New World Order
See other New World Order Articles
Title: WATCH THIS AND STOP WATCHING PORN (Rockefeller/Masonic Manipulation & Agenda To Control and Wreck Families and Values)
Source:
YT
URL Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pYNMYP7DSXg
Published: Oct 26, 2016
Author: KJ Ozborne
Post Date: 2019-03-16 11:25:38 by Liberator
Keywords: Conspiracy, Illuminati, PROGRAMMING
Views: 2903
Comments: 23
Poster Comment: Amazing insight. Turns out this thesis when played out to the maximum is...TRUE. Please be patient about this case being made. The first five minutes or so uses Hugh Hefner's debauched life and eventual homosexual tendencies to reinforce the Elites'-driven End Game of the "Playboy Philosophy." The entire 20 minutes must be watched in order to watch the evidence build and unfold as all the information, connections of dots are fully laid out in support of this thesis. As might be assumed, we are all the victims of a long-range subversive agenda. This is probably something you didn't see coming.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: Liberator, ALL (#0)
The case is made: ALL PORN LEADS TO GAY PORN. And...it's acceptance. Chalk this up as yet one more long-term mind-control PsyOp created by the Elites to control and break down society. As well as master plan to displace faith in God. WHAT WE ALL KNOW: The Internet has been allowing the easily-accessed images and video of Pornography for FREE since the turn of the century.... ...Thus that means Millennials have had easy access to a previously hidden-behind-the-counter under-world of graphic pornography. Haven't the rabid Feminist Movement, Hollywood, MSM, and Academia contributed heavily to the agenda of feminizing, emasculating and neuter man's natural sexual instincts and leadership positions? Haven't they contributed heavily to the promotion of promiscuity? To Hedonistic goals? Hasn't all of this been part and parcel of an agenda to destroy the family since the beginning of the "Sexual Revolution"? Hasn't divorce spiraled out of control since the late 60s/"Hippie-Movement"? Back on point -- Given the insidious and evil ever growing agenda and availability of free, accessible porn, bored or curious young men and women have watched porn...as countless boys (and yes, girls) have become conditioned, programmed AND addicted to porn from childhood. What we see in this culture, this society today is no accident. The ubiquitous agenda and FREE online Porn has led straight to the eventual acceptance of gay porn....as well as the un-natural militant Gay Movement....and with it a self-loathing, generation of confused, angry Millennials.
Well, I'm living proof that that's not true; same for my ladyfriend.
Exceptions in every case. And remember: You weren't conditioned and programmed from childhood either, so you developed differently.
P.S. -- Don't just accept my brief premise and conclusion; If you have the time, please watch the case unfold and extrapolation of this thesis.
The narrator, Ozborne, has simply stolen some articles from their writer, Henry Makow, and strung them together with a bunch of pix he found on the internet and some crappy music to make these videos. And he's such a coward that he won't show his own face in the video. But let's just create a list of his targets: A pretty typical laundry list. And you no doubt enjoy the references to Aaron Russo. I do realize these are all your favorite themes. What I don't get is why you are promoting this huckster who shamelessly makes videos out of the work of others, barely offering any attribution to the creators of this material. His repetitions are maddening but probably are deliberate. He seems to have pitched everything to people of low IQ and limited education. But as long as they have money to throw at his Patreon account, who cares? The money of the misfits, losers, CT freaks and dumbasses is just as green as anyone else's filthy lucre.
"Stolen"? Not quite; KJ Ozborne *immediately* acknowledges Makow's contribution. How did you miss that?? But let's just create a list of his targets: Thanks. Yup, those "targets" are guilty. Do you believe they are innocent? I do realize these are all your favorite themes. What I don't get is why you are promoting this huckster who shamelessly makes videos out of the work of others, barely offering any attribution to the creators of this material TRUTH will always be my favorite theme. OBSTRUCTION of TRUTH appears to be your favorite theme. What *I* don't get is your predictable aversion to a culture and agenda exposed; And clock-work criticism of sources, material, and theme. Then of course is your consistent mis-characterization and sloppy deconstruction of all of it. He seems to have pitched everything to people of low IQ and limited education. Lol -- nice try. Thinkers recognize these as Presentations TO OTHER THINKERS. Is it possible you are just frustrated by your inability to grasp the message? Maybe you fear it. Or...if I were a real cynic, I'd question *your* agenda.
