[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Utopian Visionaries Who Won’t Leave People Alone

No - no - no Ain'T going To get away with iT

Pete Buttplug's Butt Plugger Trying to Turn Kids into Faggots

Mark Levin: I'm sick and tired of these attacks

Questioning the Big Bang

James Webb Data Contradicts the Big Bang

Pssst! Don't tell the creationists, but scientists don't have a clue how life began

A fine romance: how humans and chimps just couldn't let go

Early humans had sex with chimps

O’Keefe dons bulletproof vest to extract undercover journalist from NGO camp.

Biblical Contradictions (Alleged)

Catholic Church Praising Lucifer

Raising the Knife

One Of The HARDEST Videos I Had To Make..

Houthi rebels' attack severely damages a Belize-flagged ship in key strait leading to the Red Sea (British Ship)

Chinese Illegal Alien. I'm here for the moneuy

Red Tides Plague Gulf Beaches

Tucker Carlson calls out Nikki Haley, Ben Shapiro, and every other person calling for war:

{Are there 7 Deadly Sins?} I’ve heard people refer to the “7 Deadly Sins,” but I haven’t been able to find that sort of list in Scripture.

Abomination of Desolation | THEORY, BIBLE STUDY

Bible Help

Libertysflame Database Updated

Crush EVERYONE with the Alien Gambit!

Vladimir Putin tells Tucker Carlson US should stop arming Ukraine to end war

Putin hints Moscow and Washington in back-channel talks in revealing Tucker Carlson interview

Trump accuses Fulton County DA Fani Willis of lying in court response to Roman's motion

Mandatory anti-white racism at Disney.

Iceland Volcano Erupts For Third Time In 2 Months, State Of Emergency Declared

Tucker Carlson Interview with Vladamir Putin

How will Ar Mageddon / WW III End?

What on EARTH is going on in Acts 16:11? New Discovery!

2023 Hottest in over 120 Million Years

2024 and beyond in prophecy

Questions

This Speech Just Broke the Internet

This AMAZING Math Formula Will Teach You About God!

The GOSPEL of the ALIENS | Fallen Angels | Giants | Anunnaki

The IMAGE of the BEAST Revealed (REV 13) - WARNING: Not for Everyone

WEF Calls for AI to Replace Voters: ‘Why Do We Need Elections?’

The OCCULT Burger king EXPOSED

PANERA BREAD Antichrist message EXPOSED

The OCCULT Cheesecake Factory EXPOSED

Satanist And Witches Encounter The Cross

History and Beliefs of the Waldensians

Rome’s Persecution of the Bible

Evolutionists, You’ve Been Caught Lying About Fossils

Raw Streets of NYC Migrant Crisis that they don't show on Tv

Meet DarkBERT - AI Model Trained On DARK WEB

[NEW!] Jaw-dropping 666 Discovery Utterly Proves the King James Bible is God's Preserved Word

ALERT!!! THE MOST IMPORTANT INFORMATION WILL SOON BE POSTED HERE


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Business
See other Business Articles

Title: CBS Badly Misplayed Their Hand By Making 'Star Trek: Discovery' A Paid Streaming Exclusive
Source: Forbes
URL Source: https://www.forbes.com/sites/insert ... eaming-exclusive/#3f36b6cd1318
Published: Nov 1, 2017
Author: Paul Tassi
Post Date: 2017-11-01 14:18:20 by Willie Green
Keywords: None
Views: 2969
Comments: 46

I was excited to watch Star Trek: Discovery last night, CBS’s return to a “true” Star Trek show in the age of JJ Abrams blockbusters. I set my DVR and gave it viewing priority over Fear the Walking Dead, because all the early buzz I’d heard was stellar.

But while I really did like the show, the process of watching it was a total disaster.

Though I’d set the recording earlier, football pushed all of CBS’s programming out of whack so that 20 minutes of some Oprah special aired during the Star Trek: Discovery recording.

