[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Freepers Still Love war

Parody ... Jump / Trump --- van Halen jump

"The Democrat Meltdown Continues"

"Yes, We Need Deportations Without Due Process"

"Trump's Tariff Play Smart, Strategic, Working"

"Leftists Make Desperate Attempt to Discredit Photo of Abrego Garcia's MS-13 Tattoos. Here Are Receipts"

"Trump Administration Freezes $2 Billion After Harvard Refuses to Meet Demands"on After Harvard Refuses to Meet Demands

"Doctors Committing Insurance Fraud to Conceal Trans Procedures, Texas Children’s Whistleblower Testifies"

"Left Using '8647' Symbol for Violence Against Trump, Musk"

KawasakiÂ’s new rideable robohorse is straight out of a sci-fi novel

"Trade should work for America, not rule it"

"The Stakes Couldn’t Be Higher in Wisconsin’s Supreme Court Race – What’s at Risk for the GOP"

"How Trump caught big-government fans in their own trap"

‘Are You Prepared for Violence?’

Greek Orthodox Archbishop gives President Trump a Cross, tells him "Make America Invincible"

"Trump signs executive order eliminating the Department of Education!!!"

"If AOC Is the Democratic Future, the Party Is Even Worse Off Than We Think"

"Ending EPA Overreach"

Closest Look Ever at How Pyramids Were Built

Moment the SpaceX crew Meets Stranded ISS Crew

The Exodus Pharaoh EXPLAINED!

Did the Israelites Really Cross the Red Sea? Stunning Evidence of the Location of Red Sea Crossing!

Are we experiencing a Triumph of Orthodoxy?

Judge Napolitano with Konstantin Malofeev (Moscow, Russia)

"Trump Administration Cancels Most USAID Programs, Folds Others into State Department"

Introducing Manus: The General AI Agent

"Chinese Spies in Our Military? Straight to Jail"

Any suggestion that the USA and NATO are "Helping" or have ever helped Ukraine needs to be shot down instantly

"Real problem with the Palestinians: Nobody wants them"

ACDC & The Rolling Stones - Rock Me Baby

Magnus Carlsen gives a London System lesson!

"The Democrats Are Suffering Through a Drought of Generational Talent"

7 Tactics Of The Enemy To Weaken Your Faith

Strange And Biblical Events Are Happening

Every year ... BusiesT casino gambling day -- in Las Vegas

Trump’s DOGE Plan Is Legally Untouchable—Elon Musk Holds the Scalpel

Palestinians: What do you think of the Trump plan for Gaza?

What Happens Inside Gaza’s Secret Tunnels? | Unpacked

Hamas Torture Bodycam Footage: "These Monsters Filmed it All" | IDF Warfighter Doron Keidar, Ep. 225

EXPOSED: The Dark Truth About the Hostages in Gaza

New Task Force Ready To Expose Dark Secrets

Egypt Amasses Forces on Israel’s Southern Border | World War 3 About to Start?

"Trump wants to dismantle the Education Department. Here’s how it would work"

test

"Federal Workers Concerned That Returning To Office Will Interfere With Them Not Working"

"Yes, the Democrats Have a Governing Problem – They Blame America First, Then Govern Accordingly"

"Trump and His New Frenemies, Abroad and at Home"

"The Left’s Sin Is of Omission and Lost Opportunity"

"How Trump’s team will break down the woke bureaucracy"

Pete Hegseth will be confirmed in a few minutes


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Bang / Guns
See other Bang / Guns Articles

Title: California Considering Unprecedented Law Restricting Police Firearm Use
Source: [None]
URL Source: [None]
Published: Apr 4, 2018
Author: Lydia O’Connor
Post Date: 2018-04-04 11:28:15 by tpaine
Keywords: None
Views: 810
Comments: 12

California Considering Unprecedented Law Restricting Police Firearm Use

Opening fire should be enforced as the last resort, the bill’s supporters say.

By Lydia O’Connor

On the heels of police officers shooting a young, unarmed black man to death in Sacramento, California, last month, state lawmakers announced a first-of-its- kind bill on Monday that raises the standard for when officers may open fire.

The proposed legislation would change the guidance in California’s use of force laws so that police may open fire ”‘only when necessary’ rather than ‘when reasonable,’” Sacramento-based Assemblyman Kevin McCarty (D), said at a press conference Tuesday.

