice

The More Americans Decide The System Is Rigged, The More They Will Silently Rebel

How Donald Trump Saved the GOP

Marching in Time

Mortgage Rates Explode and Housing Crash Imminent - With Scott Walters and The Economic Ninja

A Warning From A Farmer

What I Just Learned Will Shock You

Lake Mead Drought Update!!! What's Going On?!!!

"Homosexuals Are Coming For Your Kids Via Disney... They Want Us To Be Just Like Them"

Go read this report about a Google contractor who claims he was fired for calling out cult activity

WAYNE ROOT - My LaTesT Exclusive InTerview wiTh PresidenT Trump ... The RevelaTions - His Shocking Response AbouT Running for House Speaker --- Proof America is Under CommunisT ATTack

EXCLUSIVE: Rubio questions Harvard on Fauci-China cover-up

Can ChrisTian Russia ... save The world --- from globalism?

All in all it's just the groomers on the prowl "Another Brick in the Wall"

North Korean defector: I am terrified of the 'massive indoctrination coming from the left' in public schools

Trump vs DeSantis: Who Should Patriots Support for 2024?

Disney Disaster: United Arab Emirates Bans Pixar’s ‘Lightyear’ over Lesbian Kiss

The entire hood came out to beat this white man and they stole his car. Leftists be like 'stop profiling people'.

The FBI knew RussiaGate was a lie — but hid that truth

The narraTive is shifTing fasT ... Zelensky may soon see his --- 'supersTar' sTaTus in The WesT on The decline

The Eerie Silence Around Kavanaugh Assassination Attempt

FReepers have always supporTed him ... he goT sick --- can’T be There for all of you.

Kayleigh McEnany calls out Harris for failing to condemn threats against Kavanaugh: 'Where is the media?'

Colin Kaepernick Transitions In Order To Make Carolina Panthers Cheer Squad

ABC News: Our Numbers Show Biden Is a 'Serious Drag' on Democrats

Will Boudin Be the First Soros D.A. to Fall This Year?

Woke LA District Attorney strikes out in California court

Media Group Backed By George Soros And Obama Staffer Buys Conservative Latino Radio Stations Ahead of Midterms

Transfaggots want women to spend more time smelling their poop


Parents are still being treated like terrorists

If Schools Don’t Let Boys Into Girls’ Bathrooms, Biden Will Take Their Lunch Money

The Cancer of Election Fraud

California Spills Water into Ocean rather than letting Farmers Grow Rice

Bertrand Russell - Message To Future Generations (1959)

The bodies of those who were killed on the fields of the war in Donbas. A reportage

New bid to spin Hunter BidenÂ’s laptop

Yuma County School Board Member Set To Plead Guilty For 2020 Election Ballot Trafficking Crimes As Exposed In “2000 Mules”

Big Pharma Boss Caught FAKING His COVID Vaccination Status; Injected Himself With Salt Water Instead… Now Facing Criminal Charges

Ricky Gervais - Trans Women

Race-Based Illness at the Best of the Best

Shouldn't Hillary Clinton Be Banned From Twitter Now?

"GoFundMe for Son's Hormone Blockers!" (5 year old)

Charlie Kirk Wrecks Pro-Trans Wet Leftist

Watch the Ugly Cunt Lila Grace Rose tell her baby she could have killed it

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

U.S. Constitution
See other U.S. Constitution Articles

Title: Federal Legislators Pitching Massive Police Reform Bill That Would End Qualified Immunity
Source: Tech Dirt
URL Source: https://www.techdirt.com/articles/2 ... d-end-qualified-immunity.shtml
Published: Jun 11, 2020
Author: Tim Cushing
Post Date: 2020-06-11 19:35:24 by Deckard
Keywords: None
Views: 504
Comments: 5

from the lots-of-things-cops-won't-like,-all-in-one-place dept

There's some national-level police reform on the way, courtesy of Democratic lawmakers. Unfortunately, it's going up against a party that holds a majority in the Senate and has pledged an oath of fealty to our very pro-cop president. This will make it difficult to pass in its unaltered form. And that's even if it's given a chance to come up for a vote when it hits the Senate, considering the Senate Majority Leader's antipathy towards legislation he doesn't agree with.

That being said, the bill should still be discussed. There's a non-zero chance it will eventually make its way to a president's desk. Possibly not this one's, but there's an election in November.

The Justice in Policing Act of 2020 [PDF] addresses a number of issues that have turned our nation's law enforcement agencies into the paragons of unaccountability currently being protested en masse around the nation. The first stop is officers' legal defenses when sued or prosecuted for violating rights.

