[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

"The Democrat Meltdown Continues"

"Yes, We Need Deportations Without Due Process"

"Trump's Tariff Play Smart, Strategic, Working"

"Leftists Make Desperate Attempt to Discredit Photo of Abrego Garcia's MS-13 Tattoos. Here Are Receipts"

"Trump Administration Freezes $2 Billion After Harvard Refuses to Meet Demands"on After Harvard Refuses to Meet Demands

"Doctors Committing Insurance Fraud to Conceal Trans Procedures, Texas Children’s Whistleblower Testifies"

"Left Using '8647' Symbol for Violence Against Trump, Musk"

KawasakiÂ’s new rideable robohorse is straight out of a sci-fi novel

"Trade should work for America, not rule it"

"The Stakes Couldn’t Be Higher in Wisconsin’s Supreme Court Race – What’s at Risk for the GOP"

"How Trump caught big-government fans in their own trap"

‘Are You Prepared for Violence?’

Greek Orthodox Archbishop gives President Trump a Cross, tells him "Make America Invincible"

"Trump signs executive order eliminating the Department of Education!!!"

"If AOC Is the Democratic Future, the Party Is Even Worse Off Than We Think"

"Ending EPA Overreach"

Closest Look Ever at How Pyramids Were Built

Moment the SpaceX crew Meets Stranded ISS Crew

The Exodus Pharaoh EXPLAINED!

Did the Israelites Really Cross the Red Sea? Stunning Evidence of the Location of Red Sea Crossing!

Are we experiencing a Triumph of Orthodoxy?

Judge Napolitano with Konstantin Malofeev (Moscow, Russia)

"Trump Administration Cancels Most USAID Programs, Folds Others into State Department"

Introducing Manus: The General AI Agent

"Chinese Spies in Our Military? Straight to Jail"

Any suggestion that the USA and NATO are "Helping" or have ever helped Ukraine needs to be shot down instantly

"Real problem with the Palestinians: Nobody wants them"

ACDC & The Rolling Stones - Rock Me Baby

Magnus Carlsen gives a London System lesson!

"The Democrats Are Suffering Through a Drought of Generational Talent"

7 Tactics Of The Enemy To Weaken Your Faith

Strange And Biblical Events Are Happening

Every year ... BusiesT casino gambling day -- in Las Vegas

Trump’s DOGE Plan Is Legally Untouchable—Elon Musk Holds the Scalpel

Palestinians: What do you think of the Trump plan for Gaza?

What Happens Inside Gaza’s Secret Tunnels? | Unpacked

Hamas Torture Bodycam Footage: "These Monsters Filmed it All" | IDF Warfighter Doron Keidar, Ep. 225

EXPOSED: The Dark Truth About the Hostages in Gaza

New Task Force Ready To Expose Dark Secrets

Egypt Amasses Forces on Israel’s Southern Border | World War 3 About to Start?

"Trump wants to dismantle the Education Department. Here’s how it would work"

test

"Federal Workers Concerned That Returning To Office Will Interfere With Them Not Working"

"Yes, the Democrats Have a Governing Problem – They Blame America First, Then Govern Accordingly"

"Trump and His New Frenemies, Abroad and at Home"

"The Left’s Sin Is of Omission and Lost Opportunity"

"How Trump’s team will break down the woke bureaucracy"

Pete Hegseth will be confirmed in a few minutes

"Greg Gutfeld Cooks Jessica Tarlov and Liberal Media in Brilliant Take on Trump's First Day"

"They Gave Trump the Center, and He Took It"


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Opinions/Editorials
See other Opinions/Editorials Articles

Title: Where Do You Draw the Line in Today’s Crazed Political Environment?
Source: Liberty Blitzkrieg
URL Source: https://libertyblitzkrieg.com/2018/ ... -crazed-political-environment/
Published: Jun 26, 2018
Author: Michael Krieger
Post Date: 2018-06-27 07:34:38 by Deckard
Keywords: None
Views: 1358
Comments: 12

If you vote for Trump, then you the voter, you, not Donald Trump, are standing at the border like Nazis going ‘you here, you here’.

