U.S. Constitution
See other U.S. Constitution Articles
Title: A Sheriff Just Threatened Charges Over ‘F*ck Trump’ Sticker — and the Internet Is Destroying Him
Source:
The Daily Sheeple
URL Source: http://www.thedailysheeple.com/a-sh ... ernet-is-destroying-him_112017
Published: Nov 16, 2017
Author: Carey Wedler
Post Date: 2017-11-17 06:40:28 by Deckard
Keywords: None
Views: 12698
Comments: 107
On Wednesday morning, Sheriff Troy E. Nehls of Fort Bend County, Texas, posted a picture of the back of a truck asking members of the community to help him find the ‘offender.’ “I have received numerous calls regarding the offensive display on this truck as it is often seen along FM 359. If you know who owns this truck or it is yours, I would like to discuss it with you,” he said. Nehls apparently already sought to impose punishment, adding, “Our Prosecutor has informed us she would accept Disorderly Conduct charges regarding it, but I feel we could come to an agreement regarding a modification to it.” He also posted a picture in the comments of legal code concerning disorderly conduct, apparently attempting to justify his attempt to suppress free speech by suggesting the truck driver was instigating a breach of the peace. The statute, Sec. 42.01, says “a person commits an offense if he intentionally or knowingly uses abusive, indecent, profane or vulgar language, and the language by its very utterance tends to incite an immediate breach of the peace,” or if it “makes an offensive gesture of display in a public place, and the gesture or display tends to incite an immediate breach of the peace.” Attempting to cite this statute suggests Trump supporters could be so triggered by free speech about the president they might incite violence, a particularly hilarious notion considering the right has spent months virtue signaling about the first amendment and scolding leftists for being violent snowflakes. And the Internet responded swiftly as thousands of commenters flowed in offering relentless trolling, thoughtful defenses of free speech, and cutting rebukes of partisan hypocrisy. The trolls were numerous: Other commenters were straightforward and to the point, citing previous court decisions and defenses of free speech: Still others tackled partisan hypocrisy and cognitive dissonance: Some commenters defended the sheriff and received immediate responses: A couple pointed out the fact that people actually called the police because they were so offended: The truck driver also received an offer from a lawyer and former prosecutor for free legal assistance: The ACLU of Texas also chimed in: “Sheriff Troy E. Nehls, Constitutional Law 101: You can’t ban speech just because it has ‘f@ck’ in it. “Hey truck owner, feel free to contact the ACLU of Texas.” Delivered by The Daily Sheeple
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Comments (1-16) not displayed.
.
.
.
#17. To: Deckard (#12)
You're projecting... That said, when someone repeatedly circles the front of your house, shouting with a megaphone, "EFF DECKARD AND HIS MOM.THEY SUCK!", I'm sure you'll "Fight for his right to shout it," right? Cut the crap.
The only one that could even remotely be considered "fighting words" is "F**k your mother" The others have been ruled as protected speech by the Supreme Court. Same thing with flag burning. If you can't see the obvious, I can't help you, the ACLU, or Gilligan. The funny thing is, Gatlin would agree with you on this. How does it feel to be a right wing version of Antifa? No I would not be as upset. BUT I would recognize it as wrong to do it IN PUBLIC while also recognizing the potential baiting/incitement factor. I've seen such sentiments here and I don't recall you ever calling for censorship. Hey brutha -- THIS IS COMMON SENSE that transcends the subversive ACLU's BS definitions. Now tell me -- whatcha gonna do about that car that circles your home with a megaphone, "F*CK Deckard and His Mom!!! They are douches!!"
Once again you fail to distinguish between PROTECTED political speech and "fighting words". You come to my house talking that trash and I'll deal with you harshly. CONTEXT. Public Vulgarities, Obscenities, Incitement, and Pornographic speech and acts are NOT "protected speech." In fact, you can NOT even shout, "NIGGER!!" in public either, can you?? Because...IT'S CONSIDERED, "Hate Speech." NOW WHAT??
