[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Israel Attacks Iran, Report Says - LIVE Breaking News Coverage

Earth is Scorched with Heat

Antiwar Activists Chant ‘Death to America’ at Event Featuring Chicago Alderman

Vibe Shift

A stream that makes the pleasant Rain sound.

Older Men - Keep One Foot In The Dark Ages

When You Really Want to Meet the Diversity Requirements

CERN to test world's most powerful particle accelerator during April's solar eclipse

Utopian Visionaries Who Won’t Leave People Alone

No - no - no Ain'T going To get away with iT

Pete Buttplug's Butt Plugger Trying to Turn Kids into Faggots

Mark Levin: I'm sick and tired of these attacks

Questioning the Big Bang

James Webb Data Contradicts the Big Bang

Pssst! Don't tell the creationists, but scientists don't have a clue how life began

A fine romance: how humans and chimps just couldn't let go

Early humans had sex with chimps

O’Keefe dons bulletproof vest to extract undercover journalist from NGO camp.

Biblical Contradictions (Alleged)

Catholic Church Praising Lucifer

Raising the Knife

One Of The HARDEST Videos I Had To Make..

Houthi rebels' attack severely damages a Belize-flagged ship in key strait leading to the Red Sea (British Ship)

Chinese Illegal Alien. I'm here for the moneuy

Red Tides Plague Gulf Beaches

Tucker Carlson calls out Nikki Haley, Ben Shapiro, and every other person calling for war:

{Are there 7 Deadly Sins?} I’ve heard people refer to the “7 Deadly Sins,” but I haven’t been able to find that sort of list in Scripture.

Abomination of Desolation | THEORY, BIBLE STUDY

Bible Help

Libertysflame Database Updated

Crush EVERYONE with the Alien Gambit!

Vladimir Putin tells Tucker Carlson US should stop arming Ukraine to end war

Putin hints Moscow and Washington in back-channel talks in revealing Tucker Carlson interview

Trump accuses Fulton County DA Fani Willis of lying in court response to Roman's motion

Mandatory anti-white racism at Disney.

Iceland Volcano Erupts For Third Time In 2 Months, State Of Emergency Declared

Tucker Carlson Interview with Vladamir Putin

How will Ar Mageddon / WW III End?

What on EARTH is going on in Acts 16:11? New Discovery!

2023 Hottest in over 120 Million Years

2024 and beyond in prophecy

Questions

This Speech Just Broke the Internet

This AMAZING Math Formula Will Teach You About God!

The GOSPEL of the ALIENS | Fallen Angels | Giants | Anunnaki

The IMAGE of the BEAST Revealed (REV 13) - WARNING: Not for Everyone

WEF Calls for AI to Replace Voters: ‘Why Do We Need Elections?’

The OCCULT Burger king EXPOSED

PANERA BREAD Antichrist message EXPOSED

The OCCULT Cheesecake Factory EXPOSED


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

The Establishments war on Donald Trump
See other The Establishments war on Donald Trump Articles

Title: Conservative, Inc., Is Being Replaced By Us Militant Normals
Source: Townhall
URL Source: https://townhall.com/columnists/kur ... y-us-militant-normals-n2385943
Published: Sep 25, 2017
Author: Kurt Schlicter
Post Date: 2017-09-25 10:08:45 by Tooconservative
Keywords: None
Views: 4617
Comments: 23

I guess now we’re not supposed to be fighting culture wars anymore – man, it’s so hard to keep up with these ever-changing new rules! I’m old enough to remember way back to 2016, before Trump got nominated, and I could have sworn Conservative Inc., was gung-ho for the whole culture war thing. But then Trump actually fought it, taking on the big, soft target that is the spoiled, semi-literate athletes who like to rub their contempt for the flag we love in our faces in the guise of woke wokedness. Now we suddenly discover that fighting back is horribly uncouth and déclassé and “Oh, well I never!

 Gosh, I would have thought from all those cruise panels about how our crumbling culture is slouching toward Babylon and the need to resist the liberal onslaught that maybe we ought to actually resist the liberal onslaught, but see, that was my mistake. I took it seriously when Conservative, Inc., promised to fight the leftist blitzkrieg against normal Americans. It was all a scam, a lie, a pose for us rubes. The Tru Cons didn’t actually mean it.

There’s a lot of that not meaning it going on in the GOP right now. Exhibit A is John McCain, who ran ads touting how he was leading the way in opposing Obamacare only to give it aid and comfort when someone in the White House would actual sign its repeal. He’s the guy the establishment designated to lose to Barack Obama in 2008, and he was sure up to the task. But in retrospect, thank goodness, because McCain’s inevitable presidential betrayal of conservatives by breaking his word then and treating GOP voters like he treated his first wife would have done exponentially more damage to conservatism than Trump being prevented from keeping his word today ever could.

