[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Dealing with AGWs?

Movie Review: Vanishing Point (1971) : A libertarian perspective

Federal Judges Meeting Will Target Trump And Barr, Report Says

NSC adviser 'is to be reassigned' amid DC rumors SHE is the infamous 'Anonymous' behind anti-Trump NYTimes op-ed and book 'A Warning'

Off-Duty Cop Follows Woman Through Parking Lot, Attacks Her—Taxpayers Shell Out $125K

New Witness Corroborates Accusation That Mike Bloomberg Told Pregnant Employee to 'Kill It'

Cops Stop Veteran with PTSD for No Reason, Savagely Taser and Hit Him Over 30 Times

The Student Debt You Willingly Took On Is Not My Problem To Solve

Virginia: Gun Ban Bill Defeated!

Democrats fear Republican sabotage in key Senate race

Trump Supporters Are George W Bush Supporters LARPing As Ron Paul Supporters

US closes case against ex-FBI boss McCabe with no charges

Pelosi: A.G. Barr 'has deeply damaged the rule of law'

More Victims Discovered After Cop Caught on Video Planting Meth on Innocent People

PasTor Who Prophesized 4 Years Ago ... AbouT Kanye WesT’s ChrisTian Conversion Makes PredicTion --- AbouT PresidenT Trump’s Chances Of Re-elecTion

Senate Democrats queasy over Sanders as nomin

John Kelly Finally Lets Loose on Trump

Thursday, February 13, 2020 Trump breaks New Hampshire record for voter turnout for any incumbent president

Instrumental 9 year old guitarist Taj Farrant plays Chris Stapleton "Tennessee Whiskey" on his Gibson SG and Elixir strings Marshall amp

The Ten Most Destructive Americans of Eight Decades

Nancy Pelosi’s Staff Demands Takedown of ‘Deceptively Altered’ Video of Her SOTU Tantrum

OKC - A Conspiracy Theory

#FlashbackFriday when Vindman perjured himself and @RepBradWenstrup caught him.

Biden Calls Skeptical New Hampshire Voter ‘a Lying, Dog-Faced Pony Soldier’ (The dust-up came after the voter asked whether he can rebound from Iowa)

Trump's resilience ... causes DemocraTs --- To sound The alarm

Hillary Clinton Comments on Potentially Joining Democratic Ticket as VP Nominee

Cop Found Passed Out Drunk in Patrol Car On Duty in Traffic, 5X Over Legal Limit—No Charges

‘Clearly Guilty’: Fox News’ Judge Andrew Napolitano Says Trump Could Be Impeached Again

City Officials Want To Clamp Down on Dragon's Ascent, a Video Game That Pays Skillful Players

Trump touts Space Force, moon and Mars plans in State of the Union address

Horrifying Video Shows Cops Surround Sleeping Pregnant Mother and Execute Her

Police Called to School After 6-year-old Girl With Down Syndrome Made a ‘Gun’ with Her Finger

Midwife Gets Charged with 95 Felonies by State of New York for Delivering Babies

Pelosi’s Speech-ripping Stunt: a Perfect Metaphor for What She’s Done to America

Undercover Cops Hired 118 Handymen, Then Arrested Them All for Not Having Licenses

Florida trooper shot dead by stranded driver on interstate

Senate Acquits Trump on Impeachment But Romney Dissents

Stomach-Turning Video Catches Cops Abusing Kitten, Spitting Inside, Destroying Property

NO JAIL for Cop Guilty of Responding to Domestic Violence Call by Raping the Victim

Kirk Douglas, Indomitable Icon of Hollywood’s Golden Age, Dies at 103

Video Clearly Catches Cop Stealing Cash from a Home and He’s NOT Arrested

CNN is Angry That White People Are Trying to Stop the Coronavirus Spreading

Everyone's A Criminal

Nancy Pelosi rips paper after Donald Trumps's State of the Union Speech

2020 State of the Union

Incompetence

Court To Cop: We Don't Need On-Point Precedent To Deny You Immunity For Killing A Dog That Couldn't Hurt You

Cop Attacks 16yo Boy, Knocks His Teeth Out for Paying for Candy with Damaged Bill

Rush Limbaugh Just Announced he has lung cancer

Trump is “One Large S.T.D.” and He's Infected Gary Cohn


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

United States News
See other United States News Articles

Title: The Big Plantation
Source: Eric Peters Autos
URL Source: https://www.ericpetersautos.com/2019/11/12/the-big-plantation/
Published: Nov 12, 2019
Author: Eric
Post Date: 2019-11-13 19:46:39 by Deckard
Ping List: *Cars and Automotive*     Subscribe to *Cars and Automotive*
Keywords: None
Views: 125
Comments: 7

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Are you more likely to be injured in a car crash because you weren’t wearing a seat belt – or because you were?

Both are possibilities – and sometimes, actualities.

An unbuckled driver might be hurled out of the vehicle and crushed by it (this happened to someone I know). But he could also be trapped inside the vehicle and burnt to death (or drowned) because rescuers couldn’t reach him in time to cut him free.

But the proper question isn’t which is more likely to happen but rather, who has the right to decide which of these two risks alarms them more.

Is it ourselves? Or is it someone else?

The government asserts – via laws and men with guns – its power to make that decision (and many others) on our behalf and contrary to our own preferences. This is a pretty outrageous thing, when you think about it a little bit.

More than outrageous.

Evil.

But it’s an evil principle that’s been accepted via a kind of mesmeritic philosophical-moral osmosis, over several generations. It is the idea that the government is (effectively) our parent and endowed with the rightful authority that parents have over children to protect them – for their own good (as decided by the parent).