You can't have it both ways or all ways.
Who cares what the ACLU thinks? I don't know how many times I have to tell you this before it sinks in to your thick skull - the Supreme Court has ruled that political statements such as "F**k Trump" are PROTECTED speech. Now you can bitch and moan and disagree all you want, but the fact remains. Ok... So what's your opinion on shouting "NIGGER!!" to every black person? Or GROUPS of black people?
You can't have it both ways or all ways. I thought you were smarter than this. In fact, you can NOT even shout, "NIGGER!!" in public either, can you?? Because...IT'S CONSIDERED, "Hate Speech." Supreme Court unanimously reaffirms: There is no ‘hate speech’ exception to the First Amendment How does it feel to be a right wing version of Antifa? No, the funny thing is that YOU cited the ACLU....while Gatlin worships them. More irony -- YOU are the one engaging in Antifa tactics. They bait, and now you support baiting. Hey -- answer the question: You're walking quietly on a street with your girlfriend, wife, or mother, and some guy come up to you and sez, "F*CK YOU and your whore." And keeps on railing against you, repeating his filth. Whatcha gonna do?
Seems to me you're the one triggered by words and ideas you don't agree with and will resort to violence to shut someone up who is exercising his constitutionally protected right to free speech. Saying "F**k Trump" is not the same thing as saying "Kill Trump". Hey -- answer the question: You're walking quietly on a street with your girlfriend, wife, or mother, and some guy come up to you and sez, "F*CK YOU and your whore." And keeps on railing against you, repeating his filth. Why don't you come over here, say it and find out. Once again you fail to grasp even the simplest of concepts. Bullsh*t. People are getting fired for less; "Hate Speech" and "Hate Crimes" are enforced BY LAW. Moreover, the Supreme Court is a corrupt puppet show where killing babies is legal as is men "marrying" men. In ALL these cases -- as well as the "Free Speech" end of they insane spectrum, you are dead wrong IN PRACTICE, legally as well as wrong morally and common sense-wise, 110%. It's sad and degrading that you're even defending the kind of "free speech" that sanctions, "F*CK YOU AND YOUR MOTHER!" in public.
Why don't you come over here, say it and find out. Thanks for proving my point, Rambo. *snicker*
Their business their rules. It's sad and degrading that you're even defending the kind of "free speech" that sanctions, "F*CK YOU AND YOUR MOTHER!" in public. Please don't resort to lying - as I have made it clear, those would be considered "fighting words", not political speech. It's a shame that you don't get that. We're done.
Thanks for proving my point, Rambo. Good grief man, you can't possibly be this dense, can you? You really are unable to distinguish between PROTECTED political speech and "fighting words"? Look - I like you Lib, but you really need to understand the difference between the two. Your career as a rap artist is off to a good start.
Thanks. My next concept for the second verse of my lyrics is, "B*TCH." Wanna co-write it?
Ok... So what's your opinion on shouting "NIGGER!!" to every black person? Or GROUPS of black people? OK, --- we have a crazy shouting "NIGGER!!" to every black person, Or a GROUP of black people, as he goes down the street? Hopefully someone calls 911, and the cops arrive before the crazy gets killed by the blacks. Whereupon, the crazy is put in jail for disturbing the peace. If he's assaulted or killed, those responsible face a jury trial, and will no doubt be acquitted, or given reduced sentences/paroled because of the 'fighting words' doctrine. Is there some problem with that?
Exactly. But Deckard believes that free speech is so sacred that it should be free from consequences. Burn a flag, no consequence. Curse and spit at a cop and he can't do a thing. HE has rights. You don't.
Hopefully someone calls 911, and the cops arrive before the crazy gets killed by the blacks. Whereupon, the crazy is put in jail for disturbing the peace. Ooooh...."Disturbing the peace," eh? But "Eff Trump" and "Eff those who voted for him!" ISN'T?? And....and...But...but...but...."FREE SPEECH!" OH WAIT. Please explain what happened to IT in your anecdotal case where the so-called "crazy" who again -- according to some -- is merely exercising his constitutional "Free Speech"??
