[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Are The 4 Horsemen Of The Apocalypse About To Appear?

France sends combat troops to Ukraine battlefront

Facts you may not have heard about Muslims in England.

George Washington University raises the Hamas flag. American Flag has been removed.

Alabama students chant Take A Shower to the Hamas terrorists on campus.

In Day of the Lord, 24 Church Elders with Crowns Join Jesus in His Throne

In Day of the Lord, 24 Church Elders with Crowns Join Jesus in His Throne

Deadly Saltwater and Deadly Fresh Water to Increase

Deadly Cancers to soon Become Thing of the Past?

Plague of deadly New Diseases Continues

[FULL VIDEO] Police release bodycam footage of Monroe County District Attorney Sandra Doorley traffi

Police clash with pro-Palestine protesters on Ohio State University campus

Joe Rogan Experience #2138 - Tucker Carlson

Police Dispersing Student Protesters at USC - Breaking News Coverage (College Protests)

What Passover Means For The New Testament Believer

Are We Closer Than Ever To The Next Pandemic?

War in Ukraine Turns on Russia

what happened during total solar eclipse

Israel Attacks Iran, Report Says - LIVE Breaking News Coverage

Earth is Scorched with Heat

Antiwar Activists Chant ‘Death to America’ at Event Featuring Chicago Alderman

Vibe Shift

A stream that makes the pleasant Rain sound.

Older Men - Keep One Foot In The Dark Ages

When You Really Want to Meet the Diversity Requirements

CERN to test world's most powerful particle accelerator during April's solar eclipse

Utopian Visionaries Who Won’t Leave People Alone

No - no - no Ain'T going To get away with iT

Pete Buttplug's Butt Plugger Trying to Turn Kids into Faggots

Mark Levin: I'm sick and tired of these attacks

Questioning the Big Bang

James Webb Data Contradicts the Big Bang

Pssst! Don't tell the creationists, but scientists don't have a clue how life began

A fine romance: how humans and chimps just couldn't let go

Early humans had sex with chimps

O’Keefe dons bulletproof vest to extract undercover journalist from NGO camp.

Biblical Contradictions (Alleged)

Catholic Church Praising Lucifer

Raising the Knife

One Of The HARDEST Videos I Had To Make..

Houthi rebels' attack severely damages a Belize-flagged ship in key strait leading to the Red Sea (British Ship)

Chinese Illegal Alien. I'm here for the moneuy

Red Tides Plague Gulf Beaches

Tucker Carlson calls out Nikki Haley, Ben Shapiro, and every other person calling for war:

{Are there 7 Deadly Sins?} I’ve heard people refer to the “7 Deadly Sins,” but I haven’t been able to find that sort of list in Scripture.

Abomination of Desolation | THEORY, BIBLE STUDY

Bible Help

Libertysflame Database Updated

Crush EVERYONE with the Alien Gambit!

Vladimir Putin tells Tucker Carlson US should stop arming Ukraine to end war


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

politics and politicians
See other politics and politicians Articles

Title: Bye-bye Biden? Warren leads in new national poll, tied for lead in another
Source: HotAir
URL Source: https://hotair.com/archives/allahpu ... tional-poll-tied-lead-another/
Published: Sep 25, 2019
Author: Allahpundit
Post Date: 2019-09-25 16:11:16 by Tooconservative
Keywords: None
Views: 3714
Comments: 35

Bear in mind, these results are trickling in *before* Democratic voters have digested the allegations of corruption made against Biden in the Ukraine matter. Even if they opt not to believe them, how many will conclude that swing voters will believe them next fall and start discounting Biden’s alleged “electability” advantage?

Imagine if Trump ends up being impeached for trying to make trouble abroad for a candidate who was never going to be his general election opponent anyway.

A game-changing new poll from Quinnipiac:

DEMOCRATS/DEMOCRATIC LEANERS..........................................
 Sep 25Aug 28Aug 06Jul 29Jul 02Jun 11May 21Apr 30Mar 28
Biden25323234223035829
Sanders16151411131916119
O'Rourke2 1 2 2 1 3 2512
Harris3 7 71220 7 88 8
Warren271921151415132 4
Booker- 1 2 1 3 1 32 2
Klobuchar2 1 1 1 1 1 21 2
Buttigieg7 5 5 6 4 8 50 4
DK/NA13 91012121311814

Not only is 27 percent the best Warren’s ever done in a national poll, it’s also the first time she’s led Biden outright in any national poll. As usual, she leads him in enthusiasm too: Fully 70 percent of Dems say they’d be excited to see her as nominee versus 56 percent who say the same of Biden.

