United States News
See other United States News Articles
Title: 16 Unanswered Questions About The Las Vegas Shooting That The Mainstream Media Doesn’t Want To Talk About
Source:
Investment Watch
URL Source: http://investmentwatchblog.com/16-u ... dia-doesnt-want-to-talk-about/
Published: Oct 3, 2017
Author: Michael Snyder
Post Date: 2017-10-05 07:51:26 by Deckard
Keywords: None
Views: 5858
Comments: 56
The public is not being told the truth about what really went down in Las Vegas. As you will see below, the evidence is mounting that there were multiple shooters and that this was an operation that was planned well in advance. But according to the mainstream media, a 64-year-old retired accountant with a flabby physique that had no military training whatsoever and that wasn’t very experienced with guns was able to pull the whole thing off all by himself. We are being told that Paddock was a “lone wolf” that didn’t have any ties to terror groups, and since he is now dead nobody is ever going to be able to interrogate him. But the American people definitely deserve some answers about what took place, and that means that all of us should keep digging.
The following are 16 unanswered questions about the Las Vegas shooting that the mainstream media does not want to talk about…
#1 Photos of Stephen Paddock’s hotel room have been leaked, and one of those photos appears to show a suicide note. Why hasn’t the public been told what is in that note?
#2 Were there additional shooters? A taxi driver clearly captured video of an automatic weapon being fired out of a lower level window. A video from another angle and brief footage captured by Dan Bilzerian also seem to confirm that automatic gunfire was coming from a floor much lower than the 32nd floor room that Stephen Paddock was located on. And if you weren’t convinced by the first three videos, this fourth video should definitely do it.
#3 Why were law enforcement authorities discussing “another suspect on the fourth floor”, and why isn’t the mainstream media talking about this?
#4 As Jon Rappoport has pointed out, it would have been impossible for Stephen Paddock to kill and wound 573 people in less than five minutes of shooting with the kinds of weapons that he is alleged to have used. So why won’t law enforcement authorities acknowledge this fact?
#5 How in the world did Paddock get 42 guns and “several thousand rounds of ammo” into his hotel room without anyone noticing?
#6 How did someone with “no military background” and that wasn’t a “gun guy at all” operate such advanced weapons? Because what we are being told by the mainstream media just doesn’t make any sense whatsoever. I really like how Natural News made this point…
Far from what the firearms-illiterate media claims, these are not systems that any Joe off the street can just pick up and use to effortlessly mow down 500 people. Running these systems requires extensive training, experience and stamina. It is physically impossible for a guy like Stephen Paddock to operate such a system in the sustained, effective manner that we witnessed, especially when shooting from an elevated position which throws off all the ranging of the weapon system.
Far from being a Navy Seal, Stephen Paddock is a retired accountant senior citizen with a gambling problem and a flabby physique. The only way he could have carried out this shooting is if he were transformed into a human superweapon through a magic wand. I’m calling this “Mission IMPOSSIBLE” because of the physical impossibility of a retired, untrained senior citizen pulling this off.
#7 Why was one woman telling people in the crowd that they were all going to die45 minutes before the attack?
#8 Why did it take law enforcement authorities 72 minutes to get into Stephen Paddock’s hotel room?
#9 Why did Paddock wire $100,000 to the Philippines last week?
#10 Why was Paddock’s girlfriend, Marilou Danley, in the Philippines when the attack took place? Did she know what was about to happen?
#11 Was Paddock on antidepressants like so many other mass killers in the past have been?
#12 Why was ISIS so eager to take responsibility for this attack, and why was the FBI so quick to dismiss that connection?
#13 Apparently Paddock had earned millions of dollars “through real estate deals”. If he was so wealthy, why would he all of a sudden snap like that?
#14 Why did he move so frequently? It is being reported that Paddock had 27 different residences during his adult life.
#15 Why were nearly all of the exits out of the concert venue completely blocked?…
In essence, the concert trapped the people, preventing them from escaping, and denying them the ability to seek cover. From there, sustained, full-auto gunfire is almost impossible to survive.
