[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

What Trump Gets Right about Harvard

The wesT has no viable opTions ... shorT of nuclear war --- of defeaTing Russia in Ukraine

Grants Single Mom

Who’s our real president? Joe Biden — or the staffers who keep walking back his comments?

Flint, Mich. Clerk Resigns After Elections Group Calls Out Lopsided Number Of Democrat Poll Watchers

China Recruited Top US Scientists To Gain Military Edge In Hypersonic, UAV & Submarine Tech – Reports

Pete Kaliner: Former EcoHealth VP says they developed COVID-19

Biden’s FBI is no beTTer Than ... The worsT miliTanT police enTiTies --- in hisTory

U.S Military Recruitment video. Woke Homos

The Latino vote in Nevada could lead to a Republican Senate majority

DeSantis Moves to Prohibit Communist China From Buying Farmland, Land Around Military Bases

Trump haTers who said ... “his supporTers" --- "musT be exTerminaTed”

'I'm NoT Bluffing' - Vladimir PuTin ... Warns The WesT --- He Is Willing To Use Nuclear Weapons

Democrats are blind to the dangers the illegal migrants they invite in face

Crazed NorTh DakoTa Man ... Runs Over - Kills Teen --- For “ExTremisT” Republican Views

WWIII - The DemocraTs’ ulTimate weT dream ... JusT imagine - marTial law wiTh DemocraTs ruling over us --- wiTh an iron-fisT

By transporting migrants, GOP governors are exposing Democrats’ hypocrisy

Release Biden’s secret voter plan

Nikki Haley: I won’t stand for liberal intimidation from Tish James or her office

Facebook spied on private messages of Americans who questioned 2020 election

Progressives, Journalists Worry: Are Polls Once Again Overestimating Democrats?

Crime Runs Rampant In Democrat Strongholds, With Shootings, Beheading Last Weekend

Biden Quietly Loosens Tech Export Rules to Chinese Communist Firms Just Days After Huawei Lobbyist’s Brother Joins White House.

Now it's a majority of voters who want Biden impeached!

Bank of America's Equity: Racial Discrimination, Elitism, Fraud, and Bad Business

NUKE ALERT - ‘DirecT ThreaT’ ... Russia could use TacTical nuclear weapons in Ukraine --- Taking us To brink of WW3 - warns miliTary chief

Special Master Order Reveals Biden’s Direct Involvement In Trump Raid And Six Other Bombshells

DemocraTs ... Dangerously Copy The TacTics --- Of Famous FascisTs

TIPP Poll Asks: Does America Have A Two-Tier Justice System?

FBI agent Timothy Thibault hid intel from whistleblower on Hunter and the ‘Big Guy’ Joe Biden

Biden’s open border is attracting a huge new category of illegal migrants

Inmates received $1.3 billion in covid-19 stimulus checks, including those serving life sentences

China’s Forced Organ Harvesting Demands U.S. Response

Studies Show ... ThaT Covid “Vaccines” --- Cause Massive Blood Damage

Zuckerberg’s Admission Of FBI Meddling In 2020 Election Is Even Bigger Than It Seems

Redacted Mar-A-Lago Affidavit Confirms Biden’s DOJ Fished For A Crime To Pin On Trump

Remember The People's Convoy (Feb 2022)

EveryThing abouT The raid ... The case being builT by The DeparTmenT of JusTice --- reeks of sloppiness - desperaTion.

Unsealed Mar-a-Lago search warrant affidavit reveals the government has no case against Trump

Wave of lawsuits coming against psychiatrists and doctors who rubber-stamped transgender mutilations and surgeries

CONFIRMED: FBI Colluded With Big Tech To Prevent Voters From Learning About Hunter Biden’s Laptop

With IRS Funding, Democrats Plan to Audit the Middle Class

Biden’s 87,000 IRS Agents Set to Become Woke Army of “Equity” Enforcers

My husband Capt. David Dorn was murdered in 2020 riots. His killer had help dividing America.

