[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Freepers Still Love war

Parody ... Jump / Trump --- van Halen jump

"The Democrat Meltdown Continues"

"Yes, We Need Deportations Without Due Process"

"Trump's Tariff Play Smart, Strategic, Working"

"Leftists Make Desperate Attempt to Discredit Photo of Abrego Garcia's MS-13 Tattoos. Here Are Receipts"

"Trump Administration Freezes $2 Billion After Harvard Refuses to Meet Demands"on After Harvard Refuses to Meet Demands

"Doctors Committing Insurance Fraud to Conceal Trans Procedures, Texas Children’s Whistleblower Testifies"

"Left Using '8647' Symbol for Violence Against Trump, Musk"

KawasakiÂ’s new rideable robohorse is straight out of a sci-fi novel

"Trade should work for America, not rule it"

"The Stakes Couldn’t Be Higher in Wisconsin’s Supreme Court Race – What’s at Risk for the GOP"

"How Trump caught big-government fans in their own trap"

‘Are You Prepared for Violence?’

Greek Orthodox Archbishop gives President Trump a Cross, tells him "Make America Invincible"

"Trump signs executive order eliminating the Department of Education!!!"

"If AOC Is the Democratic Future, the Party Is Even Worse Off Than We Think"

"Ending EPA Overreach"

Closest Look Ever at How Pyramids Were Built

Moment the SpaceX crew Meets Stranded ISS Crew

The Exodus Pharaoh EXPLAINED!

Did the Israelites Really Cross the Red Sea? Stunning Evidence of the Location of Red Sea Crossing!

Are we experiencing a Triumph of Orthodoxy?

Judge Napolitano with Konstantin Malofeev (Moscow, Russia)

"Trump Administration Cancels Most USAID Programs, Folds Others into State Department"

Introducing Manus: The General AI Agent

"Chinese Spies in Our Military? Straight to Jail"

Any suggestion that the USA and NATO are "Helping" or have ever helped Ukraine needs to be shot down instantly

"Real problem with the Palestinians: Nobody wants them"

ACDC & The Rolling Stones - Rock Me Baby

Magnus Carlsen gives a London System lesson!

"The Democrats Are Suffering Through a Drought of Generational Talent"

7 Tactics Of The Enemy To Weaken Your Faith

Strange And Biblical Events Are Happening

Every year ... BusiesT casino gambling day -- in Las Vegas

Trump’s DOGE Plan Is Legally Untouchable—Elon Musk Holds the Scalpel

Palestinians: What do you think of the Trump plan for Gaza?

What Happens Inside Gaza’s Secret Tunnels? | Unpacked

Hamas Torture Bodycam Footage: "These Monsters Filmed it All" | IDF Warfighter Doron Keidar, Ep. 225

EXPOSED: The Dark Truth About the Hostages in Gaza

New Task Force Ready To Expose Dark Secrets

Egypt Amasses Forces on Israel’s Southern Border | World War 3 About to Start?

"Trump wants to dismantle the Education Department. Here’s how it would work"

test

"Federal Workers Concerned That Returning To Office Will Interfere With Them Not Working"

"Yes, the Democrats Have a Governing Problem – They Blame America First, Then Govern Accordingly"

"Trump and His New Frenemies, Abroad and at Home"

"The Left’s Sin Is of Omission and Lost Opportunity"

"How Trump’s team will break down the woke bureaucracy"

Pete Hegseth will be confirmed in a few minutes


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

U.S. Constitution
See other U.S. Constitution Articles

Title: An Open Request for Answers -
Source: [None]
URL Source: [None]
Published: Apr 19, 2020
Author: Gatlin
Post Date: 2020-04-19 16:35:45 by Gatlin
Keywords: None
Views: 2783
Comments: 26

Quote

Will anyone, or everyone, please be so kind as to answer 4 questions.
A “yes” or “no” is sufficeint. You may however add appropriae coments.

Question #1:

is the document at this link the exact wording of the US Constitution as ratified on June 21, 1788?
Question #2:
Is the following the exact wording of Article VI of the US Constitution as ratified on June 21, 1788?
Article VI (Article 6 - Prior Debts, National Supremacy, Oaths of Office):

1: All Debts contracted and Engagements entered into, before the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be as valid against the United States under this Constitution, as under the Confederation.

2: This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.

3: The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States.

Question #3:
Does Article VI Section 2 of the US Constitution as ratified on June 21, 1788 state that only: This Constitution […] shall be the supreme Law of the Land?

