[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Francis Demonic Plan To Destroy The Church Revealed

‘Capitol Punishment’ Is the January 6 Film You Must See

Why more young black Americans are calling themselves ‘conservative’

Other Senate Democrats face risks in voting for Build Back Better

Joe Biden's Dirty Little Secret: He Wants Higher Gasoline Prices

Merry Christmas!

Your Default Assumption Should Be That Everything Corporate Media Says Is A Lie

Unjabbed Austrians Now Face PRISON If They Do Not Comply

Supreme Court Justice Barrett Tips Hat to Bodily Autonomy in Vaccine Mandate Debate

THE STAGE IS SET FOR ALL SMALL AND GREAT, RICH AND POOR

Here’s A Picture Of The Loudoun Rapist The Superintendent Claimed Was Not ‘Gender-Fluid’

Ursula von der Leyen says time Europe eyed mandatory vaccination

AIDS Drugs Tested On Foster Kids

Have you seen the document dump on the Pfizer vaccine data? It's a bombshell. No wonder the FDA fought to keep it hidden for 55 years.

World Economic Forum Sees Synthetic Biology as Force to Reset Living Systems

Morning Greatness: Biden Greeted in Minnesota with ‘FJB’ and ‘You Suck’ Signs

Jussie Smollett should face justice for hurting race relations in America — and undercutting the real victims

IT was CusTer’s cavalry ... who blocked Lee’s forces aT AppomaTTox --- forced The whiTe flag of surrender.

Jamie Dimon’s quick kowtow after telling truth on communist China

Progressives forget that parents are in charge of kids’ education

NH Public Health Policy Has Officially Killed More “Kids” than COVID

CLIF HIGH AND DAVID NINO RODRIGUEZ - 11-26-21

Smartphones and Social Media - A Mass Surveillance Dystopia

In The Pacific NorThwest ... members of survivalisT movemenTs --- are growing in number ( 2016)

Biden-Harris dream team suddenly Dems' worst nightmare after just 10 months

Democrats' deepest fears

If GOP wins in 2022, they must investigate Biden family corruption

BOOM: Trump Gets Even MORE Good News From 5 Key Battleground States

The Corrupt Media Did Not Fall For The Russia Collusion Hoax. They Were Part Of It

Attempts barred to Access Info about Brandon's daughter!

How Facebook and Google Actually Fund the Creation of Misinformation

Build Back Better’s tax hikes will squeeze Americans long into the future — yet still won’t cover its spending

Whistleblower Videos Capture Pennsylvania Election Officials Destroying Evidence

Feehery: The next Republican wave is coming

FULL RELEASE: Ashley Biden Diary Reveals Child Sex Trauma, Drug Abuse, Resentment For Joe – Whistleblower

Proof that AG Garland misled Congress about silencing parents who dissent

Trump ... ‘ The USA is ' --- ' a Radicalized Mess’

IT’S NOT JUST WHITE PEOPLE: DEMOCRATS ARE LOSING NORMAL VOTERS OF ALL RACES

Pinkerton: Joe Biden and John Kerry’s Green Great Reset Punishes America, Rewards China

Are You Better Off Today Than You Were 10 Months Ago? (Does a bear sh-t in the woods?_

Byron York's Daily Memo: The Biden White House dumpster fire

Washington Post edits and adds editor's notes to at least a dozen Steele dossier stories

Media ... sacrifices RiTTenhouse --- aT alTar of iTs lies

Byron York's Daily Memo: When Adam Schiff loved the dossier

SANHEDRIN BEGINS TO PREPARE OIL TO ANOINT KING MESSIAH/KOHEN GADOL

What Did Obama Know and When Did He Know It?

The Russian ATTack On Ukraine ... Has Already Begun --- Biden Will Do NoThing To STop IT

“The only Thing ThaT sTands beTween The new way of life ... The currenT way of life is - frankly --- hesiTancy To vaccinaTions,” he said.

Joe Biden is all-in for open borders

NJ Senate President Stephen Sweeney concedes election loss to GOP trucker Edward Durr


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

United States News
See other United States News Articles

Title: Ahmaud Arbery – Did a Georgia DA sabotage any future prosecutions in the case?
Source: Fox News
URL Source: https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/ahm ... e-prosecutions-philip-holloway
Published: May 11, 2020
Author: Philip Holloway
Post Date: 2020-05-11 12:09:20 by misterwhite
Keywords: None
Views: 1034
Comments: 10

When I first saw the horrifying video of the shooting death of Ahmaud Arbery, I was sickened to my core. I’ve worked in the criminal justice system since 1989, as a law enforcement officer, prosecutor and defense attorney. I have worked more murders than I care to remember, and I’ve seen all sorts of graphic evidence, yet this video shook me.