The ReTurn of PeTer STrzok ... How a Fired FBI Official Is Making The Case --- AgainsT Himself

Parents and the left are in an all-out war, and the kids are collateral damage

Mar-a-Lago ... The --- Abyss

White people banned from off-campus UC Berkeley student housing common areas

New Jersey district removes Thomas Jefferson from elementary school name over slavery

Come On, Mitch McConnell, Republicans Need You To Step Up And Lead


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Religion
See other Religion Articles

Title: Muslims to soon beat out Jews in U.S. population
Source: Washington Times
URL Source: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news ... n-beat-out-jews-us-population/
Published: Nov 1, 2017
Author: Cheryl K. Chumley
Post Date: 2017-11-01 09:57:07 by cranky
Keywords: None
Views: 1454
Comments: 41

Heavily armed police guard as revelers march during the Greenwich Village Halloween Parade, Tuesday, Oct. 31, 2017, in New York. New York City's always-surreal Halloween parade marched on Tuesday evening under the shadow of real fear, hours after a truck attack killed several people on a busy city bike path in what authorities called an act of terror.

There are about 3.35 million Muslims in the United States right now, according to recent Pew Research Center’s Factank figures.

But by 2050, that particular population is projected to grow — from about 1 percent of the U.S. population to about 2.1 percent. If it does, that means America will be home to more Muslims than Jews.

Just something to think about, post New York City terror attack — a terror attack that we now know was committed by a radicalized Muslim who professed allegiance to ISIS.


President Donald Trump, in a tweet, wrote: “We must not allow ISIS to return, or enter, our country after defeating them in the Middle East and elsewhere. Enough!”

And of course, all sane Americans are with him on that point.

But truth is: How do we reel back the radicalization of those Muslims in America now — of those who are yet to come?

From Pew: Of the 3.35 million Muslims in America right now, 2.05 million are adults — and “a majority of them, 58 percent, are migrants.”

In other words, they weren’t born here. They were let in the gate.

It’s only common sense to do as Trump also tweeted, and bolster border security.

“I have just ordered Homeland Security to step up our already Extreme Vetting Program,” he tweeted. “Being politically correct is fine, but not for this!”

Exactly.

Terror attacks committed in the name of Allah aren’t welcome in America. That’s the obvious.

But let’s remember, too, our nation was founded on Judeo-Christian principles — not Islamic ones. Do we really want that to change?

“Our demographic projections,” Pew wrote, “estimate that Muslims will make up 2.1 percent of the U.S. population by the year 2050, surpassing people who identify as Jewish on the basis of religion as the second-largest faith group in the country (not including people who say they have no religion). A 2013 Pew Research Center report estimated that the Muslim share of immigrants granted permanent residency status (green cards) increased from about 5 percent in 1992 to roughly 10 percent in 2012, representing about 100,000 immigrants in that year.”

And once here, these Muslim families usually get busy — well, getting busy.

“Muslims have more children than members of other religious groups,” Pew reported.

Muslim women, for example, have an average 2.9 children, compared to 2.2 children from women of all other faith groups. On top of that, Muslim women have children at younger ages than women of other religions, fueling Muslim population growth even further.

Between migration and birth rates, Muslims are seeing a significant jump in cultural influence in America. Don’t forget the conversions — and don’t forget the fact that the cultural influence often leads to political influences, as well.

Political correctness dictates that talking about Muslim population surges in the context of Islamic terror attacks is out of order — is discriminatory, stereotypical, an offense to the peaceful Muslims of the world.

But this latest terror strike in New York City should be a foot-down moment for America. How many more terror attacks should innocents suffer until the left, the amnesty-loving and Islamic apologetic left, gets it through its head — Islam and terror are tied at the hip.

Trump’s temporary bans on migrants and refugees entering America from known terror hotspots in the world is common sense safety. Sending in intelligence agents to monitor mosques around the country is similarly security oriented — similarly, sensible. The time has come to cast political correctness to the wind and launch a full-frontal assault on the leftists of the country who would argue that monitoring mosques and keeping out radicals are outrageous acts of discrimination.

