Corrupt Government
See other Corrupt Government Articles
Title: Bannon blasts George W. Bush’s presidency (FR wises up)
Source:
FreeRepublic
URL Source: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3597109/posts
Published: Oct 21, 2017
Author: New York Post
Post Date: 2017-10-21 13:52:50 by Hank Rearden
Keywords: FreeRepublic, griftathon, hopalong
Views: 6168
Comments: 52
It wasn't very long ago that Hopalong was banning people for saying what's now pervasive in the comments sections. I was one of them.
The almost-always grift is running at about the same slow pace as usual, FYI. The last grift-free break between grifts was 8 days at the end of September.
---------------
Former White House adviser Steve Bannon says there has not been a more destructive presidency than George W. Bush’s.
Bannon delivered a scathing criticism of the former president after Bush this week denounced bigotry in Trump-era American politics, warning that the rise of “nativism,” isolationism and conspiracy theories have clouded the nation’s true identity.
Bannon told a capacity crowd at a California Republican convention in Anaheim that Bush “embarrassed himself.”
In his remarks in New York, Bush warned of a nation in which discourse has been degraded by “casual cruelty,” where bigotry is emboldened.
Bannon says Bush has no idea whether “he is coming or going, just like it was when he was president.”
(more via the link)
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
It's funny that I have yet to see a single person post (on any thread, not just this one) "Hey, didn't ol' RimJob ban a lot of people for saying exactly these things?"
#2. To: Hank Rearden (#1)
It wasn't very long ago that Hopalong was banning people for saying what's now pervasive in the comments sections. I was one of them.It's funny that I have yet to see a single person post (on any thread, not just this one) "Hey, didn't ol' RimJob ban a lot of people for saying exactly these things?"
What most don't realize is, --- JR never did care about whatever was said, as long as his "core group" wasn't upset, and kept the money coming in...
#3. To: Hank Rearden, ibjensen, infowarrior, rf396, Itzlzha, Uncle Siggy, stoner, BobCeleste, Chuck_ Wagon, tpaine, RISU, outdamnedspot, Vicomte13, sneakypete, calcon, Dead Culture Watch, fallujah nuker (#0)
(FR wises up)It wasn't very long ago that Hopalong was banning people for saying what's now pervasive in the comments sections. I was one of them.
Good observations.
Freepers as usual wise up when it's far too late. JR and his the Bush-Bot cartel managed to gut the America-First contingent of posters and zot them starting in 2003 (including you, Pete, Itzy, and many of THE best Freepers)
Dubya was exposed a good dozen years ago as a phony Globalist, anti-America Firster, AND closet Dem. By 2004 and 2005 FR concentrated on purging those who dared question Dubya's lax positions on Illegal Invaders, Harriet Miers, the Dubai Port take-over, etc.
Remnants of these toxic Bush-Bot bozos and Statists were still convinced that Dubya was "A good guy" until just now. Even in light of his NEVER criticizing 0bammy.
How in the world can any logical, politically observant person believe that Dubya and any of his NWO posse could possibly be a "good guy" or "love 'Murica'"? This is the same guy who lectured America that Islam was a "Religion of Peace."
Dubya and his NWO posse then got us in an obvious NO-WIN multi-trillion dollar boondoggle/quagmire (and yes, Freepers were STILL defending the Iraq War even a few years ago.) We are STILL paying for Dubya & Co phony war, their 911 Op, and their 0bammy Red Carpet.
Again -- why did Freepers love this phony globalist-Dem in sheeps clothing when he reversed the conservative agenda? And especially after he demonized the Minutemen and those defending OUR border while rolling out the red carpet for BOTH millions of Illegal Mexican Invaders AND Muzzies??
It's taken an obvious cheap shot at Trump (and again, by association, Trump-Voters and America-Firsters) for Freepers to "wise up" and FINALLY diss Dubya Bush.
#4. To: Liberator, Hank Rearden (#3) (Edited)
This must be a real downer for the Daily Bush Worship photo threads.
Here's an old favorite of the Bush idolators and old harpies over at TOS.
#5. To: Liberator (#3)
Remnants of these toxic Bush-Bot bozos and Statists were still convinced that Dubya was "A good guy" until just now. Even in light of his NEVER criticizing 0bammy.
Well,to be fair to Boy Jorge,it is traditional for former Presidents to go back home and remain silent about the actions and policies of the President that replaces them.
This held true until Bathhouse Barry had to leave the WH. He is an attention whore,and there was just no way he was going to disappear into the background like a bad dream.
In the entire history of the world,the only nations that had to build walls to keep their own citizens from leaving were those with leftist governments.
