Obama Wars
See other Obama Wars Articles
Title: Let's all thank Sarah Jeong [NYT newly hired editorial writer]for showing us what liberals think of white people
Source:
American Thinker
URL Source: https://www.americanthinker.com/blo ... als_think_of_white_people.html
Published: Aug 3, 2018
Author: Ed Straker
Post Date: 2018-08-04 17:31:50 by Liberator
Keywords: Self-Loathing-Whites, Bigoted-New York Times, War-On-Whitey
Views: 2154
Comments: 13
See also: New York Times defends double standard in hiring writer with a history of explicit, hateful racism directed at whites Anti-white racism is endemic among liberals. For liberals, it is permissible to show disdain for white people in a way that would be totally, totally unacceptable to show for blacks, Hispanics, or people of other "colors" of the liberal rainbow. This is clearer than ever now that we have been exposed to the ravings of The New York Times' latest hire, editorial writer Sarah Jeong. Jeong, who is Asian (a word I despise for its P.C. vagueness), has a long history of making racist comments about white people on Twitter. When confronted with the fact of this, the Times doubled down, releasing a statement saying it knew about Jeong's comments but was okay with them because Jeong was just using "satire" to bait people who were making racist comments against her. Can you imagine the Times excusing such naked racism as "satire" if directed against any other ethnic group? I think not. I think Jeong was hired not in spite her racist rants, but rather because of them. Because I think Jeong says exactly what liberals feel. Let's look at some of her tweets: 1. "Dumba-- f------ white people marking up the internet with their opinions like dogs p------ on fire hydrants" Liberals tell us all the time that the opinions of white people do not matter, only the sensitivities of "victim classes." 2. "oh man it's kind of sick how much joy I get from being cruel to old white men." We are constantly told how old the white population is, and the media gleefully count off the years, days, and minutes until the time they are no longer in the majority. When whites become a minority in a particular school or workplace or town, it is a cause for media celebration. 3. "I dare you to go on Wikipedia and play 'Things white people can definitely take credit for' it's really hard." The media constantly report "the first black to do X" and "the first Hispanic to do Y" but never talk about race when a white person accomplishes anything (unless it is a woman), in line with their policy of promoting accomplishments only of non-white males. 4. "White people have stopped breeding. You'll all go extinct soon." See #2 above. 5. "I was equating Trump with Hitler before it was cool." The liberal media do this all the time, trying to delegitimize not merely Trump, but the millions who voted for him as racist and extreme. 6. "I open my mouth to politely greet a Republican, but nothing but an unending cascade of vomit flows from my face." Liberals encourage violence like this all the time. What consequences has Maxine Waters faced for encouraging people to harass Sarah Sanders? None. How many Berkeley rioters have faced punishment for violent acts against conservative speakers? None. You may remember that the publisher of The New York Times met with President Trump two weeks ago to complain about Trump's adversarial comments about the media. At the very same time the publisher was complaining about Trump, he was hiring an out-and-out anti-white racist for his senior editorial staff. Liberals hate white people, even if they themselves are white (the self-loathing makes them feel virtuous, in a twisted way). But as they issue forth their propaganda, they want to maintain the charade of impartiality. Sarah Jeong has done us all a great service for once again exposing the liberal media as the base, vile, anti-white racists they truly are.
Poster Comment: Repeating from the Author: The publisher of The New York Times met with President Trump two weeks ago to complain about Trump's adversarial comments about the media. At the very same time the publisher was complaining about Trump, he [the NYT publisher] was hiring an out-and-out anti-white racist for his senior editorial staff.
MORE of the Leftist MSM Mask is coming off. And they don't even care who knows anymore.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: ALL (#0)
(above) Sarah Jeong, New York Times Editorial Writer. Sarah Jeong: HATER OF WHITE PEOPLE. Who apparently HATED the hundreds of thousands of young White Men who fought, bled, and died in Korea. Just so Sarah Jeong could HATE their sons, their daughters, grand-daughters and sons. *OBSERVATIONAL NOTE: When you see pink, blue, or un-naturally dyed hair, high odds are that the person is QUEER. (Connection??) So...What will Jim Acosta and CNN say about this Big News about this New York Times editorial hire who is exposed as openly HATES WHITES? Will MSNBC note this? Dan Rather and CBS? ABC and PBS? The View? Late Nite "Comedians"?? ALL these Talking Heads...or will they simply ignore it like they do with ALL REAL NEWS? IF they do mention it, they will likely justify and CHEER ON Jeong's open hatred of WHITES. Like the thugs & hypocrites they are. I will watch FNC because ONLY they are blowing open the Political Info Highway that the rest of the TV Media are blacking out.... Which brings me to the smug, Left-slanting weasel Bret Baier of FOX NEWS. As Shemp Smith's apparent soul-mate, will that hypocritical closet NEVER TRUMPER p*ssy from FOX NEWS also defend this Fascist broad's "right" to preach and foment hate from the New York Times editorial board? (For Bret Baier, he and his Leftist MSM cultists are entitled to Hate. He files it under the Press's "Free Speech"). Bret Baier. This little weasel from FNC is already on record as tweeting defense ofthe daily verbal assaults against Sarah Sanders by Jim Acosta and other Dem-MSM Disruptors/Haters. Some of these unprincipled cowards (yes, like Bret Baier will do anything for an applause from Leftist "celebs" on Twitter.
