U.S. Constitution
See other U.S. Constitution Articles
Title: A Sheriff Just Threatened Charges Over ‘F*ck Trump’ Sticker — and the Internet Is Destroying Him
Source:
The Daily Sheeple
URL Source: http://www.thedailysheeple.com/a-sh ... ernet-is-destroying-him_112017
Published: Nov 16, 2017
Author: Carey Wedler
Post Date: 2017-11-17 06:40:28 by Deckard
Keywords: None
Views: 9821
Comments: 107
On Wednesday morning, Sheriff Troy E. Nehls of Fort Bend County, Texas, posted a picture of the back of a truck asking members of the community to help him find the ‘offender.’ “I have received numerous calls regarding the offensive display on this truck as it is often seen along FM 359. If you know who owns this truck or it is yours, I would like to discuss it with you,” he said. Nehls apparently already sought to impose punishment, adding, “Our Prosecutor has informed us she would accept Disorderly Conduct charges regarding it, but I feel we could come to an agreement regarding a modification to it.” He also posted a picture in the comments of legal code concerning disorderly conduct, apparently attempting to justify his attempt to suppress free speech by suggesting the truck driver was instigating a breach of the peace. The statute, Sec. 42.01, says “a person commits an offense if he intentionally or knowingly uses abusive, indecent, profane or vulgar language, and the language by its very utterance tends to incite an immediate breach of the peace,” or if it “makes an offensive gesture of display in a public place, and the gesture or display tends to incite an immediate breach of the peace.” Attempting to cite this statute suggests Trump supporters could be so triggered by free speech about the president they might incite violence, a particularly hilarious notion considering the right has spent months virtue signaling about the first amendment and scolding leftists for being violent snowflakes. And the Internet responded swiftly as thousands of commenters flowed in offering relentless trolling, thoughtful defenses of free speech, and cutting rebukes of partisan hypocrisy. The trolls were numerous: Other commenters were straightforward and to the point, citing previous court decisions and defenses of free speech: Still others tackled partisan hypocrisy and cognitive dissonance: Some commenters defended the sheriff and received immediate responses: A couple pointed out the fact that people actually called the police because they were so offended: The truck driver also received an offer from a lawyer and former prosecutor for free legal assistance: The ACLU of Texas also chimed in: “Sheriff Troy E. Nehls, Constitutional Law 101: You can’t ban speech just because it has ‘f@ck’ in it. “Hey truck owner, feel free to contact the ACLU of Texas.” Delivered by The Daily Sheeple
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: Deckard (#0)
I read this on a less yella article... a load of horseshit IF he's found and cited for the language. If he's stopped because his tint is too dark and rear window obstructed... that's all good... but why make a big deal out of those violations???? Because the DA of that county isn't smart enough to see the bigger picture of the 1st amendment restriction in his quest.
I'm the infidel... Allah warned you about. كافر المسلح
If I saw that I wouldn't call the police. I'd take a baseball bat to his truck and let him call the police.
So...you advocate violence against someone whose speech you don't like? You have much in common with Antifa. I am the violence he's inciting.
Protected speech - if you can't help being triggered by a message you disagree with snowflake, then you're the one with the problem. "I may not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it". Seems like your view of the First Amendment is that it should only apply to those who share your viewpoint. And F*CK Trump if you voted for him" F*CK Trump if you voted for him" is "FREE SPEECH"?? As well as others?? THAT'S what you consider, "FREE SPEECH"?? What about, "F*CK DECKARD, HIS MOTHER, AND DAUGHTER"?? Is THAT also the type of "Free Speech" you'd "defend to the death for the right for others to say it"?? Man, this is one of yours or anyone else's worst defenses of "Freedom" ever. Those who most loudly denounce Fake News are typically those most aggressively disseminating it.
Like hell. THAT is the interpretation and Fake News of the Leftist Antifa trolls. The ACLU of Texas also chimed in: “Sheriff Troy E. Nehls, Constitutional Law 101: You can’t ban speech just because it has ‘f@ck’ in it. “Hey truck owner, feel free to contact the ACLU of Texas.” Incendiary speech, speech that incites, AND vulgar, obscene speech IN PUBLIC is NOT "protected." But then again, it IS the Leftist-Commie America-hating ACLU, isn't it? Yu and Gatlin finally find common ground. Oh, the irony. Those who most loudly denounce Fake News are typically those most aggressively disseminating it.
Geez, you're actually agreeing with Deckard on this? What IF, a Vehicle is rolling around town with, "F*CK SGT GRAND ISLAND AND HIS MOTHER and Everyone who honors them"?? Tell me the truth -- THAT person is gonna get a beat down, aren't they, sooner or later, aren't they? (And deservedly so.) Those who most loudly denounce Fake News are typically those most aggressively disseminating it.
With ya. Those who most loudly denounce Fake News are typically those most aggressively disseminating it.
You have much in common with Antifa Misterwhite: "I am the violence he's inciting.." Misterwhite is right again. By your rationale and logic, MW's baseball bat across the back windshield is merely also "free speech." Incitement is a criminal offense and a verbal assault in this case. As well as defending the honor of one's wife, mother, daughter, family, friends. Ever hear of the saying, "Them's fighting words"?? What was plastered all over that vehicle was blatant IN YOUR FACE fighting words. The perp not only chose to publicly verbally assault the President, but those who "voted FOR him." Deckard, to what end does this kind of incendiary Antifa baiting and BS end? Nasty, vulgar insults designed to bait and incite can only lead to one conclusion. And THIS is just part of the Left's/Antifa's open season on Trump and those who voted for him. With respect to this case, there are only TWO sides to take. You've chosen poorly. Those who most loudly denounce Fake News are typically those most aggressively disseminating it.