I’m not alone. The emotional response to this video caused such an uproar it got the attention of Georgia Gov. Brian Kemp, who immediately offered the assistance of the Georgia Bureau of Investigation (GBI). They, in turn, arrested Travis and Greg McMichael for murder within 48 hours of taking over the investigation.

At face value, this feels like a clear case of murder with an eventual conviction a foregone conclusion. But I’m not sure a conviction is certain. Why? Because of the early involvement of a Georgia district attorney who later dropped an investigative land mine into the case that creates a blueprint for a potential acquittal and will certainly make the prosecution’s job much harder than it needs to be.

According to a May 10 press release from the state Attorney General's Office, in the immediate aftermath of the shooting, DA George Barnhill of the nearby Waycross Judicial Circuit injected himself into the case – where he had, at that time, no jurisdiction – and was instructing local police that he saw no reason to charge anyone. This, of course, before any meaningful investigation into all the facts had occurred.

When the Brunswick district attorney had to recuse herself because Greg McMichael had worked for her as a criminal investigator, Barnhill was brought in to oversee the case.

Barnhill nearly immediately concluded, largely on the basis of video evidence, that there was no probable cause to charge anyone with any crimes. He quickly concluded the shooter was acting in clear self-defense. But he didn’t stop there.

Even though Barnhill himself was eventually recused from the case because he is the father of an assistant DA in Brunswick – upon his departure he dropped a poison pill into the case file that could derail the entire prosecution.

In early April 2020, Barnhill sent a letter to Glynn County Police setting out a detailed analysis of the facts of the case and explained why, under Georgia law, there should be no arrests.

Barnhill’s letter, which seems like a reasoned analysis, concludes these two men acting lawfully wound up defending themselves from a fleeing felon who attacked them.

This is a defense lawyer’s dream. A letter – complete with the official DA’s letterhead – concluding the defendants should never have been arrested. It’s a blueprint for a trial defense that could easily lead to an acquittal.

And there are other problems. Most importantly, the letter is based on erroneous factual assertions and flawed legal conclusions.

First, Barnhill says the McMichaels were lawfully making a citizens’ arrest as authorized by Georgia law. He says they had “solid first hand probable cause” and were in “hot pursuit” of a “burglary suspect.” That simply is not true.

The first shot is clearly heard being fired while Arbery is in front of the truck. There was, in fact, a life or death fight for control of that shotgun – Arbery was trying to disarm his attacker.

Although video has now emerged that shows Arbery entering a nearby house under construction, there is no apparent evidence that he was committing a burglary. At most, this video shows a trespass. Burglary requires an intention to commit a theft or a felony. The video does not show that. Arbery is not seen leaving that construction site with any stolen property.

There’s no way to know for sure why he was at that location, but the fact remains there is no way the McMichaels could have concluded he was a burglar from the mere fact that he had visited, for whatever reason, this house under construction.

Second, Barnhill concludes Arbery “attacks Travis McMichael" and tried to take McMichael’s shotgun away from him and that McMichael was, therefore “allowed to use deadly force to protect himself.” I disagree.

Under Georgia law, a person can’t claim self-defense if they start the fight. Barnhill says he sees on the video that Arbery attacked McMichael after making an abrupt left turn toward where the shotgun-wielding McMichael was standing. This initial altercation occurred in front of the parked pickup truck and out of the view of the camera. There is no way Barnhill could see that from the video.

The first shot is clearly heard being fired while Arbery is in front of the truck. There was, in fact, a life or death fight for control of that shotgun – Arbery was trying to disarm his attacker. I would have done the same thing. Sadly, Arbery lost the fight and lost his life after more close-range blasts from the shotgun.

Barnhill’s letter simply glosses over the fact that the fight for the shotgun took place AFTER McMichael had already shot Arbery.

To be fair, we don’t know exactly what happened in that one second in front of that truck. But absent any other evidence, there is just no time for anything much other to have occurred than for McMichael to have pulled the trigger.

