[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Utopian Visionaries Who Won’t Leave People Alone

No - no - no Ain'T going To get away with iT

Pete Buttplug's Butt Plugger Trying to Turn Kids into Faggots

Mark Levin: I'm sick and tired of these attacks

Questioning the Big Bang

James Webb Data Contradicts the Big Bang

Pssst! Don't tell the creationists, but scientists don't have a clue how life began

A fine romance: how humans and chimps just couldn't let go

Early humans had sex with chimps

O’Keefe dons bulletproof vest to extract undercover journalist from NGO camp.

Biblical Contradictions (Alleged)

Catholic Church Praising Lucifer

Raising the Knife

One Of The HARDEST Videos I Had To Make..

Houthi rebels' attack severely damages a Belize-flagged ship in key strait leading to the Red Sea (British Ship)

Chinese Illegal Alien. I'm here for the moneuy

Red Tides Plague Gulf Beaches

Tucker Carlson calls out Nikki Haley, Ben Shapiro, and every other person calling for war:

{Are there 7 Deadly Sins?} I’ve heard people refer to the “7 Deadly Sins,” but I haven’t been able to find that sort of list in Scripture.

Abomination of Desolation | THEORY, BIBLE STUDY

Bible Help

Libertysflame Database Updated

Crush EVERYONE with the Alien Gambit!

Vladimir Putin tells Tucker Carlson US should stop arming Ukraine to end war

Putin hints Moscow and Washington in back-channel talks in revealing Tucker Carlson interview

Trump accuses Fulton County DA Fani Willis of lying in court response to Roman's motion

Mandatory anti-white racism at Disney.

Iceland Volcano Erupts For Third Time In 2 Months, State Of Emergency Declared

Tucker Carlson Interview with Vladamir Putin

How will Ar Mageddon / WW III End?

What on EARTH is going on in Acts 16:11? New Discovery!

2023 Hottest in over 120 Million Years

2024 and beyond in prophecy

Questions

This Speech Just Broke the Internet

This AMAZING Math Formula Will Teach You About God!

The GOSPEL of the ALIENS | Fallen Angels | Giants | Anunnaki

The IMAGE of the BEAST Revealed (REV 13) - WARNING: Not for Everyone

WEF Calls for AI to Replace Voters: ‘Why Do We Need Elections?’

The OCCULT Burger king EXPOSED

PANERA BREAD Antichrist message EXPOSED

The OCCULT Cheesecake Factory EXPOSED

Satanist And Witches Encounter The Cross

History and Beliefs of the Waldensians

Rome’s Persecution of the Bible

Evolutionists, You’ve Been Caught Lying About Fossils

Raw Streets of NYC Migrant Crisis that they don't show on Tv

Meet DarkBERT - AI Model Trained On DARK WEB

[NEW!] Jaw-dropping 666 Discovery Utterly Proves the King James Bible is God's Preserved Word

ALERT!!! THE MOST IMPORTANT INFORMATION WILL SOON BE POSTED HERE


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

The Establishments war on Donald Trump
See other The Establishments war on Donald Trump Articles

Title: Urgent Concern Form Revised August 2019, Requirement for First-Hand Knowledge Eliminated
Source: [None]
URL Source: [None]
Published: Sep 27, 2019
Author: nolu chan
Post Date: 2019-09-27 19:46:58 by nolu chan
Keywords: None
Views: 2561
Comments: 26

Urgent Concern Form Revised August 2019, Requirement for First-Hand Knowledge Eliminated

nolu chan
27 September 2019

ICIC CPD - ICWPA Disclosure Form

DISCLOSURE OF URGENT CONCERN FORM

https://www.dni.gov/files/ICIG/Documents/Hotline/Urgent%20Concern%20Disclosure%20Form.pdf

Metadata:

xmp:ModifyDate: 2019-09-25T14:39:15-04:00
xmp:CreateDate: 2019-09-24T16:25-04:00
xmp:MetadataDate: 2019-09-25T14:39:15-04:00
xmp:CreatorTool: Acrobat PDFMaker 18 for Word

It appears that, few days ago, the form was changed to delete the requirement to have direct and personal knowledge of reported matter. The ICIG will now accept a report even if one "heard about it from others."

See Twitter thread of Stephen McIntyre:

https://twitter.com/ClimateAudit/status/1177580473566093312

The form of 24 May 2018 stated:

ICIG-ICWSP
Urgent Concern Disclosure Form
Page iii

FIRST-HAND INFORMATION REQUIRED

In order to find an urgent concern “credible," the ICIG must be in possession of reliable, first-hand information. The IC IG cannot transmit information via the ICWPA based on an employee's second-hand knowledge of wrongdoing. This includes information received from another person, such as when a fellow employee informs you that he/she witnessed some type of wrongdoing. (Anyone with first-hand knowledge of the allegations may file a disclosure in writing directly with IC IG.) Similarly, speculation about the existence of wrongdoing does not provide sufficient legal basis to meet the statutory requirements of the ICWPA. If you think that wrongdoing took place, but can provide nothing more than second-hand or unsubstantiated assertions, IC IG will not be able to process the complaint or information for submission as an ICWPA.