And THERE we have it. Very odd that you get so enraged and worked up over this. *Really* odd.
More accurate. This is just more of the exact same kookery you've peddled for years. What I don't get is why you're choosing this particular plagiarizing carnie barker as your new hero.
Lol@ your edit. What I don't get is why you're choosing this particular plagiarizing carnie barker as your new hero. You *can't* be trying to frame and de-legitimaize those who counter the lies, deceit and subversive agendas with Truth to be...anti-heroic or.... villains? (Or can you??) For you, the Messenger of Truth is to be regarded with utmost contempt and disdain; flayed, discredited, disemboweled. Why do you support internet control and censorship of opinions and theories? Q: What EXACT issue(s) do you find to be a lie?
Chemical contamination of the environment as well as synthetic medicines cannot be ruled out as possible causes of homosexual development. I see the 1950's as being the era when the chemical revolution began, and that fits with the timing of the widespread rise of homosexuality (though it apparently does go back millinia) I realize this does go against the religious doctrines that consider this predispostion to be a spiritual and not physical matter but that's an assessment I disagree with. Sexual attraction/arousal is surely and purely a physical phenomenon, and I believe it's been attributed or at least associated with a portion of the brain that is different in size between heterosexual men and women.
I would say that is true in many cases. The easy access to porn has caused people, especially men to eschew real relationships or become bored with the ones they have. As they delve into more and more porn, they get bored with that and gradually move on to darker and more violent images and movies. It seems logical that if these desires are followed, eventually it will lead to even more perversion including gay porn. The Internet has been allowing the easily-accessed images and video of Pornography for FREE since the turn of the century.... ...Thus that means Millennials have had easy access to a previously hidden-behind-the-counter under-world of graphic pornography. Good point - back when I was that age, Playboy was kept behind the counter and to see a porn movie one had to go to a seedy run-down movie theater. Today it's available at the click of a mouse - Millennials have become jaded to it all and in many cases are unable to develop normal relationships with women.
Government is in the last resort the employment of armed men, of policemen, gendarmes, soldiers, prison guards, and hangmen. It's too nice a day to waste it on you and your favorite new snake oil salesman.
Tc goT my posT flavor aid vs kool aid post pulled meanT To be funny Too wasn'T The 1sT one Too lp is a gay culT sTone is on iT too
If you ... don't use exclamation points --- you should't be typeing ! Commas - semicolons - question marks are for girlie boys !
meanT To be funny Too It was funny. You got an hilarious reaction. You're a good sport, Boris. I'll like to petition LP management to reconsider. lp is a gay culT LP or LF?
Absolutely. I concur fully. Plastics, chemicals, and synthetic meds exploded onto the scene, starting in the 50s; By the 80s and 90s, we were inundated by all those crumbling "Non-Stick" type pans and plastic containers/bottles. Moreover, during the 80s and 90s SOY MILK was the main ingredient of "Baby Formula." THAT would definitely contribute to the feminization of boys, who comprise this gen of Millennials. I see the 1950's as being the era when the chemical revolution began, and that fits with the timing of the widespread rise of homosexuality (though it apparently does go back millinia) I realize this does go against the religious doctrines that consider this predispostion to be a spiritual and not physical matter but that's an assessment I disagree with. Whereas I agree on the first part of your assertion on the proliferation of homosexuality, I differ on the degree in the past to which it affected humanity. These days, doesn't it seem that in both in attitude and in numbers, homosexuality and its acceptance appears to have physical (biological), spiritual (demonic), and psychological (programming) manifestations/components? Sexual attraction/arousal is surely and purely a physical phenomenon, and I believe it's been attributed or at least associated with a portion of the brain that is different in size between heterosexual men and women. I can agree with that in part. I suppose this is subjective but a basis of "attractiveness" may also be a perceived "inner-beauty", of demeanor or spirit. Researchers believe the different parts of our respective brain (lobes, mid-brain) "light-up" differently or may be larger. Some believe the zones and function can manipulated by visual conditioning or stimulation (such as Porno.) In general, there's no denying it; there is a genetic component to men being driven by visual cues/stimulation/arousal.
