United States News
See other United States News Articles
Title: At least 16 dead as dozens of tornadoes rip through the South
Source:
From The Trenches/Yahoo News
URL Source: https://fromthetrenchesworldreport. ... s-rip-through-the-south/265971
Published: Apr 13, 2020
Author: Yahoo
Post Date: 2020-04-13 12:40:36 by Deckard
Keywords: None
Views: 1531
Comments: 13
At least 16 people were killed after tornadoes began ripping through the South on Easter, destroying homes and storefronts and leaving over 1 million people without power from an intense storm system now headed towards the Mid-Atlantic.
Tornadoes and severe weather hit Central Texas early Sunday, bringing “gigantic” hail and damage, and then travelled east through Louisiana, Arkansas, Mississippi, Tennessee, Alabama, Georgia, and the Carolinas.
In Mississippi, the state’s emergency management agency said 11 people died in at least three different counties near the Louisiana border — Walthall, Lawrence and Jefferson Davis — from the weather.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: Liberator, A K A Stone, watchman, Gatlin (#0)
Just wondering - will these deaths be attributed to coronavirus?
Government is in the last resort the employment of armed men, of policemen, gendarmes, soldiers, prison guards, and hangmen.
The essential feature of government is the enforcement of its decrees by beating, killing, and imprisoning.
Those who are asking for more government interference are asking ultimately for more compulsion and less freedom.
#2. To: Deckard (#0)
Weaponized Weather Mod punishment by the PTB?
They seem to especially LOVE punishing conservative states' citizenry.
#3. To: Deckard (#1)
Just wondering - will these deaths be attributed to coronavirus?
Some inevitably will be; All they need are press conferences featuring crisis-actor doctors and coroners...and scripts. Same ol' FF MO we've witnessed since 911.
#4. To: Deckard (#1)
For nation shall rise against nation, and kingdom against kingdom: and there shall be famines, and pestilences, and earthquakes, in divers places.
#5. To: Liberator (#2)
Weaponized Weather Mod punishment by the PTB?
#6. To: A K A Stone (#5)
Get yourself pair of glasses. Oh wait. You're more blind than Ray Charles AND Stevie Wonder.
Nevermind. Go back to sleep, Magoo. And get back on that Gerbil-Wheel. Fat, stupid and blind is no way to continue through life, son.
#7. To: A K A Stone (#4)
For nation shall rise against nation, and kingdom against kingdom: and there shall be famines, and pestilences, and earthquakes, in divers places.
And....??
#8. To: Liberator (#6)
#9. To: Liberator (#7)
To: A K A Stone For nation shall rise against nation, and kingdom against kingdom: and there shall be famines, and pestilences, and earthquakes, in divers places. And....??
I was talking to Deckard.
#10. To: A K A Stone (#9)
I was talking to Deckard.
You addressed Deckard. But since this is a forum, we're all privy to comment, criticize and/or concur.
What does your citation mean?
#11. To: A K A Stone (#8)
Yeah, REALLY.
You have NO idea what you're talking about if you're ignorant on the subject of Weather Modification and how it's been used as a Weapon. It is a fact.
Try looking up HAARP for starters.
#12. To: Liberator (#10)
You addressed Deckard. But since this is a forum, we're all privy to comment, criticize and/or concur.What does your citation mean?
I'm seeing earthquakes, Locust plagues, Pestilence, and other signs of the times.
#13. To: A K A Stone (#12) (Edited)
I'm seeing earthquakes, Locust plagues, Pestilence, and other signs of the times.
Fair enough, but some disbelievers in Bible prophecy OR the truth as *you* see it might well disagree.
Why?
They may attribute your above observations as either coincidences, typical natural occurrences, or even delusion and wishful thinking. The bogus "Science" field of Psychology has come up with clinical term, weaponized to dismiss observable truths. It is called "Confirmation Bias." It is on this basis that many "CTs" are dismissed.
Shouldn't "Confirmation Bias" technically also be cited in any disagreement? (Just sayin')
Just because *others* can't see it through your eyes or perception doesn't mean your own observations aren't true or valid, does it?
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]