The time has come to recognize that yes, indeed, America is at war with an enemy that doesn’t play by rules of combat, that uses deception and deceit and infiltration by population as regular tools of take-over. Trump’s the right no-nonsense commander-in-chief to lead this fight. Now it’s up to the rest of us to support what must be done, to rage against the politically correct machine and make the leftists who want to drag America toward destruction to go silent.

(1 image)

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: cranky, regime change, spreading democracy (#0)

Our screwed up foreign policy leads to lots of "political refugee" visa's from the muslim countries we destroy to "spread democracy", and loot and plunder. Once these former US gov employees and "allies" in the middle east, Africa, etc. get turned loose in the USA, they're on their own.

In addition there are also the Dream Students, and other illegal aliens....

Hondo68  posted on  2017-11-01   10:44:09 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: hondo68 (#1)

Once these former US gov employees and "allies" in the middle east, Africa, etc. get turned loose in the USA, they're on their own.

On their own to act according to their upbringing and tribal beliefs.

It's too bad for what's left of America that demographics are destiny.

that's my story and i'm sticking to it

cranky  posted on  2017-11-01   11:46:51 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: cranky (#0)

But by 2050, that particular population is projected to grow — from about 1 percent of the U.S. population to about 2.1 percent. If it does, that means America will be home to more Muslims than Jews.

So by "soon", they mean "by 2050".

This is dumb clickbait.

Tooconservative  posted on  2017-11-01   11:58:22 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: Tooconservative, Thank the Neocon Whores, *Neo-Lib Chickenhawk Wars* (#3) (Edited)

So by "soon", they mean "by 2050".

This is dumb clickbait.

President Trump is expanding the war on everyone & everything, he can beat the projections!

It's gonna be YUUUGE! Enjoy your new mooselimb neighbors, and Thank The Neocon Whores.

Hondo68  posted on  2017-11-01   12:15:33 ET  (1 image) Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: cranky (#0)

Muslims to soon beat out Jews in U.S. population

No surprise there. They breed like rabbits because the government pays all their expenses,and the DNC is working night and day to bring them in by the boatload and hand them welfare checks to buy their loyalty on election day.

In the entire history of the world,the only nations that had to build walls to keep their own citizens from leaving were those with leftist governments.

sneakypete  posted on  2017-11-01   17:25:53 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: hondo68 (#1)

Once these former US gov employees and "allies" in the middle east, Africa, etc. get turned loose in the USA, they're on their own.

No,they are not. They are given "Free" apartments to live in with "free" utilities,free food,free medical care,and a free check each month to be paid for all the trouble they had to go though to sign up for the free stuff,and for registering to vote Dim.

In the entire history of the world,the only nations that had to build walls to keep their own citizens from leaving were those with leftist governments.

sneakypete  posted on  2017-11-01   17:28:18 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: Tooconservative (#3)

So by "soon", they mean "by 2050".

This is dumb clickbait.

You think that is far into the future? Basically,it is long enough for the Muslim welfare babies of today to reach adulthood and have pumped out several new Dim voters and welfare recipients who now have their own little AFDC herds.

In the entire history of the world,the only nations that had to build walls to keep their own citizens from leaving were those with leftist governments.

sneakypete  posted on  2017-11-01   17:30:27 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: sneakypete (#5)

They breed like rabbits

And they don't slaughter fetuses.

that's my story and i'm sticking to it

cranky  posted on  2017-11-01   18:10:13 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: cranky, sneakypete (#8) (Edited)

#8. To: sneakypete (#5) They breed like rabbits

And they don't slaughter fetuses. --- cranky

We will never beat extremists by outbreeding them.

There is only one solution to an overpopulation of extremist terrorists, and it ain't pretty.

tpaine  posted on  2017-11-01   18:37:25 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: sneakypete (#7)

You think that is far into the future?

I do not think "soon" is "32+ years". So, yes, this is clickbaiting.

Tooconservative  posted on  2017-11-01   19:35:31 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#11. To: tpaine (#9)

There is only one solution to an overpopulation of extremist terrorists, and it ain't pretty.

The truth must remain untold.

The truth is we should just deport ALL of them that refuse to denounce Islam,and destroy the Mosques. It is not a freedom of speech issue because Islam is the enemy of freedom,and the Mosques are their outposts.