From Fox News, a caller named Russell Bleck, who survived the shooting, said live on air, “There were ten-foot walls blocking us in. We couldn’t escape. It was just a massacre. We had nowhere to go.”
#16 Why was a country music festival chosen as the target? Was the goal to kill as many Trump supporters and other conservatives as possible? And is there evidence that Stephen Paddock was connected to Antifa in any way?
At first I thought that this was a fairly straightforward story too, but the more I have dug into it the more complex things have become.
Personally, I have come to the conclusion that Stephen Paddock definitely did not act alone. That means that the others involved in the shooting are still out there, and they must be brought to justice. Let us never forget what these extremely wicked individuals did to innocent civilians such as 27-year-old Tina Frost…
A 27-year-old woman has lost her right eye after a bullet ripped through her face during the Las Vegas concert massacre.
Tina Frost remains in a coma in hospital after undergoing surgery to remove the bullet that became lodged in her eye when a gunman opened fire on the crowd of country music fans on Sunday night.
Frost, who is originally from Maryland but moved to California several years ago, is expected to remain in the coma for a week.
Whoever did this is going to pay greatly. Yes, I do believe that Stephen Paddock was involved. But he did not act alone, and the mainstream media is doing the public a great disservice by ignoring all of the evidence that this was not just a “lone wolf” operation.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Comments (1-16) not displayed.
.
.
.
Why did Paddock wire $100,000 to the Philippines last week?
To his terrorist pals or to his girlfriend so she had some money.
#18. To: Deckard (#0)
Why was Paddock’s girlfriend, Marilou Danley, in the Philippines when the attack took place? Did she know what was about to happen?
He may have wanted to get her out of there for an alibi or something.
Maybe she knew. Not sure.
But it is irrelevant to the conspiracy theory.
#19. To: Deckard (#0)
Why was ISIS so eager to take responsibility for this attack, and why was the FBI so quick to dismiss that connection?
Because they will take credit for any attack that makes them look bigger and more powerful than they are.
#20. To: Deckard (#0)
Apparently Paddock had earned millions of dollars “through real estate deals”. If he was so wealthy, why would he all of a sudden snap like that?
Weird huh. Maybe he is just evil. He didn't snap but planned for a period of time.
#21. To: Deckard (#0)
Why did he move so frequently? It is being reported that Paddock had 27 different residences during his adult life.
Who knows who cares. Irrelevant.
#22. To: Deckard (#4)
Well, I think it is a good list of questions. To which I would add:
Why did he have so many weapons in the room ? That is a lot more than what he could use.
Stage props ?
Si vis pacem, para bellum
Rebellion to tyrants is obedience to God.
Never Pick A Fight With An Old Man He Will Just Shoot You He Can't Afford To Get Hurt
"If there are no dogs in Heaven, then when I die I want to go where they went." (Will Rogers)
#23. To: Deckard (#0)
Why were nearly all of the exits out of the concert venue completely blocked?…
There is zero proof offered at your link for this claim.
#24. To: Deckard (#0)
#16 Why was a country music festival chosen as the target? Was the goal to kill as many Trump supporters and other conservatives as possible? And is there evidence that Stephen Paddock was connected to Antifa in any way?
That is probably the case but not a certainty.
#25. To: Stoner (#22)
Why did he have so many weapons in the room ?
Speaking of multiple weapons, I've heard a couple of clips where I hear three auto rifles being fired at the same time. And no, they are not echoes. They are three distinct reports firing at slightly different rates. I haven't got time to post them this morning, but the audio and video is out there.
Now the sheriff is hinting at a search for confederates, and the MSM is doing a pirouette and mumbling about a "possible accomplice." Yesterday it was just one dude and they had that all locked up.
This thing has more loose ends than a B-grade horror movie, and the number of question marks keeps growing.
#26. To: randge (#25)
Speaking of multiple weapons, I've heard a couple of clips where I hear three auto rifles being fired at the same time. And no, they are not echoes. They are three distinct reports firing at slightly different rates. I haven't got time to post them this morning, but the audio and video is out there.
Post the link. It will only take a min or less. I'll post the video for you.
Thanks.