– Donny Deutsch on MSNBC last week

Whoever fights monsters should see to it that in the process he does not become a monster. And if you gaze long enough into an abyss, the abyss will gaze back into you.

– Friedrich Nietzsche

With each passing day, Trump’s hardcore supporters and detractors become more deeply entrenched in their respective corners and grow more hysterical. With every turn of the news cycle, we see two groups increasingly and equally convinced that only they and their allies can save the nation from total ruin. As someone who isn’t a cheerleader for any politician or political party, it’s fascinating to watch. It’s also made me consider where to draw the line when it comes to political action or commentary.

First off, we need to understand that an increasingly centralized, corrupt and unaccountable government making decisions for 325 million people will be inherently and systemically abusive toward the citizenry. To confront this reality we need resistance, but it can’t be the superficial, purely partisan kind.

Superficial resistance is what you see from establishment Democrats and MSNBC, peddling the fairytale that Trump the person is the problem, not the system itself. In contrast, genuine resistance is admitting and confronting our root problems which are deeply engrained and systemic. It means coming to terms with the fact we’re largely living in an imperial, executive-driven government structure as opposed to a Constitutional Republic. Congress doesn’t even bother to seriously weigh in on war and military operations anymore, essentially outsourcing its most awesome responsibility to whoever happens to be president. Trump the man isn’t our huge problem; excessive, secret and unaccountable government power is.

We need to admit that whoever happens to be elevated to the presidency will invariably abuse such misplaced power. Obama’s terrible policies were deserving of intense criticism as are Trump’s, but thinking that merely switching out the  president is going to magically fix our problems is deranged. This is why I have no patience for “the resistance” to-date, which focuses all its energy and passion on Trump the man, versus they  imperial leviathan he happens to be in charge of at this moment in time.

Obsessing about Trump the man has caused many of his high profile detractors to become overly hysterical, myopic and downright foolish. A perfect example of this occurred last Friday when Donny Deutsch, an advertising guy and pundit, explicitly instructed people to consider Trump voters Nazis.

What Deutsch manages to do is take an already existing obsessive focus on Trump the individual and move it in an even more counterproductive and mindless direction. Blaming Trump the man apparently isn’t superficial enough for him, so he encourages you to demonize the voter. You know the average person who’s intentionality given two awful candidates to choose from every four years. They’re the real problem according to him. Moreover, he doesn’t just want you to blame Trump voters, he wants you to consider them Nazis. This is the sort of clown they put on political television.

The fact that such nonsense so seamlessly flowed from his mouth demonstrates a total lack of capacity for reason. According to this logic, every Obama voter should be seen as a reckless imperialist murderer directly responsible for the destruction of Libya and the emergence of slave markets there. Feel free to use this sort of logic, but you won’t like where it leads.

Even worse for Deutsch, blaming voters is a surefire way to achieve noting politically.

Trump supporters expressed outrage over what Deutsch said, and I’m sympathetic to that. What he said was ludicrous, dangerous and petty. That said, many of those same people got equally bent out of shape over the fact Trump press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders was asked to leave a Virginia restaurant by its owners. On this front I disagree, and think it’s important to draw a distinction between what Deutch said and what the owner of the Red Hen restaurant did.

Of course, I’m not arguing “anything goes” when it comes to government officials and bureaucrats, but kicking Sanders out of a restaurant is a non-violent political statement specifically directed at someone who voluntarily works for government. Standing up to and making government officials uncomfortable is part of our political heritage. We should also never forget how uncomfortable our unaccountable and overbearing government makes us feel all the time.

Finally, the action may herald the beginning of a new sort of activism based on grassroots action as opposed to the superficial, nonsensical and completely phony resistance promulgated by cable television pundits and washed up corporate Democrats such as Nancy Pelosi and Chucky Schumer.

Obama wasn’t the problem, Trump isn’t the problem, and one slice of desperate, irritated voters isn’t the problem either. If we want to start blaming voters then we should look in the mirror, because all of us allowed this to happen. Demonizing and dehumanizing our neighbors because they voted differently might feel good, but it won’t get us anywhere.

However, giving government officials a hard time for doing terrible things is a reasonable tactic, irrespective of which party happens to be in power. They work for us, and if they’re screwing us over (which is at least 95% of the time) we shouldn’t just bow down and accept it.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 10.