The Supreme Court has ruled that it is protected speech. Sorry that words and ideas that you disagree with trigger you to violence snowflake - how is your response any different than that of Antifa? Would you be as upset if it had said "F**k Obama"? I've seen such sentiments here and I don't recall you ever calling for censorship. The Suprerme court has ruled that political statements are protected speech. Apples and oranges - such a statement is not political. With respect to this case, there are only TWO sides to take. You've chosen poorly. 'Fighting words' laws are made to stop fights, not authorise them. ---- The idea is that law enforcement could stop offensive displays BEFORE a crazy like whitey took a bat to the other crazy person/display. Not that misterwhite has the real balls to take a bat to anything. -- He's an agitprop ringer, a phony.
"F*CK THE DRAFT" is far different than, "F*CK TRUMP," F*CK YOUR MOTHER," or "F*CK TRUMP VOTERS." If you can't see the obvious, I can't help you, the ACLU, or Gilligan. This is just "Common Sense 101."
You're projecting... That said, when someone repeatedly circles the front of your house, shouting with a megaphone, "EFF DECKARD AND HIS MOM.THEY SUCK!", I'm sure you'll "Fight for his right to shout it," right? Cut the crap.
The only one that could even remotely be considered "fighting words" is "F**k your mother" The others have been ruled as protected speech by the Supreme Court. Same thing with flag burning. If you can't see the obvious, I can't help you, the ACLU, or Gilligan. The funny thing is, Gatlin would agree with you on this. How does it feel to be a right wing version of Antifa? No I would not be as upset. BUT I would recognize it as wrong to do it IN PUBLIC while also recognizing the potential baiting/incitement factor. I've seen such sentiments here and I don't recall you ever calling for censorship. Hey brutha -- THIS IS COMMON SENSE that transcends the subversive ACLU's BS definitions. Now tell me -- whatcha gonna do about that car that circles your home with a megaphone, "F*CK Deckard and His Mom!!! They are douches!!"
Once again you fail to distinguish between PROTECTED political speech and "fighting words". You come to my house talking that trash and I'll deal with you harshly. CONTEXT. Public Vulgarities, Obscenities, Incitement, and Pornographic speech and acts are NOT "protected speech." In fact, you can NOT even shout, "NIGGER!!" in public either, can you?? Because...IT'S CONSIDERED, "Hate Speech." NOW WHAT??
You can't have it both ways or all ways.
Who cares what the ACLU thinks? I don't know how many times I have to tell you this before it sinks in to your thick skull - the Supreme Court has ruled that political statements such as "F**k Trump" are PROTECTED speech. Now you can bitch and moan and disagree all you want, but the fact remains. Ok... So what's your opinion on shouting "NIGGER!!" to every black person? Or GROUPS of black people?
You can't have it both ways or all ways. I thought you were smarter than this. In fact, you can NOT even shout, "NIGGER!!" in public either, can you?? Because...IT'S CONSIDERED, "Hate Speech." Supreme Court unanimously reaffirms: There is no ‘hate speech’ exception to the First Amendment How does it feel to be a right wing version of Antifa? No, the funny thing is that YOU cited the ACLU....while Gatlin worships them. More irony -- YOU are the one engaging in Antifa tactics. They bait, and now you support baiting. Hey -- answer the question: You're walking quietly on a street with your girlfriend, wife, or mother, and some guy come up to you and sez, "F*CK YOU and your whore." And keeps on railing against you, repeating his filth. Whatcha gonna do?
Seems to me you're the one triggered by words and ideas you don't agree with and will resort to violence to shut someone up who is exercising his constitutionally protected right to free speech. Saying "F**k Trump" is not the same thing as saying "Kill Trump". Hey -- answer the question: You're walking quietly on a street with your girlfriend, wife, or mother, and some guy come up to you and sez, "F*CK YOU and your whore." And keeps on railing against you, repeating his filth. Why don't you come over here, say it and find out. Once again you fail to grasp even the simplest of concepts. Bullsh*t. People are getting fired for less; "Hate Speech" and "Hate Crimes" are enforced BY LAW. Moreover, the Supreme Court is a corrupt puppet show where killing babies is legal as is men "marrying" men. In ALL these cases -- as well as the "Free Speech" end of they insane spectrum, you are dead wrong IN PRACTICE, legally as well as wrong morally and common sense-wise, 110%. It's sad and degrading that you're even defending the kind of "free speech" that sanctions, "F*CK YOU AND YOUR MOTHER!" in public.
Why don't you come over here, say it and find out. Thanks for proving my point, Rambo. *snicker*
Their business their rules. It's sad and degrading that you're even defending the kind of "free speech" that sanctions, "F*CK YOU AND YOUR MOTHER!" in public. Please don't resort to lying - as I have made it clear, those would be considered "fighting words", not political speech. It's a shame that you don't get that. We're done.
Thanks for proving my point, Rambo. Good grief man, you can't possibly be this dense, can you? You really are unable to distinguish between PROTECTED political speech and "fighting words"? Look - I like you Lib, but you really need to understand the difference between the two. Your career as a rap artist is off to a good start.
Thanks. My next concept for the second verse of my lyrics is, "B*TCH." Wanna co-write it?