#27. To: randge (#25)
Why did he have so many weapons in the room ? Speaking of multiple weapons, I've heard a couple of clips where I hear three auto rifles being fired at the same time. And no, they are not echoes. They are three distinct reports firing at slightly different rates. I haven't got time to post them this morning, but the audio and video is out there.Now the sheriff is hinting at a search for confederates, and the MSM is doing a pirouette and mumbling about a "possible accomplice." Yesterday it was just one dude and they had that all locked up.
This thing has more loose ends than a B-grade horror movie, and the number of question marks keeps growing.
Anyone could have got any number of weapons in the room in luggage.
The number of weapons says zero about motive or if there were other alleged shooters.
It just isn't a defining question that leads to an undeniable truth.
#28. To: randge (#25)
Here is a link to a video that I can't post because I don't log into google.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IolTe6Q6Qg4
#29. To: Deckard (#0)
URL Source: http://investmentwatchblog.com/16-u ... dia-doesnt-want-to-talk-about/
So now that Alex Jones has flaked out and admitted he's a fake, who do you CTs turn to?
I assume Savage is still a go-to guy. Tyler Durden for financial CTing. No-name guys like this investmentblog.com guy straying outside finance discussion. And that Eric Peters guy of EricPetersAutos.
Without Jones and his reliable InfoWars/PrisonPlanet hub, CTers have fallen on hard times.
#30. To: Tooconservative (#29)
I assume Savage is still a go-to guy.
What's wrong with Savage?
And when did Alex Jones admit he is a fake? Was it under duress?
#31. To: A K A Stone (#28) (Edited)
Here is a link to a video that I can't post because I don't log into google.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IolTe6Q6Qg4
There are ways to fake it to avoid the Google age verification. I'm not logged in there either, just like you.
Just copy the embed code for any other public Youtube vid, then copy/paste the IolTe6Q6Qg4 part into the embed code.
And, viola!
#32. To: A K A Stone (#30)
And when did Alex Jones admit he is a fake? Was it under duress?
During his child custody hearings a while back.
#33. To: Tooconservative (#31)
You used to be to get it from youtube without signing in. Thanks.
#34. To: A K A Stone (#27)
" The number of weapons says zero about motive or if there were other alleged shooters.It just isn't a defining question that leads to an undeniable truth. "
Well, maybe, maybe not.
In any criminal investigation, particularly one of this magnitude, there should be NO unanswered questions. If there are, that is a red flag.
There is no logic to why one guy would have so many weapons in that room. I do not know the answer, but in this case there should be no unanswered questions if you are going to have a valid credible investigation.
Cmon stone, you know that.
Si vis pacem, para bellum
Rebellion to tyrants is obedience to God.
Never Pick A Fight With An Old Man He Will Just Shoot You He Can't Afford To Get Hurt
"If there are no dogs in Heaven, then when I die I want to go where they went." (Will Rogers)
#35. To: Tooconservative (#32)
He said that to get custody of his kid and not be described as a nut.
You know what I say is correct. Alex is a true believer. Don't you think? Honestly?
#36. To: A K A Stone (#33) (Edited)
YouTube isn't trying that hard to actually stop you as I demonstrated. They just want to throw a little barrier up to make it look to any court that they have exercised reasonable caution to protect children. It's not a bad argument. And people like me quickly find ways around it.
BTW, notice that they did add a pop-up menu to these vids. If you right-click the one you are trying to post (other than on its title area or player controls), it will offer you options. Among those is Copy embed code. It's a fairly new feature on YouTube so not everyone has noticed it yet.
#37. To: Stoner (#34)
There is no logic to why one guy would have so many weapons in that room. I do not know the answer, but in this case there should be no unanswered questions if you are going to have a valid credible investigation.Cmon stone, you know that.
He was an evil man. He just wanted a lot of guns. Maybe all of them.
He killed a lot of people. The more guns the better. We will never know the answer to that because his head is exploded.
#38. To: A K A Stone (#35)
You know what I say is correct. Alex is a true believer. Don't you think? Honestly?