#6. To: Tooconservative (#4)
Here's an old favorite of the Bush idolators and old harpies over at TOS.
I used to get a kick out of teasing the Harpies in Heat that would keep posting about how good Boy Jorge looked in tight jeans while pretending to be clearing brush at Camp Photo Op.
They would usually follow it up with a comment on how beautiful Laura is,thinking nobody would notice they were OD-ing on Estrogen.
BTW,anyone else notice that selling Camp Photo Op was practically the first thing they did after they left the WH?
In the entire history of the world,the only nations that had to build walls to keep their own citizens from leaving were those with leftist governments.
#7. To: Tooconservative (#4)
Here's an old favorite of the Bush idolators and old harpies over at TOS.
That was truly sickening...
#8. To: sneakypete (#6)
I used to get a kick out of teasing the Harpies in Heat that would keep posting about how good Boy Jorge looked in tight jeans while pretending to be clearing brush at Camp Photo Op.
Heh! I recall the Harpies swooning over those fake photo ops. Think they still believe Dubya's straight?
You were really playing with fire. No wonder they went after you with the pitchfork and and torches.
They would usually follow it up with a comment on how beautiful Laura is,thinking nobody would notice they were OD-ing on Estrogen
Yup. The "beautiful classy" Laura "Stepford Wife" Bush. Even MORE lovely once her pro-Abortion, pro-0bama positions were exposed. OH WAIT.
BTW,anyone else notice that selling Camp Photo Op was practically the first thing they did after they left the WH?
No...wow...Did they??
#9. To: sneakypete (#6)
BTW,anyone else notice that selling Camp Photo Op was practically the first thing they did after they left the WH?
No, I know they owned it up through 2010 at least. And I think it is still theirs. Also, that's part of the route for his big annual bike ride with the disabled vets. Jenna's wedding was held there in 2008 or so.
The wiki for Prairie Chapel Ranch hasn't been updated in years.
#10. To: Liberator (#8)
Heh! I recall the Harpies swooning over those fake photo ops. Think they still believe Dubya's straight?
Why not? They are so stupid they still think he was a conservative.
You were really playing with fire. No wonder they went after you with the pitchfork and and torches.
I used to love telling them he was as queer as a 3 dollar bill,and post photos of him kissing Prince Abdul,as well as various male politicians.
Why do you think I call him "Boy Jorge"?
Yup. The "beautiful classy" Laura "Stepford Wife" Bush.
AKA,"Boy Jorge's Controller". It was the women in the Bush Crime Family that have all the brains and most of the balls. Poppy did some seriously brave stuff during WW-2,but the rest of them would probably run from Richard Simmons after he slapped them. AND....,Poppy married a woman that is probably tougher than he is,and no doubt a hell of a lot smarter,even if she is a evil old bitch.
In the entire history of the world,the only nations that had to build walls to keep their own citizens from leaving were those with leftist governments.
#11. To: Tooconservative (#9) (Edited)
No, I know they owned it up through 2010 at least. And I think it is still theirs. Also, that's part of the route for his big annual bike ride with the disabled vets. Jenna's wedding was held there in 2008 or so.
I read right after they left the white house that they had bought or had built a nice new mansion in a uber rich section of the city (Houston?),and were putting Camp Photo Op up for sale.
Boy Jorge might lust after cowboys,but he has no interest in being one.
BTW,don't get me wrong. I do not know him personally,but I THINK he is most likely a very nice and pleasant man in person,but a truly horrible president.
In the entire history of the world,the only nations that had to build walls to keep their own citizens from leaving were those with leftist governments.
#12. To: Tooconservative (#4) (Edited)
This must be a real downer for the Daily Bush Worship photo threads.Here's an old favorite of the Bush idolators and old harpies over at TOS.
Before I got the heave-ho from RimJob for too much questioning of the GOPussies and Bush Jr., I coined the term "picturelickers" for those old biddies and their daily photo-worship thread. That was the most disgusting idolatry of a politician I've ever seen (including Odumbass's moron fans) - just a disgrace to a theoretically-free nation founded in individual liberty. And I told them so, to their faces.
Might have been a factor in the heave-ho'ing, come to think of it............
#13. To: sneakypete (#6)
Camp Photo Op
That's about the best name I've ever heard for El Rancho Fake-o.
#14. To: sneakypete (#11)
I read right after they left the white house that they had bought or had built a nice new mansion in a uber rich section of the city (Houston?),and were putting Camp Photo Op up for sale.
They bought it. I think it is a fenced house.