Ok... So what's your opinion on shouting "NIGGER!!" to every black person? Or GROUPS of black people? OK, --- we have a crazy shouting "NIGGER!!" to every black person, Or a GROUP of black people, as he goes down the street? Hopefully someone calls 911, and the cops arrive before the crazy gets killed by the blacks. Whereupon, the crazy is put in jail for disturbing the peace. If he's assaulted or killed, those responsible face a jury trial, and will no doubt be acquitted, or given reduced sentences/paroled because of the 'fighting words' doctrine. Is there some problem with that?
Exactly. But Deckard believes that free speech is so sacred that it should be free from consequences. Burn a flag, no consequence. Curse and spit at a cop and he can't do a thing. HE has rights. You don't.
Hopefully someone calls 911, and the cops arrive before the crazy gets killed by the blacks. Whereupon, the crazy is put in jail for disturbing the peace. Ooooh...."Disturbing the peace," eh? But "Eff Trump" and "Eff those who voted for him!" ISN'T?? And....and...But...but...but...."FREE SPEECH!" OH WAIT. Please explain what happened to IT in your anecdotal case where the so-called "crazy" who again -- according to some -- is merely exercising his constitutional "Free Speech"??
Burn a flag, no consequence. Curse and spit at a cop and he can't do a thing. Hear ya. For over 5,000 years, insulting and dishonoring one's mother or wife would be cause for b*tch-slapping and knuckle-sandwiching at the least, challenge to a dual/fight, OR worse. In the "old neighborhood" -- not long ago, EVERYONE would have understood the common sense unspoken rules and laws of society. What is being defended in this case of Donald Trump as well as his voters told to "Eff" themselves, is well over the line of decency and crystal clear incitement to violence. It reeks of Antifa/Alinsky tactics. In a nutshell, we are witnessing a hostile and clear case of Social Anarchy. But only because Trump is President. The MSM has been encoraging the overt public hostility. Now most of us realize that were this language targeting 0bama, the cacophony of howls and outrage from the Left and MSM would be deafening. The perp would likely be arrested. This irrational support of free speech under ALL circumstances is a very new concept. However, it is VERY selective, based on political correctness and those who control the culture's power structure. There seems to be one set of rules for Democrats, Progressives, and Homos/Queers, and one for Republicans, Conservatives, and Christians. The inconsistencies and bias from Democrats, the Judiciary, AND even the Supreme Court in their enforcement of Constitutional Law is conspicuously one-sided. It seems Social Justice crusaders get mulligans, whereas Conservatives are disproportionately penalized.
That nut is probably a Leftist-Antifa agitprop asset. He also forgot his white hood, and "KKK ROCKS!" sign.
Oh the Irony! How are you and paulsen any different than Antifa? The image was from a fictional movie! Is there some problem with that? There IS a problem with normalizing this anti-social anarchy crap and juvenile sociopathic behavior encouraged under the guise of "Free Speech." What we're witnessing is the over-ripened rotten fruit of over a year's worth of Leftist/Anti-MAGA propaganda and indoctrination -- a psyop designed to normalize hostility and violence toward Donald Trump and those who voted for him.
And....and...But...but...but...."FREE SPEECH!" OH WAIT. Please explain what happened to IT in your anecdotal case where the so-called "crazy" who again -- according to some -- is merely exercising his constitutional "Free Speech"?? Of course the sign saying "Fuck Trump" should be considered as disturbing the peace.. As to what happened to the crazy in my post, try reading it again.. --- He either gets jailed, --- or is assaulted, even killed. What more could you want? OK, --- we have a crazy shouting "NIGGER!!" to every black person, Or a GROUP of black people, as he goes down the street? Hopefully someone calls 911, and the cops arrive before the crazy gets killed by the blacks. Whereupon, the crazy is put in jail for disturbing the peace. If he's assaulted or killed, those responsible face a jury trial, and will no doubt be acquitted, or given reduced sentences/paroled because of the 'fighting words' doctrine. Is there some problem with that?
Which only proves that Left is as much in favor of political censorship as the right. Even if it is, it STILL works as agitprop tool of the Left designed to perpetuate a stereotype and bogeyman that simply does NOT exist. "Art" has been a political tool since the 1960s. Of ALL people, you ought to get it as well as what's going on.
What more could you want? Yes, yes, I read it, Paine. But you're missing the MUCH BIGGER PICTURE: This Crusade, these revolutions all begin with this kind of "taking-one-for-the-team." One turns into a half-dozen. Then into two-dozen. Then hundreds. And so forth. Consider human nature. "Us vs. Them." BOTH sides. See the imminent future now??
There IS a problem with normalizing this anti-social anarchy crap and juvenile sociopathic behavior encouraged under the guise of "Free Speech." What we're witnessing is the over-ripened rotten fruit of over a year's worth of Leftist/Anti-MAGA propaganda and indoctrination -- a psyop designed to normalize hostility and violence toward Donald Trump and those who voted for him. How weird, you've read my post, and apparently understood it, but still feel the need to lecture me about leftist propaganda? I'm not your enemy. Trying to get you to realize that some here (notably misterwhite), is a propagandist, isn't getting through.. Am I wasting my time?
Nah. I bet that's Bruce Willis in the 1995 movie Die Hard with a Vengeance.
Firstly, I don't believe you or 95% of the posters here are my enemy. I think that's a weird assertion or presumption to make, but hey, it's a nameless, faceless media where intent and subtleties are often misconstrued and misunderstood. What else is new? Beyond that, I'm not "lecturing," I'm clarifying. I apparently should refrain from giving my overview and opinion on the social dynamics and psyops by the PTB (Which does appear for be a waste of time -- a YUGE one. You're right. My bad.)