The form "Rev: August 2019", with a precise date unprovided, now states on page 2:

3. I know about the information I am disclosing here and:

[ ] I have direct and personal knowledge

[ ] I heard about it from others.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 24.

#3. To: nolu chan (#0)

You might be interested in this.

RedState: BREAKING: Intel Community Secretly Changed the Whistle-Blower Rules to Allow the Trump-Ukraine Complaint Just Days Before It Was Filed

It's just one of RedState's bloggers so it may not mean much. I see that some people are starting to raise the idea that there never was such a disclosure form prior to this complaint.

Anyway, I saw it and thought of your thread here.

Tooconservative  posted on  2019-09-28   12:16:57 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: Tooconservative (#3)

RedState: BREAKING: Intel Community Secretly Changed the Whistle-Blower Rules to Allow the Trump-Ukraine Complaint Just Days Before It Was Filed

I had not seen this specific article, but have seen some similar coverage. I cannot determine, without a specific rev date, if this was to allow the whistleleaker complaint, or a post-complaint CYA effort. If the Rev date was after the 12 August submission, it would not change the requirement on 12 August. The metadata creation date of the online form is 24 September 2019. The purported Rev date is just August 2019.

The published Complaint of August 12, 2019 is on plain paper. I have not seen any associated urgent concern disclosure form.

nolu chan  posted on  2019-09-28   16:26:05 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: nolu chan (#4)

It is interesting. You would think that they would be very careful if they actually tried to backdate the form revision. But then, no one thought that Dan Rather and his accomplice would simply forge GW Bush's military records from the typewriter era using modern proportional fonts in Microsoft Word and get caught red-handed doing it, ending Rather's career (except for his sad-ass little news show on that old HD channel). Most people aren't aware he's still alive, even at CBS.

I'm not sure how these things work with the feds. I assume they have some office that approves and issues forms. Also that they would have a committee that would oversee changes to forms and that at least one person in upper management would have to sign off on any changes. I don't think the feds just let anyone change their forms at the drop of a hat. There should be a committee and someone in management signing off on it.

I always thought Coates was a very weak choice for DNI, don't see why they chose him. The current Acting DNI is Joseph Maguire who took office as Acting Director on August 19, 2019.

So if the Deep State was going to sneak something into the pipeline to leak about, it would make sense to do it when Trump's top political appointee was cleaning out his desk. Funny it only took a month of Coates being gone and all of a sudden a major impeachment scandal surfaces via some new complaint form that for the first time allows hearsay accusations, something explicitly forbidden for decades.

Tooconservative  posted on  2019-09-28   20:32:08 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: Tooconservative (#5)

I'm not sure how these things work with the feds.

I have some familiarity how form management works with federal government agencies. GSA controls for all government agencies, except when it is No Such Agency or Alphabet City.

The August 12 submission, as published, is not on any form.

nolu chan  posted on  2019-09-29   13:16:23 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: nolu chan (#6) (Edited)

The August 12 submission, as published, is not on any form.

But shouldn't there be a design committee behind form changes and some official signing off on it on a particular date and certifying the official form, using another form that responsible officials use to designate the official new form along with a filed original of the official document? What I knew of formal document creation involved input from the department, a committee making recommendations, and a responsible designated official making an official approval of the final form, after which the form went into general use and all obsolete forms were discarded/recycled. That's what we did at a big corporation I worked at and that was just for routine employee matters, not national security.

This is national security administration, not just Joe Blow going down to file some change of address form at the local post office. A lot of lawyers probably worked on this form. That is, if it is actually a legitimate form that passed the appropriate procedure under forms created for national security. These are not some ad hoc forms cranked out at a moment's notice.

It's impossible to imagine that DNI's legal advisers did not have input into the creation of a new document, one that contravened a decades-long policy against filing hearsay whistleblower complaints, such as this case. There should be a record of the DNI legal staff working on the form and vetting it, perhaps discussion of it among legal staff, a final approval (or disapproval) of the revised form.

What I'm saying is there should be a form design committee, a public official with final approval, and some records of the DNI legal staff involved in reviewing such a major revision to a form in use for decades unchanged.