Or, doesArticle VI Section 2 of the US Constitution as ratified on June 21, 1788 state: This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof […] shall be the supreme Law of the Land?

Question #4:
Can it be correctly stated that the “Constitution” is not sole Law of the Land, but that the Constitution and [emphasis on the word “and”] the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof […] shall be the supreme Law of the Land …
Thank you.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 15.

#4. To: Gatlin (#0)

Yes to questions 1,2, and 4.

As to question 3, Article VI Section 2 of the US Constitution as ratified on June 21, 1788 state: This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof […] shall be the supreme Law of the Land.

Why do you ask?

misterwhite  posted on  2020-04-19   18:45:20 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: misterwhite, A K A Stone (#4)

Why do you ask?

I was in a discussion with Stone on this. He instead that only the Constitution is the Law of the Land. I factually documented a lengthy post showing him that indeed the Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof […] shall be the supreme Law of the Land.

He blew his tope like I have never seen him do before and he immediately deleted the posts and said I was only offering an opinion and then that I was stating an amendment. I tried to explain to him that I said exactly what the Article VI Section 2 had stated it verbatim. He would have no part of that. So I posted a new thread to show I was right and he immediately deleted that – still in a temper tantrum.

So, I have again posted a thread saying the same thing as I did in the one he deleted. I know that he respects your opinions, so I wanted him to see what you had to say. I hope that he will now understand what I originally stated to him was correct information.

Do I have this right, Stone? And do you now understand that the Constitution is not the “stand alone” Law of the Land. It is as the Constitution says: the Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof […] shall be the supreme Law of the Land.

Thank you for your assistance, misterwhite. I was not putting you in the middle of this, I just needed a third party fo show Stone the facts.

When I am wrong, I will quickly admit it and apologize if necessary. But when I am right, I will be persistent in showing where I am right. I have done that. It is now up to Stone if he wishes to remain in denial.

Gatlin  posted on  2020-04-19   19:09:37 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: Gatlin (#5)

Do I have this right, Stone? And do you now understand that the Constitution is not the “stand alone” Law of the Land. It is as the Constitution says: the Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof […] shall be the supreme Law of the Land.

No dipshit you don't have it right. You rarely do.

Show me one place I've ever said in my entire life that the constitution is the stand alone law. I've never even had that thought or an inkling of that thought in my life. And you even put it in quotes you deceptive prick.

You conveniently ignore the word Persuance. Why is that? Are you to much of a dunce to understand what that means?

That is why i am belittling you by the way. Because you don't acknowledge the words of the constituion and only offer articles you google up that don't address anything I've asked for days or weeks.

A K A Stone  posted on  2020-04-19   19:37:55 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#12. To: A K A Stone (#7)

You conveniently ignore the word Persuance. Why is that?

Assuming that to be true, then why did you not ask me that question at the time you read my post instead of throwing one of your notorious hissy fits and deleting my post?

Why do you have so much trouble all the time acting rationally?

Gatlin  posted on  2020-04-20   6:05:55 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#15. To: Gatlin (#12)

You conveniently ignore the word Persuance. Why is that? Assuming that to be true, then why did you not ask me that question at the time you read my post instead of throwing one of your notorious hissy fits and deleting my post?

Why do you have so much trouble all the time acting rationally?

Look weirdo. When I said laws that are contrary to the constitution that means the same things as laws made in pursuance. You really are a fucking twat retard liar.

A K A Stone  posted on  2020-04-20   7:40:11 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 15.

#21. To: A K A Stone (#15)

Look weirdo. When I said laws that are contrary to the constitution that means the same things as laws made in pursuance. You really are a fucking twat retard liar

It means the same thing, only in your mind – ONLY IN YOU MIND – and you mind is really fucked up and whacked out of shape.

Using your psychotic rational, I can say that leaving out the word “pursuant” – assuming that I did, and youhave been unable to prove I did – then I can use your warped logic and say leaving the word out “meant the same thing.”

Really Stone, you have a weird way of expressing yourself. It is a manner that only you understand and no one else does. Work on that …

You also need to do something about your poor reading comprehension. Do you have someone there that can help you with this? You desperately need immediate help.

You also have trouble expressing yourself as we are seeing now. It gets even worse when you go into your hissy fits. Try calming down before you hit the keyboard. Please ….

Gatlin  posted on  2020-04-20 11:25:40 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 15.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com