[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

"Analysis: The Final State of the Presidential Race"

He’ll, You Pieces of Garbage

The Future of Warfare -- No more martyrdom!

"Kamala’s Inane Talking Points"

"The Harris Campaign Is Testament to the Toxicity of Woke Politics"

Easy Drywall Patch

Israel Preparing NEW Iran Strike? Iran Vows “Unimaginable” Response | Watchman Newscast

In Logansport, Indiana, Kids are Being Pushed Out of Schools After Migrants Swelled County’s Population by 30%: "Everybody else is falling behind"

Exclusive — Bernie Moreno: We Spend $110,000 Per Illegal Migrant Per Year, More than Twice What ‘the Average American Makes’

Florida County: 41 of 45 People Arrested for Looting after Hurricanes Helene and Milton are Noncitizens

Presidential race: Is a Split Ticket the only Answer?

hurricanes and heat waves are Worse

'Backbone of Iran's missile industry' destroyed by IAF strikes on Islamic Republic

Joe Rogan Experience #2219 - Donald Trump

IDF raids Hezbollah Radwan Forces underground bases, discovers massive cache of weapons

Gallant: ‘After we strike in Iran,’ the world will understand all of our training

The Atlantic Hit Piece On Trump Is A Psy-Op To Justify Post-Election Violence If Harris Loses

Six Al Jazeera journalists are Hamas, PIJ terrorists

Judge Aileen Cannon, who tossed Trump's classified docs case, on list of proposed candidates for attorney general

Iran's Assassination Program in Europe: Europe Goes Back to Sleep

Susan Olsen says Brady Bunch revival was cancelled because she’s MAGA.

Foreign Invaders crisis cost $150B in 2023, forcing some areas to cut police and fire services: report

Israel kills head of Hezbollah Intelligence.

Tenn. AG reveals ICE released thousands of ‘murderers and rapists’ from detention centers into US streets

Kamala Harris Touts Mass Amnesty Offering Fast-Tracked Citizenship to Nearly Every Illegal Alien in U.S.

Migration Crisis Fueled Rise in Tuberculosis Cases Study Finds

"They’re Going to Try to Kill Trump Again"

"Dems' Attempts at Power Grab Losing Their Grip"

"Restoring a ‘Great Moderation’ in Fiscal Policy"

"As attacks intensify, Trump becomes more popular"

Posting Articles Now Working Here

Another Test

Testing

Kamala Harris, reparations, and guaranteed income

Did Mudboy Slim finally kill this place?

"Why Young Americans Are Not Taught about Evil"

"New Rules For Radicals — How To Reinvent Kamala Harris"

"Harris’ problem: She’s a complete phony"

Hurricane Beryl strikes Bay City (TX)

Who Is ‘Destroying Democracy In Darkness?’

‘Kamalanomics’ is just ‘Bidenomics’ but dumber

Even The Washington Post Says Kamala's 'Price Control' Plan is 'Communist'

Arthur Ray Hines, "Sneakypete", has passed away.

No righT ... for me To hear --- whaT you say !

"Walz’s Fellow Guardsmen Set the Record Straight on Veep Candidate’s Military Career: ‘He Bailed Out’ "

"Kamala Harris Selects Progressive Minnesota Governor Tim Walz as Running Mate"

"The Teleprompter Campaign"

Good Riddance to Ismail Haniyeh

"Pagans in Paris"

"Liberal groupthink makes American life creepy and could cost Democrats the election".


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

New World Order
See other New World Order Articles

Title: Angry student steals MAGA hat, demands anchor baby victim be punished
Source: Campus Reform
URL Source: https://www.campusreform.org/?ID=9868
Published: Sep 28, 2017
Author: Anthony Gockowski
Post Date: 2017-09-28 22:43:41 by Hondo68
Keywords: Filipino president, Nicaraguan anchor baby, MAGA?
Views: 18630
Comments: 106

  • An enraged University of California, Riverside stole a classmate's "Make America Great Again" hat, proclaiming that it "represents genocide."

  • The thief even prevailed upon administrators to prohibit the victim from wearing the hat on campus, becoming even more apoplectic when the property was returned.

Images of a student who stole a peer's MAGA hat at the University of California, Riverside.