I watched anyway, as there was extra time in the recording, so I thought maybe cable had adjusted according and squeezed in the full show by slimming down commercials or something. It did not. The last quarter of the episode had not recorded.

While I knew that Star Trek: Discovery was a CBS All Access streaming exclusive, a service you have to pay for, I thought that CBS.com would at least have the episode of Discovery they had literally just aired available to watch so I could see the ending. But no, even the pilot that had just been broadcast was locked behind a paywall. You can sign up for a “free trial,” but one that will immediately start billing you when that period ends.

I am not signing up for a CBS paid streaming service, so the only way it appears I’m going to be watching Discovery is if the show goes up on Amazon or iTunes to be purchased directly (I have no idea when or if that is happening). Others may just resort to flat-out piracy, and given my experience last night, it’s hard to blame them.

CBS really misplayed their hand with Star Trek: Discovery. While I understand that aging networks want to get their own piece of the Netflix/Hulu pie and have people pay them directly for programming, making Star Trek: Discovery an All Access exclusive misunderstands the market and their own viewing audience.

Even without the ridiculous viewing hiccups last night, Discovery being a paid exclusive was never going to fly with me. Why? Am I just a cheapskate who can’t afford $6/10 month?

No, but I am someone who already subscribes to Netflix, Hulu, Amazon Prime, HBO and for some reason, actual cable still, having not yet cut that cord. If I’m going to add anything else to that list, you had better be damn sure I’m going to get value out of it, and I cannot see that happening with one CBS show they’ve decided to make impossible to view elsewhere.

The Star Trek issue is frustrating because this is the first time I’ve actually been interested in a CBS show since Supergirl (which was later taken off CBS for underperforming and moved to The CW). CBS may still put up big numbers for many of its shows, but their audience is aging quickly. A few years ago, reports said the average CBS viewer was 55. Soon, that will be 60, if it isn’t already.

Star Trek was a chance to get younger viewers watching the channel for the first time in ages. I was hooked by what I saw of the first episode, and knew immediately it was a show I wanted to continue to follow if I could. The production value is fantastic, the cast is great and it really does address that Star Trek itch that we’ve been waiting years to scratch.

But it’s hilariously boneheaded to me to finally have a show that appeals to a younger demographic, and hide it behind a paywall. Yes, the younger crowd is used to paying for streaming services, but almost no one ever signs up for one for one show. Oh, and did I mention that the $6 tier of CBS All Access still includes ads?

Sure, Netflix and HBO are a bit more expensive than CBS All Access, but I’m watching many, many exclusive shows, miniseries and movies across those services every year, making the price worthwhile. For CBS, there is literally nothing else I care to watch on All Access (the complete collection of The Big Bang Theory and Two Broke Girls episodes just aren’t doing it for me) nor do I have any idea if the future will provide more All Access-only shows I want to watch like Star Trek: Discovery. In short, there is no way in hell I’m going to pay $72/120 a year to a channel I never watch for one exclusive show that finally managed to catch my interest.

Will I ever watch Discovery in full? I have no idea. If it’s ever for sale by itself, I’ll pick it up, and I know international viewers are actually getting the show on Netflix. But CBS really took a wrong turn here, taking one of their most promising shows in ages and locking it into one of the most unappealing subscription services I’ve seen. And they even botched the “teaser” debut so I couldn’t even finish watching the damn pilot without having to subscribe.

There are ways for old media companies to adapt to the new media landscape, but CBS is doing it poorly, and I will be amazed if Discovery gets anything even approaching a respectable viewership locked in a tower like this. This was a bad call, and I hope it’s reversed down the road.


Poster Comment:

(2 images)

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 40.

#1. To: Willie Green (#0)

It's virtually an all-girl cast. The star is a black woman who was disgraced and in prison but pulled out of prison by the captain.

Only three males on the show: the captain and the doctor and chief engineer (but Doc and "Scotty" are gay lovers).

The Klingons are badly imagined and break with previous shows in many ways. Now they eat humans for fun and nourishment after killing them.

