[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
Opinions/Editorials Title: Amnesty - good for country, or good for Democrats? One of the most outspoken critics of illegal immigration calls the latest amnesty bill submitted to Congress nothing but an effort to create a permanent dependency class in the United States that will permanently support Democrats.
Rep. Luis Gutierrez (D-Illinos)Recently Congressman Luis Gutierrez (D-Illinois) introduced what he is calling the "Comprehensive Immigration Reform for America's Security and Prosperity," which would effectively give amnesty to over 12 million illegal aliens in the United States. (See earlier article) Congressman Steve King (R-Iowa) is staunchly opposed to Gutierrez's bill and says it is only about keeping Democrats in power. "If I would advocate such a thing from my district, I can tell you that the people in the district would rise up and clamor for me to be removed from office -- but apparently the people in Chicago see some kind of benefit [to Gutierrez's bill]," the congressman contends.
Steve King"This isn't about America's prosperity," King continues, "this is about expanding the dependency class in America, trying to create a permanent dependency class so it will permanently vote for Democrats so they can be permanently in power, permanently undermining our liberty, our free enterprise system, and our Constitution and rule of law itself. That's what this is about; it isn't about helping people, and I think Gutierrez knows that." King explains that a bipartisan effort to pass amnesty was rejected twice in recent years -- and given the current economic climate and higher unemployment rate among American workers, he does not expect a different result now. Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest Good for Democrats. BAd for the US. We border a Catholic Nation that overwhelmingly votes DNC. ----------------------------------------------------------- #2. To: WhiteSands (#0) Congressman Steve King (R-Iowa) is staunchly opposed to Gutierrez's bill and says it is only about keeping Democrats in power. Gutierrez should be impeached! What's the difference between Racism_Boot's mouth and anal pore? There isn't any, they both spew gas and feces. #3. To: WhiteSands (#1) I agree, yet all this was started by Carl Rove and George Bush. You might remember that the Republicans nearly got this thing passed. You might also remember this famous GWB phrase: "Family values don't stop at the Rio Grande River". How do you explain that?
#4. To: WhiteSands (#0) Amnesty = End of this country and the republican party
#5. To: Bickus Dickus (#3) (Edited) Started with Reagan and his Amnesty. Perpetuated with your parties judges voiding our Prop 187. Carried on Paul and his votes. ----------------------------------------------------------- #6. To: WhiteSands (#5) Perpetuated with your parties judges voiding our Prop 187. My party back then was the Republicans. It took George Bush to turn me into an independent.
#7. To: Ibluafartsky (#2) Gutierrez should be impeached! No, he should be tried for treason then hanged by the neck until dead.
#8. To: Bickus Dickus (#3) You might also remember this famous GWB phrase: "Family values don't stop at the Rio Grande River". And: "hard workers" "doing the jobs Americans won't do" "just trying to feed their families" "Muslims are a peaceful people"
#9. To: Moderate Mammal (#8) Most people seem to have forgotten that Bush started his administration with an amnesty plan. That pesky 9/11 thing just postponed it. From 2000. "George W. Bush endorses the "demographic revolution" that Bill Clinton said he hoped would end "European culture" in America, the GOP presidential hopeful went on to call for a lifting of the legal limits on immigration. In an interview ignored by the liberal press, as well as his GOP rivals, Bush told the editorial board of the Cedar Rapids Gazette, that "we ought to increase legal immigration." Bush said advocates of immigration reform represent the "xenophobic dark side of American politics," and derided them as "folk's who want to isolate America." He expressed sympathy for aliens who come to America to take jobs. "Family values don't stop at the Rio Grande River," he said. "If you're a mother and dad, and you got kids to feed, and you're making 50 cents and you see someone in Iowa making $50, and you care about those kids, you're coming." Bush suggested that because Americans aren't skilled enough to handle the demands of an economy driven by high-tech industries, "we ought to increase legal immigration for our country's advantage. The high-tech world that we are now dominate is dependent on educated folks, but we're short of workers. It is to our advantage to encourage high-powered, smart people to come into this country," he said. He did not say, when questioned by Craig Nelson, an immigration-reform activist at an Iowa rally, how many more immigrants over current level he intends to bring into the U.S., if elected. When asked about "chain migration," he said he was unaware of it. Bush said if elected president he would not use U.S. troops to defend America's borders against illegal aliens and terrorists, because "Mexico's our neighbor and friend." Bush apparently agrees with Republican pollster, Lance Tarrance, who stated, "We have now moved from the southern strategy...to a Hispanic strategy." National Republican chairman Jim Nicholson, told the Washington Times that "Hispanics are to the elections of 2000 what 'soccer moms' were to the election of 1996. By "soccer moms," Nicholoson was referring to white suburban married female voters. Nicholson said the party will go after the Hispanic vote with Spanish language print advertising and radio and television spot announcements. The new strategy man require it to adopt an anti-white strategy. Eddie Mahe, a right-wing political consultant to the Republican National Committee, said the party will undertake "deep commitment" to the Hispanic community by recruiting Hispanics instead of whites on the staffs of state parties and elected Republican officials." I really don't understand the hatred for President Black Bush by Repulicans. He's doing everything the Republicans cheered about when Bush did it.