The real alarm bell for Grandpa Joe, though, is the split among black voters, as Philip Klein rightly notes:
Back in a July poll, Warren was essentially in a three-way tie for second place, with 15 percent nationally, according to Quinnipiac. In that poll, she was at 20 percent among white voters, but way back at six percent among black voters. In a Wednesday poll, she has vaulted to the top, with 27 percent overall, just edging out Joe Biden, at 25 percent. But now among black voters, she’s in second place, at 19 percent.

In California, it’s a similar story. A new LA Times poll finds Warren jumping to a 29 percent to 22 percent lead in the delegate-rich state overall, but, she’s only trailing Biden 32 percent to 24 percent among black voters. Sen. Kamala Harris, who is both black and from California, was at 18 percent among the group.

Not only is Warren now second to Biden among black voters, trailing him 40/19, but Bernie Sanders has 12 percent of that group. If Bernie fades and black progressives begin drifting towards Warren, suddenly she’d be competitive with Joe among voters who are supposed to be his “firewall,” the group that will offset his losses among other demographics by preferring him overwhelmingly. Blacks no longer prefer him overwhelmingly, according to today’s Quinnipiac data. And given the general drift towards Warren in all polling lately, it’s likely that his lead among them will shrink rather than grow.

Could the Quinnipiac poll be an outlier? Seems unlikely. This new data that dropped this morning from YouGov confirms that the race is a coin flip right now, with Warren and Biden neck and neck in the mid-20s.

When Democratic voters are asked whom they’re considering voting for, Warren leads Biden 54/47. There are other polls lately that look like this too — Emerson recently had Biden up 25/23 and NBC/WSJ had it 31/25 in mid-September. There’s no reason, in other words, to think Quinnipiac and YouGov are “bad polls” for Biden or “good polls” for Warren. They seem to accurately reflect the state of the race at the moment, before the impact of the Ukraine stuff has been felt. In fact, as of today, Warren is the first candidate besides Biden to crack 20 percent in the RCP poll of polls since May. She seems to be for real.

“But wait,” you say, “national polls are interesting but ultimately don’t matter. Iowa and New Hampshire are what matter.” Right, true — but Warren’s surging there too. I already posted this new Monmouth poll of New Hampshire yesterday but it’s worth eyeballing the numbers again:

1. If the Democratic primary election for president was today, would you vote for [NAMES WERE ROTATED]?  [If UNDECIDED: If you had to vote for one of these candidates at this moment, who do you lean toward?]
TREND: (with leaners)Sept.
2019
May
2019
Elizabeth Warren 27% 8%
Joe Biden 25% 36%
Bernie Sanders 12% 18%
Pete Buttigieg 10% 9%
Kamala Harris 3% 6%
Cory Booker 2% 2%
Tulsi Gabbard 2% <1%
Amy Klobuchar 2% 2%
Tom Steyer 2%n/a
Andrew Yang 2% 1%
Beto O’Rourke 1% 2%

She’s just three points behind Biden in the RCP polling average of the state right now. And Iowa? Warren has led the field there in the last two polls taken, 24/16 over Biden in an Iowa State survey taken in mid-September and 22/20 in a Des Moines Register poll conducted a few days later. She’s up 2.7 points in the RCP average.

If you had to make a bet on the Democratic primaries at this particular moment in time, Warren running the table would look like a fairly solid bet. The question is whether South Carolina’s mostly black Democratic electorate would stick with Biden if he lost the first two states or if they’d break for Warren if she won them. The signs there aren’t great for Biden either, per Politico:

Biden’s level of support in South Carolina makes it his firewall state, but even in South Carolina there are troubling signs of erosion. While he remains on top, among black voters, who are more than 60 percent of the Democratic electorate, Biden has plummeted 19 points in Tyson’s polls. That’s a potential leading indicator of the problems he could face after South Carolina’s Feb. 29 primary when many of the minority-heavy Southeastern states — as well as Texas and California — beginning voting on Super Tuesday, March 3, and thereafter.