 It’s so good to know that, despite his wonderful, close, awesome friend humiliating him while lying to Arizona’s voters, Lindsey Graham is still the blue falcon’s buddy. No hard feelings!

There used to be a thing called “conservatism,” and I knew it pretty well since I was part of it for about a third of a century. But conservatism changed, becoming less about principles (though the wusscons never shut up about them) and more about money-grubbing navel gazing and intellectual onanism. Actual Republican voters, actual normal Americans? Well, they became kind of beside the point in the tumbler-klinking world of the John Boehnercons, and to the corporate-friendly compassioncons who put the interests of everyone else (including the act of lovers) ahead of the GOP voters who voted the establishment in.

Conservativism forgot about the real world conservatives we expected to line up behind us. While we were talking about free trade, we were ignoring that GOP voter who fought in Fallujah, came home, got a job building air conditioners, raised a family, and then one day watched the video of the oh-so-sorry CEO – who looked remarkably like Mitt Romney, because all these guys look remarkably like Mitt Romney – sadly informing his beloved employees that their jobs were getting shipped to Oaxaca. And our response to the 58-year old Republican voter who asked us how he was going to keep paying for his mortgage and his kid in college? Pretty much, “Well, that’s how free enterprise works. Read some Milton Freidman and go learn coding.

That’s not a response, not for a political party that requires people to actually vote for it. That’s an abdication, but what did Conservative, Inc., care? Priorities! “There’s this new tapas place in Georgetown everyone is talking about – the other night, my buddy from the Liberty Freedom Eagle Institute for Liberty, Freedom and Eagles saw Lawrence O’Donnell there getting hammered!

How about the guy who wanted to be a roofer in Fontana but he couldn’t because the contractors were only hiring illegals? What was our answer to him? “Oh well, the big corporate donors need their serfs, and if some pack of tatted-up MS-13 dreamers gang-rapes your daughter that’s just a price we’re willing to pay!

 They try to crush our religion and Conservative, Inc., cowers because Apple’s CEO might say mean things. “Just bake the cake,” they say – it’s not worth the fight! They demand our tax money to kill babies and Conservative, Inc., passes the spending bills – “Gosh, we can’t risk the WaPo saying we’re mean!” They diss our National Anthem, we react, and Conservative, Inc., wags its soft, spindly fingers – “So, so very unpresidential! My word!

Conservatism has become a racket, and everything happening now is a result of its members hoping to wait out Trump and the demand for change he represents. Maybe if they do nothing, but say all the right things, we normals will get tired and go back to our jobs and keep providing those votes and renting those cruise cabins. But that’s not happening. We aren’t going away; business as usual is over. We aren’t just giving up, tossing away our country, and submitting to the ruling caste. We were nice with the Tea Party. Trump’s not as nice. What’s coming after is going to be much, much less nice.

What’s coming after is militant normalacy, the not-so-polite demand that the lackwits and failures who style themselves as our betters stop dumping on us normal Americans who work hard and play by the rules (Gosh that sounds familiar, like it used to be a winning electoral recipe, if only I could remember where I heard it before).

 Who are the normals? The Americans who built this country, and defended it. When you eat, it’s because a normal grew the food and another normal trucked it to you. When you aren’t murdered in the street or don’t speak German, it’s because a normal with a gun made those things not happen. We normals don’t want to rule over others. We don’t obsess about how you live your life, but also we don’t want to be compelled to signal our approval or pick up the tab. We are every color and creed – though when someone who is incidentally a member of some other group aligns with normals, he/she/xe loses that identity. The left drums normals who are black out of its definition of “black,” just as normal women get drummed out of womanhood and normal gays get drummed out gayhood. In a way, the left is making E pluribus unum a reality again – to choose to be normal is to choose to reject silly identity group identification and unite. Instead of saying “normal Americans,” you can just say “Americans.”

 Note that while leftists rail against the term “normals” (When I use it on Twitter, the reactions are always delightful!), they will never, ever demand to be counted as one. That’s because they hate normal Americans, wanting us enslaved or dead. How do I know? They tell me on Twitter, again and again and again.

