911
See other 911 Articles
Title: Judicial Watch Sued To Get Footage of The ‘Plane’ Hitting The Pentagon On 9/11 (Video)
Source:
Lew Rockwell
URL Source: https://www.lewrockwell.com/2019/09 ... ng-the-pentagon-on-9-11-video/
Published: Sep 13, 2019
Author: Joe Martino
Post Date: 2019-09-13 10:32:48 by Deckard
Keywords: None
Views: 4722
Comments: 22
Finally, we can put to rest the theory that a plane hit the pentagon on 9/11. Tom Fitton from Judicial Watch released a video today on his Twitter showing what looks like a Tomahawk cruise missile going into the side of the Pentagon on 9/11. Although Fitton claims this was actually a plane that hit the Pentagon, the evidence doesn’t appear to support this at all. The ‘plane hitting the Pentagon’ theory has been a question mark for so many people as the camera footage was instantly seized showing the entire event, and there were no plane parts to be found anywhere. Not to mention the plane would have to be flying completely parallel to the ground, JUST skimming the grass to make it into the side of the Pentagon. And of course the hole made in the Pentagon doesn’t match that of a plane at all. See image below. I have honestly been trying to figure out what Fitton is really up to with this post, because I almost can’t believe he thinks this is a plane which leads me to think he is doing this on purpose to help people see the truth. Have a look at his Tweet below, and the video below that. Tom Fitton Verified account In order to help put to rest the 9/11 conspiracy theories, Do you see a plane? Or do you see what looks a lot more like a Tomahawk cruise missile? Reprinted with permission from Collective Evolution. 
@TomFitton
President, Judicial Watch. @JudicialWatch sued for and obtained the Pentagon parking camera footage of AA#77 hitting the Pentagon. https://pentagonmemorial.org pic.twitter.com/QEkTewHtlJ
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 21.
#1. To: Deckard (#0)
That would be a Tomahawk cruise missile with no warhead. Right? But it must have been carrying the Flight 77 flight data recorder, personal effects of the passengers, and the landing gear from a 757.
The problem with that camera is that the frame per second is too slow and that we are lucky to see any plane at all. To those that do not under stand video its no more than a bunch of still shots. Depending on the fps you may not see much at all. Plane flying at 400mph ([400mph*5280feetpermile / 60min*60sec]=586feet per second). At roughly 30fps that's not going to show shit. 586/30=19ft of plane to be seen on video and what do we see? About 19ft of the plane! Go figure? I would like to see the video from the hotel across from the pentagon. There has to be better video footage. BTW we have already seen this video. I have already talked about this a long time ago.
I like it when people do some math. Takeoff speed for a 757 is ~143mph. Stall speed is 167mph. So the speed could have been much lower if they chose to adopt a landing profile to hit the Pentagon. The overall length of the plane is about 155 feet. Supposedly, it was a 757-223, a variant of the 757-200. That's where I'm getting the 155 feet. The 757-300 was a stretch version, about 20' longer. So if they were approaching the Pentagob at 200mph in their 155-foot 757, it does change the math for your video calculations quite a bit. Since the plane was long since under the local radar ceiling, we don't have any evidence (other than flight recorder) for the speed the plane was traveling at.
It was reported that the 757-223 was traveling 530 mph (777 feet per second) when it hit the Pentagon. The Pentagon surveillance cameras were only recording at 1 frame per second. Pure luck it was recorded at all.
I think that speed estimate was from a flight recorder. So the Truthists wouldn't accept it since they think it was something planted by the CIA or "salted" on the Tomahawk missile (or whatever bullcrap they make up on any given day). Other events on 9/11 can be analyzed better because you have network footage and some video footage from the area that confirm each other. The Pentagon hit isn't comparable to the WTC attack in video footage or other evidence.
I'm willing to listen to arguments against a 757 causing the damage. Just give me one piece of evidence that it was something else. BTW, a Tomahawk cruise missile has a diameter of 20". The hole would have been much smaller. If it was armed with the standard 1,000 pound warhead, it would have done this: Instead, the explosion was identical to the planes hitting the twin towers.
There are no replies to Comment # 21. End Trace Mode for Comment # 21.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latestshowing what looks like a Tomahawk cruise missile going into the side of the Pentagon on 9/11.
#2. To: misterwhite, Deckard (#1)
#5. To: Justified (#2)
Depending on the fps you may not see much at all. Plane flying at 400mph ([400mph*5280feetpermile / 60min*60sec]=586feet per second). At roughly 30fps that's not going to show shit. 586/30=19ft of plane to be seen on video and what do we see? About 19ft of the plane!
#6. To: Tooconservative (#5)
we don't have any evidence (other than flight recorder) for the speed the plane was traveling at.
#15. To: misterwhite (#6)
(Edited)
It was reported that the 757-223 was traveling 530 mph (777 feet per second) when it hit the Pentagon. The Pentagon surveillance cameras were only recording at 1 frame per second. Pure luck it was recorded at all.
#21. To: Tooconservative (#15)
since they think it was something planted by the CIA or "salted" on the Tomahawk missile
Replies to Comment # 21.
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]