[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
|
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
Opinions/Editorials Title: Amnesty - good for country, or good for Democrats? One of the most outspoken critics of illegal immigration calls the latest amnesty bill submitted to Congress nothing but an effort to create a permanent dependency class in the United States that will permanently support Democrats.
Rep. Luis Gutierrez (D-Illinos)Recently Congressman Luis Gutierrez (D-Illinois) introduced what he is calling the "Comprehensive Immigration Reform for America's Security and Prosperity," which would effectively give amnesty to over 12 million illegal aliens in the United States. (See earlier article) Congressman Steve King (R-Iowa) is staunchly opposed to Gutierrez's bill and says it is only about keeping Democrats in power. "If I would advocate such a thing from my district, I can tell you that the people in the district would rise up and clamor for me to be removed from office -- but apparently the people in Chicago see some kind of benefit [to Gutierrez's bill]," the congressman contends.
Steve King"This isn't about America's prosperity," King continues, "this is about expanding the dependency class in America, trying to create a permanent dependency class so it will permanently vote for Democrats so they can be permanently in power, permanently undermining our liberty, our free enterprise system, and our Constitution and rule of law itself. That's what this is about; it isn't about helping people, and I think Gutierrez knows that." King explains that a bipartisan effort to pass amnesty was rejected twice in recent years -- and given the current economic climate and higher unemployment rate among American workers, he does not expect a different result now. Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 35. Amnesty - good for country, or good for Democrats? It's good for Dims and Pubs. (you conveniently leave out the Pubs) Bad for the country.
#20. To: Wood_Chopper (#18) t's good for Dims and Pubs. (you conveniently leave out the Pubs) Another off topic remark OI. I did not author the article.
#22. To: WhiteSands, Wood_Chopper (#20) Another off topic remark OI. Wood_Chopper = Original_Intent?
#27. To: Liberator, WhiteSands (#22) Wood_Chopper = Original_Intent? Do you think I'm OI? (btw, if I'm not, will you be willing to admit, in writing to all other posters here and at LP, to the tactics WhiteSands uses when he's getting his ass handed to him by falsely accusing posters of being someone they're not?)
#30. To: Wood_Chopper (#27) (Edited) (btw, if I'm not, will you be willing to admit, in writing to all other posters here and at LP, to the tactics WhiteSands uses when he's getting his ass handed to him by falsely accusing posters of being someone they're not?) OI you still go off topic on EVERY Thread.
I do agree in your not wanting to be known as that ass hat though.
#35. To: WhiteSands, Wood_Chopper (#30) I do agree in your not wanting to be known as that ass hat though. Is that sanctimonious asshole still posting? Still seeing conspiracies everywhere?
Replies to Comment # 35. There are no replies to Comment # 35.
End Trace Mode for Comment # 35. Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest |
|
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
|