In a news release Tuesday, Paul shunned the Republican nominee and announced his support for Johnson, a former Republican governor of New Mexico who ran for president as a Libertarian in 2012 and 2016.
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
politics and politicians Title: Sen. Rand Paul Backs Libertarian Senate Candidate
SANTA FE, N.M. (AP) — Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky is endorsing the Gary Johnson's Libertarian campaign for U.S. Senate in the state of New Mexico. In a news release Tuesday, Paul shunned the Republican nominee and announced his support for Johnson, a former Republican governor of New Mexico who ran for president as a Libertarian in 2012 and 2016. Johnson and Paul share an enthusiasm for extremely limited government. Rand calls Johnson a true fiscal conservative and praises his leadership in opposing government overreach. Johnson backers are pressuring Republican Mick Rich to drop out of the race against incumbent Democrat Sen. Martin Heinrich of Albuquerque. Rich is a commercial construction contractor and political newcomer. Tuesday is the final day for candidates in New Mexico to withdraw their names from the general election ballot. Poster Comment: Integrity over party, excellent. Gary Johnson has killed a lot less babies, than President Trump has with his HUGE funding for PP, and purchase of Fresh Dead Baby Parts. (1 image) Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest Gary Johnson has killed a lot less babies, than President Trump How do you know?
#2. To: Justified (#1)
Because Gary Johnson was only the Governor of a small population State. The NM GOP wants a Democrat Senator, and they'll get it unless the certain loser Mick Rich(R) drops out. Would you vote for Rich to get the dem elected, or vote Johnson for the win? ![]() #3. To: hondo68 (#2) So you know that Trump murdered a baby?
#4. To: hondo68 (#2) Would you vote for Rich to get the dem elected, or vote Johnson for the win? Is that code for excusing another paultard of splitting non (D) votes? Fuck you, Hondope. You Paultards do everything you can do to help the Dems, because the truth is, you fucking Paultards hate (R)’s more than you do (D)’s... because LIBERALterians are more LEFT than conservatives. I'm the infidel... Allah warned you about. كافر المسلح #5. To: hondo68 (#2) Would you vote for Rich to get the dem elected, or vote Johnson for the win? Judging from the responses thus far, the so-called "conservatives" here would rather see a Democrat than a Libertarian win. “Truth is treason in the empire of lies.” - Ron Paul![]() In a Cop Culture, the Bill of Rights Doesn’t Amount to MuchIf a wall is massive enough and well guarded enough to keep them out, it is also massive enough and well guarded enough to keep you in. #6. To: GrandIsland (#4) LIBERALterians are more LEFT than conservatives. And the insanity continues unabated. Well done sport. “Truth is treason in the empire of lies.” - Ron Paul![]() In a Cop Culture, the Bill of Rights Doesn’t Amount to MuchIf a wall is massive enough and well guarded enough to keep them out, it is also massive enough and well guarded enough to keep you in. #7. To: GrandIsland, Fire Island activist (#4) Fuck you, Hondope A vote for the Dem Senator from NM. You like her because she's a homo like Pataki(R), Ruby Giuliani(R) & yukon(Independent, gender-neutral). ![]() Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest |
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
|