Of course, it is never stated in such explicitly honest terms. It is implied – and that is enough to obtain, if not the consent of those parented, at least their compliance (based on the threat of violence, always hovering, for non-compliance).

The problem, of course, is that we are not children and the people who operate the levers (and wield the guns) of government are not our parents. We don’t even know these people, except by name and title. And they only know us in a figurative sense – as “the public.”

Or something worse.

What gives these people the right to claim parental authority over grown-up men and women unrelated to them?

Italicized to emphasize the philosophical-moral issue at hand. The people who constitute this fictitious entity styled “the government” certainly have the power to enforce their decrees – but that is a very different thing than rightful authority of the sort exercised by parents on behalf of their minor children.

And what the government does isn’t parenting. That is an inaccurate – a much-too-benign –  term. The government is – and does – something much less savory.

A parent’s job is both natural and kind; it is to prepare the child to be a free and independent adult – a person no longer in need of parenting. It is a temporary and short-term occupation in the scheme of things, with the end result being (hopefully) another free adult.

What government asserts is ownership – in perpetuity – of infantilized adults.

The object is not the eventual independence of the pupil – so to speak- but rather his permanent submission to the power of the government. By which is really meant the power of the relative handful of people who comprise it.

There is a better name for this arrangement. It is slavery.

Everyone is opposed to this, of course – but for cognitively dissonant and conditioned reasons, only when it’s obvious.

Massa in his great house; an overseer keeping the field hands compliant. But do we not live on a very large plantation ourselves? Is not the arrangement the same in its essentials?

The “massas” are several, federal state and local – but they assert ownership over us just the same as the one – and they use overseers (armed government workers) just the same to enforce their asserted ownership. How else to view this business of grown men and women being told they will wear a seat belt (and hand over a portion of their earnings and accept being told what they may do with their property, with whom they may associate – and so on) else be punished?

The massas’ doctrine is premised on our being their property – which they claim a (specious) right to protect.

Put another way: The only way such a right would not be specious would be if we are in fact their property; if they do own us.

Owners have every right to do as they please with their property. It defines the relationship.

Just the same as we assert ownership over our dog or cat, say. No one disputes our right to have Fido or Felix  “fixed” and groomed, to decide what they will eat and where they will be allowed to roam (or not)   . . .  and to punish them when they act contrary to our wishes.

Because it is understood that these critters are our property.

 

Just the same as massa (singular) in the great house asserted his ownership over his slaves by ordering them about, managing their lives and having his overseer threaten to or actually whip them if they disregarded his authority.

Is this sounding familiar to you yet?

Seatbelt laws are no different; they are merely a manifestation of ownership.

It may seem a trivial thing to object to “buckling up,” but it is not the buckling-up that’s being called out. It is the asserted authority to compel the buckling up.

A very big principle is at stake.

By accepting that the government – just other people, remember – has the rightful authority to take away from us the free choice to assume any risk affecting ourselves only because it (they) considers those risks unacceptable, we have accepted the evil principle that the government has a property interest in us.

That we are owned by the government.

By the people who are the government.

Does it rankle? It ought to. But it doesn’t – for most people – who’ve been narcoticized by their conditioning to accept such effronteries as both normal and desirable. With the vicious consequence of the field hands begging to be controlled – and owned – to ever greater decrees by demanding controls be imposed on others, who then demand controls imposed upon them in turn.

Cui bono?

Only the massas – rendered in the plural.

. . .

Got a question about cars, Libertarian politics – or anything else? Click on the “ask Eric” link and send ’em in!

(6 images)

Subscribe to *Cars and Automotive*

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: Deckard (#0)

What gives these people the right to claim parental authority over grown-up men and women unrelated to them?

Power.

Might makes right.

Vicomte13  posted on  2019-11-15   8:28:24 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: Deckard (#0)

narcoticized

That is what you push.

A K A Stone  posted on  2019-11-15   8:37:15 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: Deckard (#0) (Edited)

Does it rankle? It ought to. But it doesn’t

Oh, it does rankle, just as waking up in slavery rankled every slave every single day of his existence for generations, and segregation rankled every person subject to it every single day.

But can you do?

Vicomte13  posted on  2019-11-15   8:39:48 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: Vicomte13 (#3)

“When the missionaries arrived, the Africans had the land and the missionaries had the Bible. They taught us how to pray with our eyes closed. When we opened them, they had the land and we had the Bible.” — Jomo Kenyatta, First President of Kenya, Africa

The Catholic Church played a vital role in the trans-Atlantic slave trade, according to historians and several published theses on the topic.

lasentinel.net/the-cathol...ajor-role-in-slavery.html

A K A Stone  posted on  2019-11-15   8:53:17 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: A K A Stone (#4)

The Catholic Church played a vital role in the trans-Atlantic slave trade, according to historians and several published theses on the topic.

Of course it did. And that was evil.

Protestant England was the number two slave trading nation, dominating the trade after 1600, and the Calvinist Protestant were, likewise, heavy participants in it, bringing slaves into the Protestant Dutch and Protestant British countries in America.

Christianity disgraced itself by the slave trade. The Protestants were as guilty of it as the Catholics. Neither is exonerated. Both were evil.

America is, after all, a Protestant country, historically.

Vicomte13  posted on  2019-11-15   14:23:14 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: A K A Stone (#2)

narcoticized

That is what you push.

yada, yada, yada.

Government is in the last resort the employment of armed men, of policemen, gendarmes, soldiers, prison guards, and hangmen.
The essential feature of government is the enforcement of its decrees by beating, killing, and imprisoning.
Those who are asking for more government interference are asking ultimately for more compulsion and less freedom.

Deckard  posted on  2019-11-15   14:59:05 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: Vicomte13 (#5)

fair enough. :)

A K A Stone  posted on  2019-11-15   15:55:20 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com