But you're missing the MUCH BIGGER PICTURE: This Crusade, these revolutions all begin with this kind of "taking-one-for-the-team." One turns into a half-dozen. Then into two-dozen. Then hundreds. And so forth. Consider human nature. "Us vs. Them." BOTH sides. See the imminent future now?? Now you've posted I'm "missing the MUCH BIGGER PICTURE", --- and implied that what? ---- I'm "taking-one-for-the-team."? What in hell is your problem with me? -- That I can't "See the imminent future now??" I've probably posted just as many articles as you, about how the socialists are trying to ruin our republic. Get off your soapbox when you reply to me...
Thank you...
Now the TV appearances, book, and movie deals start. She's a dead ringer for Honey Boo Boo's mom!
I honestly don't care what people think or say about me. I'd probably laugh. Lack of think skin... is a weakness. I loath weak people. I'm the infidel... Allah warned you about. كافر المسلح
You have consistently lied about yourself on this chit-chat channel.
He should be made to put a "Fuck Hillary" sticker on his truck too, see how much grief he gets over that.
Vegetarians eat vegetables. Beware of humanitarians!
The thing that Gatlin is laughing about is that she was arrested on a felony warrant charge. Fort Bend County Sheriff’s Office records show Karen Fonseca was arrested about 2 p.m. Thursday
What this proves is that this really has to be one dumb-ass woman calling so much attention to herself with an outstanding felony arrest warrant issued against her. It also proves that anti-Trumpers have never been known for displaying any degree of intelligence.
Egad! This is one ugly, fat, old tattooed sow. Pull her over and if she draws a gun, shoot her ass! Get the trash off the road. Liberals are like Slinkys. They're good for nothing, but somehow they bring a smile to your face as you shove them down the stairs.
Great! Charge her with that. They have no case against her for exercising her First Amendment rights. She should be charged for trying to encourage a sexual assault against the commander and chief.
That MAY be protected speech,but I doubt it. There are still obscenity laws on the books in many places. Regardless of it is is legal,illegal,or borderline,it IS a classless thing to do because that's not saying something in anger once and then leaving it alone,it is virtually shouting it at everyone who sees the truck. In the entire history of the world,the only nations that had to build walls to keep their own citizens from leaving were those with leftist governments.
Thanks for defining it clearer than I did. In the entire history of the world,the only nations that had to build walls to keep their own citizens from leaving were those with leftist governments.
Is that a political statement,or a call for sexual assault? Can you begin to imagine the screams of outrage if someone had "Fuck Hillary!" in the rear window of their truck? Whymen libbers heads would be exploding. In the entire history of the world,the only nations that had to build walls to keep their own citizens from leaving were those with leftist governments.
You can however shout "Honkey" or "Cracka". Some people are more equal than others. In the entire history of the world,the only nations that had to build walls to keep their own citizens from leaving were those with leftist governments.
Fuck off, Ba Ba Baaaaa Bucky the farm animal sucky sucky
I'm the infidel... Allah warned you about. كافر المسلح
I highly doubt very much that the use of derogatory language against out President would be protected under the First Amendment as it actually falls under the fighting words doctrine. See here https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/2383 and here constitution.findlaw.com/amendment1/annotation18.htm
I think you're waaay overreacting. Yes, really. I've probably posted just as many articles as you, about how the socialists are trying to ruin our republic. Get off your soapbox when you reply to me... We can either have a decent convo and exchange opinions, or we can't. "Soapbox"?? Gimme a break.
AND the arrest, past police record and exposed sordid abuse of her bull-dyke "wife," and MAYBE the Ellen appearance and hate-fest on the Liberal-Dem Late Nite Talk Show circuit.
Lack of think skin... is a weakness. I loath weak people. Yes, you'd laugh here. In real life I'd bet your pension that it'd be a much different story. IF you or especially your wife/family were targeted with these obscenities -- either via the signage OR from car-window, your reaction would be waaay more different. UNLESS you're telling us that that at a traffic light or elsewhere that were some broad or guy to open a window and shout out, "EFF YOU, B*TCH!," that you're letting THAT go?
Exactly. Imagine the kvetching, b*tching and moaning were THAT the case. OR, 0bama was targeting with the very same "EFF 0BAMA!" vehicle signage. (btw, remember how those several folks who dug out 0bama's student loan data were summarily arrested?? When in positions of power, Dems abuse it, having a hyper-emotional hair-triggers when THEY are "insulted," investigated, busted, and ridiculed otherwise.)
It also proves that anti-Trumpers have never been known for displaying any degree of intelligence. On THIS issue we can agree. (Still staunchly supporting the ACLU, btw? Because THEY are supporting this witch.)
Pull her over and if she draws a gun, shoot her ass! Get the trash off the road. THAT is basically the face (and azz) of the Democrat Party. Ugly IN & OUT.
Great! Charge her with that. They have no case against her for exercising her First Amendment rights. What part of, public "incitement," obscenity/vulgarity/indecency/lewdness" laws don't you get? The First Amendment does NOT protect any of it.
Excellent! Why can't the Bull-Dyke's proud and public display be construed as "Encouragement of sexual assault" as well as a "Hate Crime," Hate Speech," Incitement of "sexual assault," Incitement of Violence, and a few other legit charges?
Regardless of it is is legal,illegal,or borderline,it IS a classless thing to do because that's not saying something in anger once and then leaving it alone,it is virtually shouting it at everyone who sees the truck. Well stated. If all (including kids) are compelled to see it on public roads and stores, the vulgarities/obscenities are indeed forced upon them.