Burn a flag, no consequence. Curse and spit at a cop and he can't do a thing. Hear ya. For over 5,000 years, insulting and dishonoring one's mother or wife would be cause for b*tch-slapping and knuckle-sandwiching at the least, challenge to a dual/fight, OR worse. In the "old neighborhood" -- not long ago, EVERYONE would have understood the common sense unspoken rules and laws of society. What is being defended in this case of Donald Trump as well as his voters told to "Eff" themselves, is well over the line of decency and crystal clear incitement to violence. It reeks of Antifa/Alinsky tactics. In a nutshell, we are witnessing a hostile and clear case of Social Anarchy. But only because Trump is President. The MSM has been encoraging the overt public hostility. Now most of us realize that were this language targeting 0bama, the cacophony of howls and outrage from the Left and MSM would be deafening. The perp would likely be arrested. This irrational support of free speech under ALL circumstances is a very new concept. However, it is VERY selective, based on political correctness and those who control the culture's power structure. There seems to be one set of rules for Democrats, Progressives, and Homos/Queers, and one for Republicans, Conservatives, and Christians. The inconsistencies and bias from Democrats, the Judiciary, AND even the Supreme Court in their enforcement of Constitutional Law is conspicuously one-sided. It seems Social Justice crusaders get mulligans, whereas Conservatives are disproportionately penalized.
That nut is probably a Leftist-Antifa agitprop asset. He also forgot his white hood, and "KKK ROCKS!" sign.
Oh the Irony! How are you and paulsen any different than Antifa? The image was from a fictional movie! Is there some problem with that? There IS a problem with normalizing this anti-social anarchy crap and juvenile sociopathic behavior encouraged under the guise of "Free Speech." What we're witnessing is the over-ripened rotten fruit of over a year's worth of Leftist/Anti-MAGA propaganda and indoctrination -- a psyop designed to normalize hostility and violence toward Donald Trump and those who voted for him.
And....and...But...but...but...."FREE SPEECH!" OH WAIT. Please explain what happened to IT in your anecdotal case where the so-called "crazy" who again -- according to some -- is merely exercising his constitutional "Free Speech"?? Of course the sign saying "Fuck Trump" should be considered as disturbing the peace.. As to what happened to the crazy in my post, try reading it again.. --- He either gets jailed, --- or is assaulted, even killed. What more could you want? OK, --- we have a crazy shouting "NIGGER!!" to every black person, Or a GROUP of black people, as he goes down the street? Hopefully someone calls 911, and the cops arrive before the crazy gets killed by the blacks. Whereupon, the crazy is put in jail for disturbing the peace. If he's assaulted or killed, those responsible face a jury trial, and will no doubt be acquitted, or given reduced sentences/paroled because of the 'fighting words' doctrine. Is there some problem with that?
Which only proves that Left is as much in favor of political censorship as the right. Even if it is, it STILL works as agitprop tool of the Left designed to perpetuate a stereotype and bogeyman that simply does NOT exist. "Art" has been a political tool since the 1960s. Of ALL people, you ought to get it as well as what's going on.
What more could you want? Yes, yes, I read it, Paine. But you're missing the MUCH BIGGER PICTURE: This Crusade, these revolutions all begin with this kind of "taking-one-for-the-team." One turns into a half-dozen. Then into two-dozen. Then hundreds. And so forth. Consider human nature. "Us vs. Them." BOTH sides. See the imminent future now??
There IS a problem with normalizing this anti-social anarchy crap and juvenile sociopathic behavior encouraged under the guise of "Free Speech." What we're witnessing is the over-ripened rotten fruit of over a year's worth of Leftist/Anti-MAGA propaganda and indoctrination -- a psyop designed to normalize hostility and violence toward Donald Trump and those who voted for him. How weird, you've read my post, and apparently understood it, but still feel the need to lecture me about leftist propaganda? I'm not your enemy. Trying to get you to realize that some here (notably misterwhite), is a propagandist, isn't getting through.. Am I wasting my time?