Man, you are a staunch Republican, aren't you?
Good liberal ussc maTerial Hillary would do iT Love If you ... don't use exclamation points --- you should't be typeing ! Commas - semicolons - question marks are for girlie boys !
Have you ever considered that your 'love' is based on being strapped to a stainless steel gurney with a mouthpiece pushed into your throat to control your tongue movement during the government ordered mandated processes to improve your health? Meanwhile, your admission of "love" sucks as my money to pay for your government mandated containment for EST is getting really weird.
Gays for rump Yeah i geT iT Love If you ... don't use exclamation points --- you should't be typeing ! Commas - semicolons - question marks are for girlie boys !
Trump is the personification of strategic demoralization. The net result of his presidency will be a dialectic shift to the left. Bill and Hillary knew this when they encouraged him to "play a larger role in the Republican party.
So it Wass Bill who made you vote for Trump. Thanks again for your vote.
It was Bill and Hillary Clinton who encouraged your plastic "our boy" to "play a larger role in the Republican Party." And "Our Boy"'s insanity will surpass Woodrow Wilson's syphilitic contribution to American progress. { golf clap } for Golf Hat "conservatism"
"luminaries of the American Jewish establishment, included its main financial backer, Jacob Schiff, of Kuhn, Loeb & Co. [1] Concors acted as a translator for Trotsky during an interview that had been arranged with the New York Times." If the "superior" Khmer Rouge had a News Paper...
"Staunch Republican"?? Bucky -- How do you come to that conclusion? It is my "Fox News" reference?? I *hope* you've noticed that 95% of the MSM are de facto Democrat Party operatives (and liars by default.) ONLY FNC has taken a pro-truthposition of reporting. If that makes them "pro-Trump", then so be it. I'm also not sure if you're aware that the GOP is split into TWO distinct groups: a) The Establishment McStain-McConnell-Ryan-Corker Globalist wing who are more aligned with DEMS and liberal-Left policies. b) The Conservative-Libertarian Small Gummint-Trump wing, with includes the House Freedom Caucus. (Mark Meadows, Jim Jordan/DeSantis, Gohmert, Gaetz, etal. THESE are the Republicans who are exposing the Deep State and Dems who've launched the coup against Trump. AND...against We The People. It was the Freedom Caucus who also pressured that 0bama toe-licker, John Boehner out as Speaker. So my answer to you: I AM "staunchly Republican" -- just as long as those Pubbies are America-Firsters AND fight "Staunch Democrats/Commies" and "Staunch Globalists like the Bushes, McStain, McConnell, etal. QUESTIONS TO YOU: Where do YOU stand politically? Whom do you support? Whose policies do you oppose? Democrats or Republicans? (And btw -- there IS no such thing as "neutral" in this case.)
YES! I'm opposed to both wings of Donald & Hillary's globalist party, and their plans to turn America into a third world s**thole.
#2. To: Liberator (#1)
#3. To: Liberator (#1)
boris
#4. To: BorisY (#3)
Love boris
Just askin', of course.
#5. To: BorisY, Log Cabin Republicans (#3)
#6. To: hondo68 (#5)
boris
#7. To: hondo68 (#5)
Trump won the election because the homos like him better than Hillary.
#8. To: VxH (#7)
#9. To: A K A Stone (#8)
(Edited)
#10. To: A K A Stone (#8)
(Edited)
So it Wass Bill who made you vote for Trump. Thanks again for your vote.
#11. To: Liberator (#0)
#12. To: buckeroo (#2)
Man, you are a staunch Republican, aren't you?
#13. To: Liberator, buckeroo, *The Two Parties ARE the Same* (#12)
Whose policies do you oppose? Democrats or Republicans?
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]