He co-authored the bill with fellow Democrat Assemblywoman Shirley Weber with support from the American Civil Liberties Union and fellow members of the California Legislative Black Caucus. They were joined at Tuesday’s press conference with Sacramento leaders from the NAACP and the Black Lives Matter movement, along with the grandfather of 22-year-old Stephon Clark, last month’s shooting victim.

“We should no longer be the target practice of a ‘shoot first, ask questions later’ police force,” Assemblyman Christopher Holden (D) said, before listing the names of several other unarmed black victims of police shootings.

BE THE FIRST TO KNOW DOWNLOAD The legislation is aimed at tackling the reality, as seen in studies, that police kill unarmed black men at disproportionate rates compared to unarmed white men. Supporters of the bill hope raising the standard for when lethal force is permitted will encourage officers to make de-escalation their first line of defense.

The current standard comes from an “over-100-year-old law that too often justifies deadly force incidents,” McCarty said.

In the weeks since Clark’s death, McCarty’s district has been stormed by protestors furious about the emerging details surrounding the shooting. Upward of 300 demonstrators gathered in Sacramento last Friday after an autopsy revealed the young father was shot at least seven times in the back in his own backyard.

“It’s clear that the current law protects the police, not the people,” ACLU legislative advocate Lizzie Buchen said at Tuesday’s announcement as activists recounted similar shooting incidents involving police.

Weber is confident the state can pave the way on this issue.

“If California can’t do it,” she asked, “who can?”


Poster Comment:

Good plan, the first rational law by the progressives in a long time, ---- about gun use.. Far to many cops are cowboys, eager to use their weapons.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 11.

#2. To: tpaine (#0)

The legislation is aimed at tackling the reality, as seen in studies, that police kill unarmed black men at disproportionate rates compared to unarmed white men.

This may be a slanted claim.

The reality is that urban areas have disproportionately higher black populations. Does anyone contest that? Whatever the reason I believe it's true.

And it's also true that urban areas have the highest crime, so I would expect urban areas therefore to have the highest rates of police shootings.

So to measure things fairly, you need to look at the black/white police shooting victim rates in comparison with the black/white population rates where the shootings occur.

There may well still be racial profiling, but it's certainly not fair to compare national racial stats with national police shootings and conclude there is profiling, if most shootings are in urban areas where blacks make up a higher percentage of the population.

When people are packed into cities, crime will go up no matter what race they are.

Pinguinite  posted on  2018-04-04   11:49:34 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: Pinguinite (#2)

This may be a slanted claim.

Yep, I agree it is.. But race aside, cops are a bit too eager to blast away for my comfort.

tpaine  posted on  2018-04-04   13:53:39 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: tpaine, Pinguinite (#4)

cops are a bit too eager to blast away for my comfort.

I disagree. I think they are terrified which cause them to act fast or die(or greatly harmed).

How did we in the old days have so little problem with so few officers? To me it keeps coming back to we ask them to do too many things which require more officers which means we will get unqualified officer in the field because we need numbers on the street.

Justified  posted on  2018-04-04   14:05:29 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: Justified, tpaine (#6)

I think they are terrified which cause them to act fast or die(or greatly harmed).

No, cops are clearly not "terrified". If they truly were that, they would simply not be able to ever function as cops day in and day out. No one would be able to put up with going to do a job that terrifies them day in and day out.

But they are constantly armed, and deeply trained and reminded very frequently about how failing to instantly shoot at the first sign that a target may be a threat makes them, for lack of a better word "trigger happy" though I would not say "happy" enters into the equation. Certainly some cops are, as I'm confident the infamous "simon-says" cop was.

And certainly some cops have survived hostile encounters because of that training. But what I would like to see is a statistical count of the number of cops that killed people who were not threats at all vs the number of cops that were killed in hostile encounters.

I suspect that ratio is very lopsided against innocent civs, but I'd like to see the stats.

Pinguinite  posted on  2018-04-04   14:40:29 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#11. To: Pinguinite (#7)

I would like to see is a statistical count of the number of cops that killed people who were not threats at all vs the number of cops that were killed in hostile encounters.

I suspect that ratio is very lopsided against innocent civs, but I'd like to see the stats.

Me too...

tpaine  posted on  2018-04-04   16:55:07 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 11.

        There are no replies to Comment # 11.


End Trace Mode for Comment # 11.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com