A Trump-supporting student at the University of California, Riverside had his MAGA hat stolen by a peer who demanded that administrators refuse to allow him to continue to wear it.

A video of the incident obtained by Campus Reform shows an enraged female student taking the hat to the school’s Student Life Department as Matthew Vitale fruitlessly attempts to explain to the young woman that the hat is his property.

"Your f***ing freedom of speech is genocide, homeboy."   

“So this guy thought it would be a good idea to go into a conference wearing this f***ing hat,” the student who stole the hat states. “Look at the kind of sh*t he’s wearing, You know what this represents? This represents genocide—genocide of a bunch of people.”

Vitale then tries to explain that “you do not get to take other people’s property that is legally theirs in this country,” to which the unidentified thief replies, “man, f*** your laws.”

“Do you have any f***ing conscience?” she goes on to ask, questioning why Vitale would dare to wear a MAGA hat on campus and telling him that his “f***ing freedom of speech is genocide, homeboy.”

“I swear to God I could burn this sh*t. I swear to God I could burn this sh*t,” she continues as several staffers look on.

“Are you people not going to do anything? She is stealing my property,” Vitale pleads, though the altercation went on for several more minutes.

“We will need to return his property to him, but we can talk about…” one university employee begins to explain before being abruptly cut off by the student thief.

“How about we talk about not letting him wear this sh*t on campus?” the thief retorts, while Vitale later tells a growing presence of administrators that “the fact that you people haven’t gotten this back for me is sad and wrong.”

[RELATED: Female student attacked for wearing Trump hat on campus]

“That’s full of sh*t, because you all are just going to, like, mediate this and make it so like we’re all ok here, freedom of speech, whatever. How about we think about what’s actually going on in this country?” the thief subsequently responds to requests from administrators to “calm down.”

The altercation continued for several minutes until the hat was relinquished to an administrator who then returned it to Vitale, though not before his fellow student got in the last word.

“F*** your f***ing freedom of speech, boy. F***it. F*** it because your freedom of speech is literally killing a lot of people out there. That’s what it is, because you’re out there wearing hats like these that promote laws and legislations that literally kill and murder in the masses people of color,” she stated, before the two eventually walked off with separate mediators.

Campus Reform reached out to the university and Vitale for comment on the matter, and is currently awaiting responses.


Poster Comment:

He has a Filipino president, and is half Nicaraguan? Strange globalist Trumpkin.

The SJW sow was wrong to steal the anchor babies hat. (1 image)

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Comments (1-44) not displayed.
      .
      .
      .

#45. To: buckeroo (#28) (Edited)

I would intervene, irrespective of the situation. I am still strong and able and can handle myself formidably if required; I am diametrically opposed to yourself in such a situation.

How would you intervene? The assailant would have been hit in a second or less. I'd pick up my hat in about 2 seconds. Then I'd be on my way. Would you try to take my hat or beat me up or what?

A K A Stone  posted on  2017-09-29   14:17:44 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#46. To: A K A Stone (#45)

I would ask you to back down as you are accosting a woman in public.

buckeroo  posted on  2017-09-29   14:20:21 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#47. To: buckeroo (#39)

Beat a woman in public? Id just pop the person as a reflex to being attacked in a split second. It would be so quick that I may not know the assailants sex until they hit the ground. Besides how am I supposed to know what gender the bull dyke identifies as. This is California isn't it.

Oh my I just typed f a g I f o r n I a without the spaces and it android auto corrected to California.

A K A Stone  posted on  2017-09-29   14:24:45 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#48. To: A K A Stone (#45)

Would you try to take my hat or beat me up or what?

Nobody wants your Gary Johnson hat!

Hondo68  posted on  2017-09-29   14:26:03 ET  (1 image) Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#49. To: A K A Stone (#47)

The problem with you as there is no objectivity. As you claim:

Id just pop the person as a reflex to being attacked in a split second. It would be so quick that I may not know the assailants sex until they hit the ground. Besides how am I supposed to know what gender the bull dyke identifies as.

You are a reactive son-of-a bitch unwilling to survey the situation and negotiate an outcome.

buckeroo  posted on  2017-09-29   14:31:24 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#50. To: A K A Stone, nolu chan (#47)

Oh my I just typed f a g I f o r n I a without the spaces and it android auto corrected to California.