Is that a political statement,or a call for sexual assault? Can you begin to imagine the screams of outrage if someone had "Fuck Hillary!" in the rear window of their truck? Whymen libbers heads would be exploding. Exactly. The double-standard and hypocrisy of the Left as well as Anarchists is again on display and exposed in this case. What I've noticed from the Dem-Antifa-Anarchist Left is that LEADING the hate, hostility, and violence is Hillary's "The Resistance" -- comprised of malcontent Queers, Dykes, and Society's Misfits and Losers. Gotta feeling the test case is only the beginning. They (and the Dems' GOPe-cousins ) are HOPING that this disgusting display becomes epidemic. Call it the "Kaepernick Phenomena." In this seemingly single inconsequential gesture, the Dem-Antifa-Anarchists are in the process of challenging laws and standards of respect and behavior that have stood the constitutional test of time. Their long End Game is clearly Divide & Conquer, and creating legal and social chaos. Antifa and Dems have always pushed the boundaries of "Fighting Words." They need their collective clocks cleaned. Backing them up AS ALWAYS is the ACLU and SPLC.
Don't forget the Constitution and the United States Supreme Court. Funny you should mention Antifa - they are the biggest enemies of free speech in America. You can however shout "Honkey" or "Cracka". Some people are more equal than others. Funny how THAT all works, ain't it? Whitey is now targeted for open Hatred, Censorship," and Employment Restrictions at colleges and universities. With NO pushback. (What's THAT all about??) This legal double standard of speech and deed (including 'Affirmative Action,' select 'Hate Speech/Hate Crime Laws' and unequal protections and license needs once and for all to go to the Supreme Court for remediation (OR be left to the States.)
She's a dead ringer for Honey Boo Boo's mom! I see Rosie O'Donnell playing her in the made for tv role. Wonder how much she can bench press? In the entire history of the world,the only nations that had to build walls to keep their own citizens from leaving were those with leftist governments.
Well, the SCOTUS is a joke. Their respective hypocrisy, decisions based on international law, and political caving is making a mockery of justice AND the spirit of the USCON. Funny you should mention Antifa - they are the biggest enemies of free speech in America. Exactly. Oh, the irony.
Let's HOPE he has been lying,and he is really some bored 13 year old kid. In the entire history of the world,the only nations that had to build walls to keep their own citizens from leaving were those with leftist governments.
See here https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/2383 and here constitution.findlaw.com/amendment1/annotation18.htm EXCELLENT FIND!
MOST people with outstanding warrants out on them are smart enough to not try to draw attention to themselves. The good news for her is she looks like a woman that will fit right in with a jail or prison population. In the entire history of the world,the only nations that had to build walls to keep their own citizens from leaving were those with leftist governments.
Great! Charge her with that. Correct me if I'm wrong,but isn't that WHY they arrested her? The whole window sticker thing is an obscenity charge,not a felony. In the entire history of the world,the only nations that had to build walls to keep their own citizens from leaving were those with leftist governments.
Get real. You can't possibly think she wants Trump to have a little fun. In the entire history of the world,the only nations that had to build walls to keep their own citizens from leaving were those with leftist governments.
Wrong. Presidents and other politicians are public figures. Or are you now claiming that anyone that ever referred to the Bubba's as "Hitlery" or "Bubba" can and should be arrested? In the entire history of the world,the only nations that had to build walls to keep their own citizens from leaving were those with leftist governments.
I can't speak for anyone else,but *I* don't remember it. Not that I doubt threats of arrest were made,I just didn't hear about it. In the entire history of the world,the only nations that had to build walls to keep their own citizens from leaving were those with leftist governments.
THOSE are "IDs." Far different then encouraging an actual violent "act."
I can't speak for anyone else,but *I* don't remember it. Not that I doubt threats of arrest were made,I just didn't hear about it. That you can't remember it says quite a bit about the control and manipulation of the news by a colluding/bought MSM, as well as the burying of data and its aftermath. If I get a chance I'll dig up whatever remnants remain.
I disagree. That title is shared by the alleged Republican and Democratic Parties. Even Mark Twain took notice back in the 1800's that "America is safe now. Congress is in recess." When a political system is completely corrupt and working counter to their sworn oaths,WHY do we blame the people that blackmail or bribe the politicians,when it is the politicians are the ones who live where "the rubber meets the road"? In the entire history of the world,the only nations that had to build walls to keep their own citizens from leaving were those with leftist governments.
The post above should have been directed to you as well as to Liberator.
In the entire history of the world,the only nations that had to build walls to keep their own citizens from leaving were those with leftist governments.
Thanks,that definitely sounds like something I want to rant and rave about. In the entire history of the world,the only nations that had to build walls to keep their own citizens from leaving were those with leftist governments.
I concur. BOTH Parties are now so corrupt, collusive, social anarchists and Global-Firsters that many of us have been calling for a Third Party America-First, Common Sense party. And it sez volumes that BOTH parties and leaders (like Mitch McConnell, Ryan, and certain generals and Deep State rebels) are STILL trying to undermine and oust Donald Trump.
It is taking a lot of time...This story has been buried DEEP.
"F**k Congress!" Free speech? How about "F**k Obama"? Free speech? How about "F**k Obama"? I'm down with it. (Just NOT in public, where the language would STILL be inappropriate.)
Thank you! :)
Wrong. Presidents and other politicians are public figures. Correct. They are public figures Or are you now claiming that anyone that ever referred to the Bubba's as "Hitlery" or "Bubba" can and should be arrested? No. Look up "fighting words". In law "fighting words" are not to be taken lightly. It is not just a matter of shouting "fire" in a theater that serves the purpose for this doctrine but the use of language against a President that serves to incite civil disorder and/or unrest.
