LEFT WING LOONS
See other LEFT WING LOONS Articles
Title: Stacey Abrams: ‘The Electoral College Is Racist and Classist’
Source:
Grabien
URL Source: https://news.grabien.com/story-stac ... gn=news&utm_content=story24806
Published: Nov 17, 2019
Author: Grabil;en Staff
Post Date: 2019-11-17 07:02:58 by IbJensen
Keywords: None
Views: 3122
Comments: 19
We have to remember the Electoral College was not designed because people were worried about Idaho not having enough votes’
Watch the fat-assed, functional illiterate negro's comments at the link. She is ignorant of the fact that this is a constitutional republic with each state having equal status insofar as a national election goes. In a republic, states or provinces have equal weight and their sovereignty will always be honored.
Too many Democrats mimic the Chinese Maoist/Communist movements to attack tried and true laws and traditions limiting lawlessness, mob power, misuse of the law, and violence against political opponents. The Electoral College represents the individual state popular vote results in all qualifying States.
Republicans place their trust in the Constitution - although they may bemoan the excessive use of the Commerce Clause and other clauses to expand the size and actions of the federal government which in many cases has created a large bureaucratic mess with poorly defined limits on executing laws and which has been exempted from the normal appropriations process.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 12.
The Electoral College is absolutely vital. Regardless of its original design purpose, TODAY it's vital function is to wall off the USA into 51 separate compartments, each sealed off from the others.
Given wholesale corruption and vote manufacturing in Democrat urban strongholds, the electoral college walls off the effects of that corruption at each state's borders. It doesn't matter by HOW big a margin a Democrat wins Washington DC, Chicago, Philadephia, Las Vegas or Los Angeles - the state border is a firewall to fraudulent votes cancelling out real votes in the neighboring rural states.
Eliminate the electoral college, and the Democrats need only control the voting fraud machines in 4 or 5 big cities and they can manufacture enough votes to cancel out the votes of the plains and mountain states.
The electoral college is the firewall. It is the watertight compartments. If those come down, the American ship of state becomes the Titanic and progressively floods.
#5. To: Vicomte13 (#4)
Agree completely !!!
#6. To: Stoner (#5)
Yep Vic is right on this one. But my only question would be why when the Democrats won Virginia Why did he say his side was winning.
#8. To: A K A Stone (#6)
when the Democrats won Virginia Why did he say his side was winning.
My "side" wants a stable universal health insurance system, and taxation of accumulated wealth that brings the budget into balance and rectifies the problem of excessive wealth accumulation in fewer and fewer hands.
Right now, the only people offering that are Democrats, so seeing them advance means that that set of objectives is closer to being achieved. If Republicans come to their senses and start proposing their own serious plans for getting everybody health care coverage, I will be happy.
With all things, I have policy objectives that I want to see fulfilled. If the Republicans will implement them, I am glad to see them advance, especially if it encourages the Democrats to follow suit, to be competitive. And vice versa.
I'm not partisan (though I do rather favor Republicans, because there's so much screeching wrongheadedness on the Democrat side it annoys me). I would PREFER that Republicans pull their heads out of their asses and fly right, because that makes it easier for me.
But if they won't, I prefer my policy objectives over either party.
What happened in the 2019 elections puts PRESSURE on the Republicans. They can't simply hold the line and ignore the issues, because they could suffer sweeping losses if they do. So, under that pressure, it is my hope they will move in my direction.
That's why I said MY side is winning. MY side is what I think. Neither party thinks as I do, so I like to see events coerce both of them towards the right opinions, which are not theirs, either side, but mine.
#12. To: Vicomte13 (#8)
That's why I said MY side is winning. MY side is what I think. Neither party thinks as I do, so I like to see events coerce both of them towards the right opinions, which are not theirs, either side, but mine.
Vic one thing I do like about you. Is that you put your opinion out there and defend it. That is one of the reasons I like to challenge you.
Replies to Comment # 12.
There are no replies to Comment # 12.
End Trace Mode for Comment # 12.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]