On my computer, the autocorrect in Firefox offers 'California', the same exact thing!

These are spellcheck hate crimes! Let's sue. nolu can represent us in court.

Tooconservative  posted on  2017-09-29   15:06:42 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#51. To: buckeroo (#35)

You have a serious problem.

You can walk past a murder in progress and there is no legal duty to intervene.

That is a fact.

nolu chan  posted on  2017-09-29   15:28:01 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#52. To: nolu chan (#51)

It is irrelevant. All you are doing with your silly post is ensure there is no moral responsibility or individual consideration to participate in a act of compassion.

buckeroo  posted on  2017-09-29   16:04:42 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#53. To: buckeroo (#52)

Getting caught up in the causes of others can be deadly.

A K A Stone  posted on  2017-09-29   16:31:59 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#54. To: Tooconservative (#37)

Some jurisdictions do have the so-called Good Samaritan laws. Generally I understand them to require passersby to report violent crimes or a person in danger to the police. I don't know of any that require passersby to intervene physically and risk their own safety.

There are Good Samaritan laws. You misunderstand what they do. They protect the Good Samaritan if he tries to give aid to someone. It protects him from liability for damages where his good faith effort to do help results in harm. There is no requirement to be a Good Samaritan, or report anything.

There is no law in the United States that requires one to report a crime.

nolu chan  posted on  2017-09-29   16:53:28 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#55. To: Tooconservative (#36)

Hey, nolu, I already know assault and battery are illegal in Cali. What I don't know is if it is legal to use violence for a property owner to recover his property. I don't think so. And probably not in any other state either.

And some marital ball-punching of a dogkicker spouse is a very tenuous precedent to cite in a case of recovering a $5 cap from someone who grabbed it and wouldn't give it back.

I think you're giving some very lousy advice but IANAL.

The subject is using reasonable force after someone removes a hat from someone's head while they are wearing it. It was in this context that you noted at #11 that they would not have to touch the wearer "if they grabbed it by the bill of the cap." In this same context, you added at your #12, "Well, good luck with the cops if you assault someone who has taken your MAGA cap."

If you grab my hat by the bill and do not touch me, I can still use whatever force is reasonable to take it from you. If you resist, I can use force to overcome your resistance.

The law in California and Ohio provide that I may commit what would otherwise be assault and battery upon the the transgressor, and as long as I use reasonable force, it is protected by the right to defend property. I do not have to just watch someone walk away with my property. Any property, whether it is my hat or anything else.

I cited the law and provided a case. The right to defend property is the law in California and Ohio. I challenged you to identify any state that is an exception. *** C R I C K E T S ***.

As long as you cannot cite a single jurisdiction in the United States where the right to defense of property does not apply and protect the use of reasonable force to stop your property from being absconded with, I will conclude that you are giving a very lousy legal opinion. I stayed at a Holiday Inn Express last night.

As for citing some marital ball punching of a dog kicker being a tenous precedent to cite, it seems that an internationally recognized expert on the law of self-defense chose it for the Continuing Legal Education seminar he taught in May 2017 in Ohio. Lawyers have to keep up with their CLE.

Law of Self Defense LEVEL 2B Class Delaware OH CLE Syllabus 17105 v.170524

Uploaded by Law of Self Defense on May 24, 2017

Seminar Leader

Andrew F. Branca is in his 3rd decade of practicing law (MA BBO#: 557995). He has written several published books on the law of self-defense, including the currently available “The Law of Self Defense, 3rd Edition,” (ISBN: 978-1-943809-14-1). He is an internationally recognized expert on the law of self-defense, and has been quoted in this context by the Wall Street Journal, the Chicago Tribune, the Washington Post, and many other mainstream media, including nationally syndicated broadcast media and foreign press.

Page 2,

Block 2: Ohio Appellate Case Law on Use-of-Force Justification (12:05PM to 1:05PM)

[...]

"State v. Pepin-McCaffrey, 929 N.E.2d 476 (OH Ct. App. 2010)"

nolu chan  posted on  2017-09-29   16:55:28 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#56. To: nolu chan (#54)

I do not misunderstand. You are wrong.