I'm not "lecturing," I'm clarifying. I apparently should refrain from giving my overview and opinion on the social dynamics and psyops by the PTB (Which does appear for be a waste of time -- a YUGE one. You're right. My bad.) I accepted your 'clarifying ' comment above as an apology, --- an apology about the fact that we agree about most political issues, and so --- don't need to lecture each other... Now, a day or two later, it puzzles me why you want to reopen the issue ...
Yes. That shit don't phase me. I've been called every vile name on the planet. I've arrested enough people that were too thin skinned to ignore a constitutionally protected comment. How ignorant is that... catch a criminal charge because you're too snowflake WEAK... to tolerate a verbal comment? I'm the infidel... Allah warned you about. كافر المسلح
Yet some people STILL wonder how a outsider like Trump got elected as President over the objections of ALL the party regulars of both branches of our ruling party. He got elected because voters WANTED a outsider in the WH to start throwing a few political bombs to harm the status quo. In the entire history of the world,the only nations that had to build walls to keep their own citizens from leaving were those with leftist governments.
Thanks,no hurry, In the entire history of the world,the only nations that had to build walls to keep their own citizens from leaving were those with leftist governments.
"F**k Congress!" Free speech? How about "F**k Obama"? Yes,Free Speech. After all,HOW can you defame a politician? In the entire history of the world,the only nations that had to build walls to keep their own citizens from leaving were those with leftist governments.
Vaguely, I tend to forget that schitt when a$$holes like that aren't bothering me anymore, too bad he hasn't been deported back to where he came from. Vegetarians eat vegetables. Beware of humanitarians!
That's been the Lefts M.O. for quite sometime now. Vegetarians eat vegetables. Beware of humanitarians!
#2. To: Deckard (#0)
#3. To: misterwhite (#2)
I'd take a baseball bat to his truck and let him call the police.
“Truth is treason in the empire of lies.” - Ron Paul
Those who most loudly denounce Fake News are typically those most aggressively disseminating it.
#4. To: Deckard (#3)
So...you advocate violence against someone whose speech you don't like?
#5. To: misterwhite (#4)
I am the violence he's inciting.
“Truth is treason in the empire of lies.” - Ron Paul
Those who most loudly denounce Fake News are typically those most aggressively disseminating it.
#6. To: Deckard (#0)
(Edited)
"F*CK TRUMP"
#7. To: Deckard, Gatlin, Mr. ACLU (#0)
the Internet Is Destroying Him
#8. To: GrandIsland (#1)
#9. To: misterwhite (#2)
If I saw that I wouldn't call the police. I'd take a baseball bat to his truck and let him call the police.
#10. To: misterwhite, Deckard (#4)
Deckard: "So...you advocate violence against someone whose speech you don't like?"
#11. To: Liberator (#7)
(Edited)
Incendiary speech, speech that incites, AND vulgar, obscene speech IN PUBLIC is NOT "protected."
“Truth is treason in the empire of lies.” - Ron Paul
Those who most loudly denounce Fake News are typically those most aggressively disseminating it.
#12. To: Liberator (#10)
(Edited)
Ever hear of the saying, "Them's fighting words"?? What was plastered all over that vehicle was blatant IN YOUR FACE fighting words.
“Truth is treason in the empire of lies.” - Ron Paul
Those who most loudly denounce Fake News are typically those most aggressively disseminating it.
#13. To: Liberator (#7)
But then again, it IS the Leftist-Commie America-hating ACLU,
“Truth is treason in the empire of lies.” - Ron Paul
Those who most loudly denounce Fake News are typically those most aggressively disseminating it.
#14. To: Liberator (#6)
What about, "F*CK DECKARD, HIS MOTHER, AND DAUGHTER"??
“Truth is treason in the empire of lies.” - Ron Paul
Those who most loudly denounce Fake News are typically those most aggressively disseminating it.
#15. To: Liberator (#10)
Ever hear of the saying, "Them's fighting words"?? What was plastered all over that vehicle was blatant IN YOUR FACE fighting words.
#16. To: Deckard (#11)
#17. To: Deckard (#12)
Sorry that words and ideas that you disagree with trigger you to violence snowflake - how is your response any different than that of Antifa?
#18. To: Liberator (#16)
"F*CK THE DRAFT" is far different than, "F*CK TRUMP," F*CK YOUR MOTHER," or "F*CK TRUMP VOTERS."
“Truth is treason in the empire of lies.” - Ron Paul
Those who most loudly denounce Fake News are typically those most aggressively disseminating it.
#19. To: Deckard (#12)
Would you be as upset if it had said "F**k Obama"?
#20. To: Liberator (#17)
That said, when someone repeatedly circles the front of your house, shouting with a megaphone, "EFF DECKARD AND HIS MOM.THEY SUCK!",
“Truth is treason in the empire of lies.” - Ron Paul
Those who most loudly denounce Fake News are typically those most aggressively disseminating it.
#21. To: Deckard (#13)
The Suprerme court has ruled that political statements are protected speech.
#22. To: Deckard (#14)
Apples and oranges - such a statement is not political.
#23. To: Liberator (#19)
THIS IS COMMON SENSE that transcends the subversive ACLU's BS definitions.
“Truth is treason in the empire of lies.” - Ron Paul
Those who most loudly denounce Fake News are typically those most aggressively disseminating it.
#24. To: tpaine (#15)
'Fighting words' laws are made to stop fights, not authorise them. ---- The idea is that law enforcement could stop offensive displays BEFORE a crazy like whitey took a bat to the other crazy person/display.