At the ranch, they renovated the original house and built a very large house for themselves, a bunk house, then renovated the original house for overflow guests. Bush built his studio there, built an 11-acre pond/lake that he stocked with fish.
And I think they do still own it. Also, that 60,000 acre ranch down in Paraguay. And no one ever mentions him visiting there.
#15. To: Hank Rearden (#13)
That's about the best name I've ever heard for El Rancho Fake-o.
Boy Jorge needed to look Butch if he wanted to get elected,so they bought him a ranch so he could pretend to be a Texas cowboy instead of a creature of the DC belt line.
In the entire history of the world,the only nations that had to build walls to keep their own citizens from leaving were those with leftist governments.
#16. To: Tooconservative (#14)
And I think they do still own it.
Maybe they do? They sure don't need the money after the pay-offs the family got for working with the Clinton's sell military technology to the Chinese,and them from the Sauds to hang Hussein..
Not to mention the presidential retirement and all the perks it brings.
Also, that 60,000 acre ranch down in Paraguay. And no one ever mentions him visiting there.
I think it's a little bigger than that,and I'm pretty sure it belongs to the family corporation,not just Boy Jorge. In MY opinion,it's the family "bolt-hole" if things start getting dangerous for the family here in America. I don't think any of them have any plans to live,or even visit there. The caretakers probable sell enough cattle to turn a nice profit,so it can just sit there forever with no thought given to it,but it's still there if they need it.
In the entire history of the world,the only nations that had to build walls to keep their own citizens from leaving were those with leftist governments.
#17. To: sneakypete (#16)
In MY opinion,it's the family "bolt-hole" if things start getting dangerous for the family here in America.
That's what I was thinking as well.
It'd be interesting to get the lat/long of the property and do a Google Earth lookback in time to see what, if any, significant construction activity has been undertaken.
#18. To: sneakypete (#6)
Camp photo op.....
That yours Pete? If so, it's genius mang!
'What kind of man gives cigarettes to trees?'
#19. To: Liberator (#7)
Lol.
It was a daily dose thread I posted on that got me zotted. I take great pride in that.
'What kind of man gives cigarettes to trees?'
#20. To: Hank Rearden (#0) (Edited)
[duplicate]
#21. To: Hank Rearden, ibjensen, infowarrior, rf396, Itzlzha, Uncle Siggy, stoner, BobCeleste, Chuck_ Wagon, tpaine, RISU, outdamnedspot, Vicomte13, sneakypete, calcon, Dead Culture Watch, fallujah nuker, tPaine, Tooconservative (#0)
Bush “embarrassed himself.”
Yep.
#22. To: VxH, Hank Rearden, ohiowfan, Howlin (#21)
I've pinged the Harpies. They're going to come deal with you unbelievers Real Soon Now.
Boy, are you two going to get what for!
#23. To: Tooconservative (#14) (Edited)
Also, that 60,000 acre ranch down in Paraguay.
https://duckduckgo.com/? q=Reductions+Beautiful+Paraguay
Figures.
#24. To: VxH (#23)
I don't think Bush's Paraguay ranch includes any towns that could be called Jesuit reductions. At any rate, the Jesuits have been gone from those reductions for a few hundred years, I think.
#25. To: Hank Rearden (#1)
I was banned for posting exact quotes of GW in which he said in response to a question about cutting the extra Constitutional agencies of government, like the Dept of Education. His response was "that ship has sailed, we lost that fight so why fight it again" badly paraphrased after this length of time has now passed. I got banned again, for calling Bush supporters Bushitters. I really loved that place until I didn't.
Exercising rights is only radical to two people, Tyrants and Slaves. Which are YOU? Our ignorance has driven us into slavery and we do not recognize it.
#26. To: Hank Rearden (#17)
It'd be interesting to get the lat/long of the property and do a Google Earth lookback in time to see what, if any, significant construction activity has been undertaken.
I am sure there are plenty of people who know how to easily do that,but I also sure I'm not one of them.
In the entire history of the world,the only nations that had to build walls to keep their own citizens from leaving were those with leftist governments.
#27. To: Dead Culture Watch (#18)
That yours Pete? If so, it's genius mang!
Thanks. I first used it on FR. It really fired up the biddies there.
In the entire history of the world,the only nations that had to build walls to keep their own citizens from leaving were those with leftist governments.
#28. To: Tooconservative (#24)
I don't think Bush's Paraguay ranch includes any towns that could be called Jesuit reductions.
In 25 words or less,if possible,what is a Jesuit Reduction?
In the entire history of the world,the only nations that had to build walls to keep their own citizens from leaving were those with leftist governments.
#29. To: sneakypete (#28)
In 25 words or less,if possible,what is a Jesuit Reduction?