Militant normality is growing as normals awaken to the indisputable truth of our enemy’s implacable hatred for us and everything we hold dear – like America. The sight of moron sportsball players disrespecting normals warms libs’ frigid little hearts – and make no mistake, that diss is aimed straight at us, not at some musical number. All these cultural aggressions are aimed at us, from demanding you obey their pronoun proclamations to requiring your daughter share a toilet with a dude in a skirt. This is how they seek to break us.

That’s why the shameful abdication of Conservative, Inc., in the cultural fight is both important and irrelevant. It demonstrates that the first loyalty of many folks in the conservaracket is to the ruling caste to which they belong, and it also demonstrates that these wimps’ absence from the battle means nothing.

We’ll fight this fight ourselves, thanks. Sometimes we’ll fight it by rediscovering the joy of a late evening without hack TV comics lecturing us about health care (Hey, Jimmy Kimmel had a sick son, and that unusual and unique experience means he has unusual and unique insights!). Sometimes we’ll hit the remote and spend our Sunday not watching future vegetables hating on our country when they aren’t smashing into each other. Sometimes we’ll mock these idiots mercilessly. We may even launch a Conservative Insurgency. And if they keep pushing, getting violent and trying to strip us of our sacred rights, we might get even more frisky, and then it’ll get ugly.

But we’re not giving up, and we’re not going to sit back and just take it. Militant normalcy is the result of normal people roused to anger and refusing to be pushed around anymore. We prefer a free society based on personal liberty and mutual respect. But if you leftists veto that option, that leaves us either a society where you rule and oppress us, or one where we hold the power. So let me break this down, both for the left and for their fussy Fredocon enablers: You don’t get to win. 


Poster Comment:

Schlicter has become the top essayist of the Right. This is a good example of why he has risen so quickly.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: Tooconservative (#0)

I took it seriously when Conservative, Inc., promised to fight the leftist blitzkrieg against normal Americans. It was all a scam, a lie, a pose for us rubes. The Tru Cons didn’t actually mean it.

Of course they didn't. There's money in being a professional politician or hanger-on, but to keep that money flowing you have to rouse people up, but never let them get going in a direction that will bump into the cash flow from some special interest.

Vicomte13  posted on  2017-09-25   10:35:50 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: Tooconservative (#0)

There’s a lot of that not meaning it going on in the GOP right now.

Right now? You mean since U.S. Grant handed over the government to stock- jobbing crony capitalists. They NEVER meant it. The last one who really "meant it" was Lincoln - and what HE really meant was: I will burn down the country in order to save it. He meant it, he did it, he won. And he was shot dead just about the instant he did win.

Reagan really meant some things, but he was the only one, so all of the crappy crony capitalist stuff he did (like deregulate the S&Ls, and amnesty) stayed, but the good stuff he did (like the 1986 tax reform) was quickly repossessed by the usual political class, and scuppered.

Vicomte13  posted on  2017-09-25   10:39:03 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: Tooconservative (#0)

Conservatism has become a racket, and everything happening now is a result of its members hoping to wait out Trump and the demand for change he represents.

Yep. And yep.

Vicomte13  posted on  2017-09-25   10:43:22 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: Vicomte13 (#3)

This is professional level mockery of the GOP elite in the Beltway.

I notice he has a composition formula. Give his target a hard gut punch every 2-3 paragraphs, something memorable, a button-pusher.

Others like Steyn or Coulter or Shapiro tend to follow a similar pattern.

I think Shapiro and Schlicter are the rising media stars on the Right.

Tooconservative  posted on  2017-09-25   10:53:10 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: Tooconservative (#0)

But we’re not giving up, and we’re not going to sit back and just take it. Militant normalcy is the result of normal people roused to anger and refusing to be pushed around anymore. We prefer a free society based on personal liberty and mutual respect. But if you leftists veto that option, that leaves us either a society where you rule and oppress us, or one where we hold the power. So let me break this down, both for the left and for their fussy Fredocon enablers: You don’t get to win.

The bottom line.

But I've looked at the battlefield, and the Left could win. The Conservative Republican Right cannot, because of that "Republican" piece of their message.

Vicomte13  posted on  2017-09-25   10:55:09 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: Tooconservative (#4)

To win, he's going to have to mock the GOP itself. If THAT is the flag behind which the Right must be made to march, the Right cannot win, because there are too many people who will never do that.

Vicomte13  posted on  2017-09-25   10:56:42 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: Vicomte13 (#6)

To win, he's going to have to mock the GOP itself. If THAT is the flag behind which the Right must be made to march, the Right cannot win, because there are too many people who will never do that.

He's already mocked it plenty and it seems to work for him.

So I can't imagine why you say that. Not that I'm encouraging to write an essay to convince me. I think the facts simply demonstrate that you're wrong.