I think Alex Jones will peddle anything for money and fame. I think the record is quite clear on that. And, no, he does not believe all the crap that he peddles to his CT nutjob audience.
Oh, BTW, professional wrasslin' is fake too.
#39. To: Tooconservative, randge (#31)
Is the the video to which you were referring?
Why can't it be echos?
I watched half of it. I'll watch more later.
Have a great day.
#40. To: Tooconservative (#31)
In the video you posted, that certainly sounds like two different weapons to me ! Fake ? I don't think so.
Si vis pacem, para bellum
Rebellion to tyrants is obedience to God.
Never Pick A Fight With An Old Man He Will Just Shoot You He Can't Afford To Get Hurt
"If there are no dogs in Heaven, then when I die I want to go where they went." (Will Rogers)
#41. To: Stoner (#40)
In the video you posted, that certainly sounds like two different weapons to me ! Fake ? I don't think so.
It sounded like a few shots echo after shooting. Each time it seems to be about the same amount of time.
Inconclusive at this point to me. Probably echos in my honest opinion.
#42. To: Deckard, stoner (#1)
#6 How did someone with “no military background” and that wasn’t a “gun guy at all” operate such advanced weapons? Because what we are being told by the mainstream media just doesn’t make any sense whatsoever. I really like how Natural News made this point…Far from what the firearms-illiterate media claims, these are not systems that any Joe off the street can just pick up and use to effortlessly mow down 500 people. Running these systems requires extensive training, experience and stamina. It is physically impossible for a guy like Stephen Paddock to operate such a system in the sustained, effective manner that we witnessed, especially when shooting from an elevated position which throws off all the ranging of the weapon system.
Far from being a Navy Seal, Stephen Paddock is a retired accountant senior citizen with a gambling problem and a flabby physique. The only way he could have carried out this shooting is if he were transformed into a human superweapon through a magic wand. I’m calling this “Mission IMPOSSIBLE” because of the physical impossibility of a retired, untrained senior citizen pulling this off.
Hmmmm....
Las Vegas gunman Stephen Paddock has been described as a brilliant man who had an intimate knowledge of the second amendment and a room dedicated to his guns, according to a friend. The Australian man, who wanted to remain anonymous, had multiple encounters with Paddock between 2013 and 2015 after he started dating his girlfriend's sister.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4949402/Stephen-Paddock-huge-gun-room- says-friend.html
#43. To: Stoner, A K A Stone (#40)
In the video you posted, that certainly sounds like two different weapons to me ! Fake ? I don't think so.
Maybe.
In these modern police sonar systems that are being deployed in some big cities, they plant high-quality microphones on buildings to listen for gunfire.
Perhaps they aren't releasing details on them to the public but it would seem to me that they could identify small-caliber pistols versus large-caliber pistols versus long rifles being fired. But I haven't seen them announce that. That info, if it is true, will eventually come out because they would warn responding police units if they were facing a possible sniper versus some punk with a handgun because that is very valuable info to have as the police roll up on a gunfire situation.
As for these current recordings, they seem to be from smartphones. There has been a consistent decline in the audio quality of smartphones over the years as they move the microphones away from the screen. They want the entire front of the smartphone to be screen except for the front-facing camera for selfies or Skype-type apps. Look at Apple's latest phones. Samsung, much the same.
So the sound quality and microphones on these smartphone do leave a lot to be desired in terms of audio quality if you're trying to analyze gunshots with them.
I bet Vegas will shortly have those sonic analyzers throughout the strip. They may raise concert fees to license these open-air events and use it to deploy plain-clothes cops in each building that offers high ground for shooting and also put SWAT snipers on the roofs.
#44. To: Stoner, A K A Stone (#40)
The shooter couldn't have been using two bump-fire rifles, each with a tripod and do a spray-n-pray?
Admittedly, the sounds don't fit perfectly.
You also have to consider that some of these alleged recordings could be doctored by a prankster. I'm not saying it is but you have to wonder. Since there are multiple smartphone recordings, they should be compared to see if the shots all match up consistently from one recording to another. Otherwise, they may be fakes.
#45. To: Deckard (#0) (Edited)
One thing that is obvious about this.