There are two parts to this equation and the first is what prosecutors must prove when charging cops with criminal acts. This bill lowers the standard, making it a bit easier for prosecutors to get charges to stick. From the fact sheet [PDF]:

Makes it easier to prosecute offending officers by amending the federal criminal statute to prosecute police misconduct. The mens rea requirement in 18 U.S.C. Section 242 will be amended from “willfulness” to a “recklessness” standard.

The bigger change is one that attacks the Supreme Court's "qualified immunity" construct. There's no law to amend here because there was never any law created to grant police officers this extra right. If this bill becomes law, qualified immunity will cease to exist. The bill refers to 42 USC 1983, which is what gives citizens the right to sue officers for violating their rights. Nothing in that law says anything about qualified immunity.

This bill would add something to the law removing the qualified immunity defense constructed by the Supreme Court.

‘‘It shall not be a defense or immunity to any action brought under this section against a local law enforcement officer (as defined in section 2 of the Justice in Policing Act of 2020) or a State correctional officer (as defined in section 1121(b) of title 18, United States 22 Code) that—

‘‘(1) the defendant was acting in good faith, or that the defendant believed, reasonably or otherwise, that his or her conduct was lawful at the time when the conduct was committed; or

‘‘(2) the rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws were not clearly established at the time of their deprivation by the defendant, or that at this time, the state of the law was otherwise such that the defendant could not reasonably have been expected to know whether his or her conduct was lawful."

Officers will still be able to argue these things, but they won't be able to move for summary judgment just by saying a couple of magic words. They'll actually have to submit counterarguments and evidence if they hope to avoid losing a civil rights lawsuit.

Unfortunately, this won't apply to federal law enforcement officers, who have mysteriously been given a carve-out by this bill. But it will be a good start if it sticks. Taking away officers' "GET OUT OF LAWSUIT FREE" cards should have an impressive deterrent effect. Being able to prove your actions were justified is far more difficult than simply claiming any "reasonable" officer would have made the same decision under the circumstances.

There are other good reforms in there as well, although the elimination of qualified immunity is clearly the headliner.

The bill would ban chokeholds and carotid holds by federal law enforcement and make federal grants to state and local police dependent on their banning of these restraint methods. It also bans the use of no-knock warrants by federal agents and similarly restricts the distribution of federal funds to local cops who still engage in this practice.

The bill also mandates more training for cops, in hopes of reducing biased or racist policing, and makes de-escalation tactics a requirement in tense situations, rather than the usual hail of bullets in response to any "quickly evolving" interaction. It gives the DOJ more power to conduct investigations of local law enforcement agencies and establishes funding for state Attorney General investigations of problematic police departments.

The bill would also significantly modify the 1033 program, which has turned a lot of police departments into military outfits by showering them with military vehicles, guns, aircraft, and clothing. The bill would ban the transfer of armored vehicles, grenades/launchers, aircraft with "no established commercial flight application," silencers, and long-range acoustic devices.

Another (theoretically) helpful aspect of the bill is the camera mandate. Most federal officers do not wear body cameras and often ask locals to remove theirs when participating in joint operations. That will no longer be standard practice. The bill mandates use of body cameras by all federal officers and for all marked federal police vehicles to have dashcams.

It's a comprehensive set of reforms and it's going to be greeted by loud opposition from all levels of law enforcement. But that's okay. The louder they yell, the more we know this is the right direction to go. If officers are ever going to start acting like anyone else but them matters, it will take more than tepid half-efforts. Destroying the judicially-created concept of "qualified immunity" should have an immediate effect. Raising the bar for officers to escape civil rights lawsuits has huge deterrent potential. Eliminating some of the worst patterns and practices (dressing up like soldiers, using no-knock warrants, etc.) should disrupt the "soldiers in a war zone" mindset that has contributed to ongoing violence against citizens even as crime levels and killings of police officers remain at historic lows.

The bill has a lot going for it at the moment. There's plenty of public support for reform right now. Unfortunately, the bill's opponents have shown a preference for coddling the most powerful man in the world rather than listening to their constituents. If the bill's momentum stalls, it may take another horrific flash point to reignite its fire.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: Deckard, Tom McClintock -R Calif., Great American RINO (#0)


H.R.7085 - To amend the Revised Statutes to remove the defense of qualified immunity in the case of any action under section 1979, and for other purposes.116th Congress (2019-2020) | Get alerts

Sponsor: Rep. Amash, Justin [L-MI-3] (Introduced 06/04/2020)
Committees: House - Judiciary
Latest Action: House - 06/04/2020 Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary. (All Actions)

Cosponsors (39)