Wiki: Duty to rescue

In the United States, as of 2009 ten states had laws on the books requiring that people at least notify law enforcement of and/or seek aid for strangers in peril under certain conditions: California, Florida, Hawaii, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Ohio, Rhode Island, Vermont, Washington, and Wisconsin. These laws are also referred to as Good Samaritan laws, despite their difference from laws of the same name that protect individuals who try to help another person. These laws are rarely applied, and are generally ignored by citizens and lawmakers.

Tooconservative  posted on  2017-09-29   17:07:49 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#57. To: nolu chan (#55)

The law in California and Ohio provide that I may commit what would otherwise be assault and battery upon the the transgressor, and as long as I use reasonable force, it is protected by the right to defend property. I do not have to just watch someone walk away with my property. Any property, whether it is my hat or anything else.

I cited the law and provided a case. The right to defend property is the law in California and Ohio. I challenged you to identify any state that is an exception. *** C R I C K E T S ***.

I don't believe you proved any such thing. Nor have you cited any clear cases where prosecutors brought a case against someone committing violence to recover stolen property and the courts struck down such convictions or summarily dismissed any charges against the person committing violence to recover property.

I maintain my position and will not be distracted by your attempts to pretend that property recovery is some variety of legalized assault. Cite these cases where you are entitled to vigilante action including violence to recover your stolen property. Cite the statutes that declare this. Cite the court cases where the vigilante property owner prevailed.

Property recovery is not self-defense.

Tooconservative  posted on  2017-09-29   17:13:35 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#58. To: Tooconservative (#57)

I don't believe you proved any such thing. Nor have you cited any clear cases where prosecutors brought a case against someone committing violence to recover stolen property and the courts struck down such convictions or summarily dismissed any charges against the person committing violence to recover property.

My statements and your comments were made in the context of a hat taken directly from someone's head.

[A K A Stone #9] Actually if someone took my hat. They would have to touch my head to do that. That is assault

This discussion is about someone taking a hat a head. You said it could be taken without touching the other person if grabbed by the bill.

And your responses at #11 and #12:

[#11] Not if they grabbed it by the bill of the cap.

[#12] Well, good luck with the cops if you assault someone who has taken your MAGA cap.

The law is crystal clear that you cannot take my personal property off my head and leave without my having the right to use any reasonable force to stop you and take back my property.

The discussion was about a hat taken right off the head. It was not about a case of recovery at a later date.

You can cite neither a case nor a law that approaches what you claim, that I must let the culprit walk away with my hat. I may use whatever force is reasonable to regain possession of my hat.

The case citation you criticized is being taught in CLE, 2017, on the topic of, "Ohio Appellate Case Law on Use-of-Force Justification."

Saying you don't believe your lying eyes is not a persuasive argument. Use of force justification, you mess with my property, I mess with you, it's justified. It does not matter whether you kick my dog or steal my hat.

The only problem area you will find is if the owner uses unreasonable force.

nolu chan  posted on  2017-09-29   17:56:48 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#59. To: nolu chan, A K A Stone (#58)

The only problem area you will find is if the owner uses unreasonable force.

Ah. Well, having mistaken me for someone who actually cares about this issue deeply, I'll continue.

  • Is it reasonable for a man to punch a woman to retrieve his $5 MAGA cap?
  • Is it reasonable for a man to stab a woman to retrieve his $5 MAGA cap?
  • Is it reasonable for a man to shoot a woman to retrieve his $5 MAGA cap?

Or we could agree to disagree since I could care less to begin with and probably won't believe anything you say if you can't find specific cases where someone was charged for retrieving stolen property and acquitted after using violent force by 1) punching, 2) stabbing, 3) shooting.

But you can't find such a case. Because there aren't any, I think. But I can't prove that either, any more than you can prove exoneration of a defendant in such a case.

Of course, I could always point to one rather well-known case of recovering stolen property.

Wiki: O. J. Simpson, Las Vegas robbery

I don't think it helps your argument. It also doesn't clinch my argument in this case of a $5 MAGA cap.

Tooconservative  posted on  2017-09-29   18:23:56 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#60. To: A K A Stone (#53)

Getting caught up in the causes of others can be deadly.

Life is filled with risks. That is where you are wrong, in this case with the below remark:

Id just pop the person as a reflex to being attacked in a split second. It would be so quick that I may not know the assailants sex until they hit the ground. Besides how am I supposed to know what gender the bull dyke identifies as.

