Creationism/Evolution
See other Creationism/Evolution Articles
Title: St. Peters woman's fight with city hall over grass hits federal court of appeals
Source:
KMOV-TV4
URL Source: https://www.kmov.com/news/st-peters ... da-11e9-b41a-5388dfb1f732.html
Published: Jan 16, 2019
Author: Staff
Post Date: 2019-01-28 05:47:12 by Deckard
Keywords: None
Views: 1313
Comments: 21
ST. PETERS, Mo. (KMOV.com) -- A St. Peters woman locked in a battle with city hall over grass in her yard is now having her case heard in the federal court of appeals. Janice Duffner was told by the city fifty percent of her yard must be turf grass, which Duffner says she’s allergic to. Her yard is full of bushes, flowers, lawn ornaments and features a small fountain. The city says a complaint was made by a neighbor, which brought the case to their attention. Duffner says officials told her and her late husband to remove the roses and plant grass. Citing her allergy, Duffner refused and the city made a counteroffer. “Down to five percent. Five percent of turf grass,” said Matt Fairless, attorney for the city of St. Peters. “The city offered a fantastic accommodation to limit the amount of turf grass. There was opposition to that accommodation but city stuck with it.” Duffner said she didn’t agree because any amount of grass is a problem. “If I'm allergic, five percent, that's okay? I was told by the city to take out my roses, put in grass and I said I'm allergic and they say, ‘That's okay, pay somebody to pay to take care of your yard,’” she said. “Should I be required to do that?” The case has been ongoing for four years, and a three-panel judge will now decide. If they rule against Duffner, her and her lawyer Dave Roland have vowed to take the case to the Supreme Court. “The interest the city is really going for is not aesthetics, it's not making things beautiful, it's making things the same, making people conform to each other's idea of what's beautiful and that's un-American,” said Roland.
Poster Comment: “The interest the city is really going for is not aesthetics, it's not making things beautiful, it's making things the same, making people conform to each other's idea of what's beautiful and that's un-American,” 
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 19.
#17. To: Deckard (#0)
I give you a hard time when your wrong Deckard. On this one I think it is their property and they should be to do what they want to. For the most part anyway.
Even if what they do reduces nearby property values? I disagree.
#21. To: misterwhite (#19)
I agree. And if this tree hugging weed growing libtard pig was allowed to reduce my property value, I’d sure as Hell make sure their quality of living was degraded by how I behaved FROM MY PROPERTY... since according to Paultards, you can shit all over your neighbors, as long as you own the property. I’d start by burning large bon fires when the wind was blowing from my yard, into their windows on 100 degree days. When they complained, I’d say... how’s those fucking weeds, cunt?
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#19. To: A K A Stone (#17)
On this one I think it is their property and they should be to do what they want to.
Replies to Comment # 19. Even if what they do reduces nearby property values? I disagree.
End Trace Mode for Comment # 19.
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]