LEFT WING LOONS
See other LEFT WING LOONS Articles
Title: Stacey Abrams: ‘The Electoral College Is Racist and Classist’
Source:
Grabien
URL Source: https://news.grabien.com/story-stac ... gn=news&utm_content=story24806
Published: Nov 17, 2019
Author: Grabil;en Staff
Post Date: 2019-11-17 07:02:58 by IbJensen
Keywords: None
Views: 2509
Comments: 19
We have to remember the Electoral College was not designed because people were worried about Idaho not having enough votes’ Watch the fat-assed, functional illiterate negro's comments at the link. She is ignorant of the fact that this is a constitutional republic with each state having equal status insofar as a national election goes. In a republic, states or provinces have equal weight and their sovereignty will always be honored. Too many Democrats mimic the Chinese Maoist/Communist movements to attack tried and true laws and traditions limiting lawlessness, mob power, misuse of the law, and violence against political opponents. The Electoral College represents the individual state popular vote results in all qualifying States. Republicans place their trust in the Constitution - although they may bemoan the excessive use of the Commerce Clause and other clauses to expand the size and actions of the federal government which in many cases has created a large bureaucratic mess with poorly defined limits on executing laws and which has been exempted from the normal appropriations process. 
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 19.
#4. To: IbJensen (#0)
The Electoral College is absolutely vital. Regardless of its original design purpose, TODAY it's vital function is to wall off the USA into 51 separate compartments, each sealed off from the others. Given wholesale corruption and vote manufacturing in Democrat urban strongholds, the electoral college walls off the effects of that corruption at each state's borders. It doesn't matter by HOW big a margin a Democrat wins Washington DC, Chicago, Philadephia, Las Vegas or Los Angeles - the state border is a firewall to fraudulent votes cancelling out real votes in the neighboring rural states. Eliminate the electoral college, and the Democrats need only control the voting fraud machines in 4 or 5 big cities and they can manufacture enough votes to cancel out the votes of the plains and mountain states. The electoral college is the firewall. It is the watertight compartments. If those come down, the American ship of state becomes the Titanic and progressively floods.
Agree completely !!!
Yep Vic is right on this one. But my only question would be why when the Democrats won Virginia Why did he say his side was winning.
My "side" wants a stable universal health insurance system, and taxation of accumulated wealth that brings the budget into balance and rectifies the problem of excessive wealth accumulation in fewer and fewer hands. Right now, the only people offering that are Democrats, so seeing them advance means that that set of objectives is closer to being achieved. If Republicans come to their senses and start proposing their own serious plans for getting everybody health care coverage, I will be happy. With all things, I have policy objectives that I want to see fulfilled. If the Republicans will implement them, I am glad to see them advance, especially if it encourages the Democrats to follow suit, to be competitive. And vice versa. I'm not partisan (though I do rather favor Republicans, because there's so much screeching wrongheadedness on the Democrat side it annoys me). I would PREFER that Republicans pull their heads out of their asses and fly right, because that makes it easier for me. But if they won't, I prefer my policy objectives over either party. What happened in the 2019 elections puts PRESSURE on the Republicans. They can't simply hold the line and ignore the issues, because they could suffer sweeping losses if they do. So, under that pressure, it is my hope they will move in my direction. That's why I said MY side is winning. MY side is what I think. Neither party thinks as I do, so I like to see events coerce both of them towards the right opinions, which are not theirs, either side, but mine.
Obamacare?
Obamacare is not wonderful. But the alternatives are disastrous. Medicare for all, on those terms, will be a disaster for the old. It will, effectively, convert Medicare to Medicaid, quality of care will plummet, and we'll be headed into a fiscal crisis. And, more simply, it's not possible to get to Medicare for all with the Congress we have. So it's a dead letter.
My liberal neighbors love to stop by and wax about their dream of universal health care for all. They say that the doctors are greedy and should do lung transplants for a $5 co-pay...because health care is a basic human right. The only thing they hate more than doctors are the insurance companies, but somehow in their dream a new insurance program will make it all better. We once had the best health care on the planet. Yep, doctors lived in big houses, but health insurance, like college tuition, was very affordable. Even poor people like my family got a house call...from our surgeon. I was seven years old and barely recognized the doctor because he was not wearing his starched white lab coat. He wore an impeccable suit and tie! In the late 70's the dems realized if they could control health care they could stay in power...and the rest of the story is as you say..."disastrous". Obamacare has given us premiums through the roof, deductibles through the roof, and coverage in the basement. I no longer go to doctors because most likely they all came from the same med school in Calcutta. Never-the-less, according to my neighbors, there is an insurance system "out there" just beyond those mean old conservatives. All we need are more third world illegals to vote the dems in office, and by gum, we'll all be living in lotus land (like Detroit!) Obamacare is so yesterday (the halcyon days of the magic negro are over, sigh). How about "Bloomycare", Vic. It's got such a dreamy sound to it ;-)
Medicine has advanced a great deal since doctors made house calls, and it is a great deal more expensive. Tests and techniques can be done now that did not exist then, and life expectancies and survival rates after serious disease are much better now. What makes much of this possible is very expensive machines, machines that can't be taken on house calls, and that cannot be purchased by regular medical practices - machines that cost millions or tens of millions. Medicine today is simply different. Things are curable that once weren't, but at great expense. Health costs have gone up.
Ironic how the predators perched atop the Military Industrial pyramid have no problem consuming single-use machines like...
Nothing ironic about it. Drones and missiles kill the enemy without exposing our own soldiers and pilots to death. That's a good thing.
The Irony is in the process by which "the enemy" has been deliberately manufactured for the benefit of the predatory parasites feeding from the process.
There are no replies to Comment # 19. End Trace Mode for Comment # 19.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#5. To: Vicomte13 (#4)
#6. To: Stoner (#5)
#8. To: A K A Stone (#6)
when the Democrats won Virginia Why did he say his side was winning.
#13. To: Vicomte13, A K A Stone (#8)
My "side" wants a stable universal health insurance system
#14. To: watchman (#13)
#15. To: Vicomte13 (#14)
#16. To: watchman (#15)
#17. To: Vicomte13 (#16)
machines that cost millions or tens of millions
"At Lockheed Martin - We bring the BBQ to the Cows!"
#18. To: Peromischievous leucopus (#17)
Ironic how the predators perched atop the Military Industrial pyramid have no problem consuming single-use machines like...
#19. To: Vicomte13 (#18)
the enemy
Replies to Comment # 19.
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]