#25. To: Liberator (#22)
Apples and oranges - such a statement is not political.
“Truth is treason in the empire of lies.” - Ron Paul
Those who most loudly denounce Fake News are typically those most aggressively disseminating it.
#26. To: Deckard (#18)
The funny thing is, Gatlin would agree with you on this.
#27. To: Liberator (#26)
(Edited)
More irony -- YOU are the one engaging in Antifa tactics.
“Truth is treason in the empire of lies.” - Ron Paul
Those who most loudly denounce Fake News are typically those most aggressively disseminating it.
#28. To: Deckard (#25)
(Edited)
Supreme Court unanimously reaffirms: There is no ‘hate speech’ exception to the First Amendment
#29. To: Deckard (#27)
Hey -- answer the question: You're walking quietly on a street with your girlfriend, wife, or mother, and some guy come up to you and sez, "F*CK YOU and your whore." And keeps on railing against you, repeating his filth.
#30. To: Liberator (#28)
People are getting fired for less; "Hate Speech" and "Hate Crimes"
“Truth is treason in the empire of lies.” - Ron Paul
Those who most loudly denounce Fake News are typically those most aggressively disseminating it.
#31. To: Deckard (#30)
#32. To: Liberator (#29)
Why don't you come over here, say it and find out.
“Truth is treason in the empire of lies.” - Ron Paul
Those who most loudly denounce Fake News are typically those most aggressively disseminating it.
#33. To: Liberator (#24)
So what's your opinion on shouting "NIGGER!!" to every black person? Or GROUPS of black people?
#34. To: hondo68 (#33)
#35. To: Liberator (#31)
We're done.
“Truth is treason in the empire of lies.” - Ron Paul
Those who most loudly denounce Fake News are typically those most aggressively disseminating it.
#36. To: Liberator (#24)
(Edited)
Fighting words' laws are made to stop fights, not authorise them. ---- The idea is that law enforcement could stop offensive displays BEFORE a crazy like whitey took a bat to the other crazy person/display.
#37. To: Liberator, Deckard (#10)
MW's baseball bat across the back windshield is merely also "free speech."
#38. To: tpaine (#36)
(Edited)
OK, --- we have a crazy shouting "NIGGER!!" to every black person, Or a GROUP of black people, as he goes down the street?
#39. To: Liberator (#24)
So what's your opinion on shouting "NIGGER!!" to every black person? Or GROUPS of black people?
#40. To: misterwhite, Deckard, tpaine (#37)
But Deckard believes that free speech is so sacred that it should be free from consequences.
#41. To: misterwhite (#39)
#42. To: Liberator (#40)
What is being defended in this case of Donald Trump as well as his voters told to "Eff" themselves, is well over the line of decency and crystal clear incitement to violence. It reeks of Antifa/Alinsky tactics.
“Truth is treason in the empire of lies.” - Ron Paul
Those who most loudly denounce Fake News are typically those most aggressively disseminating it.
#43. To: Liberator (#41)
That nut is probably a Leftist-Antifa agitprop asset.
“Truth is treason in the empire of lies.” - Ron Paul
Those who most loudly denounce Fake News are typically those most aggressively disseminating it.
#44. To: tpaine, rlkk (#36)
If he's assaulted or killed, those responsible face a jury trial, and will no doubt be acquitted, or given reduced sentences/paroled because of the 'fighting words' doctrine.
#45. To: Liberator (#38)
Ooooh...."Disturbing the peace," eh? But "Eff Trump" and "Eff those who voted for him!" ISN'T??
#46. To: Liberator (#40)
Now most of us realize that were this language targeting 0bama, the cacophony of howls and outrage from the Left and MSM would be deafening. The perp would likely be arrested.
“Truth is treason in the empire of lies.” - Ron Paul
Those who most loudly denounce Fake News are typically those most aggressively disseminating it.
#47. To: Deckard (#43)
(Edited)
The image was from a fictional movie!
#48. To: tpaine (#45)
(Edited)
As to what happened to the crazy in my post, try reading it again.. --- He either gets jailed, --- or is assaulted, even killed.
#49. To: Liberator (#44)
If he's assaulted or killed, those responsible face a jury trial, and will no doubt be acquitted, or given reduced sentences/paroled because of the 'fighting words' doctrine. Is there some problem with that?
#50. To: Liberator (#41)
That nut is probably a Leftist-Antifa agitprop asset.
#51. To: tpaine (#49)
I'm not your enemy.... Am I wasting my time?
#52. To: Liberator (#48)
Yes, yes, I read it, Paine.
#53. To: Liberator (#51)
You're right. My bad.)
#54. To: Deckard, F Trump arrested, Art of the Deal (#0)
(Edited)
#55. To: Liberator (#8)
What IF, a Vehicle is
#56. To: GrandIsland (#55)
I honestly don't care what people think or say about me
#57. To: Deckard (#0)
#58. To: Deckard (#18)
(Edited)
on an outstanding fraud warrant issued in August by the Rosenberg Police Department. 
The Mushot of Karen Fonseca.
#59. To: Deckard (#46)
#60. To: hondo68 (#54)
#61. To: Gatlin (#59)
What this proves is that this really has to be one dumb-ass woman calling so much attention to herself with an outstanding felony arrest warrant issued against her.
“Truth is treason in the empire of lies.” - Ron Paul
Those who most loudly denounce Fake News are typically those most aggressively disseminating it.
#62. To: Deckard (#61)
#63. To: Deckard (#5)
Protected speech - if you can't help being triggered by a message you disagree with snowflake, then you're the one with the problem.