Nah. I bet that's Bruce Willis in the 1995 movie Die Hard with a Vengeance.
Firstly, I don't believe you or 95% of the posters here are my enemy. I think that's a weird assertion or presumption to make, but hey, it's a nameless, faceless media where intent and subtleties are often misconstrued and misunderstood. What else is new? Beyond that, I'm not "lecturing," I'm clarifying. I apparently should refrain from giving my overview and opinion on the social dynamics and psyops by the PTB (Which does appear for be a waste of time -- a YUGE one. You're right. My bad.)
But you're missing the MUCH BIGGER PICTURE: This Crusade, these revolutions all begin with this kind of "taking-one-for-the-team." One turns into a half-dozen. Then into two-dozen. Then hundreds. And so forth. Consider human nature. "Us vs. Them." BOTH sides. See the imminent future now?? Now you've posted I'm "missing the MUCH BIGGER PICTURE", --- and implied that what? ---- I'm "taking-one-for-the-team."? What in hell is your problem with me? -- That I can't "See the imminent future now??" I've probably posted just as many articles as you, about how the socialists are trying to ruin our republic. Get off your soapbox when you reply to me...
Thank you...
Now the TV appearances, book, and movie deals start. She's a dead ringer for Honey Boo Boo's mom!
I honestly don't care what people think or say about me. I'd probably laugh. Lack of think skin... is a weakness. I loath weak people. I'm the infidel... Allah warned you about. كافر المسلح
You have consistently lied about yourself on this chit-chat channel.
Comments (57 - 107) not displayed.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/LatestSorry that words and ideas that you disagree with trigger you to violence snowflake - how is your response any different than that of Antifa?
#18. To: Liberator (#16)
"F*CK THE DRAFT" is far different than, "F*CK TRUMP," F*CK YOUR MOTHER," or "F*CK TRUMP VOTERS."
“Truth is treason in the empire of lies.” - Ron Paul
Those who most loudly denounce Fake News are typically those most aggressively disseminating it.
#19. To: Deckard (#12)
Would you be as upset if it had said "F**k Obama"?
#20. To: Liberator (#17)
That said, when someone repeatedly circles the front of your house, shouting with a megaphone, "EFF DECKARD AND HIS MOM.THEY SUCK!",
“Truth is treason in the empire of lies.” - Ron Paul
Those who most loudly denounce Fake News are typically those most aggressively disseminating it.
#21. To: Deckard (#13)
The Suprerme court has ruled that political statements are protected speech.
#22. To: Deckard (#14)
Apples and oranges - such a statement is not political.
#23. To: Liberator (#19)
THIS IS COMMON SENSE that transcends the subversive ACLU's BS definitions.
“Truth is treason in the empire of lies.” - Ron Paul
Those who most loudly denounce Fake News are typically those most aggressively disseminating it.
#24. To: tpaine (#15)
'Fighting words' laws are made to stop fights, not authorise them. ---- The idea is that law enforcement could stop offensive displays BEFORE a crazy like whitey took a bat to the other crazy person/display.
#25. To: Liberator (#22)
Apples and oranges - such a statement is not political.
“Truth is treason in the empire of lies.” - Ron Paul
Those who most loudly denounce Fake News are typically those most aggressively disseminating it.
#26. To: Deckard (#18)
The funny thing is, Gatlin would agree with you on this.
#27. To: Liberator (#26)
(Edited)
More irony -- YOU are the one engaging in Antifa tactics.
“Truth is treason in the empire of lies.” - Ron Paul
Those who most loudly denounce Fake News are typically those most aggressively disseminating it.
#28. To: Deckard (#25)
(Edited)
Supreme Court unanimously reaffirms: There is no ‘hate speech’ exception to the First Amendment
#29. To: Deckard (#27)
Hey -- answer the question: You're walking quietly on a street with your girlfriend, wife, or mother, and some guy come up to you and sez, "F*CK YOU and your whore." And keeps on railing against you, repeating his filth.
