Corrupt Government
See other Corrupt Government Articles
Title: Trump imposes steep tariffs on imported solar panels and washing machines (More Tax Increases under consideration)
Source:
The Guardian
URL Source: https://www.theguardian.com/environ ... ar-panels-and-washing-machines
Published: Jan 25, 2018
Author: Reuters
Post Date: 2018-01-25 01:09:37 by Hondo68
Ping List: *The Two Parties ARE the Same* Subscribe to *The Two Parties ARE the Same*
Keywords: tariff is a tax, crony capitalism, World Trade Organization
Views: 1177
Comments: 24
The US president, Donald Trump, has announced steep tariffs on imported washing machines and solar panels, giving a boost to Whirlpool Corp and dealing a setback to the renewable energy industry in the first of several potential trade restrictions. The decisions in the two “Section 201” safeguard cases followed findings by the US International Trade Commission (ITC) that both imported products “are a substantial cause of serious injury to domestic manufacturers,” US trade representative Robert Lighthizer said. The washer tariffs exceeded the harshest recommendations from ITC members, while the solar tariffs were lower than domestic producers had hoped for. The restrictions aim to help domestic manufacturers but drew complaints that consumer costs for new washers and solar installations will rise. Trump will impose a 20% tariff on the first 1.2m imported large residential washers in the first year, and a 50% tariff on machines above that number. The tariffs decline to 16% and 40% respectively in the third year. A 30% tariff will be imposed on imported solar cells and modules in the first year, with the tariffs declining to 15% by the fourth year. The tariff allows 2.5 gigawatts of unassembled solar cells to be imported tariff-free in each year. Whirlpool, which sought the washers “safeguard” action against rivals Samsung Electronics and LG Electronics after years of anti-dumping cases, saw its shares rise 1.8% in after-hours trade. “By enforcing our existing trade laws, President Trump has ensured American workers will compete on a level playing field with their foreign counterparts,” Whirlpool chairman, Jeff Fettig, said. The move punishes Samsung, which recently began washer production in South Carolina, and LG, which is building a washer factory in Tennessee. “This tariff is a tax on every consumer who wants to buy a washing machine. Everyone will pay more, with fewer choices,” Samsung said in a statement. LG Electronics said that the decision will hinder the ramp-up and employment prospects of its new plant, which will not begin production until late 2018 or early 2019. Trump ignored a recommendation from the ITC to exclude South Korean-produced washers from LG from the tariffs, as prior anti-dumping duties on these machines have been dropped. The decision could also hurt retailer Sears Holdings, whose Kenmore brand sources its larger washers from LG’s overseas factories. The tariffs are expected to slow a shift to renewable energy in the United States, just as solar was becoming cost competitive with electricity generated from fossil fuels like coal, an industry that Trump has pledged to protect. MJ Shiao, head of renewable energy research for Wood Mackenzie, said the tariffs would likely reduce projected US solar installations by 10-15% over the next five years. “It is a significant impact, but certainly not destructive to the end market,” Shiao said. The domestic solar panel producers who sought the trade remedies wanted tariffs of 50% – the highest allowed under law. Petitioners Suniva and SolarWorld have said they cannot compete with the influx of cheap imports, mostly from Chinese producers, which has caused solar panel prices to drop more than 30% since early 2016. The US solar trade group, the Solar Energy Industries Association, campaigned against the tariffs and estimated the decision would create a “crisis” for the burgeoning industry and result in the loss of 23,000 US jobs this year as billions of dollars in solar investments are cancelled. Suniva, majority-owned by Hong Kong-listed Shunfeng International Clean Energy Ltd, applauded the decision, saying that Trump “is sending a message that American innovation and manufacturing will not be bullied out of existence without a fight.” The decisions were the first of several potential tariff actions that Trump may take in the coming weeks and months. He is considering recommendations on import restrictions for steel and aluminium on national security grounds under a 1962 trade law and tariffs or other trade sanctions against China over its intellectual property practices. The intellectual property, washer and solar panel probes were done under a 1974 trade law that has been seldom invoked since the World Trade Organization was launched in 1995. Poster Comment: "giving a boost to Whirlpool Corp" 50% Whirlpool tax, when you buy a new washing machine. Pay to the government as tariff, or to Whirlpool in the form of a price increase. Make America Great Again with a HUGE laundry tax increase! /s 
A residential solar installation in Albuquerque, New Mexico. Trump will impose a 30% tariff on imported solar cells and modules in the first year. Photograph: Sergio Flores/Getty Images 
Subscribe to *The Two Parties ARE the Same*
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 18.
#1. To: hondo68 (#0)
(Edited)
We will either protect our jobs with tariffs, and thereby increase the price of goods to consumers, increasing the profits to domestic employers causing them to hire more people and pay those American people salaries and benefits. OR we will have no tariff, keep prices to consumers low, thereby keeping American unemployment higher, which means that unemployment benefits, Medicaid and welfare will be paid by the government out of higher taxes or deficit spending. Pick your poison: pay more for goods so that Americans can work. Or pay more in taxes so that the Americans who can't work have welfare benefits. It is not an equal choice: working people are healthier than the unemployed, burdening the system less. And unemployed men commit a LOT more crime than employed ones do: idle hands are the Devil's workshop. What free traders do is pretend that we can have the low priced goods and NOT have the unemployed thereby, or, if we do, that we can just cut off social welfare and let those Americans rot. Those rotting Americans VOTE, and if let to rot they will vote DEMOCRAT. This country's industrial base was BUILT UPON a protective tariff between Independence and World War I. The government was FUNDED by tariffs and land land sales in the 19th Century. But history is not a strong suit for free traders. They speak with an air of authority, but they do not take either history or the free rider problem into account. We have to have welfare benefits for the same reason we have to have environmental laws: the problems of mass unemployment and its intendant poverty, and of water and air pollution, are "not the company's problem" - it will do what it can to maximize profit. But it IS everybody else's problem, because we have to live in a world that is wracked with poverty and crime, or not, or riddled with pollution, or not. Some people ignore the free rider problem, pretend it doesn't exist. But it does, and we have to face it. Poverty balks the economy and increases crime, and also increases government. Tariffs balk the economy by increasing the price of goods. Between the two, it's a no brainer. Japan and China practice sophisticated, culture-based protectionism. That's WHY they have been able to become such powerhouses. So does the EU, the largest economy in the world. So did we, when we were growing to become the world's industrial colossus. Ignorance of history and hand-waving about theory are just that: ignorance and hand-waving. Bottom line: in a world of imperfect choices and trade-offs, Trump has made the right choice here.
