[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

[FULL VIDEO] Police release bodycam footage of Monroe County District Attorney Sandra Doorley traffi Police clash with pro-Palestine protesters on Ohio State University campus Joe Rogan Experience #2138 - Tucker Carlson Police Dispersing Student Protesters at USC - Breaking News Coverage (College Protests) What Passover Means For The New Testament Believer Are We Closer Than Ever To The Next Pandemic? War in Ukraine Turns on Russia what happened during total solar eclipse Israel Attacks Iran, Report Says - LIVE Breaking News Coverage Earth is Scorched with Heat Antiwar Activists Chant ‘Death to America’ at Event Featuring Chicago Alderman Vibe Shift A stream that makes the pleasant Rain sound. Older Men - Keep One Foot In The Dark Ages When You Really Want to Meet the Diversity Requirements CERN to test world's most powerful particle accelerator during April's solar eclipse Utopian Visionaries Who Won’t Leave People Alone No - no - no Ain'T going To get away with iT Pete Buttplug's Butt Plugger Trying to Turn Kids into Faggots Mark Levin: I'm sick and tired of these attacks Questioning the Big Bang James Webb Data Contradicts the Big Bang Pssst! Don't tell the creationists, but scientists don't have a clue how life began A fine romance: how humans and chimps just couldn't let go Early humans had sex with chimps O’Keefe dons bulletproof vest to extract undercover journalist from NGO camp. Biblical Contradictions (Alleged) Catholic Church Praising Lucifer Raising the Knife One Of The HARDEST Videos I Had To Make.. Houthi rebels' attack severely damages a Belize-flagged ship in key strait leading to the Red Sea (British Ship) Chinese Illegal Alien. I'm here for the moneuy Red Tides Plague Gulf Beaches Tucker Carlson calls out Nikki Haley, Ben Shapiro, and every other person calling for war: {Are there 7 Deadly Sins?} I’ve heard people refer to the “7 Deadly Sins,” but I haven’t been able to find that sort of list in Scripture. Abomination of Desolation | THEORY, BIBLE STUDY Bible Help Libertysflame Database Updated Crush EVERYONE with the Alien Gambit! Vladimir Putin tells Tucker Carlson US should stop arming Ukraine to end war Putin hints Moscow and Washington in back-channel talks in revealing Tucker Carlson interview Trump accuses Fulton County DA Fani Willis of lying in court response to Roman's motion Mandatory anti-white racism at Disney. Iceland Volcano Erupts For Third Time In 2 Months, State Of Emergency Declared Tucker Carlson Interview with Vladamir Putin How will Ar Mageddon / WW III End? What on EARTH is going on in Acts 16:11? New Discovery! 2023 Hottest in over 120 Million Years 2024 and beyond in prophecy Questions Status: Not Logged In; Sign In Religion See other Religion Articles Title: NC church service linked to coronavirus cluster Source: WITN URL Source: https://www.witn.com/content/news/N ... navirus-cluster-569311991.html Published: Apr 2, 2020 Author: Staff Post Date: 2020-04-05 08:10:37 by Gatlin Keywords: None Views: 1647 Comments: 27 NC church service linked to coronavirus cluster North Carolina public health officials said Monday that "multiple cases" of coronavirus have been linked to a church event a week ago at a Durham hotel. North Carolina public health officials say "multiple" cases of COVID-19 have been traced back to a church event held at a Durham hotel after social distancing orders were in place. (Image: NBC News Channel/WRAL) The March 22 event at Millennium Hotel Durham was hosted by Faith Assembly Christian Center. At the time, Governor Roy Cooper had banned all gatherings of 100 or more people in North Carolina. That has since been replaced by stay-at-home orders in Durham and statewide that prohibit all gatherings of 10 or more people to limit the spread of the virus. Faith Assembly officials couldn't be reached Monday or Tuesday for comment. They didn't respond to questions posed on social media, and the church's phone wasn’t taking any messages. Durham County health officials declined to provide details on how many people might have attended the event, how many were tested and how many positive tests came back. Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread   Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 26. #1. To: Gatlin (#0) "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress ... A K A Stone  posted on  2020-04-05   8:23:19 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply   #4. To: A K A Stone (#1) "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress ... Yes Sir, that is duly noted as being correct = You got that right. But as an intelligent and logical person, you should take in mind the complex role of the Supreme Court in our system of government. When the Supreme Court rules on a constitutional issue, that judgment is virtually final; its decisions can be altered only by the rarely used procedure of constitutional amendment or by a new ruling of the Court. However, when the Court interprets a statute, new legislative action can be taken. So, when the government issues an order that has not been heretofore deemed unconstitutional, that that order is legal until such time SCOTUS may declared it unconstitutional. Has SCOTUS declared any of these closure laws unconstitutional? Let me know if you find they have … Respectfully … Gatlin  posted on  2020-04-05   9:27:04 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply   #6. To: Gatlin (#4) So, when the government issues an order that has not been heretofore deemed unconstitutional, that that order is legal until such time SCOTUS may declared it unconstitutional. NO. The order was alwasy illegal they just got around to documenting it. So they could pass a law that said kill everyone in nursing homes. Then according to you it wold be legal until the Supreme court said no. Stupid. A