#10. To: Deckard (#0)

In contrast, genuine resistance is admitting and confronting our root problems which are deeply engrained and systemic. It means coming to terms with the fact we’re largely living in an imperial, executive-driven government structure as opposed to a Constitutional Republic.

No, it really doesn't. That's just another layer of the onion.

Our root problems are deeply engrained and personal: we do not love each other, and we justify to ourselves those things that let us exploit others.

The libertarian ideal has each man and his dependents living on their own plot of land, minding their business. This is a good model, as far as it goes, for keeping people free of many problems.

It too breaks down, however, at the origin point. New land does not materialize with new people, and those dependents really are dependent: adults do not all come to adulthood with either the intellectual capital or actual capital to be able to get their own piece of land and start their own family. It takes time. When the game is fair, they can get there, but when the game is not fair - as it wasn't, for example, to former slaves and their kids who were "free", without capital - and it isn't today, for example, for crack babies - then the question is "What do we DO about it?"

And the trouble with sticking with an unmodified libertarian model is: "We do as much as individuals voluntarily decide to do". Trouble with that is that there are more ex-slaves and crack babies than there is willingness to voluntarily provide. And that's where it breaks down.

If you stick with the perfect libertarian model, you will end up with a class of people who had no chance from the outset, and who are destitute and desperate and don't have that plot of land for their family, or for themselves. But to shore it up, you have to break the voluntarism of the model: there are too many needs for voluntarism to cover.

In the end, you have to decide what you value more: the more complete liberty of the libertarian model, or the lesser liberty of the "compromised" libertarian model - libertarian as far as practical, but with sufficient coercion to reduce the human misery quotient substantially.

Most conservatives, and posters here, prefer the first option. I prefer the second option.

The question then is merely one of moral motivation. My motivation is empathy, and my biggest political ally in this is Catholicism. Your motivation seems to me to be the genuine belief that it will be better for everybody if we just have that full libertarian model, that in fact there will so few poor folks under it that volunteerism will be able to cover the difference. And I just don't believe it.

I would say that history gives us the example that a much more libertarian model existed in the past, and it didn't provide nearly enough. I expect you would counter that even in the past, the model was not TRULY libertarian, and therefore it has not been tested.

I would acknowledge that may be so, and would argue that in the real world of real men we can never get to the true libertarian model, because not all men simply value liberty and being left alone - many thirst for power, status and rulership, and any political process allows that.

We could go back and forth. I would call it the argument between a realist and an idealist, on this score, but when we flip back to the original issue that creates the fly in the ointment, I would say that we are both realists on this matter in a different way.

I do not see, in you, a person who doesn't care about the lot of marginalized and destitute. Rather, I think you do care, and that you just believe that a true libertarian model would get us there, while I also care about them and just don't think it would work in reality - or maybe it would, but that we can never get there because of supervening realities of human nature. And, because I care about the marginalized and the destitute, I think we have to help them in the here and now, and can't wait for the world to change. So my concern for them is strong enough for me to cause me to be willing to damage the purity of a model I don't think would work, while your counter is that I am not giving what would work a chance.

I actually respect your position on this, at least what I have described as your position, because I acknowledge that maybe I'm wrong, maybe it could work, and your intentions are good.

What I don't like is when other people who call themselves Christians won't admit that the problem of destitution and human suffering is more important than the integrity of a political model they prefer. And when they actually attack the concern itself, I get pissed off and vicious, and sometimes say very un-Christian things myself.

Then I feel bad, but they stay smug.

I console myself in noting that NONE of the models that ANY of us on this site prefer is actually the way that the country is run, but that the real way it is run comes a lot closer to covering the things I worry most about than any of the alternatives proposed here.

So, while I really don't like our present system, I conservatively prefer to stick to it, because it does provide for the people at the bottom, rather than go along with the political ideas of others who make a POINT of saying that the people at the bottom are all criminals who should be cut off, etc.

That was long. Honest, but long. Sorry.

Vicomte13  posted on  2018-06-27   10:18:17 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 10.

        There are no replies to Comment # 10.


End Trace Mode for Comment # 10.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com