There will be three groups of people expressing opinions of the matter:
Group # 1 - Those that will bend over backwards to validate any / all conspiracy theories
Group # 2 - Those that will bend over backwards to discredit the conspiracy theories, and to believe / validate the official story.
Group # 3 - Those that simply want the truth, what ever it is.
Unfortunately, many in group # 1, and group # 2, once they take a position, they are wedded to it, and no amount of logic will allow them to give it up. They will endlessly argue for their original position, even in the face of logic that discredits that position.
A logical person once proven wrong would admit they are wrong, and move on. Many in the first 2 groups will not do that.
In this matter, I suspect we will never know the whole truth.
Si vis pacem, para bellum
Rebellion to tyrants is obedience to God.
Never Pick A Fight With An Old Man He Will Just Shoot You He Can't Afford To Get Hurt
"If there are no dogs in Heaven, then when I die I want to go where they went." (Will Rogers)
#46. To: Stoner (#34)
In any criminal investigation, particularly one of this magnitude there should be NO unanswered questions. If there are, that is a red flag. ...
You'd think so, wouldn't you.
If there are, that is a red flag.
Not to the blatant shills here who whine "trust the MSM and government - they never lie".
“Truth is treason in the empire of lies.” - Ron Paul
Those who most loudly denounce Fake News are typically those most aggressively disseminating it.
#47. To: Deckard (#46)
" there should be NO unanswered questions. If there are, that is a red flag. ... "
For it to NOT be a red flag, it would have to be a pretty inane question. Something like " what color of socks was one of the victims wearing " ?
Otherwise, most any question is legitimate, and should not be dismissed.
Si vis pacem, para bellum
Rebellion to tyrants is obedience to God.
Never Pick A Fight With An Old Man He Will Just Shoot You He Can't Afford To Get Hurt
"If there are no dogs in Heaven, then when I die I want to go where they went." (Will Rogers)
#48. To: Deckard, A K A Stone (#13) (Edited)
("Bad link there is no video of this by that link.")And you don't even question why it was removed.
The PTB are sifting through incriminating evidence in order to control and protect their narrative of a "Lone Wolf." IMO, the PTB will be removing a LOT MORE video, eyewitness interviews, and other people who are doing the math (which, btw, IS. NOT. ADDING. UP.)
They will CULL any evidence that demonstrates this op was conducted by MULTIPLE sources.
These MOs by the PTB to control and create narratives of "Lone Wolf" attacks should be easy for us to figure out by now.
#49. To: Stoner, Deckard (#34)
In any criminal investigation, particularly one of this magnitude, there should be NO unanswered questions. If there are, that is a red flag.There is no logic to why one guy would have so many weapons in that room. I do not know the answer, but in this case there should be no unanswered questions if you are going to have a valid credible investigation.
Amen.
#50. To: Deckard, ALL (#0) (Edited)
The public is not being told the truth about what really went down in Las Vegas. As you will see below, the evidence is mounting that there were multiple shooters and that this was an operation that was planned well in advance....
Absolutely. Undoubtedly.
We are being told that Paddock was a “lone wolf” that didn’t have any ties to terror groups, and since he is now dead nobody is ever going to be able to interrogate him.
How convenient!!
All these major "Lone Wolfs" seem to commit suicide! Including the Newtown Muppet.
As with 911 and Newtown, NO REAL INVESTIGATION WILL BE CONDUCTED.
ALL EFFORTS TO WHITEWASH THE TRUTH WILL BE TAKEN. (From the biggest network sources to online opinion -- INCLUDING tiny forums. *cough*)
THIS Op was designed to emotionally manipulate public opinion with respect to GUN CONTROL and demonize a certain demo of people (Conservatives/Gun-Owners/Republicans) as well as surrendering our privacy and other constitutional rights. (PATRIOT ACT.)
As to "unanswered questions," there's an ocean of them. FAR too much damage done by a single perp; This was a well-executed EXECUTION.
