Title: WATCH THIS AND STOP WATCHING PORN (Rockefeller/Masonic Manipulation & Agenda To Control and Wreck Families and Values) Source:
YT URL Source:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pYNMYP7DSXg Published:Oct 26, 2016 Author:KJ Ozborne Post Date:2019-03-16 11:25:38 by Liberator Keywords:Conspiracy, Illuminati, PROGRAMMING Views:2942 Comments:23
Poster Comment:
Amazing insight. Turns out this thesis when played out to the maximum is...TRUE.
Please be patient about this case being made. The first five minutes or so uses Hugh Hefner's debauched life and eventual homosexual tendencies to reinforce the Elites'-driven End Game of the "Playboy Philosophy."
The entire 20 minutes must be watched in order to watch the evidence build and unfold as all the information, connections of dots are fully laid out in support of this thesis.
As might be assumed, we are all the victims of a long-range subversive agenda. This is probably something you didn't see coming.
And remember: You weren't conditioned and programmed from childhood either, so you developed differently.
Chemical contamination of the environment as well as synthetic medicines cannot be ruled out as possible causes of homosexual development. I see the 1950's as being the era when the chemical revolution began, and that fits with the timing of the widespread rise of homosexuality (though it apparently does go back millinia) I realize this does go against the religious doctrines that consider this predispostion to be a spiritual and not physical matter but that's an assessment I disagree with.
Sexual attraction/arousal is surely and purely a physical phenomenon, and I believe it's been attributed or at least associated with a portion of the brain that is different in size between heterosexual men and women.
Chemical contamination of the environment as well as synthetic medicines cannot be ruled out as possible causes of homosexual development.
Absolutely. I concur fully.
Plastics, chemicals, and synthetic meds exploded onto the scene, starting in the 50s; By the 80s and 90s, we were inundated by all those crumbling "Non-Stick" type pans and plastic containers/bottles.
Moreover, during the 80s and 90s SOY MILK was the main ingredient of "Baby Formula." THAT would definitely contribute to the feminization of boys, who comprise this gen of Millennials.
I see the 1950's as being the era when the chemical revolution began, and that fits with the timing of the widespread rise of homosexuality (though it apparently does go back millinia) I realize this does go against the religious doctrines that consider this predispostion to be a spiritual and not physical matter but that's an assessment I disagree with.
Whereas I agree on the first part of your assertion on the proliferation of homosexuality, I differ on the degree in the past to which it affected humanity.
These days, doesn't it seem that in both in attitude and in numbers, homosexuality and its acceptance appears to have physical (biological), spiritual (demonic), and psychological (programming) manifestations/components?
Sexual attraction/arousal is surely and purely a physical phenomenon, and I believe it's been attributed or at least associated with a portion of the brain that is different in size between heterosexual men and women.
I can agree with that in part. I suppose this is subjective but a basis of "attractiveness" may also be a perceived "inner-beauty", of demeanor or spirit.
Researchers believe the different parts of our respective brain (lobes, mid-brain) "light-up" differently or may be larger. Some believe the zones and function can manipulated by visual conditioning or stimulation (such as Porno.)
In general, there's no denying it; there is a genetic component to men being driven by visual cues/stimulation/arousal.
In general, there's no denying it; there is a genetic component to men being driven by visual cues/stimulation/arousal.
Clearly, men are more stimulated upon seeing beautiful women than a woman is in seeing handsome men. In contrast, women are more stimulated by physical contact than are men. This is why I expect porn would generally appeal more to men than to women.
Biologically, women are attracted to powerful men, and men are attracted to beautiful women, and I think our DNA is the driving force in both cases. It doesn't matter so much what us guys look like. We just gotta be able to get things done.
Seems a women's DNA requisites and survival assets kick in early for MAXIMUM ATTRACTIVENESS and FERTILITY.
At ALL ages men appreciate and react to both.
It appears some women prioritize a man's attractiveness and physical strength during a man's youth. But then we see that is apt to change, and sometimes quickly.
The great equalizer for unattractive men is obviously wealth. Some women eventually seem to have an embedded sense, making the decision that both she their children may eventually have better resources from which they'll be taken care of.