What makes you think that the person receiving the punch doesn't pull out a gun on you?

buckeroo  posted on  2017-09-30   0:42:56 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#61. To: buckeroo (#60)

If they pulled out a gun on me after attacking me by taking my hat. Then they were up to no good to begin with and my action would be proven right as it gave me a fighting chance to escape the assassination attempt by the democrat psychopath.

A K A Stone  posted on  2017-09-30   0:52:40 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#62. To: A K A Stone (#61)

We got all that, Stone. But, your hypothetical aggression doesn't defuse the situation; in fact, you exacerbate the problem.

buckeroo  posted on  2017-09-30   1:25:58 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#63. To: buckeroo, A K A Stone (#62) (Edited)

Wow, you guys really love your MAGA hats.

Punching women, pulling guns, all for some crappy cap.

You really do want to Make America Great Again, one cap at a time.

I thought you were the white knights, vowing to defend any woman being assaulted. Well, unless she takes your cap and then you intend to punch her yourself. Over a cap.

Chivalry may not be dead but it's gotten kinda weird.

Tooconservative  posted on  2017-09-30   7:24:13 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#64. To: Tooconservative (#63)

When a bull dyke assaults you you fight back.

A K A Stone  posted on  2017-09-30   7:53:44 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#65. To: nolu chan, Tooconservative, Deckard (#54)

There are Good Samaritan laws. You misunderstand what they do.

They protect the Good Samaritan if he tries to give aid to someone. It protects him from liability for damages where his good faith effort to do help results in harm. There is no requirement to be a Good Samaritan, or report anything.

There MAY be requirements in SOME towns in New England:

Liberator  posted on  2017-09-30   10:59:01 ET  (1 image) Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#66. To: A K A Stone (#64)

When a bull dyke assaults you you fight back.

Is it just me, but are bull dykes THE most unhappy, vile, violent pseudo-human beings on earth? And yes -- they are only too happy to challenge men physical controntations, knowing full well that they are shielded by the time-honored "no-hitting-girls" rule. If they attack, they deserve to have their teef knocked out like any other aggressor.

Liberator  posted on  2017-09-30   11:02:54 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#67. To: buckeroo, A K A Stone (#60)

Life is filled with risks...

What makes you think that the person receiving the punch doesn't pull out a gun on you?

So you want it BOTH ways, eh Buck?

You have THREE choices in life:

Preemptively or actively avoid the confrontation.

Run away.

Defend yourself.

Liberator  posted on  2017-09-30   11:05:47 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#68. To: Liberator, A K A Stone, Tooconservative (#67)

My discussion on this thread was more preemptive of further violence. I do not advocate violence as Stone does. Unlike Tooconservative, I wouldn't just stroll on by watching Stone pelt a young girl. I would intervene.

buckeroo  posted on  2017-09-30   11:34:12 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#69. To: A K A Stone (#64)

When a bull dyke assaults you you fight back.

So now you've turned your cap-grabber into a vicious bull dyke so you can justify assaulting a woman?

You're that hard-up for MAGA caps?

Tooconservative  posted on  2017-09-30   11:38:29 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#70. To: buckeroo (#68)

I would intervene.

How about if Stone was assaulting a rabid bull dyke? Well, assuming she wasn't kicking his ass...

And your whiteknighting, is it just for a "young girl"? How about an average woman? An old lady? Caitlyn Jenner or some other tranny?

Tooconservative  posted on  2017-09-30   11:41:30 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#71. To: Tooconservative (#70)

It wouldn't matter. Violence needs to be quelled so that solutions can be found.

buckeroo  posted on  2017-09-30   11:46:46 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#72. To: buckeroo, A K A Stone, Tooconservative (#68)

I do not advocate violence as Stone does.

Unlike Tooconservative, I wouldn't just stroll on by watching Stone pelt a young girl. I would intervene.

You'd intervene in a beef regardless of what had transpired in the FIRST place? Just because some chick is involved? But...but...what about those crazy nuts you'd alluded to who might have a gun??

Good luck with that whole scenario and White Knight thang.