In the entire history of the world,the only nations that had to build walls to keep their own citizens from leaving were those with leftist governments.

sneakypete  posted on  2017-11-01   19:40:24 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#12. To: Tooconservative (#10)

I do not think "soon" is "32+ years".

I remember things that happened 30-40 years ago that seem as current as anything that happened last week.

32 years ain't squat.

In the entire history of the world,the only nations that had to build walls to keep their own citizens from leaving were those with leftist governments.

sneakypete  posted on  2017-11-01   19:42:04 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#13. To: sneakypete (#11)

32 years ain't squat

The truth is we should just deport ALL of them that refuse to denounce Islam,and destroy the Mosques. It is not a freedom of speech issue because Islam is the enemy of freedom,and the Mosques are their outposts.

True, 32 years ain't squat, when you're 80..

Actually, The truth is we should just deport ALL of them that refuse to denounce the radical teachings of Islam,and close the Mosques that refuse to do so. -- It is a freedom of speech and religion issue according to our constitution, so even though Islam is the enemy of freedom,and the Mosques are their outposts, we must tread carefully.

tpaine  posted on  2017-11-01   19:56:56 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#14. To: tpaine (#13)

It is a freedom of speech and religion issue according to our constitution,

I disagree. Islam declared war on us and Islam is incompatible with freedom. They are a more dangerous enemy than the Nazi's or Imperial Japan ever were.

In the entire history of the world,the only nations that had to build walls to keep their own citizens from leaving were those with leftist governments.

sneakypete  posted on  2017-11-01   20:10:40 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#15. To: sneakypete (#14) (Edited)

Good point...

It'll be interesting to see if any of the PC crowd around here have any counters.

tpaine  posted on  2017-11-01   20:18:42 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#16. To: tpaine (#15)

It'll be interesting to see if any of the PC crowd around here have any counters.

I'm sure they will.

As American citizens,they have the right to be wrong.

In the entire history of the world,the only nations that had to build walls to keep their own citizens from leaving were those with leftist governments.

sneakypete  posted on  2017-11-01   20:28:58 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#17. To: sneakypete (#16)

As American citizens,they have the right to be wrong.

The question is, do they have the right to preach anticonstitutionalism in a church?

Or anywhere?

tpaine  posted on  2017-11-01   20:39:02 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#18. To: cranky (#0)

How do we reel back the radicalization of those Muslims in America now — of those who are yet to come?

A policy of zero tolerance. If a muslim becomes radicalised and commits a terror attack, arrest everyone associated with his mosque, bulldoze the mosque and deport all who are not citizens. All hate preachers should be deported and if citizens should loose their citizenship.

Ok, I know this violates some constitutional provisions, but the founders did not envisage the world we live in

paraclete  posted on  2017-11-01   21:29:31 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#19. To: tpaine (#17)

The question is, do they have the right to preach anticonstitutionalism in a church?

Or anywhere?

Of course they do. Political Speech is at the core of Free Speech.

The rest of us also have the right to either not listen to them,or to laugh at and ridicule them. Not that *I* would ever laugh at or ridicule a dumbass,you understand?

In the entire history of the world,the only nations that had to build walls to keep their own citizens from leaving were those with leftist governments.

sneakypete  posted on  2017-11-02   10:40:57 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#20. To: paraclete (#18)

Ok, I know this violates some constitutional provisions,

No,it doesn't. The Bill of Rights doesn't justify or excuse treason. Nor does it forbid national self-defense. The whole "you can't shout "FIRE!" in a crowded theater thing.

In the entire history of the world,the only nations that had to build walls to keep their own citizens from leaving were those with leftist governments.

sneakypete  posted on  2017-11-02   10:43:01 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#21. To: sneakypete (#19) (Edited)

The question is, do they have the right to preach anticonstitutionalism in a church? Or anywhere?

Of course they do. Political Speech is at the core of Free Speech.

The truth is we should just deport ALL of them that refuse to denounce Islam,and destroy the Mosques. ---- The Bill of Rights doesn't justify or excuse treason. Nor does it forbid national self-defense. The whole "you can't shout "FIRE!" in a crowded theater thing.

