Title: 6 Questions About the Vegas Massacre That Will Make You Wonder What They’re Hiding Source:
From The Trenches/The Organic Prepper URL Source:http://fromthetrenchesworldreport.c ... ke-wonder-theyre-hiding/209781 Published:Oct 14, 2017 Author:Daisy Luther Post Date:2017-10-17 09:45:04 by Deckard Keywords:None Views:1161 Comments:21
Survival Saturday is a round-up of the weeks news and resources for folks who are interested in being prepared.
This Week in the News
You know, I tried to keep from going full-on tinfoil with the Las Vegas massacre, but theyre making that completely impossible.
Sure, there were questions from the very beginning. A lot of things didnt quite add up, but there is an investigatory process in such events. But how is it that every single thing has been upended? This story is unraveling like a frayed sweater in a basket with a litter of kittens.
Here are the 6 questions about the Vegas Massacre that make me wonder what on earth theyre trying to hide from us.
1.) Why do witnesses keep disappearing?
It is a proven fact that many people who go through something as horrific as this attack dont remember things clearly. People with Post Traumatic Stress Disorder often experience deficits in accuracy and this event was nothing if not traumatic. Lots of people reported having no idea what was going on. They thought the noise was firecrackers at first. Confusion and fear colored their memories and their only focus was on surviving. Weve all heard someone describe an event, saying, It was all a blur.
But there were a few witnesses who had a very clear recall of the event and they are telling very different stories. Stories of multiple shooters. Stories of shooters right in the crowd. Stories of early police reports that could have prevented the entire tragedy.
These people arent alone in their stories that dont match the official narrative. Read this article and watch this video for more eyewitness stories. And guys be careful.
2.) Why does the timeline keep changing so dramatically?
Obviously, investigations are fluid and we learn things as we go on. But there have been some really dramatic changes to the timeline and a lot of apparent CYA (Cover Your A$$) at work.
A veteran from two floors below Paddocks room tried to notify the front desk and 911 regarding the origin of the shootings and recalls no one answering. He said :
It seems like it just never stops, he recalled. Seconds are going by, minutes are going by, and the rounds are continuously going.
Changing weapons, changing calibers, Bethel continued. You can hear the difference in the gunshots of the different rifles that he is shooting. (source)
If you watch this video, a maintenance man at Mandalay Bay said that he called for help stating that he and Jesus Campo called in being under fire more than 10 minutes before the shooter began unloading his weapon on concert-goers. It wasnt until a recording was unearthed of Stephen Schuck calling for help with gunshots in the background that the official timeline was changed again.
3.) Why dont the recordings match the official story?
The audio recordings from the shooting are graphic and many of them dont match the official story.
Notice how they mention multiple shooters and multiple locations. How much of that is battle fog and how much is real?
4.) Why were the laptops and phones of witnesses wiped before they were returned?
If you only learn one lesson, learn this one. If you ever witness an event like this, upload your video and photos immediately. If your story differs from the one that authorities are telling, your proof will be gone once they get their hands on your devices.
Workers at the Route 91 festival during which Stephen Paddock unleashed his massacre have reportedly been given back their phones and laptops by the FBI only to discover that all messages and videos from the night of the attack have been wiped clean.
According to a Las Vegas resident who posted a status update on Facebook, A bunch of people that worked the Route 91 said they got their cell phones back today. They all said that all their phones are completely wiped clean! All messages and info from that weekend are completely gone. Anyone else experience this?
A few different people who were vendors there are all saying the same thing, the woman later comments. (source)
What did these people record that is counter to the official narrative? Do they even know they caught something that they shouldnt have?
5.) What about these excellent questions that arent being answered?
Alternative media is asking the questions that the mainstream is not. From Ann Coulter:
Why would Paddock unload 200 rounds into the hallway at a security guard who was checking on someone elses room before beginning his massacre?
How can it possibly take eight days to figure out when the alleged shooter checked into the hotel?
Why was Paddock wearing gloves if he was about to commit suicide?
Have any other solitary mass shooters ever had girlfriends?
If Paddock wasnt making money on video poker and he wasnt why would he be cycling millions of dollars through a casino, turning every dollar into, at best, 99 cents?
Paddock called hotel security at least twice to complain about loud music on the floor below him the day of the shooting. Why would a mass shooter care, or take the risk of drawing too much attention to himself?
Why, after so much careful planning, did Paddock expose his position by smashing two separate windows in his adjacent hotel rooms? There are other ways of providing a shooters loophole with less exposure?
Who set off this alarm which conveniently helped to give away Paddocks position early, and why?