Tooconservative  posted on  2019-09-29   14:56:05 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: Tooconservative (#7)

What I knew of formal document creation involved input from the department, a committee making recommendations, and a responsible designated official making an official approval of the final form, after which the form went into general use and all obsolete forms were discarded/recycled.

For most of the Government there is this and other regulations.

https://www.gsa.gov/cdnstatic/Handbook09.pdf

STANDARD AND OPTIONAL FORMS

PROCEDURAL HANDBOOK

Forms Policy and Management Team
GSA Office of Governmentwide Policy
forms@gsa.gov
July 2009

nolu chan  posted on  2019-09-30   12:57:01 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: nolu chan (#8)

For most of the Government there is this and other regulations.

https://www.gsa.gov/cdnstatic/Handbook09.pdf

I think the forms and process are rather different at intel agencies than they are at Commerce, or Agriculture, or Education.

Some of the intel agency forms themselves are likely classified material. Because it is so useful to keep them confidential.

So I'm not prepared to believe that a whistleblower form at the DNI's office is exactly the same as whistleblower forms at routine civilian federal agencies.

Tooconservative  posted on  2019-09-30   16:46:22 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: Tooconservative (#9)

So I'm not prepared to believe that a whistleblower form at the DNI's office is exactly the same as whistleblower forms at routine civilian federal agencies.

I'm fairly certain that they are not. I just heard on Fox News that the whistleblower used the appropriate 2018 form with the associated August 212 complaint and, therein, claimed first hand knowledge. And Trump had directed the keeping of all forms, a timeline of the changes, and who signed off on the change.

nolu chan  posted on  2019-09-30   18:24:57 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#11. To: nolu chan (#10) (Edited)

I'm fairly certain that they are not. I just heard on Fox News that the whistleblower used the appropriate 2018 form with the associated August 212 complaint and, therein, claimed first hand knowledge. And Trump had directed the keeping of all forms, a timeline of the changes, and who signed off on the change.

So do you now disbelieve that the forms were unchanged entirely at the DNI office and at the various intel agencies?

Are you suggesting that only the forms used at intelligence agencies allow for hearsay accusations to be made?

Something is starting to sound inconsistent about what you have been relating about the new hearsay allowance of whistleblower allegations that are now supposedly in effect at the DNI office or at the intel agencies.

I wouldn't accept everything heard on FNC as gospel either. Baier hosts NeverTrumpers (including his best college buddy is NeverTrumper Steve Hayes). And you have NeverTrumper Sheppy Smith who is gaying it up almost daily with Judge Napolitano. I'm getting more and more the impression that FNC's opinion shows are more trustworthy for hard news info than is FNC's daytime news division with Shep Smith and Bret Baier.

Who on FNC was reporting the use of the 2018 form along with the revised August complaint and did they report this on FNC or did you surmise this for yourself? Who stated directly (and on which show) that the whistleblower had firsthand knowledge and not a hearsay accusation?

Why can't I find any other news source confirming what you are alleging was reported at FNC about the whistleblower and firsthand allegations. I'm getting nothing from a handful of the usual rather busy news sites. Nada. Is only FNC reporting this?

Tooconservative  posted on  2019-09-30   18:57:09 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#14. To: Tooconservative (#11)

Who stated directly (and on which show) that the whistleblower had firsthand knowledge and not a hearsay accusation?

The ICIG in a new report which was in the reporter's hand.

Why can't I find any other news source confirming what you are alleging was reported at FNC about the whistleblower and firsthand allegations.

Because you have not yet achieved Jedi mastery over the google. :-)

nolu chan  posted on  2019-09-30   22:18:09 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#16. To: nolu chan (#14)

I see now that there is a DNI news release.

https://www.dni.gov/files/ICIG/Documents/News/ICIG%20News/2019/September%2030%20-%20Statement%20on%20Processing%20of%20Whistleblower%20Complaints/ICIG%20Statement%20on%20Processing%20of%20Whistleblower%20Complaints.pdf

I see that they are retards about white space in file names. Some people just never learn.

I found the link in an article at HotAir: Lindsey Graham: “We’re not going to try the president of the United States based on hearsay”

Tooconservative  posted on  2019-10-01   0:36:11 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#17. To: Tooconservative (#16)

I see now that there is a DNI news release.

It was on Lou Dobbs on Fox Business channel last night. The first few minutes before that are worth watching.

At 2:54 Andrew McCarthy comments on the statute.

Catherine Herridge talked about the ICIG report in her hand that had just been received at the 3:13 mark.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JVKTLR9F-UQ

nolu chan  posted on  2019-10-01   12:09:27 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#18. To: nolu chan (#17)

Well, it turns out that this business of suddenly allowing secondhand reporting by whistleblowers was itself kinda overblown.

I'm more interested in who Barr is meeting with in Italy right now. He's been there for several days already on official business.