#30. To: Liberator (#28)
People are getting fired for less; "Hate Speech" and "Hate Crimes"
“Truth is treason in the empire of lies.” - Ron Paul
Those who most loudly denounce Fake News are typically those most aggressively disseminating it.
#31. To: Deckard (#30)
#32. To: Liberator (#29)
Why don't you come over here, say it and find out.
“Truth is treason in the empire of lies.” - Ron Paul
Those who most loudly denounce Fake News are typically those most aggressively disseminating it.
#33. To: Liberator (#24)
So what's your opinion on shouting "NIGGER!!" to every black person? Or GROUPS of black people?
#34. To: hondo68 (#33)
#35. To: Liberator (#31)
We're done.
“Truth is treason in the empire of lies.” - Ron Paul
Those who most loudly denounce Fake News are typically those most aggressively disseminating it.
#36. To: Liberator (#24)
(Edited)
Fighting words' laws are made to stop fights, not authorise them. ---- The idea is that law enforcement could stop offensive displays BEFORE a crazy like whitey took a bat to the other crazy person/display.
#37. To: Liberator, Deckard (#10)
MW's baseball bat across the back windshield is merely also "free speech."
#38. To: tpaine (#36)
(Edited)
OK, --- we have a crazy shouting "NIGGER!!" to every black person, Or a GROUP of black people, as he goes down the street?
#39. To: Liberator (#24)
So what's your opinion on shouting "NIGGER!!" to every black person? Or GROUPS of black people?
#40. To: misterwhite, Deckard, tpaine (#37)
But Deckard believes that free speech is so sacred that it should be free from consequences.
#41. To: misterwhite (#39)
#42. To: Liberator (#40)
What is being defended in this case of Donald Trump as well as his voters told to "Eff" themselves, is well over the line of decency and crystal clear incitement to violence. It reeks of Antifa/Alinsky tactics.
“Truth is treason in the empire of lies.” - Ron Paul
Those who most loudly denounce Fake News are typically those most aggressively disseminating it.
#43. To: Liberator (#41)
That nut is probably a Leftist-Antifa agitprop asset.
“Truth is treason in the empire of lies.” - Ron Paul
Those who most loudly denounce Fake News are typically those most aggressively disseminating it.
#44. To: tpaine, rlkk (#36)
If he's assaulted or killed, those responsible face a jury trial, and will no doubt be acquitted, or given reduced sentences/paroled because of the 'fighting words' doctrine.
#45. To: Liberator (#38)
Ooooh...."Disturbing the peace," eh? But "Eff Trump" and "Eff those who voted for him!" ISN'T??
#46. To: Liberator (#40)
Now most of us realize that were this language targeting 0bama, the cacophony of howls and outrage from the Left and MSM would be deafening. The perp would likely be arrested.
“Truth is treason in the empire of lies.” - Ron Paul
Those who most loudly denounce Fake News are typically those most aggressively disseminating it.
#47. To: Deckard (#43)
(Edited)
The image was from a fictional movie!
#48. To: tpaine (#45)
(Edited)
As to what happened to the crazy in my post, try reading it again.. --- He either gets jailed, --- or is assaulted, even killed.
#49. To: Liberator (#44)
If he's assaulted or killed, those responsible face a jury trial, and will no doubt be acquitted, or given reduced sentences/paroled because of the 'fighting words' doctrine. Is there some problem with that?
#50. To: Liberator (#41)
That nut is probably a Leftist-Antifa agitprop asset.
#51. To: tpaine (#49)
I'm not your enemy.... Am I wasting my time?
#52. To: Liberator (#48)
Yes, yes, I read it, Paine.
#53. To: Liberator (#51)
You're right. My bad.)
#54. To: Deckard, F Trump arrested, Art of the Deal (#0)
(Edited)
#55. To: Liberator (#8)
What IF, a Vehicle is
#56. To: GrandIsland (#55)
I honestly don't care what people think or say about me
.
.
.
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]