[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
I AM A PROPHET and I prophesy Title: 2020 in Bible Prophecy Hi guys, IT's that time again, to make my annual prognostications. Taken from the last page of my new book, The Revelation, 2020 edition: 2020 (and beyond) in Bible Prophecy © 12/31/2019 Barry Midyet As always, I must add my standard qualifier here, These predictions are based on the Bible, and cannot fail to come true, But I may be ahead of God’s timetable by a year or two. 1. Last plagues one and five will start to level off and dissipate, But others – like global warming – may last a few decades yet. (See Revelation 16:1-9) 2. Ar Mageddon will rage for a couple more years or thereabout Until all the demon-possessed kings of the East are taken out. (See Revelation 16:12-21) 3. Every day you wake up in the U-S-A, Bullets will spray (at least) two times a day. (See Revelation 19:20) 4. After a thousand years of great schisms, and pandemonium, The Church will unite as one for a glorious millennium. (See John 17:20-23 and Revelation 20:1-3) 5. When the nations not wearing a wedding garment are booted from NATO, The remnant will rule the Earth with Jesus in a thousand-year crescendo. (See Matthew 22:1-14 and Revelation 20:4a) 6. Someone now alive will live to be a thousand with increase in knowledge, And men will reach the heavenly planet with no sea within two decades. (See Revelation 20:4b-6 and 21:1-2) Thy Kingdom come on the Earth as it is in Heaven, Amen Barry Midyet Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 13. These predictions are based on the Bible... I'm trying to understand your exegesis if Revelation 16... It would be most helpful to know, for example, who taught you Revelation? Or, what are the primary source materials/commentaries that led you to your conclusions about Rev.16?
#10. To: watchman (#6) 'm trying to understand your exegesis if Revelation 16... Thank you for your response and questions. But no one taught me my (historicist) view Revelation, and there are no source materials or commentaries with the exception of two 16th century sources when the historicist view was virtually the only view of the Revelation (before Whitefield invented the futurist view in the 1700's). One example of an early historicist view is the marginal notes on the Revelation found in some editions of the Geneva Bible, but unfortunately I dont know who wrote them (and I dont think anyone does, they were simply the accepted view at the time). For example the Geneva Bible says St. Constantine is the first horseman and the second Christian conqueror / horseman is Charlemagne (which I fully agree with). Another source is of course Nostradamus (who wrote his predictions at about the same time). That's why some posters on this site call me Nostradamus Junior. But that does not mean that I agree with either one of those historist views beyond that. I like to think my views are entirely my own. More (on Ch. 16 and what's happening today) later ...
#11. To: interpreter (#10) One example of an early historicist view is the marginal notes on the Revelation found in some editions of the Geneva Bible, but unfortunately I dont know who wrote them (and I dont think anyone does, they were simply the accepted view at the time). It is pretty well known who wrote the vast majority of the footnotes: John Calvin, John Knox, Miles Coverdale, and many other leaders of the Reformation. So a rabid Presbyterian group of writers produced those footnotes. The Geneva bible itself is essentially a slightly modernized version of the Tyndale bible along with the subversive footnotes. (Subversive to kings who are tyrants, that is.)
#13. To: Tooconservative (#11) It is pretty well known who wrote the vast majority of the footnotes: John Calvin, John Knox, Miles Coverdale, and many other leaders of the Reformation. So a rabid Presbyterian group of writers produced those footnotes. You are basically correct, but I wouldn't go so far as to ever call them rabid. And neither were all of them Presbyterians. The Geneva Bible is the Bible that was carried to America by the Pilgrims on the Mayflower, and I seriously doubt that they were all Presbyterians. My point is, at that time (1600 or whenever the Pilgrims arrived) pretty much all Christians on Earth held the historicist view -- even the Roman Catholics and the Anglicans or anyone you want to name, because Whitefield had not invented the ridiculous futurist view yet. There is absolutely no way that all of the events in the Revelation (after Ch. 4) can possibly occur in just 7 years like the futurists say. "The Geneva bible itself is essentially a slightly modernized version of the Tyndale bible along with the subversive footnotes. (Subversive to kings who are tyrants, that is.)" Well, it is well known that King James didn't like either one, and that of course is why he wrote his own Bible. That is very ironic because he is the 3rd horseman, who rode a black (racing) horse and conquered the Earth (or most of it) with economics (represented by the scales), and typically without firing a shot, all of which England / Great Britain is quite famous for. Any guesses as to who the fourth Christian nation / horseman to rule the Earth is?
Replies to Comment # 13. There are no replies to Comment # 13.
End Trace Mode for Comment # 13. Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest |
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
|