The Islamists are free to preach sedition/treason, --- and then the government has the power to destroy their mosques and deport them for doing so?

Good plan, --- providing we can trust the govt to use that power against only those radicals ..... Can we?

tpaine  posted on  2017-11-02   11:22:47 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#22. To: tpaine (#21) (Edited)

The Islamists are free to preach sedition/treason, --- and then the government has the power to destroy their mosques and deport them for doing so?

Close,but no cigar. They have a right to talk all the trash they want to talk,as long as they don't threaten to harm individuals or the country.

Which,when you think of it is the ideal setup because they pretty much "out" themselves as traitors and/or enemy agents,so the Feebs know where to start looking and who to start following in the hope it will lead them to the deep cover agents.

And we all know the one thing these loons can't quit doing is running their mouths.

Good plan, --- providing we can trust the govt to use that power against only those radicals ..... Can we?

Not until the public bring out their pitchforks and march on DC with rope and hang half of the US Senate at random,and a high percentage of the congress critters in order to send a message to the ones that survive that "there is a new sheriff in town,and he doesn't bring bags of unmarked cash,he brings the hangman."

I am completely uninformed about the FACTS on this issue. All I know/THINK I know is what I read from various sources,and then connecting the dots in my head with what I know about politics and politicians,as well as world History.

It is MY firm belief that most of the trouble in today's world comes directly from Saudi Arabia. Ain't saying what I would do my first day as the new Ultimate Ruler of America,but let's just say that Saudi Arabia would be in a HEAP of trouble before sunset. It has been MY experience in life that when you cut the head off of a snake,the snake ceases to be dangerous to you. Yeah,I don't see it happening either,and it's a damn shame it won't.

In the entire history of the world,the only nations that had to build walls to keep their own citizens from leaving were those with leftist governments.

sneakypete  posted on  2017-11-02   11:50:15 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#23. To: sneakypete (#22) (Edited)

It has been MY experience in life that when you cut the head off of a snake,the snake ceases to be dangerous to you

I has been my experience that the snake is dangerous until sunset, so cutting off the head doesn't assure you you won't be bitten. One sure way of getting that pit of vipers, which is the Islamic religion, riled up against you will be to attack their holy land which is Saudi Arabia

paraclete  posted on  2017-11-02   19:11:51 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#24. To: paraclete, sneakypete (#23)

sneakypete (#22) (Edited) ---- It has been MY experience in life that when you cut the head off of a snake,the snake ceases to be dangerous to you.

I has been my experience that the snake is dangerous until sunset, so cutting off the head doesn't assure you you won't be bitten. One sure way of getting that pit of vipers, which is the Islamic religion, riled up against you will be to attack their holy land which is Saudi Arabia --- paraclete

We're in a religious war with radical Muslims, and cutting off the Saudi head is not a wise move, imho.

I like Pete's idea that it should be constitutional to prosecute radical Islamists for sedition/treason..

And another conservative justice on the Scotus could make that possible..

tpaine  posted on  2017-11-03   0:13:56 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#25. To: paraclete (#23)

One sure way of getting that pit of vipers, which is the Islamic religion, riled up against you will be to attack their holy land which is Saudi Arabia

They ALREADY want to murder every non-believer and enforce a Muslim police state over the whole world,so why should I give a rabid rats ass if they were to get upset over destroying Saudi Arabia?

Are you trying to claim we must be careful to not upset the people that DECLARED WAR ON US?

In the entire history of the world,the only nations that had to build walls to keep their own citizens from leaving were those with leftist governments.

sneakypete  posted on  2017-11-03   8:22:06 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#26. To: tpaine (#24)

We're in a religious war with radical Muslims, and cutting off the Saudi head is not a wise move, imho.

Yeah,and killing Hitler at the start of WW-2 would have been a bad idea too,huh?

You people need to understand that Islam is at war with the entire western world,and want nothing less than total domination over us,and having up end up as their slaves. The more tribal heads and Immans we kill,the better off the world will be.

You either fight a war to win it,or you surrender and start blowing the enemy leadership. You can't have it both ways.