#64. To: Liberator (#7)
Incendiary speech, speech that incites, AND vulgar, obscene speech IN PUBLIC is NOT "protected."
#65. To: Deckard (#13)
The Suprerme court has ruled that political statements are protected speech.
#66. To: Liberator (#21)
In fact, you can NOT even shout, "NIGGER!!" in public either, can you?? Because...IT'S CONSIDERED, "Hate Speech."
#67. To: buckeroo (#56)
#68. To: Deckard (#0)
#69. To: tpaine (#52)
What in hell is your problem with me? -- That I can't "See the imminent future now??"
#70. To: hondo68 (#54)
Now the TV appearances, book, and movie deals start.
#71. To: GrandIsland (#55)
I honestly don't care what people think or say about me. I'd probably laugh.
#72. To: CZ82 (#57)
He should be made to put a "Fuck Hillary" sticker on his truck too, see how much grief he gets over that.
#73. To: Gatlin, Deckard (#59)
What this proves is that this really has to be one dumb-ass woman calling so much attention to herself with an outstanding felony arrest warrant issued against her.
#74. To: IbJensen (#60)
Egad! This is one ugly, fat, old tattooed sow.
#75. To: Deckard, Gatlin (#61)
["one dumb-ass woman calling so much attention to herself with an outstanding felony arrest warrant issued against her."]
#76. To: A K A Stone, Deckard (#62)
She should be charged for trying to encourage a sexual assault against the commander and chief.
#77. To: sneakypete, Deckard (#63)
That MAY be protected speech,but I doubt it. There are still obscenity laws on the books in many places.
#78. To: sneakypete, CZ82, A K A Stone (#65)
The Suprerme court has ruled that political statements are protected speech.
#79. To: Liberator (#78)
Antifa and Dems have always pushed the boundaries of "Fighting Words." They need their collective clocks cleaned. Backing them up AS ALWAYS is the ACLU and SPLC.
“Truth is treason in the empire of lies.” - Ron Paul
Those who most loudly denounce Fake News are typically those most aggressively disseminating it.
#80. To: sneakypete (#66)
In fact, you can NOT even shout, "NIGGER!!" in public either, can you?? Because...IT'S CONSIDERED, "Hate Speech."
#81. To: hondo68 (#54)
Now the TV appearances, book, and movie deals start.
#82. To: Deckard (#79)
Don't forget the Constitution and the United States Supreme Court.
#83. To: buckeroo, Grand Island (#56)
(Edited)
You have consistently lied about yourself on this chit-chat channel.
#84. To: goldilucky (#68)
I highly doubt very much that the use of derogatory language against out President would be protected under the First Amendment as it actually falls under the fighting words doctrine.
#85. To: Gatlin (#58)
Fort Bend County Sheriff’s Office records show Karen Fonseca was arrested about 2 p.m. Thursday on an outstanding fraud warrant issued in August by the Rosenberg Police Department.
#86. To: Deckard (#61)
What this proves is that this really has to be one dumb-ass woman calling so much attention to herself with an outstanding felony arrest warrant issued against her.
#87. To: A K A Stone (#62)
She should be charged for trying to encourage a sexual assault against the commander and chief.
#88. To: goldilucky (#68)
I highly doubt very much that the use of derogatory language against out President would be protected under the First Amendment as it actually falls under the fighting words doctrine.
#89. To: Liberator (#72)
btw, remember how those several folks who dug out 0bama's student loan data were summarily arrested??
#90. To: sneakypete, goldilucky (#88)
Or are you now claiming that anyone that ever referred to the Bubba's as "Hitlery" or "Bubba" can and should be arrested?
#91. To: sneakypete (#89)
(Edited)
btw, remember how those several folks who dug out 0bama's student loan data were summarily arrested??
#92. To: Liberator, Liberatorr (#82)
Funny you should mention Antifa - they are the biggest enemies of free speech in America.
#93. To: Deckard (#92)
#94. To: Liberator (#91)
If I get a chance I'll dig up whatever remnants remain.
#95. To: sneakypete (#92)
(Edited)
That title is shared by the alleged Republican and Democratic Parties.
#96. To: sneakypete (#94)
#97. To: sneakypete, Liberator (#92)
Even Mark Twain took notice back in the 1800's that "America is safe now. Congress is in recess."
“Truth is treason in the empire of lies.” - Ron Paul
Those who most loudly denounce Fake News are typically those most aggressively disseminating it.
#98. To: Deckard, sneakypete (#97)
"F**k Congress!"
#99. To: Liberator (#84)
#100. To: sneakypete (#88)
#101. To: Liberator (#69)
"Get off your soapbox when you reply to me"..
#102. To: Liberator (#71)
(Edited)
UNLESS you're telling us that that at a traffic light or elsewhere that were some broad or guy to open a window and shout out, "EFF YOU, B*TCH!," that you're letting THAT go?
#103. To: Liberator (#95)
BOTH Parties are now so corrupt, collusive, social anarchists and Global-Firsters that many of us have been calling for a Third Party America-First, Common Sense party.
#104. To: Liberator (#96)
It is taking a lot of time...This story has been buried DEEP.
#105. To: Deckard (#97)
Even Mark Twain took notice back in the 1800's that "America is safe now. Congress is in recess."
#106. To: Liberator (#72)
(btw, remember how those several folks who dug out 0bama's student loan data were summarily arrested??
#107. To: Liberator (#78)
What I've noticed from the Dem-Antifa-Anarchist Left is that LEADING the hate, hostility, and violence is Hillary's "The Resistance" -- comprised of malcontent Queers, Dykes, and Society's Misfits and Losers.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]