[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
Opinions/Editorials Title: War...
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest Bs Health care and education get nearly as much individually as military. Military is constitutional as healthcare and education isn’t.
#2. To: Justified (#1) Health care and education get nearly as much individually as military. Why is the federal government even involved in healthcare and education? Aren't those issues better addressed at the state level?
#3. To: Justified, Deckard (#1)
#4. To: Deckard (#0) In the last budget Trump got his $200 billion for the military, but the Democrats also got $200 billion for their programs. Your cartoon should show all the government agencies eating well, surrounded by taxpayers with empty plates.
#5. To: Justified (#1) Military is constitutional as healthcare and education isn’t. All three are constitutional.
#6. To: Deckard (#0) Over half of the federal budget goes for social services. That's just a fact.
#7. To: Vicomte13 (#5) Only one is . The others are a state’s issue. US is to big to have a one fits all law/taxation for health care and education.
#8. To: misterwhite (#2) Yes.
#9. To: Willie Green (#3)
#10. To: Justified (#1) (Edited) Health care and education get nearly as much individually as military. What does "hundreds of billions of dollars" mean?
NATO sure is a profitable cash-cow for being "obsolete".
#11. To: Justified (#7) Only one is . The others are a state’s issue. US is to big to have a one fits all law/taxation for health care and education. That's your political opinion, to which you are certainly entitled. However, as a matter of the law, health car and education are constitutional.
#12. To: Deckard (#0) National Defense is the first thing on the list for valid uses of tax money.
#13. To: Vicomte13 (#11) Technically we could also turn communist by that thought. We could pay the rest of the world a living wage technically constitution wise.
Realistically, ethically and righteously its up to the states.
I do know whenever the central government gets a hold of it they screw it up, bloat it with crony payoffs and distort it to what they want it to do. That's why the founding fathers set up the country and government this way. They(socialist) perverted the commerce law to mean regulate everything which it was never meant todo.
#14. To: Justified (#13) Technically we could also turn communist by that thought. We could pay the rest of the world a living wage technically constitution wise. All true. It's up to us to elect politicians who don't do that. And it's up to the politicians to develop a sufficiently robust set of social services and social welfare that voters will be content with that and not, in their frustration of being underserved by a government that needs to take care of its people, end up electing a government that will over-serve them by going full socialist.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest |
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
|