Remnants of the old GOP remain but Trump has already slain much of the old rock-ribbed country club GOP establishment. And he could go much further with it than he already has.

Tooconservative  posted on  2017-09-25   11:37:46 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: Tooconservative (#7)

So I can't imagine why you say that.

The GOP brand, to my mind, is akin to marching behind some offensive symbol, or pledging allegiance to some offensive flag.

Vicomte13  posted on  2017-09-25   13:10:19 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: Vicomte13 (#8) (Edited)

So the GOP is essentially like a Nazi banner at a Nuremburg rally or the (Democrats') Confederate flag or the burning crosses of the KKK. All of which the GOP opposed when the Dems were actually complicit in these crimes against humanity.

"Black is white, white is black, who are we to judge?"

You are actually going to stick with that story?

You are seriously fucked up or a shameless liar.

Tooconservative  posted on  2017-09-25   13:31:51 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: Tooconservative (#0)

tumbler-klinking world of the John Boehnercons

Kasich

some kind of poliTical Alzheimer

aids

Typhoid mary

laura bush

big govT

with Three arms

no child lefT behind

around you

love
boris

If you ... don't use exclamation points --- you should't be typeing ! Commas - semicolons - question marks are for girlie boys !

BorisY  posted on  2017-09-25   13:43:19 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#11. To: Tooconservative (#0)

they will never, ever demand to be counted as one.

That’s because they hate normal Americans, wanting us enslaved or dead.

How do I know?

They tell me on Twitter, again and again and again.

lefTist pc

poliTical jihad

sharia

whiTe slavery

genocide

love
boris

If you ... don't use exclamation points --- you should't be typeing ! Commas - semicolons - question marks are for girlie boys !

BorisY  posted on  2017-09-25   13:53:49 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#12. To: Tooconservative (#9)

You are actually going to stick with that story?

You are seriously fucked up or a shameless liar.

Yes, I am going to stick with it.

You are obsessed with your partisan hatred. I am not.

I came into the GOP during college for a specific reason: national security in the Cold War era. I stuck with the GOP for many years afterwards.

Trouble is, the GOP was doing all along what everybody sees them doing now: SAYING they're for things that I vote for them to do, but not REALLY intending to do any of it.

I don't like being lied to.

So, you telling my I'm fucked up and a shameless liar because I won't bend over and take being lied to by your Republican Party and its politicians, because I won't buy YOUR lies and drink YOUR stinking Kool Ade is rich.

Rather than exploding in anger at you, I'm inclined to just let you rage. I have been as constant as the sun in my beliefs, and where I have been convinced by facts and circumstances to change my mind or change my beliefs, I have always said so, never been shy about giving my reasoning.

Your party has constantly promised things that they never deliver, and then guys like you verbally abuse people like me, who won't get in line and stay in line. Why would I want to have anything to do with a party that has to rely on its operatives calling people "seriously fucked up" or "shameless liars" for calling you people out on the fact that you TALK a good game but YOU NEVER TELL THE TRUTH. YOU ALWAYS FAIL TO DO WHAT YOU PROMISE.

Look at health care reform? I've seen you shuck and jive and try to shift blame to Trump, or to Democrats. You own the government. You own the failure. I do not.

So, am I going to follow the banner of the party that GAVE US Roe, that has appointed NINE SUPREME COURT JUSTICES SINCE THEN, all under Presidents professing to be pro-life (to get the pro-life vote)? Or that promised to strike down Obamacare in four election cycles but then - handed plenary power - didn't, and won't?

Of course I'm not going to follow that banner. It's a banner of lies.

Am I inspired to follow it because somebody calls me fucked up and a shameless liar because I excoriate liars, and because I won't just get in line? No. I'm inclined to hate Republicans more, because of you.

Your words are a reflection of your type's enmity for people like me. They reflect the hatred you feel for people who won't buy your lies.

OF COURSE I'm never going to get in line behind your rotten party.

Vicomte13  posted on  2017-09-25   14:13:50 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#13. To: Vicomte13 (#12)

You are obsessed with your partisan hatred. I am not.

You are deluded and dishonest about it.

Tooconservative  posted on  2017-09-25   14:16:54 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#14. To: Tooconservative (#13)

You are deluded and dishonest about it.

I see things very clearly, and state it.

You need to scream at me and hope you will get me to make a crazy bullcharge, because if more and more people wake up to you Republicans and your endless deceit and corruption and pathetic weakeness, you're finished as a movement and a party - and you guys are every bit as much the grifters as the televangelists who need to raise a million bucks or "Gawd's gonna call them home."

