[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Freepers Still Love war Parody ... Jump / Trump --- van Halen jump "The Democrat Meltdown Continues" "Yes, We Need Deportations Without Due Process" "Trump's Tariff Play Smart, Strategic, Working" "Leftists Make Desperate Attempt to Discredit Photo of Abrego Garcia's MS-13 Tattoos. Here Are Receipts" "Trump Administration Freezes $2 Billion After Harvard Refuses to Meet Demands"on After Harvard Refuses to Meet Demands "Doctors Committing Insurance Fraud to Conceal Trans Procedures, Texas Children’s Whistleblower Testifies" "Left Using '8647' Symbol for Violence Against Trump, Musk" KawasakiÂ’s new rideable robohorse is straight out of a sci-fi novel "Trade should work for America, not rule it" "The Stakes Couldn’t Be Higher in Wisconsin’s Supreme Court Race – What’s at Risk for the GOP" "How Trump caught big-government fans in their own trap" ‘Are You Prepared for Violence?’ Greek Orthodox Archbishop gives President Trump a Cross, tells him "Make America Invincible" "Trump signs executive order eliminating the Department of Education!!!" "If AOC Is the Democratic Future, the Party Is Even Worse Off Than We Think" "Ending EPA Overreach" Closest Look Ever at How Pyramids Were Built Moment the SpaceX crew Meets Stranded ISS Crew The Exodus Pharaoh EXPLAINED! Did the Israelites Really Cross the Red Sea? Stunning Evidence of the Location of Red Sea Crossing! Are we experiencing a Triumph of Orthodoxy? Judge Napolitano with Konstantin Malofeev (Moscow, Russia) "Trump Administration Cancels Most USAID Programs, Folds Others into State Department" Introducing Manus: The General AI Agent "Chinese Spies in Our Military? Straight to Jail" Any suggestion that the USA and NATO are "Helping" or have ever helped Ukraine needs to be shot down instantly "Real problem with the Palestinians: Nobody wants them" ACDC & The Rolling Stones - Rock Me Baby Magnus Carlsen gives a London System lesson! "The Democrats Are Suffering Through a Drought of Generational Talent" 7 Tactics Of The Enemy To Weaken Your Faith Strange And Biblical Events Are Happening Every year ... BusiesT casino gambling day -- in Las Vegas Trump’s DOGE Plan Is Legally Untouchable—Elon Musk Holds the Scalpel Palestinians: What do you think of the Trump plan for Gaza? What Happens Inside Gaza’s Secret Tunnels? | Unpacked Hamas Torture Bodycam Footage: "These Monsters Filmed it All" | IDF Warfighter Doron Keidar, Ep. 225 EXPOSED: The Dark Truth About the Hostages in Gaza New Task Force Ready To Expose Dark Secrets Egypt Amasses Forces on Israel’s Southern Border | World War 3 About to Start? "Trump wants to dismantle the Education Department. Here’s how it would work" test "Federal Workers Concerned That Returning To Office Will Interfere With Them Not Working" "Yes, the Democrats Have a Governing Problem – They Blame America First, Then Govern Accordingly" "Trump and His New Frenemies, Abroad and at Home" "The Left’s Sin Is of Omission and Lost Opportunity" "How Trump’s team will break down the woke bureaucracy" Pete Hegseth will be confirmed in a few minutes Status: Not Logged In; Sign In U.S. Constitution See other U.S. Constitution Articles Title: An Open Request for Answers - Source: [None] URL Source: [None] Published: Apr 19, 2020 Author: Gatlin Post Date: 2020-04-19 16:35:45 by Gatlin Keywords: None Views: 2792 Comments: 26 Quote Will anyone, or everyone, please be so kind as to answer 4 questions. A “yes” or “no” is sufficeint. You may however add appropriae coments. Question #1: is the document at this link the exact wording of the US Constitution as ratified on June 21, 1788? Question #2: Is the following the exact wording of Article VI of the US Constitution as ratified on June 21, 1788? Article VI (Article 6 - Prior Debts, National Supremacy, Oaths of Office): 1: All Debts contracted and Engagements entered into, before the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be as valid against the United States under this Constitution, as under the Confederation. 2: This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding. 3: The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States. Question #3: Does Article VI Section 2 of the US Constitution as ratified on June 21, 1788 state that only: This Constitution […] shall be the supreme Law of the Land? Or, doesArticle VI Section 2 of the US Constitution as ratified on June 21, 1788 state: This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof […] shall be the supreme Law of the Land? Question #4: Can it be correctly stated that the “Constitution” is not sole Law of the Land, but that the Constitution and [emphasis on the word “and”] the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof […] shall be the supreme Law of the Land … Thank you. Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread   Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 17. #4. To: Gatlin (#0) Yes to questions 1,2, and 4. As to question 3, Article VI Section 2 of the US Constitution as ratified on June 21, 1788 state: This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof […] shall be the supreme Law of the Land. Why do you ask? misterwhite  posted on  2020-04-19   18:45:20 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply   #5. To: misterwhite, A K A Stone (#4) Why do you ask? I was in a discussion with Stone on this. He instead that only the Constitution is the Law of the Land. I factually documented a lengthy post showing him that indeed the Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof […] shall be the supreme Law of the Land. He blew his tope like I have never seen him do before and he immediately deleted the posts and said I was only offering an opinion and then that I was stating an amendment. I tried to explain to him that I said exactly what the Article VI Section 2 had stated it verbatim. He would have no part of that. So I posted a new thread to show I was right and he immediately deleted that – still in a temper tantrum. So, I have again posted a thread saying the same thing as I did in the one he deleted. I know that he respects your opinions, so I wanted him to see what you had to say. I hope that he will now understand what I originally stated to him was correct information. Do I have this right, Stone? And do you now understand that the Constitution is not the “stand alone” Law of the Land. It is as the Constitution says: the Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof […] shall be the supreme Law of the Land. Thank you for your assistance, misterwhite. I was not putting you in the middle of this, I just needed a third party fo show Stone the facts. When I am wrong, I will quickly admit it and apologize if necessary. But when I am right, I will be persistent in showing where I am right. I have done that. It is now up to Stone if he wishes to remain in denial. Gatlin  posted on  2020-04-19   19:09:37 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply   #6. To: Gatlin (#5) I was in a discussion with Stone on this. He instead that only the Constitution is the Law of the Land. I factually documented a lengthy post showing him that indeed the Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof […] shall be the supreme Law of the Land. Liar. I never said only the constitution is the law of the land. I said if a law contradicted the constitution it isn't truly a law or constitutional. For example for umpteenth time. Congress shall make no law..... If a law contradicts that than it isn't constitutional. Since any law congress would make would be unconstitutional on its face because they are explicitly forbidden to make laws having to do with peaceful assembly and the other rights recognized in the first amendment. But you are a pinhead or a serial liar and wont admit the truth when it smacks your ugly mug. A K A Stone  posted on  2020-04-19   19:32:41 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply   #11. To: A K A Stone (#6) But you are a pinhead or a serial liar and wont admit the truth when it smacks your ugly mug. You are the FASCIST PIG that deletes my posts when I show you the truth and you delete my posts to cover up your ignoarance and mistakes. As a self-annoyed expert on the Constitution – why is it you have no snese of justice. Oh, you would say that you do – But it must be by the rule of stone’s justice. What am I talking about? Your Mission Statement says: “… one feels needs to be discussed is welcome at Liberty's Flame. This site was built upon the idea of free speech so everyone is welcome to come and discuss and debate the issues on hand. You are the perhaps the biggest LIAR I have ever cme in contact with. You do not believe in the “idea of free speech” – You delete posts that show your ignorance and mistakes. And that is why I call you a FASCIST PIG. Gatlin  posted on  2020-04-20   3:53:04 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply   #17. To: Gatlin (#11) Your Mission Statement says: “… one feels needs to be discussed is welcome at Liberty's Flame. This site was built upon the idea of free speech so everyone is welcome to come and discuss and debate the issues on hand. You're an asshole. You don't get to come here and lie and think I will keep your garbage posts up. Go climb a tall ladder today and clean your gutters. A K A Stone  posted on  2020-04-20   7:43:34 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply   Replies to Comment # 17. #24. To: A K A Stone (#17) Your Mission Statement says: “… one feels needs to be discussed is welcome at Liberty's Flame. This site was built upon the idea of free speech so everyone is welcome to come and discuss and debate the issues on hand. That is YOUR mission statement – Right? Then why don’t you follow it? You're an asshole. Nah, you are the asshole for lying about your mission statement. And I have repeatedly shown where you did. You don't get to come here and lie and think I will keep your garbage posts up. Ah. You are making the old whimpering threat again. Translation: “If you don’t stop showing up my ignorance, I am not only going to delete your post, I am going to ban you to cover up my mistakes. “ Go climb a tall ladder today and clean your gutters. My penthouse has no gutters. Arizona is a “dry” state. Gatlin  posted on  2020-04-20 11:56:27 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply   End Trace Mode for Comment # 17. Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register]  Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com