Nevertheless, this letter is a HUGE problem for the GBI and the new prosecutor. It is out in public and fueling the public discussion. And if experienced prosecutors and the head of the GBI – an experienced criminal lawyer (defense and prosecutor) and former judge – can't agree on probable cause for an arrest, I doubt a jury will be able to agree that anyone is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.

Did Barnhill knowingly inject a poison pill into the investigation? If so, why? Was he trying to sabotage any future prosecution?

These are legitimate questions that Barnhill will be called on to answer. Georgia's attorney general has now asked the U.S. Department of Justice to investigate this investigation – including Barnhill's early involvement and his letter.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: All (#0)

Here we go again. White shooter. Black victim. Enraged black community. Facts be damned.

This is a very interesting article, covering things I hadn't heard about. But don't waste your time on it if you've already made up your mind.

misterwhite  posted on  2020-05-11   12:13:31 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: All (#0)

Although video has now emerged that shows Arbery entering a nearby house under construction, there is no apparent evidence that he was committing a burglary ... Burglary requires an intention to commit a theft or a felony.

Oh, please. Why else would Arbery enter a nearby house under construction? The intent to commit a theft or a felony is inherent in his actions.

misterwhite  posted on  2020-05-11   12:17:52 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: All (#0)

Barnhill says he sees on the video that Arbery attacked McMichael after making an abrupt left turn toward where the shotgun-wielding McMichael was standing.

What else to conclude? Why turn towards McMichael? To me, rushing an armed individual qualifies as an attack.

misterwhite  posted on  2020-05-11   12:22:20 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: All (#0)

Arbery was trying to disarm his attacker. I would have done the same thing.

Then you're as stupid as Arbery. How about putting your hands in the air and talking it over?

McMichaels had plenty of opprtunities to gun down Arbery if his intent was to execute him.

misterwhite  posted on  2020-05-11   12:28:28 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: All (#0)

Barnhill’s letter simply glosses over the fact that the fight for the shotgun took place AFTER McMichael had already shot Arbery.

Say what? The author just finished telling us that "There was, in fact, a life or death fight for control of that shotgun" in front of the truck.

The shotgun fired during the struggle. How does he know Arbery was hit?

misterwhite  posted on  2020-05-11   12:33:46 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: All (#0)

From another article:

"This family are not strangers to the local criminal justice system. From best we can tell, Ahmauds older brother has gone to prison in the past and is currently in the Glynn jail, without bond, awaiting new felony prosecution. It also appears a cousin has been prosecuted by DA Johnson's office. Ahmaud, the deceased, had a juvenile and adult felony record."

So, no, Ahmaud was not out "jogging". He was recorded walking down the street, stopping, then entering the home under construction. He left then started running (not jogging) down the street.

misterwhite  posted on  2020-05-11   13:20:14 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: misterwhite (#6)

I can't decide without more evidence. With that said, citizens have the exact same rights as the police. If cops had attempted to stop him for questioning, they too would have had guns drawn. If he moves towards them, they would shoot him. This case will hinge on eyewitness testimony of the sort only eyeballs at windows can give. Aubrey was shot through the hand. If it were me I would have put hands up, or went up to the door of a house and knocked and asked them to call the police, Or ran right past these guys and hope they didn't get lucky if they shot at me. I am not running at a gun, that is stupid. You don't close the distance, you put distance between you and the gun.

THIS IS A TAG LINE...Exercising rights is only radical to two people, Tyrants and Slaves. Which are YOU? Our ignorance has driven us into slavery and we do not recognize it.

jeremiad  posted on  2020-05-13   1:24:58 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: jeremiad (#7)

Aubrey was a convicted felon and probably figured these guys saw him go into the house under construction. That's burglary, even if he didn't take anything.

He made up his mind that he wasn't going back to prison. Had he succeeded in wrestling away the shotgun, the outcome would have been completely different.

misterwhite  posted on  2020-05-13   10:56:04 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: All (#0)

Barnhill’s letter, which seems like a reasoned analysis, concludes these two men acting lawfully wound up defending themselves from a fleeing felon who attacked them.

Here's the letter:

https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/6884019-Waycross- DA-Letter-on-Arbery-Shooting-Jp.html

misterwhite  posted on  2020-05-14   10:59:54 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: misterwhite (#8)

My opinion is, you are correct.

THIS IS A TAG LINE...Exercising rights is only radical to two people, Tyrants and Slaves. Which are YOU? Our ignorance has driven us into slavery and we do not recognize it.

jeremiad  posted on  2020-05-15   15:19:50 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com