[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
United States News Title: In 2002, President Bush Imposed 30% Steel Tariffs; This Is What Happened Next In an eerie analogue of what is about to take place, on March 5, 2002 President George W. Bush imposed tariffs as high as 30% on global steel imports. The temporary tariffs of 8–30% were originally scheduled to remain in effect until 2005. They were imposed to give U.S. steel makers protection from what a U.S. probe determined was a detrimental surge in steel imports, as more than 30 steel makers had recently declared bankruptcy. Canada and Mexico were exempt from the tariffs because of penalties the United States would face under NAFTA. Additionally, some developing countries such as Argentina, Thailand, and Turkey were also exempt. The response was immediate. Domestically, some of the president’s political opponents, such as Democratic House Representative Dick Gephardt, criticized the plan for not going far enough. For some of the president’s conservative allies, imposing the tariff was a step away from Bush’s commitment to free trade. Critics also contended that the tariffs would harm consumers and U.S. businesses that relied on steel imports, and would cut more jobs than it would save in the steel industry. The international response – like now – was more vocal. Immediately after the announcement, the European Union announced that it would impose retaliatory tariffs on the United States, risking the start of a major trade war. To decide whether or not the steel tariffs were fair, a case was filed at the Dispute Settlement Body of the World Trade Organization (WTO). Japan, Korea, China, Taiwan, Switzerland, Brazil and others joined with similar cases. In a decisive decision, on November 11, 2003, the WTO came out against the steel tariffs, saying that they had not been imposed during a period of import surge—steel imports had actually dropped a bit during 2001 and 2002—and that the tariffs therefore were a violation of America’s WTO tariff-rate commitments. The ruling authorized more than $2 billion in sanctions, the largest penalty ever imposed by the WTO against a member state, if the United States did not quickly remove the tariffs. In retaliation, the European Union threatened to counter with tariffs of its own on products ranging from Florida oranges to cars produced in Michigan, with each tariff calculated to likewise hurt the President in a key marginal state. But it was the market’s response that broke the camel’s back: what followed immediately after the tariffs were announced was a 30% plunge in the S&P 500, a slump in the dollar and a rally in bonds that slashed 10Y yields in half.
After receiving the verdict, both from the market and the WTO, the United States backed down and withdrew the tariffs on December 4, 2003. (1 image) Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 12. In a decisive decision, on November 11, 2003, the WTO came out against the steel tariffs, Told ya you were a globalist wto worshipper. You're anti American. Wet your diaper it doesn't matter. Trump will continue course diaper rash weirdo.
#2. To: A K A Stone (#1) (Edited) the WTO came out against the steel tariffs, You're a fricking clown. I don't GAS about the WTO - I do care about the economy and just like Bush's tariffs - Trump's will be equally as bad. Bush did the same thing Trump is doing now ...what followed immediately after the tariffs were announced was a 30% plunge in the S&P 500, a slump in the dollar and a rally in bonds that slashed 10Y yields in half. What makes you think this time will be any different?
#8. To: Deckard, A K A Stone (#2) You're a fricking clown. I don't GAS about the WTO - I do care about the economy and just like Bush's tariffs - Trump's will be equally as bad. So your okay with America getting ass-reamed by the rest of the world? Plus did you forget 9-11???????????? What happen sept 2001?
#9. To: Justified, Pinguinite, A K A Stone, Gatlin (#8) I do care about the economy and just like Bush's tariffs - Trump's will be equally as bad. If Trump's tariffs do not negatively impact the economy within 6 months I will make a formal apology to all here.
#11. To: Deckard (#9) We know its going to make an impact but the market system will adjust to it just like it did when these crappy trade deals were made. They said this about Brexit and yes Brits took it on the chin but now they are back to normal after 6 months. My problem is ptb have ran all the good paying jobs out and any good job left illegals were brought in to take those. There is about 30% of the populations that got hosed in these deals and everyone just said to bad so sad deal with it.
#12. To: Justified (#11) We know its going to make an impact but the market system will adjust to it just like it did when these crappy trade deals were made. They said this about Brexit and yes Brits took it on the chin but now they are back to normal after 6 months. I appreciate your thoughtful response. Yes - we will see what happens after six months.
Replies to Comment # 12. Yes - we will see what happens after six months. Its a deal.
End Trace Mode for Comment # 12. Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest |
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
|