Settlements where Jesuits converted natives to Catholicism and resisted Portugese-Spanish slaver raids, so successful that the Jesuits got banned from the Americas by 176724.
#30. To: Tooconservative (#29)
Settlements where Jesuits converted natives to Catholicism and resisted Portugese-Spanish slaver raids, so successful that the Jesuits got banned from the Americas by 176724.
Thanks,I was completely unaware of this. Sounds like some good and a lot of bad.
Truth to tell,sounds like the Jesuits and the Portuguese-Spanish slavers were in competition to see who would be the top dog in the slave trade. People in Catholic countries back then were little more than slaves to the Catholic Church.
In the entire history of the world,the only nations that had to build walls to keep their own citizens from leaving were those with leftist governments.
#31. To: sneakypete (#30) (Edited)
Sounds like some good and a lot of bad.
It kinda ranged from "bad" to "hell on earth".
These were Stone Age people. No domesticated equines or bovines, hadn't even invented the wheel, no Iron Age or Bronze Age, etc. Where they were civilized at all, they had degrading religions involving human sacrifice.
To us, it would all be very depressing.
I think the colonists were a lot worse than the Jesuits. That's why they got Rome to get all of the Jesuits out of the Americas
The Caribbean and South America, the entire old Spanish empire in the "New World" (Spain's name for it), was built on slave labor, some imported but mostly just running around enslaving anyone they could grab to work their mines and plantations. And they killed them off so fast, they had to keep raiding deeper and deeper into the deadly jungles just to keep their labor force up.
As Molyneux pointed out in that video I posted, during the era of slavery in the Americas that involved Europeans, only 5% of the world's slavery was in North America. The overwhelming majority of slavery in that era (and the cruelest and most lethal type of slavery) was in the Muslim lands (Ottoman empire) and in the Spanish (and Portugese) colonial empire that stretched from California to the southern tip of South America.
#32. To: Tooconservative (#24)
the Jesuits have been gone from those reductions for a few hundred years, I think.
So much for the collective Utopia.
And remember - NO SLEEPING IN BEDS err {edit} WIF SHEETS!
#33. To: Tooconservative (#31)
These were Stone Age people.
Not much has changed there in all these centuries. Everything they know was imported.
In the entire history of the world,the only nations that had to build walls to keep their own citizens from leaving were those with leftist governments.
#34. To: jeremiad (#25)
I got banned for criticizing H W Bush.
#35. To: Dead Culture Watch (#19)
It was a daily dose thread I posted on that got me zotted. I take great pride in that.
Yup. Hitting a Daily Dose thread is taking one for the team! On behalf of the rest of us, Hi-FIVE
Good to see you, DCW...
#36. To: Vicomte13 (#34)
I got banned for criticizing H W Bush.
I very worthy ZOT. Do you remember specifically the criticism?
#37. To: jeremiad (#25)
I was banned for posting exact quotes of GW in which he said in response to a question about cutting the extra Constitutional agencies of government, like the Dept of Education. His response was "that ship has sailed, we lost that fight so why fight it again" badly paraphrased after this length of time has now passed. I got banned again, for calling Bush supporters Bushitters.
Well done.
Dubya was embarrassingly wimpy -- even if some of us knew he was just a willing Globalist Puppet. EVERY "ship sails" for GOPe toolbags.
I'd go as far as saying Dubya was snickering at those who voted for him in TWO different elections in which he wasn't nearly as much voted FOR as much as being the "Lesser-of-two-evils."
Meanwhile, FREE REPUBLIC'S JimRob and its core of Bush-Bots were guilty of being stupid , aiding and abetting stupidity, and ignoring obvious signs that Dubya & Co were nothing but lying, subversive globalists and America-Lasters.
#38. To: Liberator (#7)
Here's an old favorite of the Bush idolators and old harpies over at TOS.That was truly sickening...
Don't be posting the photo of Jorge in the flight suit, or you'll be owing OhioWfan a new pair of panties.
Non auro, sed ferro, recuperando est patria
#39. To: Liberator (#36)
Yes. What I specifically wrote was "Was it worth putting up with 8 years of Clinton to get rid of H.W. Bush? Yes, yes it was."
And that was that.
#40. To: Vicomte13 (#39)
HA! That was a Capitol Offense, no doubt at FR.
#41. To: nativist nationalist (#38)
Don't be posting the photo of Jorge in the flight suit, or you'll be owing OhioWfan a new pair of panties.
HEH! Oooh...Now *I'M* getting da vapors...
OH WAIT. *barf*
.
.
.
Comments (42 - 52) not displayed.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]