#10. To: Ibluafartsky (#2) Gutierrez should be impeached! What's the sentence for Treason again?
#11. To: Bickus Dickus (#3) You might also remember this famous GWB phrase: "Family values don't stop at the Rio Grande River". No one except you would "explain it" with a picture of Sarah Palin. *snicker*
#12. To: TXBSAFH (#4) Amnesty = End of this country and the republican party Especially immediate Amnesty before 2012.
#13. To: Bickus Dickus (#9) (Edited) Bush said if elected president he would not use U.S. troops to defend America's borders against illegal aliens and terrorists, because "Mexico's our neighbor and friend."
Can you provide proof he said this? ----------------------------------------------------------- #14. To: WhiteSands (#5) Started with Reagan and his Amnesty. In Reagan's defense, there's a HUGE difference between 3 million given Amnesty in 1986 and 35 million today. Perpetuated with your parties judges voiding our Prop 187. THAT destroyed California. I still don't know how millions of votes could be overturned by a few over-officious black-robed jerks.
#15. To: Liberator (#14) (Edited) I love Reagan too. But he did create the belief that Amnesty could happen again. ----------------------------------------------------------- #16. To: Liberator (#14) We saw the flames licking around the US 15 years before most Americans had ever seen their first Mexican. ----------------------------------------------------------- #17. To: Bickus Dickus (#9) Bush said if elected president he would not use U.S. troops to defend America's borders against illegal aliens and terrorists, because "Mexico's our neighbor and friend." GREAT FIND!!!
And when Bush was elected he .... fought the Border states Governors to ..... put the national guard on the border! ----------------------------------------------------------- #18. To: WhiteSands (#0) Amnesty - good for country, or good for Democrats? It's good for Dims and Pubs. (you conveniently leave out the Pubs) Bad for the country. ______________________________________________________________ tag ... you're it. #19. To: Bickus Dickus (#3) Our Values do extend well beyond the Rio Grande. ----------------------------------------------------------- #20. To: Wood_Chopper (#18) t's good for Dims and Pubs. (you conveniently leave out the Pubs) Another off topic remark OI. I did not author the article. ----------------------------------------------------------- #21. To: Bickus Dickus (#9) I really don't understand the hatred for President Black Bush by Repulicans. He's doing everything the Republicans cheered about when Bush did it. PLENTY of Republicans and Independents did NOT "cheer," but moaned groaned and b*tched about Dubya - even at the time...Then conveniently came 9/11. And even then Dubya policies were questioned further and it was determined that he was a FOS. That said, the dynamics of the 2000 and 2004 election forced the elctorate to choose between Al Gore and Dubya Bush....OR, John Kerry and Dubya Bush. LOSE-LOSE-LOSE-LOSE. Not defending Bush at ALL, but have you noted who Barry Hussein's Cabinet and Czars are? Noted his "Blame America Apology Tour"? Noted his agenda? WHO his supporters are? Dubya was a snake-oil salesman, a coked-out, drunken pro-illegal lunatic, and socialist CFR/NWO-tool, but Barry Hussein 0bama is in his OWN league.