Why did Paddock prepare for an escape, use his cameras to allow him to fire at hotel security through his door, equip rounds capable of annihilating any SWAT team that stacked up to breach his room, but decided to shoot himself instead before SWAT ever entered? No one noticed the man placing cameras about the area?
A witness on site at the concert stated that a woman (and her apparent boyfriend) approached people near the stage 45 minutes before the attack, telling them that they were all going to die. She was later escorted out of the venue by security. Who was this woman? Was she trying to menace the concertgoers or warn them? Or, was it all coincidence?
Despite the fact that these questions get right to the heart of method and motive, no one else seems to be asking them.
6.) WHY?
Most of all, WHY? Why the heck did this rich gambler who had no history of hurting anyone or being a hardcore gun guy unload thousands of rounds on 22,000 innocent people?
There is little in his history that would make us think, Yeah, that guy is gonna go postal one day.
Then some stuff arose that has been pooh-poohed by investigators as unrelated.
Paddock doesnt fit the psychological profile of a mass shooter. He had a girlfriend, was wealthy, had no known tactical background, and was described as kind and caring.
No one really knows how he got so rich. Gambling? Real estate? Or something more insidious? Unproven rumors suggest he could have been an arms dealer or a child trafficker.
The Islamic State has repeatedly claimed he converted in the past 6 months and did this in the name of ISIS, but the media says this is not true. No one in the investigation even seems to be considering the possibility. As well, a former Trump campaign official said that Paddock made an ISIS video, but nothing else has been heard about this.
Couldnt you wrap your head around this better if you knew why?
It just doesnt add up.
Im not saying that our own government committed this atrocity or that Stephen Paddock was a converted Muslim or that he didnt actually carry out this shooting.
I have no idea what to say, honestly. I mean, the FBI and the Vegas PD assure us there is no conspiracy and nobody is attempting to hide anything.
But
There are way too many things that dont add up, but what I can say is that we arent getting the whole story. And that in itself makes me suspicious. What are they hiding? Was the motive something that would change our perspective on everything we believe?
Perhaps it was another attempt by the corrupted ATF that decided to proceed with a scenario somewhat similar to Obama's Fast and Furious. Of course the shooter would have to be assassinated and perhaps conditioned by way of hypnosis before beginning. But another dastardly anti-gun scenario would be revealed to the public in front of a curtain.
Magic!
Liberals are like Slinkys. They're good for nothing, but somehow they bring a smile to your face as you shove them down the stairs.
There are too many facts that ensure Paddock was THE shooter. There are zero facts that dispel him as an innocent bystander awaiting a poker game in his own room with a pile of firearms and ammunition. You are sounding, as in a recent article introduced on LF, like some Harvard Law Professor playing with word salad sandwiches.
Your claimed lack of knowledge, masquerading as factual proof of anything, is bullshitting.
I don't pretend to be a pseudo-lawyer playing with word salad BULLSHIT like yourself. I won't apologize to you or anyone, if I hurt your feelings that is because you are too sensitive attempting to preserve your own posts, as though they are perfect to an imaginary audience outside of your own mind; your unnecessary defensive posture is entirely placed on your own shoulders.
There is no FACTUAL data to support any other shooter other than Paddock. Get over your own denial; get with REALITY.
I take it that they got their advanced degrees from the same university as this guy.
Except that they present more than you and he together by way of evidence. If their evidence is false, I see no attempt to show that it is false, by you or your alien expert.
I don't need to support my thesis of a single shooter other than by brutal FACTS that are common knowledge through published sources; if you refute my perspective, that is your problem. If you want to support another alternative universe, that is your problem yo collect FACTS.
Who was the other shooter? Nolu Chan who has lost his arguments tyme after tyme on an insignificant and out of the way Internet chit-chat channel?
None of us know shit about how Paddock organized his shooting PLANS. Are you claiming responsibility?
I don't need to support my thesis of a single shooter other than by brutal FACTS that are common knowledge through published sources;
Your claimed lack of knowledge, masquerading as factual proof of anything, is bullshitting.
Your claim at #4 was:
There are too many facts that ensure Paddock was THE shooter.
Your only claimed "fact" is what you claim not to know.
There are so many "brutal FACTS" ensuring Paddock was THE shooter, that you cannot produce one of your imaginary "brutal FACTS that are common knowledge through published sources."
Next you will claim that something published by NYT or WAPO is established FACT.
You are not hurting my feelings by making a fool of yourself. Keep going. I can still take some more of your flailing bullshit.
I don't "need" to claim anything within your infinite knowledge of BULLSHIT. That is a property of silly posts no matter how you try or otherwise attempt an inept or weak opinion.
You have no facts. You have opinions. But your opinions are literally STUPID, as you can't support your personal perspective. Where are the FACTS supporting a second shooter other than your imaginary illusions?