Liberator  posted on  2017-09-30   11:50:38 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#73. To: Liberator (#72) (Edited)

It wouldn't matter. Violence needs to be quelled so that solutions can be found. Well, of course, I could drop to my knees a pray to GOD for an answer. But that sort of action plan seems rather clownish to me.

buckeroo  posted on  2017-09-30   11:52:17 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#74. To: Tooconservative (#63)

I thought you were the white knights, vowing to defend any woman being assaulted.

You do know what a "white knight" means nowadays?

Non auro, sed ferro, recuperando est patria

nativist nationalist  posted on  2017-09-30   11:56:49 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#75. To: Tooconservative'buckeroo, A K A tone (#70)

How about if Stone was assaulting a rabid bull dyke? Well, assuming she wasn't kicking his ass...

And your whiteknighting, is it just for a "young girl"? How about an average woman? An old lady? Caitlyn Jenner or some other tranny?

Lol x2...

Buck: ("It wouldn't matter. Violence needs to be quelled so that solutions can be found.")

So, your solution to violence is to leap in (regardless of who may be right), and escalating MORE violence to end the violence. Aren't you then risking a melee??

Kinda Seinfeldian/Costanzian.

Liberator  posted on  2017-09-30   11:58:03 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#76. To: Liberator (#75)

Stone's hypothetical violence in a situation is pure reaction as though adrenaline is pumping in his body all the tyme. That is purely reactive and solves nothing in a situation like this.

Being in a publick venue is important to note that heightened awareness is required by all participants. Being ready for a physical fight is silly and denies the purpose of being out and about in publick, wouldn't you say?

buckeroo  posted on  2017-09-30   12:06:51 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#77. To: nativist nationalist (#74)

You do know what a "white knight" means nowadays?

I thought I did. Has it changed? I would say it means:

  1. a rescuer, typically of a damsel in distress
  2. an investor who comes to the aid of a distressed company with needed funds to maintain liquidity
  3. a man who promotes for gender equality but jumps in to rescue a woman as soon as equality isn't working

I suppose now you'll tell me that it can also involve strap-on objects and intimate electrical devices. If so, I probably prefer to remain ignorant.

Tooconservative  posted on  2017-09-30   12:10:45 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#78. To: nativist nationalist (#74)

You do know what a "white knight" means nowadays?

Stop demonstrating yo' "privilege," crackah.

Liberator  posted on  2017-09-30   12:11:47 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#79. To: buckeroo (#76)

Being in a publick venue is important to note that heightened awareness is required by all participants.

I fully agree.

Being ready for a physical fight is silly and denies the purpose of being out and about in publick, wouldn't you say?

I would say, readiness in anticipation of a possible physical confrontation or violence -- in a public venue in which the usual suspects emit their hate-vibe -- is merely preemptive wisdom and an instinctive necessity. You more than most ought to understand that.

Liberator  posted on  2017-09-30   12:17:13 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#80. To: Liberator, A K A Stone (#79)

There is little purpose being in a publick venue prepared for a fist fight as Stone suggests. We should be pursuing more purposeful actions and in a college setting, such as in this case @UCR, it would be educational goals.

Stone doesn't get "it." He is totally out of the mainstream. He is out on the cusp of the moon.

buckeroo  posted on  2017-09-30   12:25:50 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#81. To: buckeroo (#68)

libtarded feminist activist scream equality... until you punch one like a man.

I'm the infidel... Allah warned you about. كافر المسلح

GrandIsland  posted on  2017-09-30   13:29:56 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#82. To: GrandIsland (#81)

Go back to your mommy's basement where you are allowed free boarding capability. Hug your primers, pal.

buckeroo  posted on  2017-09-30   13:36:46 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#83. To: buckeroo, GrandIsland (#82)

G.I. is right. Everything is all about equality until you actually treat a Womyn like a man. Then suddenly it's all unfair because "I'm just a girl". A complete double-standard.

Don't deny his valid point just because you don't happen to like him or cops in general.

Tooconservative  posted on  2017-09-30   16:33:15 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#84. To: Tooconservative, GrandIsland (#83)

Don't deny his valid point just because you don't happen to like him or cops in general.

I am afraid that I will not validate anything this retired school crossing guard suggests. "It" is just too weird. Remember ... "it" had his nose up yukon's ass.

buckeroo  posted on  2017-10-01   0:43:51 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  



      .
      .
      .

Comments (85 - 106) not displayed.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com