The perp's ties to Antifa and the actual goob itself are most compelling. But given an Alphabet Soup intel that exonerated criminals Hitlery and Bammy (Server-Gate/Benghazi/Fast & Furious) and is still undermining Trump, how can we possibly expect them to ferret out the truth?
#51. To: Liberator (#50)
Valid viewpoint !!
Si vis pacem, para bellum
Rebellion to tyrants is obedience to God.
Never Pick A Fight With An Old Man He Will Just Shoot You He Can't Afford To Get Hurt
"If there are no dogs in Heaven, then when I die I want to go where they went." (Will Rogers)
#52. To: Stoner, Deckard (#51)
It seems for *some* of us, the equation and rationale is easily sussed out.
#53. To: Stoner, Deckard (#45) (Edited)
There will be three groups of people expressing opinions of the matter:Group # 1 - Those that will bend over backwards to validate any / all conspiracy theories
Group # 2 - Those that will bend over backwards to discredit the conspiracy theories, and to believe / validate the official story.
Group # 3 - Those that simply want the truth, what ever it is.
Unfortunately, many in group # 1, and group # 2, once they take a position, they are wedded to it, and no amount of logic will allow them to give it up. They will endlessly argue for their original position, even in the face of logic that discredits that position.
A logical person once proven wrong would admit they are wrong, and move on. Many in the first 2 groups will not do that.
Well done.
THAT said, in order to discern THE truth, BOTH "Conspiracy Theory" evidence -- as well as "Official Evidence" need to be examined thoroughly and then logic, common sense, as well as credibility need to be taken into account....
As of the present, "Official Sources" have an abysmal record of Truth Telling. For obvious reasons.
There have been many MANY assets WITHIN the bowels of the Swamp -- even at the very top of the Food Chain -- whose agenda is to crush the USCON, and with it, THE demo who fervently supports the 2A and US Sovereignty.
#54. To: Liberator (#53)
I have a problem with "official" explanations coming from FBI, the same outfit that failed to prosecute anyone connected with server gate, Bengazi, fast & furious, & such notables as Bill & Shitlerly, Obutthole, Rice, Lerner, Holder, etc, etc, etc.
I do not have the answers, but this incident stinks to high heaven !! They are telling us that 2 + 2 = 5.
I think anyone that is buying the official line is stupid, or blind, or extremely naive, or worse - complicit. Like I said before, I doubt we will ever know the full truth !
Si vis pacem, para bellum
Rebellion to tyrants is obedience to God.
Never Pick A Fight With An Old Man He Will Just Shoot You He Can't Afford To Get Hurt
"If there are no dogs in Heaven, then when I die I want to go where they went." (Will Rogers)
#55. To: Deckard, *Bill of Rights-Constitution* (#0)
#8 Why did it take law enforcement authorities 72 minutes to get into Stephen Paddock’s hotel room?
To give the handlers time to round up all of Trump's MK-Ultra assassins, get them on the FBI informant buses, and make their getaway to an undisclosed location (one of Trump's luxury resort hotels).
"Weighing new gun laws" ~St. Donald Trump
#56. To: Stoner (#54)
I have a problem with "official" explanations coming from FBI, the same outfit that failed to prosecute anyone connected with server gate, Bengazi, fast & furious, & such notables as Bill & Shitlerly, Obutthole, Rice, Lerner, Holder, etc, etc, etc.
Yes sir.
This is a matter of credibility, trust, and reputation. "Official" = "Subverted". UNTIL that respect and honor and cred has been regained for good reason.
Those entrusted to honor their positions of authority to uphold the law and oaths have failed on all counts.
Incredibly, in THIS crucial case, we see even LESS reasons to trust and believe so-called "Official Reports" by those who resources and forensic tools to figure something like this out are endless.
But yes -- considering the lack of prosecution on so easily proven parties to treachery designed to advance the gun-lobby agenda (like F&F), The Swamp must be considered having a conflict of interest when investigating such a issue near and dear to the Swamp's heart.
You'd think there were more than ample patriots at that level of America's Sentries who PROTECT and NOT ATTACK America from within.
Only fools still believe America is not hijacked from the inside, or Bammy hasn't set up a subversive machination within to sabotage us from head to toe.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]