As they delve into more and more porn, they get bored with that and gradually move on to darker and more violent images and movies. It seems logical that if these desires are followed, eventually it will lead to even more perversion including gay porn. Thanks for underscoring the insidious development and potential downfall of porn if allowed to consume one. Some people may snicker, but at its zenith, this is why we can hardly believe there's an audience for bestiality, S&M, satanic sacrifice,snuff films/acts, etc. To you point of people eschewing real, healthy relationships and becoming bored with existing one -- I can be argued that the "Sexual Revolution" and "Playboy Philosophy" has influenced and hit Baby Boomers hard. Divorce stats began skyrocketing by the early 70s in ALL Western nations. Heavily promoted and glorified by movies and TV shows (remember how many TV shows by the 1970s had only one parent?) ...Back when I was that age, Playboy was kept behind the counter and to see a porn movie one had to go to a seedy run-down movie theater. Exactly. To protect us from ourselves. I remember a Playboy Mag found by one of the kids in the neighborhood...all the guys met in a field, huddled around it, checking out the contents like it was The Golden Fleece. Millennials have become jaded to it all and in many cases are unable to develop normal relationships with women. Yup. It's very sad. The situation is made even more dire by the contrived but now real war on men and traditional flirting/mating rituals. This is a HUGE problem for Millennials AND for the rest of a normal society. Destroying our traditions, our history, and especially The Family was/is the Elites/Marxists plan.
My take is that homosexuality started becoming normalized beginning in 1973. When Homosexuality Stopped Being a Mental Disorder In 1973, the American Psychiatric Association (APA) asked all members attending its convention to vote on whether they believed homosexuality to be a mental disorder. 5,854 psychiatrists voted to remove homosexuality from the DSM, and 3,810 to retain it. The APA then compromised, removing homosexuality from the DSM but replacing it, in effect, with "sexual orientation disturbance" for people "in conflict with" their sexual orientation. Not until 1987 did homosexuality completely fall out of the DSM.
Government is in the last resort the employment of armed men, of policemen, gendarmes, soldiers, prison guards, and hangmen. Man. BULLSEYE. That 1973 APA de-classification of homosexuality out of its proper "MENTAL DISORDER" prognosis opened the eventual floodgates to today's insanity, marking the beginning of the end of "normalcy" in society. Of that 5,854 psychiatrists number (many themselves psychotics, malignant narcissists, perverts), you wonder how many "votes" were bogus, how many were compensated, and just how many of them truly voted "AYE" just to purposely screw up society? Thanks for the link and further revelations. For instance, who was unaware that from 1973-1987 the APA still acknowledged QUEER to be a mental problem?: ("Sexual orientation disturbance"..."in conflict with" their sexual orientation. This APA decision was no doubt a result of as a very large bone thrown to the gay lobby as compensated sympathy and a morale-booster given the 80s rampant AIDS epidemic. HUGE MISTAKE. It was THEN the wheels immediately began falling off and everything began going to Hell in a hand-basket. The ol' "give an inch" adage (yeah, insert pun HERE.) Remember not long ago gays swore, "All we vant iz to be left alone in our bedroom!" Chyeah, right.