#22. To: WhiteSands, Wood_Chopper (#20) Another off topic remark OI. Wood_Chopper = Original_Intent?
#23. To: WhiteSands (#15) I love Reagan too. And he later said it was a great mistake. IOW, he was badly advised by his viper-nest of NWO-infiltrating staff.
#24. To: Liberator (#22) Yes. OI was always dodging by using the Debate Rules form a Jr College to reply with. Just as he does here. ----------------------------------------------------------- #25. To: Bickus Dickus (#9) "we ought to increase legal immigration." What is it about "legal" that offends you, little dick? What's the difference between Racism_Boot's mouth and anal pore? There isn't any, they both spew gas and feces. #26. To: Bickus Dickus (#9) Black Bush Watch yourself, little dick. What's the difference between Racism_Boot's mouth and anal pore? There isn't any, they both spew gas and feces. #27. To: Liberator, WhiteSands (#22) Wood_Chopper = Original_Intent? Do you think I'm OI? (btw, if I'm not, will you be willing to admit, in writing to all other posters here and at LP, to the tactics WhiteSands uses when he's getting his ass handed to him by falsely accusing posters of being someone they're not?) ______________________________________________________________ tag ... you're it. #28. To: Wood_Chopper, Liberator, WhiteSands (#27) Do you think I'm OI? How often do you soil yourself? What's the difference between Racism_Boot's mouth and anal pore? There isn't any, they both spew gas and feces. #29. To: Ibluafartsky (#28) How often do you soil yourself? Never. How often do you use personal attacks instead of posting cogent arguments, especially when you've been bested? Oh, never mind. Everyone here who's interested to find out can search your posts here and see. Merry Christmas to you and yours. ______________________________________________________________ tag ... you're it. #30. To: Wood_Chopper (#27) (Edited) (btw, if I'm not, will you be willing to admit, in writing to all other posters here and at LP, to the tactics WhiteSands uses when he's getting his ass handed to him by falsely accusing posters of being someone they're not?) OI you still go off topic on EVERY Thread.
I do agree in your not wanting to be known as that ass hat though. ----------------------------------------------------------- #31. To: Wood_Chopper, WhiteSands (#27) Do you think I'm OI? It doesn't matter who you are, but it'd be interesting since you've already informed me that we're already supposedly "acquainted." Lol - WHAT are your terms to admitting who your alias is? Wouldn't you rather have my first born?
#32. To: Liberator, WhiteSands (#31) Lol - WHAT are your terms to admitting who your alias is? Wouldn't you rather have my first born? I dunno. How much wood can your first born chop? :-) I ain't OI. But you can see WhiteSands' tactics. Keep them in mind. ______________________________________________________________ tag ... you're it. #33. To: Liberator (#31) You'll know me for who I am by what I post. Someone telling me that amnesty is not amnesty because they had to pay $500 to get it is on par with Obama telling me illegal aliens won't get health care because he will give them amnesty first, and only give them health care after he's made them legal. Technically, they're both right, but they're still lying pieces of shit. ______________________________________________________________ tag ... you're it. #34. To: Bickus Dickus (#9) Most people seem to have forgotten that Bush started his administration with an amnesty plan. Yup, the plan all along. They knew the bushbots would suck up to him no matter what happened. Even 9/11 followed by the open border and the gall to import mooslums into the US while fighting terrorists.
#35. To: WhiteSands, Wood_Chopper (#30) I do agree in your not wanting to be known as that ass hat though. Is that sanctimonious asshole still posting? Still seeing conspiracies everywhere? What's the difference between Racism_Boot's mouth and anal pore? There isn't any, they both spew gas and feces. #36. To: WhiteSands (#19) Our Values do extend well beyond the Rio Grande. Well I guess that means we should let everybody into the country then.
That was what Bush was getting at.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest |
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
|