The series is set about ten years before the original Star Trek series. Yet they have a biologically-based star drive that can transport them anywhere in the universe in a split-second. When it's working.

It's all a big disappointment, possibly worse than Deep Space Nine and Voyager which I didn't like. I did like Enterprise and the original series and ST:TNG.

If it’s ever for sale by itself, I’ll pick it up, and I know international viewers are actually getting the show on Netflix.

Another good reason to use VPN so you can route your internet connection overseas.

Tooconservative  posted on  2017-11-01   14:46:21 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: Tooconservative (#1)

Only three males on the show: the captain and the doctor and chief engineer

No... the chief of security is a guy also... and it looks like he might be developed into a "love interest" for the black gal...

Another good reason to use VPN so you can route your internet connection overseas.
Any recommendations?

Willie Green  posted on  2017-11-01   14:56:58 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: Willie Green (#2)

Any recommendations?

I use PrivateInternetAccess.com.

It is a premium VPN. No person has ever been traced via them. They keep no logs at all. They've been around for a number of years.

You subscribe to it and they email you a user name/password. You download their VPN client program and install it and enter the user name/password. Then you just select where in the world you want to connect via. It's quite easy.

They also have clients for various platforms (Windows, Mac, iPhone/iPad/AppleTV, Android phones & Android TV boxes.

I've used it on my Mac and my iPhone and iPad and AppleTV and on my Android Kodi box.

You do have to update the client program every 2-3 months, it seems. They update it when they detect that someone is finding a way to penetrate it. PIA's client also has an option to lock your internet connection if the VPN is compromised or drops. This is so you don't "leak" your info even if their servers go down, like if you're torrenting so you don't get exposed and traced.

My guess is that PIA and other VPNs are not secure against NSA and CIA. Some of them are almost certainly CIA fronts, just like some of the supposed secure encrypted email programs turned out to be. But probably these VPNs are secure against FBI and other police agencies and MPAA/RIAA snoops.

When you read reviews of various VPNs, they often compare themselves to PIA's service. Sometimes they have a feature or two that PIA doesn't, may offer more VPN endpoints in various countries, etc.

From using USA VPN endpoints, my 2Mbps connection generally can do 1.5-1.8Mbps downloads. So that is a pretty good rate, considering the latency of any VPN connection.

Right now, I'm connected via an IP address in Elk Grove, IL. I also use a Midwest connection or a Texas one now and then. If I go overseas, it does slow a bit but once you establish a streaming connection or download connection it still runs pretty fast once you get past the latency of starting the connection.

About 10 endpoints here in the States, a few in Canada, a few in England and a few in Australia, one each in the major EU countries, India, Turkey, Israel, Japan, Hong Kong, Korea, Brazil, Mexico, New Zealand. PIA is weakest at offering Asian endpoints.

Tooconservative  posted on  2017-11-01   15:47:54 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: Tooconservative, Willie Green (#3)

I use PrivateInternetAccess.com.

It is a premium VPN. No person has ever been traced via them. They keep no logs at all. They've been around for a number of years.

Thanks for the info 2Con.

I'll look into this stuff in detail soon, as college basketball season is nearly here and I want to see some games of interest that ESPN seems to have a monopoly on. I cut my satellite/cable about 5 years ago.

Thanks again.

Fred Mertz  posted on  2017-11-01   16:32:53 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: Fred Mertz (#6)

PIA is pricey at $40 a year. Hardly any other service costs as much. But it gets consistently high marks from sites like Lifehacker and ArsTechnica.

They also have payment via gift cards. So you can go buy a $40 gift card at Dollar Store or Walmart with cash and use that to pay for PIA. Pretty hard to trace you then as there is no financial trail back to you for the account.

They also include other extras like proxies and adblocking if you want that.

Tooconservative  posted on  2017-11-01   17:00:06 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: Tooconservative (#7)

PIA is pricey at $40 a year.

Yeah... but that's cheap if it helps circumvent subscribing to a bunch of other overpriced crap...