As strange as it is to imagine after the Democratic field initially ballooned to more than 20 candidates, the actual race could be over quickly once Democrats start voting. Which means Trump will never have a chance to use the Ukraine matter against Biden — but Warren will have lots of chances to use it against Trump. Good lord.

Exit question: Kamala Harris is now at three percent nationally, per Quinnipiac? Was even Scott Walker’s 2016 flameout as embarrassing as this?


Poster Comment:

Brutal numbers for Biden. And these were before most of the news about his own Ukraine scandal came out.

Will Team Biden even survive the journey to the Iowa caucus? And Warren is taking the black vote away from him, his last stronghold.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 33.

#8. To: Tooconservative (#0)

Now if Warren were a black woman, but I'm not allowed to go there?

paraclete  posted on  2019-09-25   20:35:45 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: paraclete (#8)

Now if Warren were a black woman, but I'm not allowed to go there?

Would you settle for a #FakeCherokee if she were further Left than Karl Marx?

Tooconservative  posted on  2019-09-26   7:47:04 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: Tooconservative, paraclete (#9) (Edited)

Would you settle for a #FakeCherokee

The fact that this Cherokee thing is the main argument against Warren shows two things. First her opponents are desperate, second she is going to be the next President (unless Trump has some tremendous successes).

further Left than Karl Marx?

Taxing great wealth is not Karl Marx idea, abolishing it altogether is. Taxing it (akin to FDR New Deal) would prolong the life of capitalism (like restart of Monopoly Game or Jubilee year).

Radical Marxists would not have it. They would rather prefer greater concentration of wealth in few hands and misery of common people, so revolution becomes possible.

A Pole  posted on  2019-09-26   8:02:47 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#16. To: A Pole, Tooconservative, paraclete (#10)

The fact that this Cherokee thing is the main argument against Warren shows two things. First her opponents are desperate, second she is going to be the next President (unless Trump has some tremendous successes).

Should Warren be nominated, Trump will be reelected in a landslide. Her stated policies may work in a radical socialist Democrat primary, but would challenge George McGovern for the record for electoral college failure (520-17).

nolu chan  posted on  2019-09-26   11:51:38 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#19. To: nolu chan (#16)

Should Warren be nominated, Trump will be reelected in a landslide. Her stated policies may work in a radical socialist Democrat primary, but would challenge George McGovern for the record for electoral college failure (520-17).

Wanna bet?

If this were 1980 that would be true. But the warnings about Reaganomics - that the "trickle down" economics actually results in the rich pulling up the ladder - that is visible everywhere.

And so many families are now crashing out of the middle class because of illness that can't be covered.

No, the jig is up. There will be substantial wealth redistribution in America, from the very top.

It won't be crazy Bernie style - he won't be elected.

Warren is measured, a capitalist not a socialist, and a social democrat, as opposed to a democratic socialist. There is a world of difference between the two.

Universal health insurance paid by taxes, and wealth taxation are key aspects of the future, and of the solution to two of the most pressing and persistent problems of America.

Trouble is, the Republicans won't ever acknowledge either thing. They keep holding the fort trying to resist all change. In the Obamacare age, they had the opportunity to present their OWN policy option, but all that is, is status quo.

And then came the Obamacare repeal, and now that insurers are making a ton of money from it, the status quo is: don't repeal it.

Anyway, it's pointless to argue with Republicans on these things.

They will be determined by power, not by argument. My part of the country: the Independent middle, decides everything, and the Republicans have lost us on untaxing the rich - no, they must be taxed more to bring what they pay in line with the far heavier tax burden that we bear: the rich have to pay the same percentage of THEIR wealth in taxes that the middle class does. Right now they pay FAR less. That will end.

And everybody needs government health insurance. There's no other way to afford care against diseases that randomly strike everybody.

Those will be the issues THIS election that will move the middle towards Warren, if she's the nominee.

The wild card is Trump. HE has always believed in some sort of universal care. If HE co-opts that issue, he gives the middle the ability for the middle to vote for our policy.

Likewise, if he agrees that the overconcentration of wealth at the top needs to be addressed, and agrees to something like the wealth tax, and says he's going to focus on making the economy more competitive and responsive so that more people get rich and have to pay those taxes - well, he will have found the sweet spot.