K A Stone  posted on  2020-04-05   9:55:37 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply   #9. To: A K A Stone (#6) (Edited) So, when the government issues an order that has not been heretofore deemed unconstitutional, that that order is legal until such time SCOTUS may declared it unconstitutional. NO. The order was alwasy illegal they just got around to documenting it. “Sez” who – You? Your personal opinion – bluntly speaking – really doesn’t mean shit to me. And that is what you are stating, only your personal opinion. Cite case law to back up your biased personal opinion and I will gladly and humbly agree with you. Can you? So they could pass a law that said kill everyone in nursing homes. Then according to you it wold be legal until the Supreme court said no. Stupid. Oh dear God, man – Have you gone completely bonkers with expressing that premise? Oh – “Never mind” … Respectfully … Gatlin  posted on  2020-04-05   11:51:30 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply   #10. To: Gatlin (#9) Dumb ass. The right to peacefully assemble is iron clad constitutional law. If you are afraid stay in your cave. A K A Stone  posted on  2020-04-05   11:54:58 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply   #11. To: A K A Stone (#10) The right to peacefully assemble is iron clad constitutional law. That is correct. I believe we have already agreed on this. The question you ever so blindly continue to overlook is: Who gets to decide if the “law” is “constitutional” and that it must be obeyed. Ahem – I will go ahead and answer that question for you. It is SCOTUS. … you are afraid stay in your cave. I am not afraid to come out and kick your ass each time you make these irrational statements. You really need to do some learning. In doing so, you will find that learning is a simple process of acquiring new, or modifying existing, knowledge, behaviors, skills, values, or preferences. Try it – you may just like it … Respectfully … Gatlin  posted on  2020-04-05   12:17:40 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply   #12. To: Gatlin (#11) The question you ever so blindly continue to overlook is: Who gets to decide if the “law” is “constitutional” and that it must be obeyed. Ahem – I will go ahead and answer that question for you. It is SCOTUS. Your answer isn't found in the constitution. So it is just an opinion. Read it and think for yourself instead of having someone who is probably lying telling you. Since you are weak and senile. Let me give you a few words so you can learn what they mean. That way if the Supreme court makes a decision you can see if they are lying or issuing a correct decision based on the words passed into law. No- adverb 1. not at all; to no extent. "they were no more able to perform the task than I was" Assemble - verb 1. (of people) gather together in one place for a common purpose. A K A Stone  posted on  2020-04-05   12:27:08 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply   #26. To: A K A Stone (#12) Your answer isn't found in the constitution. So it is just an opinion. Ahem: The Constitution was ratified in 1787, long, long before the advent of the airplane. It provides, specifically, for a navy and an army in Article 1, Section 8. Though they were aware of lighter-than-air flying craft, the Framers could not have reasonably provided for an Air Force. It should be noted at the outset that the Constitution does not provide, specifically, for the other uniformed services, the Marines and Coast Guard. The Marines, however, as an arm of the Navy, could be excepted; and the Constitution does provide for "naval forces," and the Coast Guard could thus be excepted. How, then, do we except the Air Force? The first way is via common sense — the Framers certainly did not intend to preclude the use of new technology in the U.S. military, and because of the varied roles of the Air Force, it makes sense for it to be a separate branch. The second (and less desirable) way is historical — the Air Force originated as the Army Air Corps, an arm of the Army, similar to the Navy/Marine relationship. Basically, unless your interpretation of the Constitution freezes it in 1789, the Air Force is a perfectly constitutional branch of the U.S. military. Thanks to James Severin for the idea. Is the US Air Force unconstitutional since it DEFINITELY is not mentioned in the consgtitution? According to the way you look at things, what are we to just see those as? Unconstitutional – Huh? You presume a lot of things about the Constitution. Some are true, some are not. I am going to list some things and you tell me if they are in the constitution or not: Congressional Districts The Electoral College Executive Order Executive Privilege Freedom of Expression (Absolute) Freedom of Speech and Press God Immigration Impeachment means removal from office Innocent until proven guilty It's a free country Judicial Review Jury of Peers "Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness" Marriage Martial Law No taxation without representation Number of Justices in the Supreme Court "Of the people, by the people, for the people" Paper Money Political Parties Primary Elections Qualifications for Judges The right to privacy The right to travel The right to vote The separation of church and state The Separation of Powers Clause Slavery So, if none of these are mentioned in the constitution – and they definitely are not – Then are they all unconstitutional? I will be most interested to learn of your answer. Respectfully … Gatlin  posted on  2020-04-05   14:08:37 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply   Replies to Comment # 26.         There are no replies to Comment # 26. End Trace Mode for Comment # 26. Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register]  Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com