[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
Cult Watch Title: Gatekeeper of DC Society Sally Quinn Comes Out as Occultist, Used Hex to Kill People You and I, meaning Normal People, we look at our Thought Leaders, our Media and Cultural Overlords, our Ruling Class, and oftentimes wonder how they can be so venal and dishonest in pursuit of what they want — and what they want most of all is control over the lives of us Normal People, those of us who do not want to control anyone. We just want to be left alone.How many times have we asked, How do they live with themselves? All the lies they tell, the innocent people they destroy, the fake news they publish, the character assassination, the stoking of racial conflict, the hate campaigns, the advocating of violence, the unending cultural bigotry against those of us just minding our own business… How do they sleep at night?
Maybe, thanks to the dribs and drabs that have bubbled up over the past year, we are starting to have that question answered. The latest revelation surrounds Sally Quinn, the surviving widow of Ben Bradlee, the Washington Post’s powerful executive editor from 1968 to 1991, who then served as the paper’s vice president until his death in 2014. For nearly 50 years, the entire social and political world of DC revolved around this couple. Bradlee and Quinn were the New Camelot (his career took off in large part because of his friendship with John F. Kennedy), the Gatekeepers of who was in and who was out, the Elite Deciders among our Ruling Class with the extraordinary power of the Washington Post, and by extension the rest of the mainstream media, to abuse and weaponize their will against the rest of us. Well, to put it as bluntly as possible, we are now learning that the Queen of Camelot is an occultist, a witch of sorts who honestly believes (according to her own new memoir) that she murdered three innocent people through the dark art of the hex: a young woman who committed suicide after flirting with Quinn’s boyfriend; a magazine editor who published an unflattering profile of her, who decades later died of cancer; a psychic who died of a cerebral hemorrhage before the end of the year after telling Quinn something she did not want to hear. The anecdote about the magazine story, published in 1973, and her son, who was born in 1982, informs us that Quinn, who was born in 1941, practiced the occult in the most demonic ways imaginable well into adulthood. Quinn finally ceased hexing others, but not out of a sense of remorse:
Quinn’s other acts of admitted wickedness include plotting to break up Bradlee’s marriage (which she did) and using the threat of adultery to bend Bradlee to her will. Almost as troubling is the matter-of-fact way in which the Washington Post informs us of this bombshell, in the Outlook section under the chatty headline, “Sally Quinn’s hexes, marital ultimatums and visceral love of her son.” The story is written by Connie Schultz and her criticism of Quinn is primarily limited to this:
What in God’s name is going on here? We have just discovered that one of the primary movers and shakers of the last half-century is a practicing occultist, and… Nothing.
Nobody cares. The information is dropped as though Quinn’s tell-all is the usual-usual about plastic surgeries and sex. Worse still, our Ruling Class is now joking about Quinn putting a deadly hex on President Trump. In my mind, this explains so, so much. Before I get to that, though, rewind your brain to last year…
We now know, at the very least, that John Podesta, one of the most powerful men in DC, is comfortable with the occult practice of Spirit Cooking, comfortable enough that his own brother invited him to a Spirit Cookout. To protect Podesta from this bombshell, and by extension Hillary Clinton (the news broke in the heat of the 2016 presidential campaign), Snopes published a dismissal, which is worth reading. However, as much as Snopes wants to wish it all away, what cannot be wished away (and what Snopes and Podesta’s other MSM defenders failed to address) is the fact that in 1996, the hostess of this Spirit Dinner, Marina Abramovic, wrote a cookbook about Spirit Cooking with recipes that include “fresh breast milk with fresh sperm milk” and “fresh morning urine.” Moreover, Abramovic is a full-blown occultist. Whether or not John Podesta attended this dinner with his brother Tony (a powerful DC lobbyist who admits he did), so what? What in the world is this woman doing swimming in the same circles as the chairman of a presidential nominee’s campaign who also served as chief of staff to a sitting president (Bill Clinton)?
Let’s just say it out loud… The most powerful people in our country are either outright occultists, are comfortable with witchcraft and Satanism, or are moving and shaking among those who are. Whether or not you believe in the power of the occult, that does not matter. Also beside the point is whether or not the Podestas and Quinn and those calling to have Trump hexed believe. What we do know is that these people have completely rejected any notion of a loving God, and moved towards darkness. Furthermore, we also know that this darkness is not about consenting adults behaving badly amongst themselves. Rather, this is about them attempting to harness a power to control others, to manipulate events to their will, to hurt or outright kill those who offend or insult them. As I said, this explains so, so much. Especially the fact that everyone is shrugging over the disturbing news, as though it is not news, as though it is normal, or at least as though it should be normal. Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest We have just discovered that one of the primary movers and shakers of the last half-century is a practicing occultist, and… Do you know why nobody cares? (Some people do care, but most do not). There is one big one, and a smaller one. The smaller one is that the wife of some newspaper editor is just not "all that". Most people not interested in her. Do you know the bigger reason? The bigger reason is why I, for example, don't care. It's why sneakypete doesn't care. It's why you shouldn't care.
#2. To: Vicomte13 (#1) I know why you don't t give a shit. Because you tolerate false teachings about god as a catholic. So what is the big deal if someone else attacks the truth also.
#3. To: A K A Stone (#2) You don't know why. You think you do, but you always miss the mark. It's your habit.
#4. To: A K A Stone (#2) I know why you don't t give a shit. Because you tolerate false teachings about god as a catholic. Vic doesn't care because the false religion he practices is based on occultism. “Truth is treason in the empire of lies.” - Ron Paul![]() Those who most loudly denounce Fake News are typically those most aggressively disseminating it.#5. To: Deckard, vicomte13 (#4) How is it based on the occult?
#6. To: Deckard (#0) (Edited) Excellent post. Absolutely explains EVERYTHING in DC, and why the USA and West are so evil and corrupt. America's gubmint and culture have been run by festering Baal-worshiping occultists, pedophiles, baby-killers, and sodomites. Literally... And because the MSM won't report it, still most people will dismiss it as fiction or a "conspiracy." (Just like 9/11, Chemtrails, 0bama, Benghazi, and Bubba's Body Count.)
#7. To: A K A Stone, Deckard (#5) Google or do a search on keywords, "roman catholic church vatican occult." Target-Rich info.
#8. To: Liberator (#7) I googled what you suggested and I found this. I'll just quote the text. Vic can you shed any light on this. I ask this because I like you vic. You probably think I attack you because I don't like you. That isn't the case. It is because I believe if I can get you to open your mind (maybe that is the problem i'm trying to reach you through the mind when it is spiritual) and see that some of the things I say about the catholic church are true. That they are problems and show false teachings that are taught by the catholic church. Or if I am wrong maybe you can show me something that I can learn from. Also I am not a Bible scholar. Just because I like talking about it doesn't mean I am claiming to be an expert. But the things I discuss I do believe I understand correctly or close to correctly. You say the Bible is full of errors. So I guess we all have to ask you what it really means. God must be the author of confusion. Because he is responsible for a book that is full of errors that we cannot trust. If you cannot trust part of it how can you trust any of it. I guess that is why we have Pope Vic here to set us straight. Because you are the only one that comes up with your own private interpretation and you insist you are always correct.
#9. To: vicomte13 (#8) the above was directed at you as much as liberator
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest |
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
|