Don't get me wrong... I don't mind paying for what I actually watch... I just don't like buying a subscription that also includes a pile of worthless crap that I wouldn't want to watch even if you paid ME...

Willie Green  posted on  2017-11-01   17:19:08 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#11. To: Willie Green, All (#10)

It's a lot cheaper than paying off DMCA notices, that's for sure. Not that I ever have, just sayin'.

You should never torrent without a VPN. It's just not safe.

BTW, PIA is one of the few VPN companies that makes a nice VPN client for Linux.

Tooconservative  posted on  2017-11-01   17:24:39 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#35. To: Tooconservative (#11)

PIA is one of the few VPN companies that makes a nice VPN client for Linux.

OK... you convinced me... I got PIA installed on my computer (linux Mint) and my Android phone... and it seems to be working OK... later this afternoon I'll give it a try on my Android tablet & TV box as well... (supposedly one subscription is good on multiple devices, so I'm happy I don't have to pay for each one separately)

Willie Green  posted on  2017-11-02   13:26:48 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#36. To: Willie Green (#35) (Edited)

Woh. I'm surprised you took my advice. But it has been trouble-free for me on multiple platforms over a stretch of a few years now.

You can do up to five devices at once. For the price and features, it's hard not to like PIA. There are much pricier VPNs that don't offer more. However, some of those offer double-encrypted links which adds another layer of untracability to your internet connection. It's more hacker-level VPN.

It doesn't make you untrackable but it does help a lot. And you can use public wi-fi a lot more safely than just connecting directly. And a standard VPN like PIA offers all the VPN features the majority of users are looking for. You have to be fairly paranoid to spring for a $100 a year VPN connection just so it is double-encrypted.

BTW, on your Linux you can probably use more features than on the Android versions. So if your streaming gets slow, you can select a lower level of encryption if your Android device gets bogged down from decrypting and displaying a stream. Each of the five devices can use different encryption settings so you might want to keep that in mind.

Tooconservative  posted on  2017-11-02   14:13:49 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#38. To: Tooconservative (#36)

What about the ad/tracker blocker? Is it good enough that I can disable or remove the other adblocker I normally use with my browser? Or is it best to use both so as to give all of the crapware the old 1-2?

Willie Green  posted on  2017-11-02   14:40:14 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#40. To: Willie Green (#38)

What about the ad/tracker blocker? Is it good enough that I can disable or remove the other adblocker I normally use with my browser? Or is it best to use both so as to give all of the crapware the old 1-2?

It's pretty good, about like AdBlock Plus is, I guess.

One thing: if PIA filters it for you, even your desktop computer will browse faster simply because it doesn't have to do all of that filtering itself, much of which involves little networking handshakes. It makes sense for PIA to do pretty good filtering as that reduces the total bandwidth needed to operate the VPN connections. IOW, PIA doesn't really want to pay to transmit all those ads and tracker traffic back and forth to you. So filtering is really in their best interest as well as yours. A happy alignment of the interest of the customer and the service provider.

Anyway, just keep in mind it is at least possible that a few sites won't like you operating with an adblocking VPN connection, perhaps blocking some of their content (video especially) or even preventing you from login (only on very badly designed sites).

I'd say you just have to try it and see what you think. If you think a site is being blocked in some way so it doesn't work for you, you can always submit a request to PIA for them to fix that site to work for you. But I've never needed to. It handles every site as expected.

Tooconservative  posted on  2017-11-02   14:59:14 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 40.

#43. To: Tooconservative (#40)

It's pretty good, about like AdBlock Plus is, I guess.

After trying it for a day or so, I reinstalled uBlock Origin... PIA blocked a lot of stuff, but there were still a few sponsored ads leaking through here and there... So I figure there's no harm in using BOTH...

So you don't care much for Star Trek: Discovery.... so what do you think about The Orville? LOL!

Willie Green  posted on  2017-11-05 09:22:34 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 40.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com