in a world of imperfect choices and trade-offs, Trump has made the right choice here. Don't pay the Trump Whirlpool tax, Washtub 2020! Whirlpool México exports approximately 80% of its annual production of household appliances to the US and Canadian markets and to countries such as Colombia, Ecuador, El Salvador, Belize, Nicaragua, the Philippines, the United Kingdom, Poland, Sweden, France, Aruba, Jordan and Israel, among others, making it a key part of the firm that has been a sector leader for over a century. "Several factors make Mexico a relevant and very attractive market for investments. For Whirlpool Mexico, the 'winners' in the country are its geographic location, its talented and highly skilled workforce and its programs or incentives that support innovation and technology development," says Adrián Estrada Montemayor, Legal and Institutional Relations VP at Whirlpool Mexico. Whirlpool Mexico's history goes back to 1987, when it operated as Vitromatic Comercial. In 2002 it became Whirlpool Mexico, embracing all that a name of such magnitude implies. Currently, Whirlpool is the leader in refrigerators manufacturing and exports in Mexico, and the second largest producer of other household appliances, such as washing machines and stoves. The firm has five plants –three in Apodaca, Nuevo León, that produce refrigerators and washing machines, as well as plastic parts for these products, one in Celaya, Guanajuato, that produces compact refrigerators and semiautomatic washing machines and one in Ramos Arizpe, Coahuila, that produces duplex refrigerators– and a workforce of close to 11,000 people. The line of household appliances manufactured, commercialized and distributed by Whirlpool Mexico includes manual, semiautomatic and automatic washing machines, dryers, freezers, duplex, single-door and compact refrigerators, builtin and free standing stoves, hoods, ovens, free standing and built-in dishwashers, microwaves and air conditioning units. In addition, the company has three technology centers with 100% Mexican human capital that develop new technologies and products. Whirlpool Mexico is constantly exporting innovative products to the rest of the corporation.
We should be developing employment in Mexico. The more employment in Mexico, the fewer low-skilled illegals come north for work. We should NOT be developing employment in China, India, Vietnam, Indonesia and other overseas places, because that primarily simply exports jobs. When we employ people in Mexico, we take the strain off of our own immigration, welfare, education, medical and prison systems, so we get a substantial benefit that offsets the cost of paying benefits to a low- skilled American. None of that is true when we offshore the jobs to Asia. So, some form of NAFTA should stay, and we DO need to consider the well- being of the Mexican economy, precisely because we are joined at the hip by a long border that has no wall, yet, and that is not really guarded effectively at all. None of that is true with China. Mexico is part of our problem. It's in our wheelhouse and what happens to the poor there DIRECTLY affects American welfare expenditures BECAUSE of illegal mass immigration. That is not true of China or India or Africa thanks to oceans. Sure, there's SOME of it, but not millions and millions. We have to be realistic and intelligent. "One-size-fits-all" does not work for complicated problems.
We should NOT be developing employment in China, India, Vietnam, Indonesia and other overseas places, because that primarily simply exports jobs. When we employ people in Mexico, we take the strain off of our own immigration, welfare, education, medical and prison systems, so we get a substantial benefit that offsets the cost of paying benefits to a low- skilled American. None of that is true when we offshore the jobs to Asia. So, some form of NAFTA should stay, and we DO need to consider the well- being of the Mexican economy, precisely because we are joined at the hip by a long border that has no wall, yet, and that is not really guarded effectively at all. None of that is true with China. Mexico is part of our problem. It's in our wheelhouse and what happens to the poor there DIRECTLY affects American welfare expenditures BECAUSE of illegal mass immigration. That is not true of China or India or Africa thanks to oceans. Sure, there's SOME of it, but not millions and millions. We have to be realistic and intelligent. "One-size-fits-all" does not work for complicated problems. Repeated in entirety because it is all true,and needs to be said over and over again until people stop their knees from jerking long enough to start to understand it.
#20. To: sneakypete (#18)
It has already largely happened. There is a lot of manufacturing in Mexico. Their economy isn't that bad. It's the cartels that are out of control, kind of like Chicago under Capone.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#7. To: Vicomte13, Gary Johnsons laundry room, A K A Stone (#1)
(Edited)
Whirlpool, a Key Link in the Appliances Industry
Whirlpool began operations in Mexico more than 25 years ago. In that time, the Mexican subsidiary has become a key part of the company worldwide, with exports to the North American, Central American, European and Asian markets.
#10. To: hondo68 (#7)
#18. To: Vicomte13 (#10)
We should be developing employment in Mexico. The more employment in Mexico, the fewer low-skilled illegals come north for work.
Replies to Comment # 18. Repeated in entirety because it is all true,and needs to be said over and over again until people stop their knees from jerking long enough to start to understand it.
End Trace Mode for Comment # 18.
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]