The Democrats are all going to come out and vote for their nominee. The Republicans always vote.

The question is what people like me - the Independent middle will do.

Warren v. Trump will be a very hard decision. Biden v. Trump is easy: Trump. Anybody else v. Trump is easy: Trump.

With Warren, it's hard because she has the right policies, and only Democrats can get those things through...unless Trump surprises us.

Vicomte13  posted on  2019-09-26   19:08:49 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#30. To: Vicomte13, Tooconservative (#19)

With Warren, it's hard because she has the right policies

Posted without comment.

https://freebeacon.com/politics/warren-backs-aocs-illegal-immigrant-welfare-plan/

Warren Backs AOC’s Illegal Immigrant Welfare Plan

Bill package includes federal rent control, welfare for illegal immigrants and ex-cons

Collin Anderson - October 1, 2019 5:00 AM

Democratic presidential candidate Elizabeth Warren endorsed a Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D., N.Y.) policy proposal that includes taxpayer-funded welfare benefits for illegal immigrants.

Ocasio-Cortez's proposal, dubbed "A Just Society," calls for nationwide rent control and bans the federal government from denying welfare benefits based on an individual's immigration status and previous criminal convictions. Warren became the first Democratic presidential candidate to endorse the plan, calling it "just the type of bold, comprehensive thinking we'll need" to make "big, structural change."

Ocasio-Cortez is considered to be "one of the most important endorsements in America," and Warren's immediate support of her latest policy marks another attempt to win the freshman congressman's nod of approval. Warren's quick embrace of Ocasio-Cortez's plan is the latest sign of the social media superstar's policy impact on the Democratic presidential field.

Neither Ocasio-Cortez nor Warren returned requests for comment.

Ocasio-Cortez's proposal, consisting of six separate bills, calls for the expansion of welfare. Bills three and four make it illegal for the federal government to deny welfare benefits to ex-convicts and illegal immigrants. The legislation does not address how to pay for the rising cost of welfare, nor does it explain how it would accomplish its goals.

"It's been really hard for me to find housing. I have the money to move places and stuff, but they deny me for my felony history. It's not right," a man with a face tattoo said in the legislative package's announcement video.

Ocasio-Cortez's second bill, titled "The Place to Prosper Act," calls for federal rent control by imposing a 3 percent national cap on annual rent increases. Similar legislation has failed at the local level amid concerns that such policies increased housing prices while limiting supply. A recent study by the American Economic Association found that San Francisco rent control policy "drove up market rents in the long run, ultimately undermining the goals of the law." The Council of Economic Advisers found that in 11 metropolitan areas with housing regulations, deregulation would reduce homelessness by an average of 31 percent. More than 80 percent of economists surveyed by the University of Chicago in 2012 found rent control to be bad policy.

Ocasio-Cortez's proposal also includes an official poverty guideline that accounts for "new necessities," such as internet access, while the fifth bill creates a "worker-friendly score" based on union membership and other factors that would be used to evaluate or award government contracts.

The last bill in Ocasio-Cortez's proposal establishes health care, housing, and healthy food as government-provided rights.

A Just Society is Ocasio-Cortez's latest major policy initiative since introducing the Green New Deal, a $94.4 trillion environmental policy proposal that would have no effect on the environment.

All major Democratic presidential candidates quickly supported the Green New Deal, including Warren, Sanders, former vice president Joe Biden, and South Bend mayor Pete Buttigieg.

To date, only Warren has endorsed "A Just Society."

nolu chan  posted on  2019-10-01   12:21:09 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#33. To: nolu chan (#30)

Rent control is bad policy. Much better policy is government-built housing projects for the very poor.

Government projects (not prisons) should house the derelict homeless and those who cannot afford other housing. People who can afford better housing than that, and who want to, can rent on the private market.

The private market needs firm regulation for health and safety standards (there are grim illegal tenements in New York, still, and the landlords who operate them should be punished financially and criminally when they are caught), but rent control is a mistake. Build a lot of cheap government welfare housing, so that there is no homelessness, and leave the nicer things to the private market.

Vicomte13  posted on  2019-10-01   16:24:40 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 33.

#34. To: Vicomte13 (#33)

How does one politically sell welfare for illegal aliens to the taxpayers and voters who must pay for it?

nolu chan  posted on  2019-10-01 16:47:03 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 33.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com