The world today would be a much different place if we had gone ahead and defeated the communists in North Korea as well as Red China if they did't back off. It gave America's enemies hope and made them bold because they suddenly KNEW they could go to war with us without negative consequences coming to them if they lost.Hell,we would even help them rebuild and feed their people.

Win-win for evil,lose-lose for freedom and safety in the world.

In the entire history of the world,the only nations that had to build walls to keep their own citizens from leaving were those with leftist governments.

sneakypete  posted on  2017-11-03   8:28:55 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#27. To: sneakypete (#26)

We're in a religious war with radical Muslims, and cutting off the Saudi head is not a wise move, imho.

Yeah,and killing Hitler at the start of WW-2 would have been a bad idea too,huh?

You people need to understand that Islam is at war with the entire western world,and want nothing less than total domination over us,and having up end up as their slaves.

I have NO problem with killing Islamic leaders or individuals who want war with us. I was advocating such assassinations back at FR, as one of the best ways to win this war..

-- But I don't think it would be wise to instigate a world war (probably ending as nuclear) against hundreds of millions of moderate Muslims who treat their religion as most people do, as a social duty, a way to go along to get along.

Do we really want a world wide religious/nuclear war? There'd be no winner.

tpaine  posted on  2017-11-03   12:35:38 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#28. To: tpaine, sneakypete (#17)

The question is, do they have the right to preach anticonstitutionalism in a church?

Or anywhere?

Don't we already have anti-sedition laws on the books already?

This Free Speech issue is like walking a fine line. Normally.

The problem as I see it is a matter of select, PC law, gubermental & judiciary enforcement that aggressively prosecutes certain demos (Ex: Pro-Lifers, Pro-Family) while enabling others (Ex: Antifa, BLM.)

Those who most loudly denounce Fake News are typically those most aggressively disseminating it.

Liberator  posted on  2017-11-03   12:44:02 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#29. To: tpaine (#27) (Edited)

-- But I don't think it would be wise to instigate a world war (probably ending as nuclear) against hundreds of millions of moderate Muslims who treat their religion as most people do, as a social duty, a way to go along to get along.

Do we really want a world wide religious/nuclear war? There'd be no winner.

It was ISLAM that declared war on US,and as a result started attacking us. Including right here inside our own country.

MY suggestion would be to quietly tell the second teir Muslim princes that they have a choice,they can either revolt and hang the Kings and Clerics that promote the war,or they can die with the bastards when we take them out.

This is a war that has been going on for several hundred years. We fight it over and over and kill off enough of them they become submissive until they bread another couple of generations of jihadists and start up the fight again.

Do we really want a world wide religious/nuclear war?

No,but then again,WE are not the ones that declared war.

There'd be no winner.

Of course there would be a winner,and it would be us as well as the rest of the world. Provided of course that we do it now. If we wait another 20 years they will have bought their own nukes and delivery systems,and will no doubt use them to take over the world.

People keep forgetting that they are NOT rational people. They are religious nutcases who have no interest in living in peace,and will keep fighting until we either kill all of them off,or they kill all of us off. Time to put an end to this crap once and for all.

In the entire history of the world,the only nations that had to build walls to keep their own citizens from leaving were those with leftist governments.

sneakypete  posted on  2017-11-03   19:20:55 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#30. To: sneakypete (#29) (Edited)

Do we really want a world wide religious/nuclear war?

No, --- but then again,WE are not the ones that declared war.

Nor did the millions of ordinary muslims declare war, -- and we agree on warning their leaders that they cannot win.

There'd be no winners, seeing that Islamic nutcases already have nukes, imo.

tpaine  posted on  2017-11-03   19:36:45 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#31. To: sneakypete (#29)

People keep forgetting that they are NOT rational people. They are religious nutcases who have no interest in living in peace,and will keep fighting until we either kill all of them off,or they kill all of us off. Time to put an end to this crap once and for all.

Far too many of them are indeed irrational. But that leaves hundreds of millions who aren't, --- yet.