Clearly, men are more stimulated upon seeing beautiful women than a woman is in seeing handsome men. In contrast, women are more stimulated by physical contact than are men. This is why I expect porn would generally appeal more to men than to women. Biologically, women are attracted to powerful men, and men are attracted to beautiful women, and I think our DNA is the driving force in both cases. It doesn't matter so much what us guys look like. We just gotta be able to get things done.
IF they'll let us ;-) Seems a women's DNA requisites and survival assets kick in early for MAXIMUM ATTRACTIVENESS and FERTILITY. At ALL ages men appreciate and react to both. It appears some women prioritize a man's attractiveness and physical strength during a man's youth. But then we see that is apt to change, and sometimes quickly. The great equalizer for unattractive men is obviously wealth. Some women eventually seem to have an embedded sense, making the decision that both she their children may eventually have better resources from which they'll be taken care of.
lf - queers
If you ... don't use exclamation points --- you should't be typeing ! Commas - semicolons - question marks are for girlie boys !
Lol... Possible of a couple of candidates.
This APA decision was no doubt a result of as a very large bone thrown to the gay lobby as compensated sympathy and a morale-booster given the 80s rampant AIDS epidemic. HUGE MISTAKE. It was known at the time that the APA working group that cemented this new APA policy into place had a number of known homosexual psychologists on the panel. What became known years later was that all of the members of the APA working group on the normalization of homosexuality in the DSM were themselves gay or came out of the closet in the years following their work to cement that policy in the DSM. Most people still don't know this. Much of the current normalization of transgenderism we are seeing now is even more compromised than the working group that normalized homosexuality in the DSM.
#2. To: Liberator (#0)
The case is made: ALL PORN LEADS TO GAY PORN.
#3. To: Hank Rearden (#2)
#4. To: Hank Rearden (#2)
#5. To: Liberator (#0)
(Edited)
#6. To: Tooconservative (#5)
(Edited)
The narrator, Ozborne, has simply stolen some articles from their writer, Henry Makow...
#7. To: Tooconservative (#5)
The money of the misfits, losers, CT freaks and dumbasses is just as green as anyone else's filthy lucre.
#8. To: Liberator (#6)
Lol -- nice try.
Thinkers Kooks recognize these as Presentations TO OTHER THINKERS KOOKS.
#9. To: Tooconservative (#8)
#10. To: Liberator (#3)
And remember: You weren't conditioned and programmed from childhood either, so you developed differently.
#11. To: Liberator (#1)
The case is made: ALL PORN LEADS TO GAY PORN. And...it's acceptance
The essential feature of government is the enforcement of its decrees by beating, killing, and imprisoning.
Those who are asking for more government interference are asking ultimately for more compulsion and less freedom.
#12. To: Liberator (#9)
#13. To: Liberator (#7)
#14. To: BorisY, A K A Stone (#13)
flavor aid vs kool aid post pulled
#15. To: Pinguinite (#10)
Chemical contamination of the environment as well as synthetic medicines cannot be ruled out as possible causes of homosexual development.
#16. To: Deckard (#11)
The easy access to porn has caused people, especially men to eschew real relationships or become bored with the ones they have.
#17. To: Liberator, Pinguinite (#15)
The essential feature of government is the enforcement of its decrees by beating, killing, and imprisoning.
Those who are asking for more government interference are asking ultimately for more compulsion and less freedom.
#18. To: Deckard, Pinguinite, RLK (#17)
My take is that homosexuality started becoming normalized beginning in 1973.
#19. To: Liberator (#15)
In general, there's no denying it; there is a genetic component to men being driven by visual cues/stimulation/arousal.
#20. To: Pinguinite (#19)
We just gotta be able to get things done.
#21. To: Liberator (#14)
#22. To: BorisY (#21)
#23. To: Liberator (#18)
For instance, who was unaware that from 1973-1987 the APA still acknowledged QUEER to be a mental problem?: ("Sexual orientation disturbance"..."in conflict with" their sexual orientation.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]