* = Original cosponsor

Cosponsor Date Cosponsored

Rep. Pressley, Ayanna [D-MA-7]* 06/04/2020
Rep. Omar, Ilhan [D-MN-5]* 06/04/2020
Rep. DeGette, Diana [D-CO-1]* 06/04/2020
Rep. Garcia, Jesus G. "Chuy" [D-IL-4]* 06/04/2020
Rep. Blumenauer, Earl [D-OR-3]* 06/04/2020
Rep. McGovern, James P. [D-MA-2]* 06/04/2020
Rep. Pingree, Chellie [D-ME-1]* 06/04/2020
Rep. Ocasio-Cortez, Alexandria [D-NY-14]* 06/04/2020
Rep. Espaillat, Adriano [D-NY-13]* 06/04/2020
Rep. Meeks, Gregory W. [D-NY-5]* 06/04/2020
Rep. Velazquez, Nydia M. [D-NY-7]* 06/04/2020
Rep. Norton, Eleanor Holmes [D-DC-At Large]* 06/04/2020
Rep. Lee, Barbara [D-CA-13]* 06/04/2020
Rep. Takano, Mark [D-CA-41]* 06/04/2020
Rep. Carson, Andre [D-IN-7]* 06/04/2020
Rep. Maloney, Carolyn B. [D-NY-12]* 06/04/2020
Rep. Kennedy, Joseph P., III [D-MA-4]* 06/04/2020
Rep. Tlaib, Rashida [D-MI-13] 06/08/2020
Rep. Sherrill, Mikie [D-NJ-11] 06/08/2020
Rep. Clarke, Yvette D. [D-NY-9] 06/08/2020
Rep. DeSaulnier, Mark [D-CA-11] 06/08/2020
Rep. Pocan, Mark [D-WI-2] 06/08/2020
Rep. Grijalva, Raul M. [D-AZ-3] 06/08/2020
Rep. Rush, Bobby L. [D-IL-1] 06/08/2020
Rep. Trahan, Lori [D-MA-3] 06/08/2020
Rep. Khanna, Ro [D-CA-17] 06/08/2020
Rep. Clay, Wm. Lacy [D-MO-1] 06/08/2020
Rep. Jayapal, Pramila [D-WA-7] 06/08/2020
Rep. Horsford, Steven [D-NV-4] 06/08/2020
Rep. Beatty, Joyce [D-OH-3] 06/08/2020
Rep. Green, Al [D-TX-9] 06/08/2020
Rep. Dingell, Debbie [D-MI-12] 06/08/2020
Rep. Huffman, Jared [D-CA-2] 06/08/2020
Rep. Bonamici, Suzanne [D-OR-1] 06/08/2020
Rep. Eshoo, Anna G. [D-CA-18] 06/08/2020
Rep. Hayes, Jahana [D-CT-5] 06/08/2020
Rep. McEachin, A. Donald [D-VA-4] 06/08/2020
Rep. Kaptur, Marcy [D-OH-9] 06/08/2020
Rep. Adams, Alma S. [D-NC-12] 06/08/2020


With 1 Republican Cosponsor, Rep. Justin Amash Gains Tripartisan Support To End Qualified Immunity

Rep. Tom McClintock (R–Calif.) announced he will support the Ending Qualified Immunity Act.

Ron Paul - Lake Jackson Texas Values

Hondo68  posted on  2020-06-11   22:13:02 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

#2. To: Deckard (#0)

They'll actually have to submit counterarguments and evidence if they hope to avoid losing a civil rights lawsuit.

In other words, they'll have to prove their innocence.

misterwhite  posted on  2020-06-12   11:15:39 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

#3. To: Deckard (#0)

18 U.S.C. Section 242 will be amended from “willfulness” to a “recklessness” standard.

Uh-huh. This means in the George Floyd case the cops should have assumed he had a heart condition and was under the influence of methamphetamine, cocaine and pot. Otherwise they're "acting recklessly".

misterwhite  posted on  2020-06-12   11:19:31 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

#4. To: Deckard (#0)

Good law. Perhaps there are aspects that could be improved. Republican complaints about the bill aren't good enough, though. If the Republicans don't want to lose on this issue, they have to take the lead by proposing their OWN set of reforms, and they need to be as real and have as much teeth in them as these Democratic proposals. If the Republicans simply abdicate the field, the Democrats will dominate the issue, and if there's no reform because Trump blocks it, when the next crop of civilians are killed by the cops, the Republicans will suffer the blowback. Folding their arms and trying to uphold the status quo, without change, will get the Republicans killed politically this year.

Vicomte13  posted on  2020-06-12   18:36:34 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

#5. To: Deckard (#0)

No word on civil asset forfeiture. I guess it's not violent enough of an abuse to warrant attention.

But it's certainly a big move in the right direction.

Pinguinite  posted on  2020-06-12   23:39:36 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com