Italy is where Misfud is located. And Barr is still hot to expose the FISA court warrant abuses against Papadopoulos.

TheConservativeTreehouse: Attorney General Bill Barr Visits Italy on “Official Business”? – Remember That Audio-Tape Deposition by Joseph Mifsud?…

I'd post a thread but any meaty details about the trip are not being reported, at least not yet. It's a story to watch. Barr isn't afraid to take action even if the Slimes and WaPo sniff in disapproval. Too bad the Court's weak sister, John Roberts, never learned to do the same.

Tooconservative  posted on  2019-10-01   12:36:19 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#19. To: Tooconservative (#18)

I'm more interested in who Barr is meeting with in Italy right now. He's been there for several days already on official business.

Italy is where Misfud is located.

And Italy is where Secretary of State Pompeo has gone.

Mifsud is Maltese and could be located there, near Sicily. Dunno where they might meet, but flying in to Malta would be a bit obvious.

nolu chan  posted on  2019-10-01   14:21:12 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#20. To: nolu chan (#19)

Mifsud has been in hiding. His exact location is unknown. He is right to fear for his life. Meeting with the AG and giving unknown info (to the Dems) to the AG actually helps Mifsud have the confidence that he won't get rubbed out on any given day.

When the Senate holds hearings and Mifsud shows up to testify, Barr's efforts will pay off. Similarly if Barr indicts and prosecutes the Brennan Clown Posse to attempt to flip them against Obama and the Xlinton crime family. Well, okay, that probably won't happen but I can dream...

Tooconservative  posted on  2019-10-01   14:48:23 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#24. To: Tooconservative (#20)

https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2019/10/01/confirmation-bill-barr-and-john-durham-listened-to-mifsud-audio-tape-deposition-in-italy/#more-172558

Confirmation – Bill Barr and John Durham Listened to Mifsud Audio-Tape Deposition in Italy…

Posted on October 1, 2019
The Conservative Treehouse by sundance

When reports first surfaced that AG Bill Barr had traveled to Italy recently, we surmised the trip was likely related to Joseph Mifsud; specifically related to an audio-taped deposition that Mifsud gave to Italian police about being a western intelligence asset who was enlisted by the CIA (Brennan) to run a covert intelligence operation against the Donald Trump campaign in 2016.

If accurate, well, there’s the motive for the latest “CIA whistle-blower” approach.

The Daily Beast is now reporting that Bill Barr’s visit to Italy was exactly for that reason:

ROME–When Attorney General William Barr showed up at the U.S. embassy’s Palazzo Margherita on Rome’s tony Via Veneto last week, he had two primary requests. He needed a conference room to meet high level Italian security agents where he could be sure no one was listening in. And he needed an extra chair for U.S. Attorney John Durham of Connecticut who would be sitting at his right hand side.

[…] The Daily Beast has learned that Barr and Durham were especially interested in what the Italian secret service knew about Joseph Mifsud, the erstwhile professor from Malta who had allegedly promised then candidate Donald Trump’s campaign aide George Papadopoulos he could deliver Russian “dirt” on Hillary Clinton.

The Italian Justice Ministry public records show that Mifsud had applied for police protection in Italy after disappearing from Link University where he worked and, in doing so, had given a taped deposition to explain just why people might want to harm him.

A source in the Italian Ministry of Justice, speaking on the condition of anonymity, told The Daily Beast that Barr and Durham were played the tape.

A second source within the Italian government also confirmed to The Daily Beast that Barr and Durham were shown other evidence the Italians had on Mifsud. (read more)

It is unknown whether Barr and Durham actually interviewed Mr. Mifsud in person. Some say yes, some say no.

[...]

nolu chan  posted on  2019-10-01   23:29:26 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 24.

#26. To: nolu chan (#24)

ROME–When Attorney General William Barr showed up at the U.S. embassy’s Palazzo Margherita on Rome’s tony Via Veneto last week, he had two primary requests. He needed a conference room to meet high level Italian security agents where he could be sure no one was listening in. And he needed an extra chair for U.S. Attorney John Durham of Connecticut who would be sitting at his right hand side.

Yep, curiouser and curiouser. You can see why I was intrigued. Because that is a helluva lot of intrigue, especially with an American A.G. going overseas with a particular U.S. attorney to meet with a foreign secret service.

Something is definitely up. Barr is no fool and he is action-oriented. He wouldn't have gone if there was another way to achieve his goal. And Italy is under the control of two allied parties, both very friendly to Trump. Yet, Barr went in person with his chosen prosecutor at his side just to get this info, whatever it is.

We will definitely hear more about this and see some kind of significant court case from it.

Tooconservative  posted on  2019-10-01 23:43:51 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 24.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com