[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
|
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
International News Title: How Trump May Finally Kill the WTO GENEVA—In an ornate stone palace on the shores of Lake Geneva, just a stone’s throw from the Quai Wilson and the Palais des Nations, the Trump administration is waging its latest battle against the international order that the United States helped to build. At issue is the fate of a little-known part of a little-understood institution: the Appellate Body of the World Trade Organization. As soon as Wednesday, if U.S. President Donald Trump continues his administration’s yearslong campaign of obstruction, the WTO’s ability to resolve trade disputes between countries—pretty much its most important function—will likely be paralyzed. That means that the go-it-alone unilateralism that has characterized the Trump administration’s approach to trade could soon spread far and wide, essentially turning back the clock to a time when trade rivalries between nations were settled not with legal arguments but with tariff walls, trade barriers, and beggar-thy-neighbor protectionism. “When you listen to the rhetoric from the Trump administration, they argue that the United States is better off in a power-based, law of the jungle system,” said Jennifer Hillman, the senior fellow for trade at the Council on Foreign Relations. “I think the last three years have shown how wrong that is.” The specific battle between the United States and the other members of the WTO centers on the seven judges of the Appellate Body, who ultimately decide appeals on trade complaints between nations. At least three judges are needed to hear an appeal. But with the Trump administration systematically blocking the naming of any new judges since it took office, no new justices have replaced those whose terms expired. On Wednesday, barring an unlikely eleventh-hour breakthrough, two of the last three judges will leave, and the Appellate Body will be down to one. Soon after, the wheels of trade justice will grind to a halt, with essentially no way to ultimately resolve big trade disputes like the yearslong battle between Airbus and Boeing. “We’re getting to a point where we could soon prove a counterfactual,” said Keith Rockwell, the director of external relations at the World Trade Organization. “We have the WTO essentially because of economic nationalism, and the lessons of the Smoot-Hawley tariffs, and all those destructive policies.” What would happen if the WTO didn’t exist?
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 3. What would happen if the WTO didn’t exist? We'd negotiate trade agreements with each country individually. Which is what Trump is doing. If the WTO worked, there would be no need for us to impose tariffs on other countries.
#3. To: misterwhite (#1) If the WTO worked, there would be no need for us to impose tariffs on other countries. There is no need to impose tariffs. Tariffs are a blunt instrument that harms your own as much as it harms your opponent
Replies to Comment # 3. There is no need to impose tariffs. Tariffs are a blunt instrument that harms your own as much as it harms your opponent No you are wrong. It helps your domestic manufacturing. We should have tariffs on every good that makes them more expensive then buying American. We may pay a tiny bit more but it is more than made up in jobs and less welfare. America first second and third. Dominate.
#5. To: paraclete (#3) Tariffs are a blunt instrument that harms your own as much as it harms your opponent In theory. In practice, China is eating the tariffs to maintain their prices while our treasury grows by the tens of billions.
End Trace Mode for Comment # 3. Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest |
|
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
|