Vicomte13  posted on  2017-09-25   14:21:17 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#15. To: Vicomte13 (#12) (Edited)

So, am I going to follow the banner of the party that GAVE US Roe, that has appointed NINE SUPREME COURT JUSTICES SINCE THEN, all under Presidents professing to be pro-life (to get the pro-life vote)? Or that promised to strike down Obamacare in four election cycles but then - handed plenary power - didn't, and won't?

Quite obviously, the mistake was in appointing Catholic justices to the Court who merely claim to be pro-life and pro-family.

Tooconservative  posted on  2017-09-25   14:39:03 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#16. To: Tooconservative (#15)

Quite obviously, the mistake was in appointing Catholic justices to the Court who merely claim to be pro-life and pro-family.

That may be so. But I don't recall the Presidents ever applying a litmus test.

Come to think about it, Scalia and Thomas and Alito are Catholic appointees, by Republicans, who are very likely stalwart pro-lifers.

Anthony Kennedy is a Catholic who is not pro-life, clearly.

Roberts - well, you know, I would expect a Catholic to try to find a way to save universal health care, so I can't predict he'd be faithless on abortion.

Gorsuch was born and raised a Catholic, but attends an Episcopal parish, so at this point I wouldn't call him a Catholic - we'll see what happens when he rules on abortion.

Aren't those the five Catholics appointed by Republicans? O'Connor and Souter aren't Catholic. Not sure about Rehnquist. I doubt he was Catholic.

Of the Catholics on the court now, only Kennedy has shown his colors. So we'll see what happens when abortion comes back up for a vote.

Vicomte13  posted on  2017-09-25   15:30:24 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#17. To: Tooconservative (#0)

I don't know what planet this author lives on. This is old news. They rejected St. Patrick J. Buchanan and the culture war back in the 90s.

A K A Stone  posted on  2017-09-25   16:01:02 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#18. To: A K A Stone (#17)

I don't know what planet this author lives on. This is old news.

It is an opinion piece, not a news piece. And very Trumpian overall. It also pulls no punches and hits below the belt. So I thought it was notable.

Tooconservative  posted on  2017-09-25   16:37:04 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#19. To: Vicomte13, Tooconservative (#2)

The last one who really "meant it" was Lincoln - and what HE really meant was: I will burn down the country in order to save it.

Lincoln may have had the most corrupt administration in history. During the war, Lincoln was signing off on passes for political cronies to pass through the lines into the South to buy cotton and bring it back through the lines. It was enormously profitable, what with the blockade of the ports and all. Best of all is what the South was getting for the cotton. Food for the Confederate army. Union generals got very irate about the wheeling and dealing.

nolu chan  posted on  2017-09-25   16:47:36 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#20. To: Tooconservative, Vicomte13 (#15)

Quite obviously, the mistake was in appointing Catholic justices to the Court who merely claim to be pro-life and pro-family.

A justice is supposed to rule on the law, and what the law says, not rule based on his personal opinion of the way things ought to be.

nolu chan  posted on  2017-09-25   16:55:53 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#21. To: Vicomte13 (#8)

The GOP brand, to my mind, is akin to marching behind some offensive symbol, or pledging allegiance to some offensive flag.

I just need some kind of context. Can you kindly clarify and be more specific? I also find the 2017 GOP brand offensive.

Do you find the Democrat brand offensive? Less, more, or the same?

Liberator  posted on  2017-09-25   20:49:04 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#22. To: Vicomte13 (#8)

To be fair, let me read further down in the thread....

Liberator  posted on  2017-09-25   20:49:57 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#23. To: Liberator (#21)

Do you find the Democrat brand offensive? Less, more, or the same?

I find Democrat ideas about race and justice to be grotesque, and local Democrat rule to be horribly corrupt. Democrat political theology regarding abortion extols infanticide. So no, I'm not a fan of the Democrat brand either.

The one thing that the Democrats have on the Republicans is that they do what they say they are going to do, and they maintain party discipline to protect their gains against their opposition when the Republicans get power.

Democrats can be trusted that they are going to do what they say. What they say is bad, but Democrats predictably fight for the bad things they advance, just exactly as they say they will.

Republicans, on the other hand, say whatever will get votes. Then they serve the interests of crony capitalists and systematically disregard their campaign promises.

I never was inclined to vote Democrat, not since the Democrats went soft on national security during the Cold War. I did vote Republican for years. I am tired of being deceived by the Republicans.

Vicomte13  posted on  2017-09-25   21:10:52 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com