It's gonna be tough to kill all the radical nutcases without going nuclear, and maybe that's impossible. -- We have to find some way to do it though, imo.

tpaine  posted on  2017-11-03   19:47:46 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#32. To: sneakypete (#25)

Are you trying to claim we must be careful to not upset the people that DECLARED WAR ON US?

Not at all I think you have been fighting the wrong enemy

paraclete  posted on  2017-11-05   7:43:25 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#33. To: tpaine (#24)

We're in a religious war with radical Muslims, and cutting off the Saudi head is not a wise move, imho.

surprise, surprise, the cleansing has begun from the inside

paraclete  posted on  2017-11-05   7:45:28 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#34. To: paraclete (#32)

Not at all I think you have been fighting the wrong enemy

You don't know that Islam declared war on us?

It was in all the papers.

In the entire history of the world,the only nations that had to build walls to keep their own citizens from leaving were those with leftist governments.

sneakypete  posted on  2017-11-05   11:40:44 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#35. To: sneakypete (#34)

You don't know that Islam declared war on us?

It was in all the papers.

No that's not how I read it, a group of saudi terrorists declared war on you because you had troops in their land. Terrorists aided and abetted by the high eschalons of Saudi Arabia. These same Saudi wanted you to fight their proxy war against Saddam for them and wanted you to fight Iran for them and you fell for it. You were protecting your oil supply or so you thought. But your foreign policy is a fickle thing, it changes every time your king changes

paraclete  posted on  2017-11-05   16:45:10 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#36. To: paraclete (#35)

We're in a religious war with radical Muslims, and cutting off the Saudi head is not a wise move, imho.

paraclete --- surprise, surprise, the cleansing has begun from the inside

a group of saudi terrorists declared war on you because you had troops in their land. Terrorists aided and abetted by the high eschalons of Saudi Arabia. These same Saudi wanted you to fight their proxy war against Saddam for them and wanted you to fight Iran for them and you fell for it. You were protecting your oil supply or so you thought. But your foreign policy is a fickle thing, it changes every time your king changes.

Your claim that we have king is weird. --- Where are you from, and what's your agenda? And cleansing from inside? Where?

tpaine  posted on  2017-11-05   16:59:00 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#37. To: tpaine (#36)

Your claim that we have king is weird. --- Where are you from, and what's your agenda? And cleansing from inside? Where?

No It is not weird, you have an elected king or Emperor, only the title is different. My agenda is to comment on events and to bring a perspective from outside the USA. Don't you get news first hand? The Saudi Dauphin has arrested many for corruption, who knows where it will lead, interestingly one of them is an enemy of Dump. So just maybe Dump is not so much in the pocket of the Russians as the pocket of the Saudi, just like the Bush clan

paraclete  posted on  2017-11-05   21:44:21 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#38. To: paraclete (#37)

Your claim that we have a king is weird. --- Where are you from, and what's your agenda? And cleansing from inside? Where?

No It is not weird, you have an elected king or Emperor, only the title is different. My agenda is to comment on events and to bring a perspective from outside the USA. Don't you get news first hand? The Saudi Dauphin has arrested many for corruption, who knows where it will lead, interestingly one of them is an enemy of Dump. So just maybe Dump is not so much in the pocket of the Russians as the pocket of the Saudi, just like the Bush clan

Hey, you won't answer some basic questions, feel free to continue on being a weirdo.

tpaine  posted on  2017-11-05   22:22:27 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#39. To: paraclete (#37)

Kings have unlimited power. If we had a king then when Obama would have taken our guns. Only little pussies let the government take their guns. Kind ok like the Aussie pussies who let their king who they must worship take their guns. What a docile people.

A K A Stone  posted on  2017-11-05   22:41:33 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#40. To: paraclete (#35)

No that's not how I read it, a group of saudi terrorists declared war on you because you had troops in their land.

WHEN did we have troops fighting in Saudi Arabia?

NOT that I am opposed to the idea.

In the entire history of the world,the only nations that had to build walls to keep their own citizens from leaving were those with leftist governments.

sneakypete  posted on  2017-11-05   23:03:13 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  



      .
      .
      .

Comments (41 - 41) not displayed.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com